Re: Activities versus presenters - best practise

2010-11-29 Thread Raphael André Bauer
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 nov, 14:40, Raphael André Bauer raphael.andre.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, just a simple best-practise question. We are using GWT 2.1, mappers, activities and views. Everything works nicely. But sometimes we

Activities versus presenters - best practise

2010-11-26 Thread Raphael André Bauer
Hi, just a simple best-practise question. We are using GWT 2.1, mappers, activities and views. Everything works nicely. But sometimes we want to use activities (aka presenters) and views without a mapper. We could switch from an activity back to good old presenter and a custom view interface

Re: Activities versus presenters - best practise

2010-11-26 Thread Thomas Broyer
On 26 nov, 14:40, Raphael André Bauer raphael.andre.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, just a simple best-practise question. We are using GWT 2.1, mappers, activities and views. Everything works nicely. But sometimes we want to use activities (aka presenters) and views without a mapper. We could

Re: Activities versus presenters - best practise

2010-11-26 Thread matttai
I think everyone is misinterpreting the statement in the documentation Activities are analogous to presenters the exact definition of analogous is : similar or equivalent in some respects though otherwise dissimilar the key part of what people are missing being 'otherwise dissimilar' it seems