You made my week!
On Aug 4, 10:42 pm, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
How does today strike you? It's headed into gwt trunk, and will be
part of the 2.0 release.
On Tuesday, August 4, 2009, brett.wooldridge brett.wooldri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ping. This not this month any more, it's
Just a question, and a comment. First the comment. Thank you for
getting this up into the repo, in whatever state. Second, it was
commented that Adwords and a few other projects have vetted this over
the past year. How does this jibe with the deficiencies outlined?
For example, not being able
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the response I created the issue, here is the link
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/issues/detail?id=297
Cheers
Gabriel
On Jul 31, 2:09 pm, Joel Webber j...@google.com wrote:
Gabriel,
If you could enter an issue for this and cc' me on it, that would
Whoops, thanks Ray.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5878
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
We considered doing something like this originally, and I think it's the
right approach for Swing/SWT. However, when you have to implement these
layouts in (...) impossible to change a panel's layout after it's
constructed, because it forces you to reconstruct the entire DOM.
I understand,
Revision: 5881
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 06:36:35 2009
Log: Add Linux x86 FF3 libraries.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5881
Added:
/plugin-sdks/gecko-sdks/gecko-1.9.0/Linux_x86-gcc3/lib/libmozjs.so
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Sami Jaber sami.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
We considered doing something like this originally, and I think it's the
right approach for Swing/SWT. However, when you have to implement these
layouts in (...) impossible to change a panel's layout after it's
Reviewers: jlabanca,
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804
Affected files:
M user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/LayoutPanelExample.java
M user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/Layout.java
M user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/LayoutImpl.java
Since this was committed TBR last night, I've added all the changes
discussed here to http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51830/diff/2003/2004
File user/javadoc/com/google/gwt/examples/LayoutPanelExample.java
(right):
LGTM
Just change onAttached/onDetached to onAttach/onDetach.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6
File user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/Layout.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6#newcode495
Line 495: public void onAttached() {
Should be
Committed at r5882.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6
File user/src/com/google/gwt/layout/client/Layout.java (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804/diff/1/6#newcode495
Line 495: public void onAttached() {
On 2009/08/05 14:34:34, jlabanca wrote:
Should be
Revision: 5882
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 07:51:26 2009
Log: Minor tweaks to Layout code in response to post-TBR review.
Review: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/55804
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5882
Modified:
Revision: 5883
Author: j...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 08:05:56 2009
Log: Fixing missing Layout module include.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5883
Modified:
/trunk/user/src/com/google/gwt/user/User.gwt.xml
===
---
Reviewers: bobv,
Description:
This is the native-code portion of the changes to the OOPHM wire
protocol and initialization sequence.
The common code and XPCOM changes have been tested, the IE and WebKit
changes have not so there may be obvious errors there (especially since
I am not familiar
We're shooting for a milestone drop in a few weeks, and we're planning
for an RC by the end of the quarter. But, you know how predicting
dates goes...
On 8/4/09, Claudemir Todo Bom claude...@gmail.com wrote:
is there an ETA for 2.0?
On Aug 4, 10:42 am, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
How
Revision: 5885
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 12:08:19 2009
Log: Edited wiki page through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5885
Modified:
/wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki
===
--- /wiki/UsingOOPHM.wiki Thu
Revision: 5887
Author: jlaba...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 12:55:36 2009
Log: This patch adds emma code coverage statistics to the output of an ant
test when emma.enabled is set.
Patch by: jlabanca
Review by: fabbott
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5887
AFAICT, what's happening here is that the layout works properly in the
sense that the tables inside the various LayoutPanels are in fact laid out
as requested. The problem is that children nested *inside* table cells don't
take up the entire cell in standards mode, even if their width/height
Revision: 5888
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 15:18:29 2009
Log: Turn on batching mode for disableClassMetaData and draftCompile, now
that John
has increased the timeout limit for slow-script-warnings
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Comment by m...@oizo.biz:
I need opera plugin too
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/UsingOOPHM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hi John,
I'm glad to see the Gecko SDKs landed in SVN. Here are three sets of
changes so that the plugin can be built for Firefox 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5
on the Mac.
(1)
Here's a patch that adds gecko-1.9.1 for Mac and libxpcomglue_s.a for
gecko-1.8 and gecko-1.9.0. I also included some files that
Revision: 5889
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 17:30:52 2009
Log: I had added these dependencies to get htmlunit working. However, we
have more
recent versions of these libraries in the tools dir and upgrading to them is
not breaking htmlunit. The xercesImpl-2.8.1 jar was also
Revision: 5890
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 17:37:05 2009
Log: Updates the htmlunit dependencies and restores the test.web.htmlunit
test target.
Patch by: amitmanjhi
Review by: rjrjr
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5890
Modified:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Sam Gross colesb...@gmail.com wrote:
(1)
Here's a patch that adds gecko-1.9.1 for Mac and libxpcomglue_s.a for
gecko-1.8 and gecko-1.9.0. I also included some files that are needed
for the executable_path in gecko 1.9.0.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Sam Gross colesb...@gmail.com wrote:
A gecko-sdks/gecko-1.9.1/Darwin-gcc3/bin/xpidl
This file appears to be just i386 (at least according to the Linux file
command) -- does it need to be a universal binary or do we need to provide
a way of running an
Revision: 5891
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 18:16:14 2009
Log: Updates the eclipse .classpath files for gwt-user project to match the
tools/xerces update (c5889).
Patch by: amitmanjhi
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5891
Modified:
Revision: 5897
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 20:57:41 2009
Log: Rolling back tools and trunk r5889 through 5892 due to
build break
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5897
Added:
/tools/lib/xerces/serializer-2.7.1.jar
Revision: 5900
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Wed Aug 5 21:32:01 2009
Log: branch-info.txt for snapshot-2009.08.04-r5888
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=5900
Added:
/branches/snapshot-2009.08.04-r5888/branch-info.txt
===
---
I agree with jsautocfg64.h, but the others look platform-independent. Do
having them there cause problems for the Mac build?
In gecko-1.9.1:
The prcpucfg.h file differs between platforms. The version in
gecko-1.9.1/include causes problems for the mac build.
D
29 matches
Mail list logo
