Hi Brian:
This is well-documented and looks like solid work.
Thanks for the kudos!
I think the main issue will be whether it can be made compatible with
modular compilation. So the best timing will be to land it after modular
compilation.
It looks like it should be compatible
Stephen:
Per Brian's comments, a javax.rebinding spec might have a hard time
having feature-parity with GWT, because I imagine the Java8 plugins,
like APT, only runs on .java files currently under compile, and doesn't
re-process all of the types in .class files via .jars on the classpath.
What's the current thinking on removing ImageResource.isStandalone from
2.6.0 final, as in the https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5504/ review?
It isn't in GWT 2.5.x, and isn't in master, but is present in both
2.6.0-rc1 and 2. If it was an oversight to add this the first time around,
I sent it for cherry-picking earlier today. There was a few other missing
patches as well. Matthew is going to release RC3 soon.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the current thinking on removing ImageResource.isStandalone from
2.6.0 final, as in
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Colin Alworth niloc...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the current thinking on removing ImageResource.isStandalone from
2.6.0 final, as in the https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/5504/review?
Thomas added ImageResource.isStandalone several months ago (between
