Gabriel,
If you could enter an issue for this and cc' me on it, that would be great.
It's not immediately obvious to me whether it would make more sense to add a
click event, to change the selection event semantics (probalby not the best
idea), or to make the method
overridable, but we can discuss
Reviewers: scottb,
Description:
The Name class deals with converting between various types of Java
names:
- source names (org.test.Foo.Bar)
- binary names (org.test.Foo$Bar)
- internal names (org/test/Foo$Bar)
ASM typically uses internal names, classloaders use binary names, and
To all GWT contributors-
As you may know, there many exciting
thingshttp://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html#roadmap
we're working on for GWT 2.0. With all the new features coming
your way we thought GWT 2.0 would be a good opportunity to clean house
and remove previously deprecated
2009/7/30 Miguel Méndez mmen...@google.com
The first is something that we call contributor SDKs. These allow you to
define a GWT SDK that is backed by the gwt-user, gwt-dev-PLAT/gwt-dev-oophm
projects in your eclipse workspace. Configure your workspace per
Awesome, thanks.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51826/diff/1/65
File dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/JSORestrictionsChecker.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51826/diff/1/65#newcode203
Line 203: private void fail() {
I just meant this visitor itself could throw the
One of the reviewers of
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2507
asked that I forward to this group the question I asked of those
involved in fixingclosing this issue.
Is someone going to re-open this bug? Every mac developer out there trying
to do GWT agrees that
Reviewers: scottb,
Description:
Attempt #2.
JsBreak and JsContinue traverse() methods do not visit their labels.
Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51828
Affected files:
dev/core/src/com/google/gwt/dev/js/ast/JsBreak.java
LGTM, just make sure tests pass and stuff. :)
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/51828
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Nice! I love house cleaning. :-)
Is there any plan for removing com.google.gwt.user.client.Element in
GWT 2.0 or some time in the future?
-Sam
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Fred Sauerfre...@google.com wrote:
To all GWT contributors-
As you may know, there many exciting
things we're
Woo and, may I say, hoo, for removing deprecated code.
Will deprecated code in the Incubator be disappearing as well?
Obviously if that deprecated code depends on deprecated GWT code, it
will at least have to be updated.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Fred Sauerfre...@google.com wrote:
To
Thanks! Commited at r5857.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/54813
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Reviewers: bobv,
Description:
In some cases, the runAsync lightweight metrics generated the wrong
event or dropped an event entirely. This patch fixes the two known
problems and adds two tests of the lightweight metrics. First,
AsyncFragmentLoaderTest now also verifies that the correct
Web mode stack traces are steadily improving. You can even get line numbers
(by inheriting com.google.gwt.core.EmulateJsStack).
Without the extra instrumentation you web mode stack traces might look
something like this:
at Unknown.$NullPointerException()
at Unknown.onClick_6()
at
Reviewers: bobv,
Description:
1. Change StackTraceElement#getFileName() to return null instead of
Unknown Source to. See Javadoc which indicates null should be returned
when filename is not available
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/StackTraceElement.html#getFileName()
2.
I prefer Unknown because it's an indication you are looking at suboptimal
stack trace output. JavaScript makes it sound like we actually intend for
you to be looking at that output, when in fact, you really want to use
symbol maps to reverse lookup the Java idents.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:42 PM,
Indeed,
Out of the box (-style OBF) you get:
at Unknown.lG(Unknown Source:0)
at Unknown.Ccb(Unknown Source:0)
at Unknown.kD(Unknown Source:0)
at Unknown.nK(Unknown Source:0)
at Unknown.vO(Unknown Source:0)
at Unknown.cP(Unknown Source:0)
at Unknown.f_(Unknown Source:0)
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Fred Sauer fre...@google.com wrote:
You get the following, which notably can be pasted into Eclipse's Stack
Trace Console view so that the filename:lineNumber pairs become clickable
hyperlinks:
That's just awesome beyond belief.
I can't wait!
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Bruce Johnson br...@google.com wrote:
4 cheers for Bob! w00t, w00t, w00t and w00t.
Also, note that this is phase 1 in a larger plan. For Bob's next feat of
magic, he's going to provide better control over permutations, allowing you
to, say,
Perhaps one of bobs tricks will involve taking the `-style DETAILED`
information which looks like this:at
Unknown.com_allen_1sauer_gwt_log_demo_client_InteractiveDemoPanel$5_onClick__Lcom_google_gwt_event_dom_client_ClickEvent_2V(InteractiveDemoPanel.java:135)
and magically reverse transform
Isn't that already there, if you wire up the symbol maps correctly?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Fred Sauer fre...@google.com wrote:
Perhaps one of bobs tricks will involve taking the `-style DETAILED`
information which looks like this:at
20 matches
Mail list logo
