Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Jetty upgrade broke HtmlUnit for window.onerror

I am not aware of anything specific we have done within Google, we never imported the jetty upgrade. I think you just go ahead for open source and make it work there. We do not care that much for htmlunit anymore within Google. On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:28 AM Thomas Broyer

[gwt-contrib] Jetty upgrade broke HtmlUnit for window.onerror

Hi all, I spend a considerable amount of time on getting our changes for window.onerror launched in open source: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/gwt/+/18880/ This causes some tests to fail in html unit: http://build.gwtproject.org/job/gwt/972/testReport/ Note: these tests are already

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop & collections

In general we consider JSNI deprecated and it will not be present in the new J2CL transpiler. JsInterop (together with Jsinterop base) is powerful enough to do all things you were doing in JS. public class Helper { @JsMethod(name = "Array.prototype.push.apply", namespace=JsPackage.GLOBAL)

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop & collections

First of all do not use JSNI going forward. Use elemental2 (or define your own JSON.parse): Without elemental2: @JsType(isNative=true, namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL); public class JSON { public static Object parse(String s, Reviver r); } @JsFunction public interface Reviver { public Object

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: PROPOSAL: a devserver to replace devmode

I am seeing a lot of arguments pop up about GWT RPC, but I think it should not be considered for this discussion at all. In my mind GWT 2.8 will be the last release that has GWT RPC and people should start migrating. I think its perfectly fine do design a replacement to devmode without GWT RPC

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: 2.8 (final) is released very silent!?

I just sent the announcement to gwt-users that its now final, the reason you could see the tag is that I pushed this as part of our release process. The reason the tag is 17 days old is that its identical with that commit (we have not changed GWT), traditionally we just turn the RC into the final

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: CodeServer with Bookmarklets not working in GWT 2.7 (2nd request)

This is what recompile on reload is for, you can simply always load: http://[sdmhost]:[sdmport]/recompile-requester/[module] On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:53 PM JonL wrote: > I've had to do this when working on a sdm compiled application in a web > wrapper on ios, instead

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: ScriptInjector seems to be broken (2.8-SNAPSHOT)

+Goktug Gokdogan +Roberto Lublinerman Should we be holding RC3, I guess so right? On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:12 PM Jens wrote: > > Can you file an issue and ping Daniel (by mail or hangout) to delay the > RC3 a bit? (if not

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

This is a last call for patches, anything that is not in until tomorrow (and is not important enough to hold the release) will not get in. Is there already a patch in review for this? On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:40 PM Kay-Uwe Janssen wrote: > Is there a plan to fix the

[gwt-contrib] Last call for 2.8.0-RC3

Hi all, I will be cutting rc3 tomorrow 1pm CEST, please respond to this email with any outstanding reviews that you want to see included. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: A possible JsInterop issue in GWT 2.8 RC2

Jens is spot on. We want people to explicitly use -generateJsInteropExports if they rely on exporting since it has a hit on code size. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:56 PM Thomas Broyer wrote: > FWIW, I believe this is >

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.8.0 RC2 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here . Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble and file bugs . We are planing to release

[gwt-contrib] Last call for GWT 2.8.0 RC2

Hi all, I think we have all patches in place for putting out an RC2. If you feel strongly that something should make RC2 please raise this on this thread. I will be cutting RC2 tomorrow PST time. -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0 RC1 is here!

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.8.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here . Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble and file bugs . We are planing to release

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8 RC1 Help with testing

submitting thomas two fixes and then recutting. On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:57 PM Brandon Donnelson wrote: > Where's the link to the GWT 2.8.0-rc1.zip? > > > On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at 7:22:11 AM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 at

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 RC1 Help with testing

Hi all, we have build the preliminary GWT 2.8.0-rc1 version and now need help with DOA testing (making sure its not dead on arrival). We are currently missing testers for: Linux / Chrome Windows 7 / IE8/IE9 Windows 7 / IE 10 Windows 7 / IE 11 If you are interested in spending ~1h in testing

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8 rc1 work items

I went through the issue tracker and curated the 2.8 mile stone. Currently we have 22 open issues: https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/milestones/2.8 I assigned all unassigned issues and asked clarifying questions, *please go through your assigned issues and respond to those questions*. If you

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8 rc1 work items

Hi all, in the last steering committee meeting we agreed that making the next version of Guava work (which contains a lot of Java8 usage) was the goal for RC1. We have gotten significantly closer to this now and I am happy to report that as of now we pass all of Guavas tests. However there are a

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Generator and Linker maintenance and changes

Hi all, thanks for Colin for writing this up. To me this discussion is not so much about the particular feature (enhancing generators), but rather about us making smart choices. We are already struggling to get 2.8 out the door (and making sure it will work with the next version of Guava). So I'd

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8.0 SNAPSHOT compiler crash

With j2cl we do a javac compile up front and thus those basic problems are gone. On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:22 PM Colin Alworth wrote: > Agreed - validating supersource is tricky. I've heard of some good options > lately that change how the project interacts with them (like

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Rules for managing issues on GitHub

Nice work Thomas, really appreciated! On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 4:11 PM Thomas Broyer wrote: > FWIW, I started doing some of the things I highlighted in the document: > >- created GitHub milestones and replaced the Milestone-* labels with >assignments to the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Compiler failing with java 7

We have seen issues internally where some code would be a compile error in Java8 but not in Java7 (especially around type checking). This setup will leave users vulnerable to this since their code will compile in their IDE, but will fail GWT compile. On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:57 AM Manuel

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run GWTTestCase in Eclipse

Hi Michael, you are probably missing adding all required source roots to the class pathso that the compiler can find the .java .files. If you go to your Run Configuration under Classpath, hit adavanced and add all required folders At least you should add: dev/core/super/ user/src/ user/super/

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run GWTTestCase in Eclipse

If you want to see the console output use a browser to do so, simply pass this in your args: -Dgwt.args='-runStyle Manual -style PRETTY -setProperty compiler.stackMode=native -port 5454' Once the test is compiled it will print a url that you can paste into any browser and run the test there.

[gwt-contrib] Help testing the GWT 2.8 release

Hi all, the GWT team needs help testing the GWT 2.8.1-beta1 release. As always, before we publicize the release we are doing a bunch of DOA (dead on arrival tests) before we open the release to the broader community. Platforms that need testing: - Chrome (Linux or mac), - Window IE11,

Re: [gwt-contrib] I think the 2.7.0 GWT release was compiled on Daniel Kurka's machine !

, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com a écrit : Hi Arnaud, how are you producing these? -Daniel On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:06 AM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Just dumping a bit of errors i get for a project : Tracing compile failure

Re: [gwt-contrib] I think the 2.7.0 GWT release was compiled on Daniel Kurka's machine !

Hi Arnaud, how are you producing these? -Daniel On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:06 AM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Just dumping a bit of errors i get for a project : Tracing compile failure path for type 'java.lang.Object' [INFO] [ERROR] Errors in 'file:

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3 Build System

As a side note: We had a discussion to make j2cl be able to compile itself to JavaScript. If that is actually done you can easily integrate with all kinds of JavaScript build tools. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:16 PM Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, I've been watching an

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 3 Build System

One other thing: It won't matter which system we use to build the new compiler. Google internal we always use our own build system and since its very close to bazel it should work fine with bazel. If you want some kind of other integration with other build systems you can easily build them since

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Stop calling it GWT 3.0

Hi all, thanks for sharing your views in this discussion. Let me add a little background: Currently we the GWT team have decided to work on a new fast transpiler from Java to Closure (our internal enhanced version of JavaScript). This makes sense for a lot of reasons that I won't go into detail

Re: [gwt-contrib] A new library to integrate GWT with any CSS Framework

Hi Arnaud, great work! Have you considered using a APT generator instead of hooking into the old GWT Generator API? -Daniel On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I come up here to let you know about a library i build, aiming at

Re: [gwt-contrib] How to include changesets to an existing gerrit review?

You make the changes in your local git client and amend the commit: 'git commit --amend' Then you just push to gerrit: 'git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master' and this will update the review. On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've

Re: [gwt-contrib] com.google.gwt.dev.SourceSaver cannot be compiled with java6

Yes the readme needs to be updated. Trunk does not support java6 anymore. Mind sending a patch? On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi team, I've just imported gwt-dev in Eclipse and I saw there is only one class that doesn't compile:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.8: Turn GSS on by default

I agree with Goktug on this one. We can remove it from trunk right after we created the 2.8 release branch, depending on how other things come together (Java8, JSInterop v1) this should be in ~2 months. I think we are fine letting the old code sit for that while. I would suggest that we switch

Re: [gwt-contrib] Javascript Exceptions in SDM about classes not being defined

This looks like the same compiler bug we are currently investigating, for now you can clear your SDM cache (button on its page) and you should be able to continue. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Ali Akhtar ali.rac...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT, from

Re: [gwt-contrib] What constitutes an acceptable emulated String.format implementation?

Hi Benjamin, thanks for reaching out to us. Answers are inline. On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Benjamin DeLillo bpd9...@gmail.com wrote: For an implementation to be accepted would it have to conform to the entire Java Formater spec?

Re: [gwt-contrib] Where do I find my password for gerrit?

Here is how you do it: 1. Go to http://gwt-review.googlesource.com 2. Upper left corner press on the arrow right of our login name 3. Press preferences 4. Press HTTP Password 5. Press Obtain password -Daniel On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Richard Wallis rdwal...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for

Re: [gwt-contrib] Compile error with latest gwt (from trunk)

Are you sure that there is not another version of GWT somewhere in the classpath? On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Stefano Pulze stefano.pulz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, Today I've updated and build latest gwt from trunk. I've tried to compile my project but the compilar said: Caused by:

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi Luca, we are intentionally not deploying right now, but we will eventually sort this out. I am sorry but we do not have an ETA for that. -Daniel On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 9:20 PM, luca.masini luca.mas...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone take the time to fix the problem with the CI system that

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Build server is down

This is a known thing and we can't change that for a short period of time. On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Update: it's not down (as it built this night), just unreachable. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT Generators vs java annotation processing

I will be presenting something around that at GWT.create - http://gwtcreate.com/#agenda-us_room1_event9 http://gwtcreate.com/#agenda-us_room1_event9 On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: GWT itself won't run annotation processors (yet), but if your IDE runs

Re: [gwt-contrib] Incremental Scheduler can be about 10% faster

I think we do not want to make any assumptions about runtime of any tasks since this would not work well with task that have variable runtime. If you need to do heavy calculations since browser APIs have evolved a lot you should be using web workers anyway. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:57 AM,

Re: [gwt-contrib] Recompile issue coming up on sdm start, gwt 2.7.0-snapshot

I am really curious why this is not working for you in the first place. Since the code we added to SDM should always scope you down to one permutation. Are you still using bookmarklets? (These do not deal with this properly and should not be used anymore). On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Rob

Re: [gwt-contrib] SDM memory footprint

Hi Nicolas, Having no-op recompiles taking ~30s is very uncommon, even on our large projects this never exceeds 1s. Right now there is not much you can do to trim down memory usage for SDM. It really needs this amount of memory. Also keep in mind that SDM slows down a lot if it comes close to the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run any GWTTestCase

On the run rght now, but john merged a patch in that area yesterday, can you try reverting that one? On Friday, November 14, 2014, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote: I've updated my master branch (of the GWT-core project) the with the remote and now I'm not able to run any GWT test

Re: [gwt-contrib] Not able to run any GWTTestCase

Deleted all unit caches? On Nov 14, 2014 1:10 PM, Julien Dramaix julien.dram...@gmail.com wrote: I have this problem for several days in fact. It's why I think the problem is on my side. On Fri Nov 14 2014 at 1:05:30 PM 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] SDM in 2.7.0-rc1 doesn't support inclusion in 3rd party sites

Can you take a look at this and let me know if this helps you out? https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Tal Shani tsh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am writing a GWT generated JS script that is hosted by several sites. 2.7.0 introduced a

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

You are comparing apples and oranges here. SDM compiles are not optimized, thus much bigger. If you want to compare performance you will need to do an optimized compile. The SDM setup in my blog post is now outdated, here is how you use SDM with Phonegap in 2.7:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

Are you comparing prod compiles or SDM compiles? On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:22 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, this (https://github.com/mgwt/mgwt/wiki/SuperDevMode-with-PhoneGap) is what I did. Super dev mode is working. I get a recompile after reload that is

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

prod = production = optimized. SDM in incremental code does not do any optimizations. Normal GWT compiles optimize a lot. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:36 AM, confile michael.gorsk...@googlemail.com wrote: @Daniel Sorry for my stupid question but what is the difference? How do I do prod compiles

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Upgrade 2.7 beta1 to rc1 - browser refresh and change detection not working

I added a tracking item for updating SDM docs before 2.7.0 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Matic Petek maticpe...@gmail.com wrote: Jens, Thank you. Now it's working. SDM documentation should really be updated - http://www.gwtproject.org/articles/superdevmode.html Regards, Matic On

Re: [gwt-contrib] Cell widgets and GSS

I think we should not provide these files as of yet. If someone wants to make the transition right now they can easily use the converter with these files and convert them to gss themselves. I think we want to make that transition once GSS is default (or about to be default) inside of Google as a

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7.0-RC1 is available

Hi all, I just build the GWT 2.7.0 RC1 and pushed it to maven central. The complete SDK is also available from here http://goo.gl/npqEUR. Please start testing and let us know if you run into any trouble. You can either reply to this thread on gwt-contrib

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7.0-RC1 Smoke testing update

Hi all, the smoke testing for the release showed up a couple of problems, some of them need to be fixed before we put RC1 out others can wait until the final release. - Dev mode test do not work: issue 8967 https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8967 - Smoke

[gwt-contrib] Blocking RC1: Fold gwt-codeserver into gwt-dev

Hi all, right now GWT builds with RC1 are failing in Eclipse with GPE since the gwt-codeserver.jar is not on the build path. The next GPE release (with changes that fix this) is still a long way out. In order to not be blocking on this I propose we fold gwt-codeserver.jar into gwt-dev.jar. This

Re: [gwt-contrib] Blocking RC1: Fold gwt-codeserver into gwt-dev

I think moving sources right now is too risky and too much work we should just merge the jars in dist. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Fine for me. Do you intend to move the sources or just merge the JARs during dist-dev/dist? -- You received this

[gwt-contrib] Help with testing GWT 2.7 RC1

Hi all, we are looking for help with testing GWT 2.7 RC1. We are in need of people testing the release on these platforms (others are already covered): - Windows 7/8, IE10 - some Windows, IE8 Please reach out to me directly if you want to get involved. -Daniel -- Google Germany GmbH

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

Hi Jeremie, what do you mean by 15s reload? Does the compiler take 15s to detect that you do not have a change? (this would be bad). -Daniel On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Jérémie Gottero jeremiegott...@gmail.com wrote: It works like a charm, thanks. I still have ~15sec of compilation to

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

These times are incredible slow. The worst I have seen was around 700ms for a huge chunk of code. Normally these times are around ~100ms. Something is seriously wrong. Lets try a couple of things: 1. Up the ram of SDM to see if this makes any difference. 2. Are there any other things running on

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

You can not create a JSO using new in Java. If this has worked with GWT 2.6.1 it is just a bug and should not have worked in the first place. -Daniel On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jan Thewes janthe...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, we're in the process of trying out GWT 2.7 in our massive

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 : precompile and incremental flags

With GWT 2.7 you do not need any bookmarklet stuff anymore. You can just bring it up through the old dev mode integration in eclipse, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpCSbj36O44 PS: You do not need the -superDevMode anymore its now default. On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Jérémie Gottero

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: odd super dev mode times

Stephen can you verify that this solved your problem and if so cherry pick it to the branch and add me as a reviewer? On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:02 PM, 'John Stalcup' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: I think it's in master now (commit

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: odd super dev mode times

I think that CL is only on master. Thats why I said try master and if it works send me a cherry pick for the CL :) On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Stephen Haberman stephen.haber...@gmail.com wrote: However, right, it didn't actually make it into 2.7-beta1. Crap. Eclipse was lying to me,

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7.0 beta1

Hi all, since we are adding major features to GWT, we decided to change our release process for GWT 2.7. I just published GWT 2.7.0-beta1 to maven central and our file storage http://goo.gl/pr7km3. We are doing this beta to get external feedback on incremental compilation and GSS. Incremental

[gwt-contrib] Maven release process broken

Hi all, apparently sonatype now verifies that all jar files have a sources.jar associated with them. Our build does not do that for gwt-servlet.jar. To be able to push out beta1 I settled on a nasty hack, see: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9774/ I think we need to change the way the

[gwt-contrib] Java6 compatibility broken due to UiBinder change for GSS

Hi all, currently GWT does not build with Java6 (not even the release build: ant elemental dist), because of this change: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9620/ @Colin, @Arthur can you guys take a look together with Julien? -Daniel -- You received this message because you are

[gwt-contrib] Change packaging for GSS

Hi all, apparently we ended up packaging gss into gwt-dev instead of gwt-user: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9803/ @Thomas, @Julien can you guys look into providing a patch that moves this into gwt-user? -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7.0 beta1

This looks like an issue with your gwt-unitCache. Can you clear it and retry? -Daniel On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Jim Douglas jdou...@basis.com wrote: Is GPE support still pending? I just did a quick test in Kepler. I set this as my default GWT SDK, then attempted to GWT Compile my

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Maven release process broken

oops was still a draft, now its okay. On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com wrote: The patch link provided is bad. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [gwt-contrib] Authentication issues

Did you sign the CLA on the gerrit web interface? -Daniel On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:31 PM, Scott Morgan sc...@adligo.com wrote: Hi, Ok I had issues with the ~/.netrc file, which never authenticated me. So I removed it to get command line user/password dialogs which did this; (Replaced

Re: [gwt-contrib] GssParserException

Did you update your svn tools dir? On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Stefano Pulze stefano.pulz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've a problem with GssParserException when try compile from GWT trunk version. I've download latest GWT trunk versione from the web and start to compiling with ant

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: GWT 2.7 release plan

I think this call is up to the elemental maintainers (manolo thomas), if it breaks any tests I will roll it back since we need a green build to be able to branch. -Daniel On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:57 PM, 'Brian Slesinsky' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com

[gwt-contrib] Last call for patches

Hi all, as a reminder: Please make sure to get your patches in for GWT 2.7 until tomorrow (October 7th). -Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT Contributors group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [gwt-contrib] bug with the new snapshot

Hi Julien, I think this is related to us not waiting for the body to be loaded before injecting the recompile.nocache.js. Can you try: https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/9451/ and let me know if this fixes your issue? -Daniel On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Julien Dramaix

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: JsInterop

Make sure turn turn on -XjsInteropMode JS -Daniel On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:03 PM, 'John Stalcup' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: Make sure turn turn on -XjsInteropMode JS On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:18 AM, 'Chris DiGiano' via GWT Contributors

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 release plan

Hi all, we just settled on a GWT 2.7 release plan: - We *code freeze* on *October 7th* and branch for GWT 2.7. - As soon as we have the *remaining patches submitted*, we put out a beta1 build, this should be no later than *October 7th.* - Putting out a *beta1 externally* allows us to collect

Re: [gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 release plan

we're waiting on a patch to CLDR 25 On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:15 PM, 'Daniel Kurka' via GWT Contributors google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com wrote: Hi all, we just settled on a GWT 2.7 release plan: - We *code freeze* on *October 7th* and branch for GWT 2.7. - As soon as we

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Change the superDevMode to be the default for dev-mode?

The GWT team thinks that this should be the default behaviour going forward. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Brandon Donnelson branflake2...@gmail.com wrote: Should I make this default behavior in GPE? On by default? On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 3:40:15 PM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote:

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.7 requiring Java7 for development - Action needed

Hi all, while bringing GSS support into GWT, I discovered that the closure styleheets compiler actually requires Java7. This means that we either have to do a back port of the compiler (I haven't looked at it seriously) or require Java7 for development with GWT (probably only if you are using

Re: [gwt-contrib] Chrome LiveEdit and SDM

Hi Ivan, why would you want to edit the JavaScript instead of editing your Java code? How long does your compile take with the current GWT 2.7 Snapshot? -Daniel On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ivan Markov ivan.mar...@gmail.com wrote: (Background: I'm trying to further shorten the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: SDM -XcompilePerFile: initial feedback

Hi Arnaud, are those 10s after the changes we made or before? -Daniel On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Arnaud TOURNIER ltea...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to all of you who participated to this very good things ! I am now able (from the trunk) to have a great experience debugging with Gwt +

Re: [gwt-contrib] Sluggish Gerrit

I am experiencing the same thing, but it seems like my colleagues do not. I was thinking it was just me. I'll invoke the oncall people. On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Andrei Korzhevskii a.korzhevs...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Currently I'm experiencing very slow work of Gerrit (since

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: What's the current plan for GWT 2.7 release?

We decided that we are holding GWT 2.7 for the new per file compilation and GSS support. Both of them are shaping up to be really cool features, but are not done yet. As soon as we consider them done (being live within google and not causing issues anymore), we will put out a release candidate.

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Can someone mentor me through my first push to Gerrit?

Hi Richard, I emailed the internal team to help with this. I'll update this thread once I hear back from them. -Daniel On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Richard Wallis rdwal...@gmail.com wrote: This still isn't working this morning. I get that this is my first commit. Most likely there's

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: CLA problem

Just a guess: Maybe the email address is missing a real name in your google apps domain? On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Michael Vogt i...@michaelvogt.eu wrote: The problem is, as it seem to me, that the field for the full name is empty, and it is not editable. Clicking the edit button tells

Re: [gwt-contrib] HTMLElement

This was only done in demo code. You will need to rebuild that item from scratch. -Daniel On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Michael Vogt i...@michaelvogt.eu wrote: Hello. Tried to reproduce the JsInterop demo, but the type HTMLElement can't be found. Is this not provided, yet? Thanks,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Redirecting Subversion to Git

Hi Patrick, do you mind sending a patch for gwt-site? (Let me know if you need any help..) -Daniel On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick M. Tucker patrick.tuc...@macefusion.com wrote: There are still links on the gwtproject.org site that point to the old code. For example:

Re: [gwt-contrib] Redirecting Subversion to Git

I think you attached the wrong script?! On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: So, attached is the script I'm using (just after a clean svn checkout). I'll commit with message: Replace all files with dummy content pointing to gwt.googlesource.com On

Re: [gwt-contrib] Redirecting Subversion to Git

I think updating the trunk branch is a good idea. I just gave you commit rights and I did hide the source tab from the project. On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, When we moved from SVN at code.google.com to Git at gwt.googlesource.com, I wanted

Re: [gwt-contrib] Add Object.clone as throwing implementation

I rolled the patch because it broke internal apps and it seemed to hard and not worthwhile to clean this up. I just imported the change and running some tests internally I get back once I can see what needs to be done. On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Rocco De Angelis

Re: [gwt-contrib] who discusses the next features and adopts feature requests?

Hi Zied, thanks for bringing this up. I think the right place to start discussions about any GWT feature is gwt-contrib. In the past a lot of new features have been added to the GWT SDK in a very short amount of time. This leaves all the contributors with a huge maintenance burden and limits the

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Nightly snapshot being uploaded to sonatype maven repository

You can always download the individual jar files from http://oss.sonatype.org (search for gwt-user, gwt-servlet, gwt-dev, gwt-codeserver, etc.) -Daniel On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Matic Petek maticpe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi That is really great news! Any idea how can access the latest

[gwt-contrib] GWT 2.6.1-RC2

Hi all, RC2 is now available from maven central and as download from here: http://storage.googleapis.com/gwt-releases/gwt-2.6.1-rc2.zip -Daniel -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups GWT

[gwt-contrib] Nightly snapshot being uploaded to sonatype maven repository

Hi all, we updated our Jenkins setup to publish the daily open source GWT build to the sonatype maven repository. Currently snapshots are posted as *2.7.0-SNAPSHOT*. A new snapshot is only uploaded after a successful build and google is following trunk closely, so these snapshots should be