Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB quotas query

On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 08:51 +, Sobey, Richard A wrote: > For us the only one that matters is the fileset quota. With or > without –perfileset-quota set, we simply see a quota value for one of > the filesets that is mapped to a drive, and every other mapped drives > inherits the same value.

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB quotas query

Thanks Jonathan for the offer, but I'd prefer to have this working without implementing unsupported options in production. I'd be willing to give it a go in my test cluster though, which is exhibiting the same symptoms, so if you wouldn't mind getting in touch off list I can see how it works?

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB quotas query

For us the only one that matters is the fileset quota. With or without –perfileset-quota set, we simply see a quota value for one of the filesets that is mapped to a drive, and every other mapped drives inherits the same value. whether it’s true or not. Just about to do some SMB tracing for my

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] gpfs 4.2.3.6 stops workingwithkernel3.10.0-862.2.3.el7

> On May 15, 2018, at 11:55 PM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > > hi stephen, > >> There isn’t a flaw in that argument, but where the security experts >> are concerned there is no argument. > we have gpfs clients hosts where users can login, we can't update those. > that is a

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB server on GPFS clients and Followsymlinks

On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 22:32 +, Christof Schmitt wrote: > > I could use CES, but CES does not support follow-symlinks outside > respective SMB export. >   > Samba has the 'wide links' option, that we currently do not test and > support as part of the mmsmb integration. You can always open a RFE

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 5.0.1.0 Update issue with python dependencies

Hallo Smita, i will search in wich rhel-release is the 0.15 release available. If we found one I want to install, and give feedback. Regards Renar. Renar Grunenberg Abteilung Informatik – Betrieb HUK-COBURG Bahnhofsplatz 96444 Coburg Telefon:09561 96-44110 Telefax:09561

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB server on GPFS clients and Followsymlinks

Jonathan,   Are you suggesting that a SMB exported symlink to /etc/shadow is somehow a bad thing ? :-) Daniel     

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 5.0.1.0 Update issue with python dependencies

You are right Simon, that rpm comes from object. Below two are the new dependencies that were added with Pike support in 5.0.1 pyOpenSSL-0.14-1.ibm.el7.noarch.rpm python2-urllib3-1.21.1-1.ibm.el7.noarch.rpm >From RHEL 7.0 to 7.5 the pyOpenSSL package included in the ISO is

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] What happened to /usr/bin/ganesha.nfsd in 5.0.1-0??

Thing to do here ought to be using overrides in /etc/systemd, not modifying the vendor scripts. I can’t think of a case where one would want to do otherwise, but it may be out there. -- || \\UTGERS, |---*O*--- ||_// the State |

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB quotas query

> I am really not sure what the issue with the code path for this as it> is 35 lines of C including comments to get the fileset if one exists> for a given path on a GPFS file system. You open a random file on the> path, call gpfs_fcntl and then gpfs_getfilesetid. It's then a simple> call to

Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 5.0.1.0 Update issue with python dependencies

I wondered if it came from the object RPMs maybe… I haven’t actually checked, but I recall that it was mentioned 5.0.1 was bumping to Pike swift stack (I think!) and that typically requires newer RPMs if using RDO packages so maybe it came that route? Simon From: