Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Experiences with Synchronous Replication, Stretch Clusters, and Spectrum Scale <= 4.2

2018-04-08 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 20:27:49 +0300, "Yaron Daniel" said:
> Main items to take into account :
> 1) What is the latecny you have between the 2 main sites ?
> 2) What network bandwidth between the 2 sites ?
> 3) What is the latency to the 3rd site from each site ?
> 4) Which protocols plan to be used ? Do you have layer2 between the 2  sites 
> , or layer 3 ?
> 5) Do you plan to use dedicated network for GPFS daemon ?

The answers to most of these questions are a huge "it depends". For instance,
the bandwidth needed is dictated by the amount of data being replicated.  The
cluster I mentioned the other day was filling most of a 10Gbit link while we
were importing 5 petabytes of data from our old archive solution, but now often
fits its replication needs inside a few hundred mbits/sec.

Similarly, the answers to (4) and (5) will depend on what long-haul network
infrastructure the customer already has or can purchase. If they have layer 2
capability between the sites, that's an option. If they've just got commodity
layer-3, you're designing with layer 3 in mind.  If their network has VLAN
capability between the sites, or a dedicated link, that will affect the answer
for (5).  And so on...



pgpKF0JzRO9ux.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss


Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Experiences with Synchronous Replication, Stretch Clusters, and Spectrum Scale <= 4.2

2018-04-07 Thread Yaron Daniel
HI

We have few customers than have 2 Sites (Active/Active using SS 
replication) + 3rd site as Quorum Tie Breaker node.

1) Spectrum Scale 4.2.3.x
2) Lenovo x3650 -M4 connect via FC to SVC (Flash900 as external storage)
3) We run all tests before deliver the system to customer Production.

Main items to take into account :
1) What is the latecny you have between the 2 main sites ? 
2) What network bandwidth between the 2 sites ?
3) What is the latency to the 3rd site from each site ?
4) Which protocols plan to be used ? Do you have layer2 between the 2 
sites , or layer 3 ?
5) Do you plan to use dedicated network for GPFS daemon ? 
Regards
 


 
 
Yaron Daniel
 94 Em Ha'Moshavot Rd

Storage Architect
 Petach Tiqva, 49527
IBM Global Markets, Systems HW Sales
 Israel
 
 
 
Phone:
+972-3-916-5672
 
 
Fax:
+972-3-916-5672
 
 
Mobile:
+972-52-8395593
 
 
e-mail:
y...@il.ibm.com
 
 
IBM Israel
 
 
 
 

   



From:   "Howard, Stewart Jameson" 
To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" 

Date:   04/06/2018 06:24 PM
Subject:[gpfsug-discuss] Experiences with Synchronous Replication, 
Stretch Clusters, and Spectrum Scale <= 4.2
Sent by:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org



Hi All,



I was wondering what experiences the user group has had with stretch

4.x clusters.  Specifically, we're interested in:



1)  What SS version are you running?



2)  What hardware are you running it on?



3)  What has been your experience with testing of site-failover

scenarios (e.g., full power loss at one site, interruption of inter-

site link).



Thanks so much for your help!



Stewart
___
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Bn1XE9uK2a9CZQ8qKnJE3Q&m=yYIveWTR3gNyhJ9KsrodpWApBlpQ29Oi858MuE0Nzsw&s=V42UYnHtEYVK3LvH6i930tzte1qp0sWmiY6Pp1Ep3kg&e=






___
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss


Re: [gpfsug-discuss] Experiences with Synchronous Replication, Stretch Clusters, and Spectrum Scale <= 4.2

2018-04-06 Thread Sobey, Richard A
Hi Stewart

We're running a synchronous replication cluster between our DCs in London and 
Slough, at a distance of ~63km. The latency is in the order of 700 microseconds 
over dark fibre.

Honestly... it's been a fine experience. We've never had a full connectivity 
loss mind you, but we have had to shut down one site fully whilst the other one 
carried on as normal. Mmrestripe afterwards of course.

We are running Scale version 4.2.3 and looking at v5. Hardware is IBM v3700 
storage, IBM rackmount NSD/CES nodes. The storage is connected via FC.

Cheers
Richard

-Original Message-
From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org 
 On Behalf Of Howard, Stewart Jameson
Sent: 06 April 2018 16:15
To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Experiences with Synchronous Replication, Stretch 
Clusters, and Spectrum Scale <= 4.2

Hi All,

I was wondering what experiences the user group has had with stretch 4.x 
clusters.  Specifically, we're interested in:

1)  What SS version are you running?

2)  What hardware are you running it on?

3)  What has been your experience with testing of site-failover scenarios 
(e.g., full power loss at one site, interruption of inter- site link).

Thanks so much for your help!

Stewart
___
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
___
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss