[GROW]Re: Working Group Call for Adoption for draft-hmntsharma-bmp-tcp-ao (start 29/Apr/2024 end 15/May/2024)

Hello, I Ssupport adoption. We had actually added some preliminary support for this in the BMP YANG model.. we can continue making sure it meets the demands of this draft. Camilo C > On 29 Apr 2024, at 16:54, Job Snijders > wrote: > > Dear GROW, > > The author of

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-00.txt

lv-00.txt is now available. > It is a work item of the Global Routing Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF. > > Title: BMP Extension for Path Status TLV > Authors: Camilo Cardona >Paolo Lucente >Pierre Francois >Yunan Gu >Th

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-yang-02.txt

ote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Global Routing > Operations (GROW) WG of the IETF. > > Title : BMP YANG Module > Authors : Camilo Cardona >

[GROW] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang-04.txt

we tried to model its words in the yang. Please, let us know if you have any comments/suggestions/etc. Grow-chairs, can we have 7 minutes for this in the next session? Thanks, Camilo Cardona > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Camilo Cardona > Subject: FW: New Version Notificati

[GROW] New Version for draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-11.txt, and slot in London

, a back-up, primary, invalid, etc. We just released a new version, mainly with some edits and adding some status. Chairs, could we pretty please have a 8 minutes slot for this draft in London? Thanks, Camilo Cardona On 18/10/22, 12:16, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: <>

Re: [GROW] Working Group Adoption Call: draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang (Ends 15/Sep/2022)

Hello Tom, First of all, thanks a lot for your thoughtful review of the model. Some answers next: > On 26 Aug 2022, at 11:23, tom petch wrote: > > From: GROW mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf > of Jeffrey Haas mailto:jh...@pfrc.org>> > Sent: 25 August 2022 15:25 > > I support

Re: [GROW] How to reuse the tcp model in the BMP model - asking for suggestions

ay. Please see below. > -Original Message- > From: Camilo Cardona > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 7:21 PM > To: Jeffrey Haas ; Scharf, Michael esslingen.de> > Cc: draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp.auth...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-tcpm-yang- > t...@ietf.or

Re: [GROW] How to reuse the tcp model in the BMP model - asking for suggestions

subject to change. > > Michael > > From: Camilo Cardona > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 4:37 PM > To: Scharf, Michael ; draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp.auth...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-...@ietf.org > Cc: t...@ietf.org; grow@ietf.org > Subject: Re: How t

Re: [GROW] How to reuse the tcp model in the BMP model - asking for suggestions

was to leverage other model for this, if existing. Thus, I guess the most general question we can make is , How is the recommended way of reusing the tcp model? Thanks, Camilo Cardona From: "Scharf, Michael" Date: Friday, 17 June 2022 at 04:26 To: Camilo Cardona , "draft

[GROW] How to reuse the tcp model in the BMP model - asking for suggestions

Hello draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp authors, We are analysing how to leverage the tcpm model for managing tcp connectivity in the BMP yang model (draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang-02). In general, how do you suggest other models reuse ietf-tcpm? Most of tcpm model is defined directly in containers,

Re: [GROW] Status Check for: draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang

Hello Grow-chairs, grow list, I confirm It was the authors’ intent to ask for WG adoption for draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang. Thanks, Camilo C. > On 8 Apr 2022, at 09:20, Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > Folks, > During our last meeting Camilo gave a presentation on: > draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang >

Re: [GROW] New draft: Yanog module for BMP - draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang

it makes sense moving that action point within the station, yeah. We'll discuss it further. Camilo On 11/3/22, 12:37, "Jeffrey Haas" wrote: Camilo, > On Mar 7, 2022, at 5:59 PM, Camilo Cardona wrote: > On 7/3/22, 22:32, "Jeffrey Haas" wrote: >

Re: [GROW] New draft: Yanog module for BMP - draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang

for this review, Camilo On 11/3/22, 11:43, "tom petch" wrote: From: GROW on behalf of Camilo Cardona Sent: 07 March 2022 10:06 Hi Grow, We just submitted a new draft proposing a yang module for configuring and managing BMP on a device. It would be nice t

Re: [GROW] New draft: Yanog module for BMP - draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang

per-station action. See for example the actions in the bgp yang model. JCC: The action currently points to a single station. Maybe I am misunderstanding your observation here though. -- Jeff > On Mar 7, 2022, at 5:06 AM, Camilo Cardona wrote: > > Hi Grow, >

Re: [GROW] New draft: Yanog module for BMP - draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang

Thanks Tim! We will consider your points for next version, together with the recommendations from Jeffrey. Camilo From: "Tim Evens (tievens)" Date: Monday, 7 March 2022 at 19:05 To: Camilo Cardona , Camilo Cardona Cc: "grow-cha...@ietf.org" , "grow@ietf.

[GROW] New draft: Yanog module for BMP - draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang

, Camilo Cardona > > On 7/3/22, 10:51, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" > wrote: > > >A new version of I-D, draft-cptb-grow-bmp-yang-01.txt >has been successfully submitted by Camilo Cardona and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name:

[GROW] New Version Notification and slot for draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-07.txt

Hi Grow, A new version of draft draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv was released a couple of days ago. As always, comments are welcome. Grow chairs, can I have 10 mins to present this draft in the next session? Thanks, Camilo C > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Camilo Cardona

[GROW] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-02.txt

ernet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-02.txt > Date: 3 January 2020 at 16:44:15 GMT-5 > To: "Pierre Francois" , "Paolo Lucente" > , "Pierre Francois" , "Thomas > Graf" , "Yunan

Re: [GROW] New Version Notification for draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-01.txt

fully submitted by Camilo Cardona and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv > Revision: 01 > Title:BMP Extension for Path Marking TLV > Document date:2019-10-31 > Group:Individual Submis

Re: [GROW] Call for IETF 106 agenda items

Hi Job, We would like to have a couple of minutes for draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv. Thanks, Camilo > On 22 Oct 2019, at 17:56, Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear Folks! > > GROW is planning to meet in Singapore at IETF 106, iff we have agenda > items. People who would like time on the

Re: [GROW] Path marking using BMP - TLVs

lly try to signal that a path’s next-hop is not reachable, therefore invaliding the path. > > Thanks, > Shunwan > > > -Original Message- > From: GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Camilo Cardona > Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2019 11:04 AM > To: grow@ietf.o

[GROW] Path marking using BMP - TLVs

. Thanks, Camilo Cardona ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Re: [GROW] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: (with COMMENT)

Hello Brian, Thanks for your feedback, comments inline. Camilo Cardona > On 18 Aug 2015, at 20:18, Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote: > > Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: No Objection > >

Re: [GROW] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: (with COMMENT)

Hello Stephen, Thank you. Answers inline. Camilo C. > On 19 Aug 2015, at 17:09, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the

Re: [GROW] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: (with COMMENT)

Hello Alvaro, Thanks for your comments. Answers inline. Camilo C. > On 18 Aug 2015, at 22:03, Alvaro Retana wrote: > > Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the

Re: [GROW] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-07: (with COMMENT)

> > On 9/15/15, 7:48 AM, "Camilo Cardona" <juancamilo.card...@imdea.org> wrote: > > Camilo: > > Hi! > >>> -- >>> COMMENT: >>> ---

Re: [GROW] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-06

Hi all, As promised, we submitted an update for draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats based on the most recent comments. Please let us know if you have any more observations. Thanks, Camilo C. On 20 Jul 2015, at 10:04, Christopher Morrow christopher.mor...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-04.txt

policies and the relationships among external ASes to detect if its actions could trigger the appearance of unexpected traffic flows. --- Cheers, Rick Experiences not things. On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Camilo Cardona juancamilo.card...@imdea.org wrote: Hi Rick

Re: [GROW] WGLC draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-03

Wes, Thank you again for all your detailed comments and recommendations. Please give us a few days to take a careful look at them and come back with an answer. Regards, Camilo Cardona On 10 Oct 2014, at 19:43, George, Wes wesley.geo...@twcable.com wrote: I've done another review pass

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-03.txt

this document. Regards, Camilo Cardona On 04/08/14 14:15, internet-dra...@ietf.org internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Global Routing Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title