Re: Development with GObjects

Nice work, Pavlo! I wonder if you can work this into a patch for the GObject documentation :-) You might want to check out https://blogs.gnome.org/desrt/2012/02/26/a-gentle-introduction-to-gobject-construction/ as well. In my personal style I would do three things differently, I don't know for

Re: Proposal: Recommend meson for glib 2.58.0

On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 8:02 AM Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 1:13 AM wrote: > > > > Before making the switch please be aware of > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3077 and > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/2121 which make Meson-built > libraries mostly

Re: Proposal: Recommend meson for glib 2.58.0

Before making the switch please be aware of https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/3077 and https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/2121 which make Meson-built libraries mostly broken on macOS, particularly with regard to g-ir-scanner. Regards, Philip C On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 12:08 PM

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:15 PM wrote: > Thanks for this call for help, it's our chance to finally be serious > about supporting multiple platforms, instead of always fixing a > posteriori. Thanks to gitlab that shouldn't be too hard to setup. > > Le vendredi 18 mai 2018 à

Re: GitLab CI runners for non-Linux systems

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:52 AM Philip Withnall wrote: > Can anybody else provide and maintain CI runners for other platforms? > I’d particularly like to see: > • *BSD (probably OpenBSD and NetBSD) > • macOS (ideally several versions, since we support from OS X 10.7 >

Re: Migration to GitLab, turn your notif off to avoid mail flood

On Wed, May 2, 2018, 11:32 Christoph Reiter, wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Morten Welinder wrote: > > It is just me, or is the migration mangling bugs? > > > > Compare https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765921 > > to

Re: gobject-introspection Version 1 || GNOME

Hi, As is the standard in open-source software, you can find the license information in the COPYING file in the root directory of the source distribution or Git repository: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/blob/master/COPYING We do not have an ECCN number. Although I don't

Re: Contribution question

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:30 PM Pavlo Solntsev wrote: > Hi, > > To better understand how some glib modules work, I write mini tests. I was > thinking it would be beneficial for a lot of people if more examples will > be included into the documentation to better explain

Re: gtk 3 stuck menu bug on Mac

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 6:45 AM Christian Schoenebeck < schoeneb...@linuxsampler.org> wrote: > On Freitag, 17. November 2017 00:51:25 CET Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > What I found out so far is that whenever this problem occurs, both of the > > following two checks in function

Re: Stackexchange community for GNOME/GTK+

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:02 AM Tobias Mueller wrote: > Hi. > > On Mi, 2017-05-10 at 08:04 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Looks like if you want to do this, we'd have to host it > Or use Stackoverflow. > Sri's motivation was: > > > We need to have a search engine

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] Native look and feel via GTK+ CSS

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:38 AM John Ralls wrote: > > > On Jan 16, 2017, at 1:25 AM, Марко М. Костић > wrote: > > > > GTK+3 Python3 programs with headerbars look out of place on macOS > Sierra. > > > > I thought about using new GTK+ CSS system for

Re: GLib.DIR_SEPARATOR_S problem on raspbian

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:36 AM narcisse doudieu siewe < wambenarci...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > Hello just to signal a problem. > > GLib.DIR_SEPARATOR_S on raspbian gives "\\" in place of "//". > and GLib.DIR_SEPARATOR gives 92 number. > Several bugs are reported for this:

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:14 AM Davin McCall <dav...@davmac.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not a regular poster to this list and am not subscribed. I'm posting > here now at the suggestion of Philip Chimento, who read a blog post I wrote > recently [1] about the GTK+ lifecycle pla

GTK-Next (was: Re: Gtk+4.0)

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:08 AM Simon McVittie < simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk> wrote: > On 09/07/16 20:42, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > > In fact, this could be a new plan. If we double down on Flatpak, then we > > could simply not bump soname / major version, leave it at 4, break ABI > > every

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 9:31 PM wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Here are some thoughts I have about all this, from a

Re: Gtk+4.0

I realized this thread had been sitting for quite a while. GUADEC is about to start and I'd like to summarize what's been talked about. Some of the concerns I read from this thread are: 1. Developers are concerned about there not being enough indication of which APIs are more likely or less

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 3:51 PM John Tall wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 9:06 PM, wrote: > > I'm expecting this will become less and less of a problem as apps move > to Flatpak as a means of distribution. > > As far as I know Flatpak only targets

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 1:14 PM Peter Weber wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, 2016-07-09 at 19:06 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I'm expecting this will become less and less of a problem as apps move > > to Flatpak as a means of distribution. > > Uhuuu. I'm sorry,

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:13 PM Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM, wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 21/06/16 16:26, Peter Weber wrote:

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 21/06/16 16:26, Peter Weber wrote: >> > I don't see here an active discussion about Gtk+4.0[1]? So I'm trying to >> > write

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/06/16 16:26, Peter Weber wrote: > > I don't see here an active discussion about Gtk+4.0[1]? So I'm trying to > > write about my thoughts, in a careful way. In the first moment, I thought > > this is

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:29 AM Peter Weber wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:07:46 +0100, Simon McVittie > wrote: > > Ideally, we'd choose the trade-off such that projects that want to stick > > to a stable-branch version are happy with

Re: Gtk+4.0

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:34 AM Peter Weber wrote: > Hello! > > I don't see here an active discussion about Gtk+4.0[1]? So I'm trying to > write about my thoughts, in a careful way. In the first moment, I thought > this is a good idea and just the numbering is

Re: Does Gtk+ Still Support Application-Provided Widgets?

Hi, To a certain, lesser, extent this has always been the case: for example, I filed [1] a long time ago because you can't write your own GtkContainer subclass with an internal layout manager and have gtk_container_add() and gtk_container_remove() still work on it, although GtkAssistant does this

[gtk-osx-devel] Linking on El Capitan

I've run into a problem linking with ICU since upgrading to El Capitan. I've pasted some example output from building webkit2gtk3 below, but I have seen this as well on other modules that depend on icu. This only happens when generating introspection data, not when linking the actual libraries.

Re: Ülease get gtk3 css definition to be similar to gtk pixbuf!

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: We will be discussing how to document the evolving GTK+ css capabilities in a clearer way at Guadec in a few weeks. I wanted to reply to this before GUADEC but it slipped my mind. Here's a documentational Gist

Re: GMemVTable broken

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: Yeah, we've all been sort of aware of this for some time. I've abused it to the fact where I know that malloc and g_new / free and g_free will *always* be the same since a specific glib version. I think removing

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Moduleset-stable: fixing the repository link of cups module

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:18 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On May 11, 2015, at 1:50 AM, Kirill Moizik kir...@daynix.com wrote: Hi John, I sent it here https://github.com/GNOME/gtk-osx/pulls I am a little bit confused about all this different projects Kirill On Sun, May 10,

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] Libsoup Introspection (was Bison 3 and WebKit)

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:27 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Mar 1, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Philip Chimento philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:53 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Feb 23, 2015, at 11:13 PM, Philip Chimento philip.chime...@gmail.com

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] configure: error: Python module libxml2 is needed to run this package

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 8:11 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Dec 24, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Jim Charlton char...@gmail.com wrote: On 14-12-23 12:23 PM, Philip Chimento wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Jim Charlton char...@gmail.com wrote: I am building gtk-osx on MAC

Re: GL and libepoxy

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: Are you sure? This shouldn't be the case since https://github.com/anholt/libepoxy/commit/e3051481cc9f5b7b36b317aff1454ee16ea9cdb9 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:54 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: It looks

Re: RFC: GtkPreview library

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: After talking to Owen today, I'm wondering if it makes sense to consider GtkPreview a portable widget. These platforms tend to already

Re: RFC: GtkPreview library

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: Gah. I always get those backwards. I actually typed SCM_RIGHTS and then changed it to SCM_CREDENTIALS. I still don't understand why fd passing is called rights. On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Simon McVittie

Deprecated widgets on Stack Overflow [was: a new combo box]

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Cosimo Cecchi cosi...@gnome.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Philip Chimento philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: Assuming that questions on Stack Overflow are an approximate poll of what application authors do - many application authors go

Re: a new combo box

On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Cosimo Cecchi cosi...@gnome.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net wrote: Cosimo talks about GtkPopover and GtkMenu, but those just sort of have me stunned. Why should I use one instead of the other? I doubt

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] configure: error: Python module libxml2 is needed to run this package

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Jim Charlton char...@gmail.com wrote: I am building gtk-osx on MAC Yosemite 10.10 1. gtk-osx-build-setup.sh 2. export PATH=$PATH:/Users/chartech/.local/bin 3. Added lines checkoutroot = os.path.expanduser(/Applications/Drumroaster/gtk/ Source/gtk)

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] Bison 3 and WebKit

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:01 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Dec 14, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Philip Chimento philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:15 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Dec 8, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Philip Chimento philip.chime...@gmail.com

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] Bison 3 and WebKit

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:15 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Dec 8, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Philip Chimento philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: The upgrade of Bison to version 3 which you graciously provided breaks

Re: [gtk-osx-devel] Bison 3 and WebKit

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: The upgrade of Bison to version 3 which you graciously provided breaks the WebKit build, which you also graciously provided. ISTR that you mumbled something about working on building a newer WebKit version. Are you? Yes!

Re: help wanted for implementing GdkGLContext on Windows and MacOS X

/libepoxy/pull/28 It did, thanks! All we can do is pressure Eric Anholt to merge it at this point. On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Philip Chimento philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: hi all; I posted this on my

Re: help wanted for implementing GdkGLContext on Windows and MacOS X

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: hi all; I posted this on my blog, which is syndacated on Planet GNOME, but I thought about trying to reach out to more people by using the GTK+ mailing list as well. GTK+ 3.16 will have OpenGL support out of the box —

Intermediate children [was: Re: flow box]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Tristan Van Berkom trista...@openismus.com wrote: o gtk_flow_box_insert() or gtk_container_add() add an intermediate child, breaking the logical widget hierarchy.

Re: win32-fixup.pl

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:47 AM, John Emmas john...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: On 24/02/2013 08:34, John Emmas wrote: Can anyone tell me what the correct syntax is for running the script? I tried perl win32-fixup.pl (without any command-line options) and although it did work, it only processed

Re: runtime accel changes

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Juan Pablo Ugarte juanpablouga...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:22 +, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: From what I see... all one should *need* to do is specify the

Re: GTK+ meetup at Guadec

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: - We need to document how one extends GTK+ itself (eg how to create a new widget class), to make it easier for new people to get involved (I'll try to get this started) I wrote a tutorial on extending

Incorporating changes from bindings [was: Add GtkRadioGroup?]

gtk_builder_get_widget_derived(), based on a method in gtkmm [1]. This would make it much easier to use Glade when subclassing widgets. [1] http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/sec-builder-using-derived-widgets.html.en -- Philip Chimento ___ gtk-devel-list

Re: Incorporating changes from bindings [was: Add GtkRadioGroup?]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 17:49, Tristan Van Berkom trista...@openismus.com wrote: On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 17:16 +0100, Philip Chimento wrote: On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:28, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote: By the way, are there any other places where the java or C++ bindings do cleanup

Re: Generic undo stack for GTK+

subtly differently. Regards, -- Philip Chimento ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

GtkTextBuffer serialization/deserialization into Rich Text Format

can get the source code here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/osxcart/ Regards, Philip Chimento ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list