Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread vmagnin
Thank you Emmanuele and Stefan for your answers, Gtk+ - General mailing list wrote > Have you considered using the GObject introspection data that GTK itself > generates, instead of your custom parsing code? Yes, but a long time ago in the first year of the project. In this Dec. 2011 post:

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread Emmanuele Bassi via gtk-list
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 18:38, Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 18:21 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > It most definitely is not. The project is actively maintained, and it > > recently got even a full description of the XML schema: > > That is interesting. Well 172 open issues > >

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 18:21 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > It most definitely is not. The project is actively maintained, and it > recently got even a full description of the XML schema: That is interesting. Well 172 open issues https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/issues but

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread Emmanuele Bassi via gtk-list
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 18:13, Stefan Salewski wrote: > On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 17:58 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via gtk-list wrote: > > Have you considered using the GObject introspection data that GTK > > itself generates, instead of your custom parsing code? > > But a warning: GObject introspection

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 17:58 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via gtk-list wrote: > Have you considered using the GObject introspection data that GTK > itself generates, instead of your custom parsing code? But a warning: GObject introspection is not that much fun, as it is in zombie state. Starting with

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 09:46 -0700, vmagnin wrote: > oncerning the "new discourse forum", I am not sure of what you mean. It is this: https://discourse.gnome.org/ Was recently advertised by Mr Bassi. The gtk mailing list will be closed soon, at least this one and gtk-app-devel.

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread Emmanuele Bassi via gtk-list
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:46, vmagnin wrote: > I am one of the main authors and administrators, working on the python > script used to parse the GTK .h header files and generate the Fortran > interfaces. Have you considered using the GObject introspection data that GTK itself generates,

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread vmagnin
Dear Stefan, I am one of the main authors and administrators, working on the python script used to parse the GTK .h header files and generate the Fortran interfaces. I wrote some messages in the GTK+ forum in 2011 about gtk-fortran, but it seems I had not registered at that time:

Re: gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 04:06 -0700, vmagnin wrote: > Launched in 2011, the gtk-fortran library offers interfaces to around > 1 > GTK functions Funny. I know how much work such bindings take, I created the Nim bindings twice, oldgtk3 lowlevel bindings, and high level gintro ones :-) Are you

gtk-fortran 19.04 released

2019-04-26 Thread vmagnin
Hello, Launched in 2011, the gtk-fortran library offers interfaces to around 1 GTK functions (GTK, GDK, GdkPixbuf, Cairo, Pango, ATK, GLib, GObject, GIO) using the ISO_C_BINDING module. Although mainly developed under Linux, you can easily use it under Windows via MSYS2. It runs also under