Hi Liliana,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 at 00:19, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 14.09.2023 um 19:48 +0200 schrieb Simon Tournier:
>> a. … send an Email to guix-patc...@gnu.org #only once
>> b. $ git config sendemail.to 12...@debbugs.gnu.org #only once
>> c. $
Hi Saku,
Saku Laesvuori writes:
>> I'd like to be part of the solution, so Saku, I'd like to help
>> write the putative scripts you talk about. The main difficulty I see is
>> that they need to be configured to be able to send and receive email on
>> the user's behalf.
>
> That could probably
Hi Simon,
Am Donnerstag, dem 14.09.2023 um 19:48 +0200 schrieb Simon Tournier:
> a. … send an Email to guix-patc...@gnu.org #only once
> b. $ git config sendemail.to 12...@debbugs.gnu.org #only once
> c. $ git send-email --base=auto -v origin
>
> and the order is flipped:
>
> I'd like to be part of the solution, so Saku, I'd like to help
> write the putative scripts you talk about. The main difficulty I see is
> that they need to be configured to be able to send and receive email on
> the user's behalf.
That could probably be done via git send-email. I think the
Hi Edouard,
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 at 20:57, Edouard Klein wrote:
> Second, I don't know what the general feeling is here towards debbugs, but
> if moving away from it is something that may happen, my suggestion is not
> to use anything with Pull Requests, as Simon you seem to have
> understood.
Hi Simon, Saku
Thank you for your answers.
First, I should have slept on my email instead of sending it right away.
I was still dealing with the frustration of having made a fool of myself
with debbugs, which compounded with wrestling earlier with golang build
system. My tone was unnecessarily
Hi Edouard,
It is very important to speak up, although that makes me sad to read
such poor feedback experience.
Well, the friction is about Debbugs. Maybe I repeat myself: Debbugs is
initially thought to be a bug tracker system and not a patch track system.
Do not take me wrong, I am not
> Dear Guix,
>
> I've just blown up Guix's debbugs by opening (and then closing) 33 bugs
> instead of sending a 33-commits patch series.
>
> I've also seen that there is a huge discussion on the cognitive overhead
> of contributing. I will read it as soon as I can spare more time on this.
>
> I
Dear Guix,
I've just blown up Guix's debbugs by opening (and then closing) 33 bugs
instead of sending a 33-commits patch series.
I've also seen that there is a huge discussion on the cognitive overhead
of contributing. I will read it as soon as I can spare more time on this.
I find git email's
