[h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
I found a photo on eBay that is being described as a post-mortem bride photo. What do you think, is she death or not? Read the description the seller has of the bride. The item number is 380202466338. Penny Ladnier (who has been snow-bound for two weeks) Owner, The Costume Gallery Websites

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Land of Oz
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 04:29:43 -0500 Penny Ladnier pe...@costumegallery.com wrote: I found a photo on eBay that is being described as a post-mortem bride photo. What do you think, is she death or not? Read the description the seller has of the bride. The item number is 380202466338.

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Sharon Collier
If you look at the dress, the ribbon that the seller says is holding her up is clearly a ribbon at the waist. If it was holding her up it would have to go under the veil, but it doesn't look as if it is doing that. This looks like any other photo of this period, in which the sitters had to sit

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread AnnBWass
In a message dated 2/6/2010 4:45:21 AM Eastern Standard Time, sha...@collierfam.com writes: Who would want a picture of a dead woman bride and what reputable photographer (as this seems to be) would agree to do that? People DID take pictures of their dead babies--I have seen some. But

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Onaree Berard
I don't think that this is a postmortem photo. I did read (I think it was a book or article) that very early in photography there were photos of dead people done (or people who the family might never see again in life -- Civil War soldiers being a great example) but they were always lying down,

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Hanna Zickermann
Her posture is unusually relaxed, but her eyes are far more alive than most other brides´ of that time. And I agree, the flowers look like put into the photo later - they seem to float in the air somewhere in front of her belt and nowhere attached. Or do I just not see the ribbon? Wouldn´t

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Beteena Paradise
There have been pictures of them sitting in chairs. But that woman is obviously alive. From: Onaree Berard msber...@gmail.com To: Historical Costume h-cost...@indra.com Sent: Sat, February 6, 2010 12:32:26 PM Subject: Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not? I

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Onaree Berard
Thanks for that info. The only ones that I knew of looked like they were taken at the wake. Onaree On 2/6/10, Beteena Paradise bete...@mostlymedieval.com wrote: There have been pictures of them sitting in chairs. But that woman is obviously alive. From:

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Dianne
I found a photo on eBay that is being described as a post-mortem bride photo. What do you think, is she death or not? Read the description the seller has of the bride. The item number is 380202466338 I don't believe this is a post mortem photo. I don't think that woman looks dead, she has

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Marjorie Wilser
Dianne, that's an oh-come-now. :) The seller is ignorant. The bride is not necessarily relaxed, but sitting that way because of her gown and corset. She is leaning slightly back, but her corset doesn't allow her a bend at the waist. The flowers are probably not photoshopped; she is

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Carol Kocian
I've heard of post-mortem photos that are taken of the person in a coffin. Are there other examples of them with a dead person posed sitting up? There is something on the side of her head which could be a barrette or could be a head prop or rest of some sort. It does not look

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Ron Carnegie
My experience with photographs is mostly earlier (I am a wet plate photographer and this is almost certainly dry plate) but I agree with you. I do not believe that this is a post mortem photograph at all. Here is the seller's reasoning. The bride in the photo is clearly deceased. Her

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Ron Carnegie
Hey Carol, I have seen plenty of post mortem shots that were not in coffins, though they were almost all if not all if young children. Many of these have the subject posed as if sleeping sometimes in its mother's arms. Usually they don't quite look right and you can therefore tell that they

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Irina Moeller
I agree that she looks very much alive. The pose for both of them looks totally normal for the time period. I also agree that she is simply looking at something else than the groom. I do not think that he looks upset and there really were a lot of mourning rituals back then. Her flowers do not

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Sharon Collier
I just realized something else. While it is true that a body goes into rigor after death, I believe (too much CSI) that rigor then PASSES. So unless the bride was photographed IMMEDIATELY after death (in that rigor phase) she would not have been stiff. And I agree with the person who said her

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Liz Herman
Couldn't say for sure... but I do notice that her pose is very odd for the time. Generally speaking, you'd expect the bride to be sitting upright, not slightly reclined. Also, you can clearly see her shoes - not flat on the floor. I can't think of another picture with long skirts that show

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Lynn Downward
I don't think she's dead either. IF she were in rigor, no one would have been able to dress her in those clothes. If she had died just before, during or just after the wedding and died in her dress, the flowers would have been fresh. Her strange position and her feet off the floor could easily be

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Tracy Thallas
Dead photography wasn't that unusual down south, at least - though it does seem to mostly have been children (often posed as if alive in mother's or siblings's arms eeew or in a little chair or cradle; most adults I've seen were laid out or in their casket. Money for photographers was scarce,

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
Ann, Yes there was superimposed photography at the time. I have seen photos of a family in a graveyard with a ghost image of the deceased on them. Penny Ladnier Owner, The Costume Gallery Websites www.costumegallery.com 14 websites of fashion, textiles, costume history - Original

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread otsisto
The flowers appear to be slightly wilted as if they were picked early morning and it is afternoon. Some of the stems are resting in the lap and may be the cause of the angle of the bouquet. If there was a larger picture you might see a buckle on that waist ribbon on the left of the sitter,

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Maureen Campbell
I remember reading about ladies tucking bouquets in their belts, or pinning them to their waists, and I thought of that when I saw this photo. She looks very much alive to me, but those flowers are definitely past their prime. M.

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread otsisto
Double exposure. though the second exposure does not appear real solid. not sure if this is a good example, might be figs on a stick. http://tinyurl.com/2o6b8r -Original Message- Does anybody know if photographers back then could superimpose such things? Anne

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Irina Moeller
Thank you. I remember seeing this picture before. I suppose it is just natural to see what one can do artistically with a new medium. Anne -Original Message- From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On Behalf Of otsisto Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
What a lively discussion on a snowy weekend! We dodged the big bullet this weekend Ron! I checked my massive bridal photo collection from 1880-1919. Her bodice dates from 1898-1902. So here are my observations from my collection: ***About half of the photos during these four decades, the

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
Linda Walton sent me the image URL and I have zoomed in on the photo. The buckle on the belt slightly to her left side. The belt's bottom rests and about an inch above the bodice's bottom. This seems a bit odd location to me. Has anyone seen this fashion trend? The flowers are

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
A correction about the flower...I am almost positive that the flower was added later. The stem does not go into a fold line, it just ends abruptly before a normal cutting position. Behind one of the leaves there is a spot that does not appear on the leave. If it was a good sized spot on the

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Ron Carnegie
My understanding is that this image was done with paper figures on sticks. They are rather famous. Double images can certainly be made with wetplate or dryplate photography and I have seen some ghost images that were done that way. A double exposure will usually leave a ghostly image

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Patricia Dunham
I must say, the close-up Beteena provided makes the mystery artifact (the light colored, horizontal whats-it) at her left temple look even more like a photographer's head-clamp than I thought originally! As for her eyes not being completely even, well, lots of people have uneven eyes or very

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
Patricia, This white line is only three pixels deep. The white part is online one pixel deep. I think it is probably a scratch on the photo or something on the scanner glass or a bobby pin. At only three pixels, I believe it is a scratch. I run across a lot of photo scratches like this.

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Ron Carnegie
Doesn't look like a head clamp to me. They are not usually light colored. Every original I have seen and most repros are either black or green. The ends are shaped sort of like spoons, less elaborate than those seem. I also wouldn't expect to see it placed so high, but then she is

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Galadriel
The first thought I had: She is not dead. My second thought: I've seen a lot more wedding photos of the groom sitting and the woman standing. And she does seem slightly reclined. And what are we seeing at the hem of her dress? I wonder if she was partially paralyzed or something which would

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Carol Kocian
Hi Penny, It's still a little tricky — I see jpg artifacts — it's different than if you had the photo and did a hi-res scan yourself. The white pixels around the flower stems could be from sharpening the image file. I see the same effect between the man's sleeve and the background,

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Ron Carnegie
Here is a better one also repro http://www.cwreenactors.com/phorum/read.php?1,6536 I'm your huckleberry Ron Carnegie r.carne...@verizon.net -Original Message- From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On Behalf Of Ron Carnegie Sent: Saturday, February 06,

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
Good eye Carol! I hadn't notice before the right temple/out lid. This looks like someone painted digitally on it. I noticed the specs on the man's suit too. Ron, was their a type of airbrushing on photos during this time. Penny Ladnier Owner, The Costume Gallery Websites

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Penny Ladnier
Thanks Ron for the images of head braces. Penny Ladnier Owner, The Costume Gallery Websites www.costumegallery.com 14 websites of fashion, textiles, costume history ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Ron Carnegie
I am not aware of airbrushing, but colouring of the images is sometime done. This is by adding pigments onto the image, which can obscure the image underneath. I'm your huckleberry Ron Carnegie r.carne...@verizon.net -Original Message- From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Kim Baird
Face it, they have both been dead for a long time. But in the photo they are alive--there's really no reason to think otherwise. Have you EVER seen a post-mortem photo with open eyes? Kim ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread Tracy Thallas
I have - one or two - but they didn't look like The Bride's.. Imagine something more like that whole fish in the grocer's case, the one you think's a little too old Liadain THL Liadain ni Mhordha OFO You get a wonderful view from the point of no return...

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread otsisto
The eyes on the bride look natural. This is an example of painted eyes. http://www.petroliaheritage.com/zpostmort.JPG Guess which one. Picture is from here http://www.petroliaheritage.com/people.html scroll down to the pic and it explains a few things. And yes all post mortems have closed eyes.

Re: [h-cost] Is this real or not?

2010-02-06 Thread otsisto
I stand corrected, found this photo after i sent the last post http://entertheoctopus.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/52.jpg ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume