Re: [hackers] Transparency
Yes... But you proposed a new descision :) Should we differentiate (through authentication) between non developers who are active in the community - and active developers? I.E. give lurkers less rights than participants? I am leaning yes - but what do you guys think? -Zack On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote: > Right, authenticated to submit anything except comments. And different levels of > authentication: > > Anonymous: Read and comment > Authenicated: more privileges, but not a lot > Developer: All of us, submit just about anything and probably some editing > Admin: Admin, editing. > > -Neil > > Original message > >Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:56:44 -0500 (CDT) > >From: zachary rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: [hackers] Transparency > >To: Neil Drumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated > >before they can submit things. Comments? > > > >-Zack > > > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote: > > > >> Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I > >> can do whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use a second instance of > >> Drupal for our internal communicaion. Are we okay with letting our lurkers be > >> anonymous? I plan on letting them have privileges to view most things. > >> > >> -Neil > >> > > >
Re: [hackers] Transparency
Right, authenticated to submit anything except comments. And different levels of authentication: Anonymous: Read and comment Authenicated: more privileges, but not a lot Developer: All of us, submit just about anything and probably some editing Admin: Admin, editing. -Neil Original message >Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:56:44 -0500 (CDT) >From: zachary rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [hackers] Transparency >To: Neil Drumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated >before they can submit things. Comments? > >-Zack > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote: > >> Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I can >> do whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use a second instance of Drupal for >> our internal communicaion. Are we okay with letting our lurkers be anonymous? I >> plan on letting them have privileges to view most things. >> >> -Neil >> >
Re: [hackers] Transparency
Submit things - as in be active in development conversations. This means using the communication tools, posting blog entries, etc. Depending on what we do with the CVS (keep SF or set up out own tree) we can handle code submission authentication in the same way. -Zack On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, CMR wrote: > > > Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated > > before they can submit things. Comments? > > > > Submit content, as in posts, blogs, profiles, endorsements.. right? not > scripts/code etc.. I haven't seen any specs indicating we 're inviting folks > to submit the latter (at this stage) to DeanSpace (correct?); obviously that > would be a blood red flag given all the karl rove wannabes out there; fake > registration info, etc... > > If I'm stating the painfully obvious here; proceed with eye rolls and carry > on... > > Hey Neil, is there a sandbox link to see the DeanSpace theme? I downloaded > and installed but can't get it to take in my test enviro; bluesky and the > others load fine though(?); debug time (where's my boss...) > > Thanks > CMR > > <--enter gratuitous quotation that implies my profundity here--> > > >
Re: [hackers] Transparency
> Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated > before they can submit things. Comments? > Submit content, as in posts, blogs, profiles, endorsements.. right? not scripts/code etc.. I haven't seen any specs indicating we 're inviting folks to submit the latter (at this stage) to DeanSpace (correct?); obviously that would be a blood red flag given all the karl rove wannabes out there; fake registration info, etc... If I'm stating the painfully obvious here; proceed with eye rolls and carry on... Hey Neil, is there a sandbox link to see the DeanSpace theme? I downloaded and installed but can't get it to take in my test enviro; bluesky and the others load fine though(?); debug time (where's my boss...) Thanks CMR <--enter gratuitous quotation that implies my profundity here-->
Re: [hackers] Transparency
Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated before they can submit things. Comments? -Zack On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote: > Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I can > do whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use a second instance of Drupal for > our internal communicaion. Are we okay with letting our lurkers be anonymous? I plan > on letting them have privileges to view most things. > > -Neil >
[hackers] Transparency
Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I can do whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use a second instance of Drupal for our internal communicaion. Are we okay with letting our lurkers be anonymous? I plan on letting them have privileges to view most things. -Neil
