Yes... But you proposed a new descision :)
Should we differentiate (through authentication) between non developers who are active in the community - and active developers? I.E. give lurkers less rights than participants? I am leaning yes - but what do you guys think? -Zack On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote: > Right, authenticated to submit anything except comments. And different levels of > authentication: > > Anonymous: Read and comment > Authenicated: more privileges, but not a lot > Developer: All of us, submit just about anything and probably some editing > Admin: Admin, editing. > > -Neil > > ---- Original message ---- > >Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:56:44 -0500 (CDT) > >From: zachary rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: [hackers] Transparency > >To: Neil Drumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated > >before they can submit things. Comments? > > > >-Zack > > > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote: > > > >> Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I > >> can do whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use a second instance of > >> Drupal for our internal communicaion. Are we okay with letting our lurkers be > >> anonymous? I plan on letting them have privileges to view most things. > >> > >> -Neil > >> > > >
