Yes...

But you proposed a new descision :)

Should we differentiate (through authentication) between non developers
who are active in the community - and active developers?

I.E. give lurkers less rights than participants?  I am leaning yes - but
what do you guys think?

-Zack

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote:

> Right, authenticated to submit anything except comments. And different levels of 
> authentication:
>
> Anonymous: Read and comment
> Authenicated: more privileges, but not a lot
> Developer: All of us, submit just about anything and probably some editing
> Admin: Admin, editing.
>
> -Neil
>
> ---- Original message ----
> >Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 09:56:44 -0500 (CDT)
> >From: zachary rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: [hackers] Transparency
> >To: Neil Drumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Yes this makes sense to me - but i think they should be authenticated
> >before they can submit things. Comments?
> >
> >-Zack
> >
> >On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Neil Drumm wrote:
> >
> >> Right now we are kinda opaque. People have to sign up to see whats going on. I 
> >> can do whatever with the Drupal permissions or even use a second instance of 
> >> Drupal for our internal communicaion. Are we okay with letting our lurkers be 
> >> anonymous? I plan on letting them have privileges to view most things.
> >>
> >> -Neil
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to