Hello haproxy.org Team,
Hope you are doing well.
It is an honor to go through your website. I must say you have built a
phenomenal website, however to get relevant traffic you need visibility on
the major search engines which require SEO touch in order to make it more
famous and popular over the
Hi Olivier,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 06:07:36PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:40:00PM +0100, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> > Hi Olivier
> >
> > > Le 13 févr. 2018 à 15:27, Olivier Houchard a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > Thanks a
Hello Moemen
Thank you for your reply.
Indeed we have already thought of the MAXCONN values.
Any other thoughts?
The aim is to move clients from a failed server slowly much like the
feature where a real server comes back online and slowly the weight is
raised until all connections are on the
On 13/02/2018 15:49, Andrew Smalley wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Andrew,
>
> We have had a request and not sure if there is any way to implement this.
>
> Simply think of two real servers being loadbalanced. one fails all the
> connections are moved to the remaining server overloading it.
>
> What we want
Hi Emmanuel,
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:40:00PM +0100, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> Hi Olivier
>
> > Le 13 févr. 2018 à 15:27, Olivier Houchard a écrit :
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the detailed analyze, and sorry for the late answer.
> > You're probably right,
Hi Olivier
> Le 13 févr. 2018 à 15:27, Olivier Houchard a écrit :
>
> Thanks a lot for the detailed analyze, and sorry for the late answer.
> You're probably right, SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL shouldn't be treated as an
> unrecoverable error.
> So, what you basically did was
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:29:21PM +0100, Mateusz Malek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 13.02.2018 15:27, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the detailed analyze, and sorry for the late answer.
> > You're probably right, SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL shouldn't be treated as an
> > unrecoverable error.
> > So,
Hi,
On 13.02.2018 15:27, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the detailed analyze, and sorry for the late answer.
> You're probably right, SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL shouldn't be treated as an
> unrecoverable error.
> So, what you basically did was something equivalent to the patch attached ?
Hi,
We have had a request and not sure if there is any way to implement this.
Simply think of two real servers being loadbalanced. one fails all the
connections are moved to the remaining server overloading it.
What we want is for the traffic from the failed real server to be
moved to the
Hi guys,
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:26:42PM +0100, Mateusz Małek wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've narrowed down my problem down to the same commit as Tomek Gacek -
> c2aae74f010f97a3415542fe649198a5d3be1ea8 (MEDIUM: ssl: Handle early data
> with OpenSSL 1.1.1), so I guess it may be related. In my
Hello there
I noticed on http://feedjunkie.com/feed/229/3 that you reference an article
which has some information regarding ketones. I would like to ask if an article
I published would be some help to you. It is all about what they are and what
they do for us.
You can read all the takeaways
Thanks for the update,
Looks like I need to clear from both nodes simultaneously then, or use the
option to shut down connections on return of the non-backup server(s).
Thanks again
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Frederic Lecaille [mailto:flecai...@haproxy.com]
Sent: 13 February 2018
12 matches
Mail list logo