Re: Clients occasionally see truncated responses

2021-04-09 Thread Nathan Konopinski
Thanks, Willy. I appreciate you taking the time to send a patch. Unfortunately, I'm still seeing the errors and multiple records being sent back to the clients When you say, I've just rechecked in the code and indeed, by default it will not limit. Does that mean tune.idletimer allows for the

Re: Still 100% CPU usage in 2.3.9 & 2.2.13 (Was: Re: [2.2.9] 100% CPU usage)

2021-04-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:14:26PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote: > It seems you have a blocking call in one of your lua script. The threads dump > shows many threads blocked in hlua_ctx_init. Many others are executing lua. > Unfortunately, for a unknown reason, there is no stack traceback.

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: sample: add json_string

2021-04-09 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
Tim. On 09.04.21 18:55, Tim Düsterhus wrote: Aleks, > I have taken a first look. Find my remarks below. Please note that for the actual > source code there might be further remarks by Willy (put in CC) or so. I might have > missed something or might have told you something incorrect. So

Re: Still 100% CPU usage in 2.3.9 & 2.2.13 (Was: Re: [2.2.9] 100% CPU usage)

2021-04-09 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 09/04/2021 à 19:26, Robin H. Johnson a écrit : Hi, Maciej had said they were going to create a new thread, but I didn't see one yet. I want to start by noting problem was much worse on 2.2.8 & 2.2.9, and that 2.2.13 & 2.3.9 don't get entirely hung at 100% anymore: a big thanks for that

Re: Still 100% CPU usage in 2.3.9 & 2.2.13 (Was: Re: [2.2.9] 100% CPU usage)

2021-04-09 Thread Maciej Zdeb
Hi Robin, W dniu pt., 9.04.2021 o 19:26 Robin H. Johnson napisał(a): > Maciej had said they were going to create a new thread, but I didn't see > one yet. > > I want to start by noting problem was much worse on 2.2.8 & 2.2.9, and > that 2.2.13 & 2.3.9 don't get entirely hung at 100% anymore: a

Still 100% CPU usage in 2.3.9 & 2.2.13 (Was: Re: [2.2.9] 100% CPU usage)

2021-04-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi, Maciej had said they were going to create a new thread, but I didn't see one yet. I want to start by noting problem was much worse on 2.2.8 & 2.2.9, and that 2.2.13 & 2.3.9 don't get entirely hung at 100% anymore: a big thanks for that initial work in fixing the issue. As I mentioned in my

Re: Request for new 1.8.x release due to freq counter bug

2021-04-09 Thread Amaury Denoyelle
"Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > Hi, > Wondering if you could make a new 1.8.x release to get the fix for the > freq counter bug into more systems? > dde80e111 BUG/MEDIUM: time: make sure to always initialize the global tick > 491b86ed0 BUG/MEDIUM: freq_ctr/threads: use the global_now_ms variable >

Re: [PATCH] MINOR: sample: add json_string

2021-04-09 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Aleks, I have taken a first look. Find my remarks below. Please note that for the actual source code there might be further remarks by Willy (put in CC) or so. I might have missed something or might have told you something incorrect. So maybe before making changes wait for their opinion.

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.4-dev16

2021-04-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 2.4-dev16 was released on 2021/04/09. It added 37 new commits after version 2.4-dev15. This one is particularly calm, I even hesitated between making it or not. But there are a few updates that may affect configuration so I figured it was better to emit a new one. A large part of

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] URI normalization / Issue #714

2021-04-09 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 08/04/2021 à 20:59, Tim Duesterhus a écrit : Willy, Christopher, Not sure who of you is better suited to review this series, so I'm adding both of you :-) I'm tagging this as RFC, because it's large and quite a bit outside of my comfort zone. However the patches are as clean as possible.

Re: haproxy 2.4 opentracing using x-b3-traceid header

2021-04-09 Thread Andrea Bonini
I've tried to add header adding the context name but with no luck (i thinks it's done after ot read the request) here an example of headers that i receive X-B3-TraceId: 48485a3953bb6124 X-B3-ParentSpanId: 48485a3953bb6124 X-B3-SpanId: 42e1e27066118383 X-B3-Sampled: 1 X-B3-Flags: 0 here the

Re: haproxy 2.4 opentracing using x-b3-traceid header

2021-04-09 Thread Miroslav Zagorac
On 04/09/2021 01:40 PM, Andrea Bonini wrote: Hi Zaga, thank you for the explanation. My problem is that the external service send the span info in header as x-b3-* format (the opentracing default one). For reading it, which extract context must i configure? if i don't understand wrong if i want

Re: haproxy 2.4 opentracing using x-b3-traceid header

2021-04-09 Thread Andrea Bonini
Hi Zaga, thank you for the explanation. My problem is that the external service send the span info in header as x-b3-* format (the opentracing default one). For reading it, which extract context must i configure? if i don't understand wrong if i want read x-b3-* header i must use a context with

Request for new 1.8.x release due to freq counter bug

2021-04-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi, Wondering if you could make a new 1.8.x release to get the fix for the freq counter bug into more systems? dde80e111 BUG/MEDIUM: time: make sure to always initialize the global tick 491b86ed0 BUG/MEDIUM: freq_ctr/threads: use the global_now_ms variable It's a problem for anybody using

Request for new 1.8.x release due to freq counter bug

2021-04-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Hi, Wondering if you could make a new 1.8.x release to get the fix for the freq counter bug into more systems? dde80e111 BUG/MEDIUM: time: make sure to always initialize the global tick 491b86ed0 BUG/MEDIUM: freq_ctr/threads: use the global_now_ms variable It's a problem for anybody using

Re: Clients occasionally see truncated responses

2021-04-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Nathan, On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 06:15:10PM -0700, Nathan Konopinski wrote: > One other behavior I've observed, nginx has an ssl_buffer_size ( > http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/ngx_http_ssl_module.html#ssl_buffer_size) > option that defaults to 16kb. As I decrease its value, I start seeing the >

Re: haproxy 2.4 opentracing using x-b3-traceid header

2021-04-09 Thread Miroslav Zagorac
On 04/08/2021 01:48 PM, Andrea Bonini wrote: Hi everyone, i have a question about opentracing addon. Is there a way for using headers info about a trace created from an outside service? what i want is using x-b3-traceid header from an incoming request as traceid and use spanid as parentid