Thanks for clarifying the issue!
Peter Varkoly
SW Engineering(Systems)
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Frankenstraße 146
90461 Nürnberg
Germany
T +49-(0)911-740 53 0
E
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
https://www.suse.com
restriction */
xxh_u64x2 const v32 = { 32, 32 };
Peter Varkoly
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren!
Ich dachte mir, ob Sie vielleicht an meiner accesscontrol.de interessiert sind.
Was halten Sie von diesem Angebot?
Viele Grüße
Peter Schroeder
Guten Tag
loadbalance.de wird nicht mehr benötigt, und deshalb zur Feilbietung
ausgeschrieben.
Vielen Dank im Voraus.
Liebe Grüße
Peter Schroeder
Hi folks,
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/ssl-client-certificate-information-in-http-headers-and-logs/
Suggests the following code as a way to set X-SSL-* headers based on client
certificate properties.
http-request set-header X-SSL-Client-DN %{+Q}[ssl_c_s_dn]
http-request set-header
The version of scm_rights receiving that I use in my programs will
eventually need to support multiple file descriptors, so the buffer is
larger. I had totally forgotten about the difference here :)
On 7/20/21 9:27 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 03:04:05AM -0500, Peter Jin
On 7/20/21 7:55 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Peter,
first, thanks for bringing this here.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 01:13:58AM -0500, Peter Jin wrote:
1. The network namespace support seems to be a bit broken. In the function
"my_socketat" (lines 114-129 of src/namespace.c in the
Sorry, after analyzing the code again, it's not a security issue since
the ancillary buffer can only hold one file descriptor. Forget
everything that I said and focus on # 1 instead.
On 7/20/21 1:48 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 08:13, Peter Jin wrote:
2
ll (the send_fd_uxst
function would only send one file descriptor at a time, and if that was
the only function to send file descriptors, each receive on the other
side would only obtain one file descriptor at a time anyway), but the
fact that it's a stack buffer overflow still warrants a fix anyw
just an observer, I don't have write access to the website.
Peter
On 7/20/21 1:48 AM, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 08:13, Peter Jin wrote:
2. There is a stack buffer overflow found in one of the files. Not
disclosing it here because this email will end up on the public
to do with security, but I will only
disclose this after #2 has been resolved.)
Peter Jin
Thanks. Inline:
On 5/19/2021 8:23 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:52:10PM -0700, Peter Scott (US 172D) wrote:
We have observed some behavior we do not understand with
haproxy-1.5.18-6.e17.x86_64 and need help determining what is going on and
how to get the desired
We have observed some behavior we do not understand with
haproxy-1.5.18-6.e17.x86_64 and need help determining what is going on
and how to get the desired behavior.
The behavior: When an HTTP request is initiated from one of the cluster
back ends, if the load balancer picks that back end to
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 08:40, Christopher Faulet wrote:
>
> Le 11/12/2020 à 21:34, Peter Statham a écrit :
> >
> > The patch seems to fix the issue.
> >
>
> Peter,
>
> The fix was backported to the 1.8. Thanks !
>
> --
> Christopher Faulet
Hello
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 15:21, Christopher Faulet wrote:
>
> Le 11/12/2020 à 11:45, Christopher Faulet a écrit :
> > Le 10/12/2020 à 19:38, Peter Statham a écrit :
> >> > Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. It is the same crash,
> >> > we've
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 14:55, Christopher Faulet wrote:
>
> Le 04/12/2020 à 21:24, Peter Statham a écrit :
> > I might have spoken too soon.
> >
> > The latest release of 1.8 works flawlessly on my debian desktop but
> > still crashes when I attempt the same configu
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 at 13:05, Peter Statham
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 10:00, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> >
> > Le 16/10/2020 à 10:04, Christopher Faulet a écrit :
> > > Le 13/10/2020 à 14:53, Peter Statham a écrit :
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
gt; Thus the computed ideal release date for 1.8.27 would be 2020-10-26, which is
> in one week or less.
Hi,
I was just wondering how realistic stable-bot's time estimates are?
Is 1.8.27 likely to be released this week or is it being optimistic?
--
Peter Statham
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
www.loa
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 10:00, Christopher Faulet wrote:
>
> Le 16/10/2020 à 10:04, Christopher Faulet a écrit :
> > Le 13/10/2020 à 14:53, Peter Statham a écrit :
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> We've found an issue when using agent checks in conjunction with th
1\062\377\177\000\000\350+\211\062\377\177\000\000\001\303\307\016\022V\000\000\201\000\000\000\000\000\000\000H,\211\062\377\177\000\000`C\225\017"
pidfd =
(gdb)
core-1.8.26
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/18Y1Fm3nkmg9-6N-UqqdCzkynaMIuLANF/view?usp=drive_web>
haprox
just to be sure I have tried another kernel, with the same result
0 : CentOS Linux (5.1.16-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64) 7 (Core)
1 : CentOS Linux (4.4.184-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64) 7 (Core)
2 : CentOS Linux (3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64) 7 (Core)
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 23:23, Peter Hudec wr
bind :::443 ssl crt /home/certs/haproxy/combined/
bind :80
bind :443 ssl crt /home/certs/haproxy/combined/
regards
Peter
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 23:12, Peter Hudec wrote:
>
> it works on localhost, but not on public ip
>
> curl -k -v https://2.
it works on localhost, but not on public ip
curl -k -v https://2.57.64.11 <https://2.57.64.11/>
curl -k -v http://2.57.64.11
or try IPv6 2a09:d4c0::11
Peter
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 23:02, Peter Hudec wrote:
>
> thos config do not works.
> I took your working config anf
-response set-header X-Client-IP %[src]
http-response set-header X-Client-Port %[src_port]
server www 127.0.0.1:8000
listen srv
mode http
bind 127.0.0.1:8000
http-request deny deny_status 200
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 22:55, Peter Hudec wrote:
>
> There’s not problem with
.
Peter
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 22:53, Christopher Faulet wrote:
>
> Le 05/07/2019 à 21:55, Peter Hudec a écrit :
>> Hi Jarno,
>> thanks for answer.
>> I tried to run the haproxy in debug mode, but I do not see the request
>> headers for the upstream in the
Hi,
still could be problem on my side, but I have the same result with version
1.8.20
1.9.8
2.0.1
Peter
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 21:55, Peter Hudec wrote:
>
> Hi Jarno,
>
> thanks for answer.
> I tried to run the haproxy in debug mode, but I do not see the
entOS7?
regards
Peter
> On 4 Jul 2019, at 18:42, Jarno Huuskonen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jul 04, Peter Hudec wrote:
>> I have maybe found some bug in haproxy, submitted as
>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/154
>> <https://github.c
t; '22696',
'HTTP_X_SERVER_IP' => '217.73.20.190’,
regards
Peter
Hello - I'm attempting to use HAProxy's service discovery (SRV records)
along with `load-server-state-from-file` but the port numbers from `show
servers state` are incorrect.
Here is my example (HA-Proxy version 1.9-dev2 2018/09/12)
DNS configuration:
$ dig SRV _nginx._tcp.alpha.int
;; ANSWER
Hi Willy
Am Fr., 14. Sep. 2018 um 19:15 Uhr schrieb Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 05:43:14PM +0200, Peter Fröhlich wrote:
> > For your consideration, the doc patch with context.
> > Please give me feedback if I should incorporate some other aspects.
>
> Thank yo
Am Do., 13. Sep. 2018 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Peter Fröhlich
:
>
> Am Do., 13. Sep. 2018 um 10:06 Uhr schrieb Willy Tarreau :
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:29:42AM +0200, Peter Fröhlich wrote:
> > > Would our use case of setting the backend servers only through the
socket,
&g
Am Do., 13. Sep. 2018 um 10:06 Uhr schrieb Willy Tarreau :
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:29:42AM +0200, Peter Fröhlich wrote:
> > Would our use case of setting the backend servers only through the socket,
> > and the necessary workaround of setting the server entries to 'localhos
On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, 07:52 Willy Tarreau, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 02:46:52PM +0200, Peter Fröhlich wrote:
> > HAProxy does not restore the configured IP address present in the
> > state file but falls back to the one in the config file at startup.
> > Other in
great work
Peter
pe...@froehlich.cc
---
1.9-dev
--- src/server.c 2018-09-12 12:02:48.0 +
+++ server.c 2018-09-12 12:02:41.0 +
@@ -4143,7 +4143,7 @@
goto srv_init_addr_next;
for (srv = curproxy->srv; srv; srv = srv->next)
- if (srv->hostname)
+ if (srv->hos
Hi,
No, i'am not using threads.
Med venlig hilsen
*Peter Lindegaard Hansen*
*Softwareudvikler / Partner*
Telefon: +45 96 500 300 | Direkte: 69 14 97 04 | Email: p...@tigermedia.dk
Tiger Media A/S | Gl. Gugvej 17C | 9000 Aalborg | Web: www.tigermedia.dk
For supportspørgsmål kontakt os da
We've been experiencing crashes too, with all 1.8 versions - currently
using 1.8.4 from PPA.
We noticed that disabling h2 prevents crashes.
Med venlig hilsen
*Peter Lindegaard Hansen*
*Softwareudvikler / Partner*
Telefon: +45 96 500 300 | Direkte: 69 14 97 04 | Email: p...@tigermedia.dk
ound seems to be resolved too.
Perfect, thanks much! :)
Med venlig hilsen
*Peter Lindegaard Hansen*
*Softwareudvikler / Partner*
Telefon: +45 96 500 300 | Direkte: 69 14 97 04 | Email: p...@tigermedia.dk
Tiger Media A/S | Gl. Gugvej 17C | 9000 Aalborg | Web: www.tigermedia.dk
For supportspørgsm
.
Med venlig hilsen
*Peter Lindegaard Hansen*
*Softwareudvikler / Partner*
Telefon: +45 96 500 300 | Direkte: 69 14 97 04 | Email: p...@tigermedia.dk
Tiger Media A/S | Gl. Gugvej 17C | 9000 Aalborg | Web: www.tigermedia.dk
For supportspørgsmål kontakt os da på supp...@tigermedia.dk eller på tlf.
96
update:
we've disabled h2 on 1.8, and everything is running as expected again.
haproxy does not degrade performance anymore nor does it segfault.
so it issues seem to be related to the h2
Med venlig hilsen
*Peter Lindegaard Hansen*
*Softwareudvikler / Partner*
Telefon: +45 96 500 300
) for years on the same
requests with no problem.
Thanks
Med venlig hilsen
*Peter Lindegaard Hansen*
*Softwareudvikler / Partner*
Telefon: +45 96 500 300 | Direkte: 69 14 97 04 | Email: p...@tigermedia.dk
Tiger Media A/S | Gl. Gugvej 17C | 9000 Aalborg | Web: www.tigermedia.dk
For supportspørgsmål
Hi there,
I reached out last week but haven't heard back so I wanted to try one last
time. Is there an opportunity to sponsor a post on Cron Weekly: a weekly
newsletter for Linux and Open Source sysadmins?
Please see my initial email below.
Best wishes,
Peter
Hi there,
I reached out last week but haven't heard back. I wanted to see if there was an
opportunity to sponsor a post on Cron Weekly: a weekly newsletter for Linux and
Open Source sysadmins.
Please see my initial email below.
Best wishes,
Peter
On Sun, Nov 26
logy company who operate in the same marketplace as Android. We would
like to feature a unique piece of content on your site on behalf of our client.
For the privilege, we'd be happy to pay you somewhere in the region of $30.
Let me know your thoughts.
Best wishes,
Peter
as long as nbproc is 1. Whenever I increase this,
I get a warning on "stick on" that this does not work correctly in multi
process mode. Also the documentation says this. What would be the correct
way to achieve this with nbproc > 1?
Thanks in advance,
Peter
On Fri, Jun 9, 201
.
Is there a way how can we scale this to more cores while still having
session stickyness?
Thanks in advance,
Peter
unsubscribe
roxy[30219]: sve:- sni:""
I'm sure something obvious is missing, but no idea what. Any hints would be
helpful.
Thx,
Peter
rks as designed"?
Thx,
Peter
How can I get off this mailing list please! ( I love HAProxy but not all
the mails ).
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
> On 5 February 2016 at 20:08, Bryan Talbot wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Bryan Talbot
Hi There,
If you know how violent the courier is, then you wont refuse the flight case to
protect
your TV set or kiosk display these fragile.
Yes, our factory Arboocase located in China is the leading flight case
manufacturer who can
give you custom made flight case design and
I found there is use_after_free bug in the pat_ref_delete_by_id.
diff --git a/haproxy/src/pattern.c b/haproxy/src/pattern.c
index 4bd6924..0bd35a7 100644
--- a/haproxy/src/pattern.c
+++ b/haproxy/src/pattern.c
@@ -1573,14 +1573,14 @@ int pat_ref_delete_by_id(struct pat_ref *ref,
struct
the work after it will be finished by us. Thus
you can save your time and spirit, and will spend more time on your work.
We believe that you will make a wise choice.
Best Regards
Peter
for you within 4 hours.
PS,If youre not the right person ,Please help to forward this email to your purchase dept . thank you .
To unsubscribe, please click here
Bestech Circuits (HK) Limited
peter ( Oversea Sales Department
I am trying to redirect all HTTP to HTTPS except for 1 site.
The below redirects everything because redirect are processed before
use_backend.
part of my issue is i have heaps of sites requiring HTTPS, and use
*.wildcard certs, and like the simplicity of it. So would prefer not to be
contact us today so I can go over options for you.
Thanks,
Peter Strong
Contact: vanc...@sina.com
Hello,
I'm trying to configure HAProxy to reject HTTP requests on Layer 4
unless the URL path requests use starts with a configured prefix.
It works fine on Layer 7 but I cannot get it work on Layer 4.
I've tried quite a few of combinations and couldn't anything to work.
Please find below the
On 24/05/15 11:20, Peter Drobek wrote:
Git commit 0e0dc16e26d19d105d0a3828a22154cd4cddf42b
HA-Proxy version 1.6-dev1-0e0dc1-22 2015/03/13
So it looks it's something in 1.4 and 1.5?
My apologies but I spoke too soon - it turns out that in
1.6-dev1-0e0dc1-22 it does work from time to time
On 24/05/15 11:46, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Even in 1.6, it should not work at 100% in tcp mode, tcp inspection is
time dependant. Please add:
tcp-request inspect-delay 10s
For more details :
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#tcp-request%20inspect-delay
Perfect, I
Sorry, I pressed send a little early on this. MOre information
backend https_mysite
mode http
option tcp-check
reqrep ^([^\ ]*\ )//(.*)\1/\2
server webserver 10.1.1.1:80 check
Any ideas what I have missed in getting this to work?
From: Peter BUtler
Sent: Wednesday, May 20
I have a site: https://mysite.comAfter a little browsing, something within
the app gives a https://mysite.com//something or https://mysite.com//other-thing
Notice the double slash. If it exists, how do I remove the second slash for
all contexts?
I assume a reqrep will do it, but I have
Thanks Alex,
whats the feature in 1.6 that I should be looking out for? I might throw it
on a Test server.
-Original Message-
From: Aleksandar Lazic
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 9:10 PM
To: Peter BUtler
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: HAProxy for - AddOutputFilterByType
thanks
peter
of
the certificate?
How do I use/test the workaround you mention below?
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribus
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 8:24 PM
To: Peter BUtler ; haproxy@formilux.org ; w...@1wt.eu
Subject: RE: HAProxy with multiple certificates, one of which being wild
card, and the other being
In fact, I am sure its a bug.
I also happen to have the following certs:
*.apps.mycompany.com.au
*.its.apps.mycompany.com.au
If I go to sitea.its.apps.mycompany.com.au, I get the *.apps.mycompany.com.au
certificate
Where should I log this?
From: Peter BUtler
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2015 8
secure.mycompany.com.au page)
c.. www.secure.mycompany.com.au
d.. on the backend its all the same content
haproxy --v
HA-Proxy version 1.5.11 2015/01/31
Copyright 2000-2015 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Peter BUtler
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 8:52 AM
thanks Lukas, I have this working now (at least on my test server).
fyi,
1.5.8 didn't work with either method.
1.5.11 worked with both methods.
thanks for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribus
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 9:27 PM
To: Peter BUtler ; haproxy@formilux.org
Hi Peter,
Le 20/03/2015 00:32, Peter Butler a écrit :
I logged this on stackoverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29133477/haproxy-with-multiple-certificates-one-of-which-being-wild-card-and-the-other),
but HAProxy usage there is pretty low.
THis is my first mailing list email
I logged this on stackoverflow
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29133477/haproxy-with-multiple-certificates-one-of-which-being-wild-card-and-the-other),
but HAProxy usage there is pretty low.
THis is my first mailing list email in years, please let me know if I have
broken any rules.
Hello All!
I'm fairly new to Haproxy and I'm configurting it with puppet as a reverse
proxy for several web apps.
An issue I'm running into right now is that we're not getting error logs in
a file, they're just sent to stdout like so:
Message from syslogd@localhost at Jul 16 11:17:06 ...
I've made a custom RPM I've been using for version 1.5.1 and I've hosted it
here:
https://bitbucket.org/PeteMS/haproxy-rpm-vagrant/downloads
I adapted the spec from https://github.com/nmilford/rpm-haproxy
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ryan O'Hara roh...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16,
I was trying to compile HAProxy 1.5.2 with SSL support on my box but was
facing below error.Am i missing some pre requisites.Could anybody help:
Pre-reqs are:
sudo yum -y install pcre-devel gcc make openssl-devel
Taken from https://github.com/nmilford/rpm-haproxy
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:22
, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Peter M Souter p.mor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello All!
I'm fairly new to Haproxy and I'm configurting it with puppet as a
reverse
proxy for several web apps.
An issue I'm running into right now
Looks awesome!
What mechanism are you using to push config changes to HAproxy? ( ssh, scp,
etc )
Thank you,
Peter.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Dave Blakey d...@snapt-ui.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to introduce you to Aura - a service we are developing for
haproxy users. I
I did not found the how to enforce the client verification on the haproxy
;(
If there are some docs or examples point me to them please.
Best regards
Peter Hudec
Thanks Lukas,
I will try 1.5 version.
But for Debian this version is in experimental now ;( I will look if some
already done for Wheezy.
Best regards
Peter Hudec
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com
Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 10:24 AM
this setting in each server directive.
Best regards
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Baptiste bed...@gmail.com
Date: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 11:13 AM
To: Hudec Peter phu...@cnc.sk
Cc: Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com, haproxy@formilux.org
haproxy@formilux.org
Subject
is the problem?
Best regards
Peter Hudec
Thanks Thomas,
It worked. There is really a lot of options so I missed this one.
Best regards
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Heil h...@terminal-consulting.de
Date: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:24 AM
To: Hudec Peter phu...@cnc.sk
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org haproxy
if this issue is still present in the latest version of IE, I think I last
tested it with IE8)
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My answers inline.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Peter Saitz peter.sa...@gmail.com
wrote:
1. For http, I should set
or
source IP persistence, don't make any difference between browsers.
Baptiste
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Peter Saitz peter.sa...@gmail.com
wrote:
3. is there a way for haproxy to detect this scenario? Or how would I
create
special block of options/rules for such clients in haproxy
websockets?
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Peter Saitz peter.sa...@gmail.com
wrote:
A side question: all traffic is directed to B server (second server in
configuration), the BAYEUX_BROWSER cookie is attached but it is always
3. If cookie is not accepted by client's browser, how can I ensure that all
those clients are redirected to a single server?
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Peter Saitz peter.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
I see, hmm, reason why I went this way originally was to ensure stickiness
of single browser
One more question if I may:
The haproxy.cfg file I attached, if you examine it, does options there make
haproxy attach x-forwarded-for header to the http upgrade message?
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Peter Saitz peter.sa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you guys, I think you pretty much
:43 PM, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
At first sight, I can't see any reason why HAProxy would not insert
the X-Forwarded-For header.
Baptiste
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Peter Saitz peter.sa...@gmail.com
wrote:
One more question if I may:
The haproxy.cfg file I
I am having problem where my app server is not able
to retrieve X-FORWARDED-FOR being behind haproxy and using websockets. It
works when websockets are not used, only plain http. The haproxy cfg is
pretty simple, but I guess there is a problem I do not see in the config
file.
I am attaching my
was the transparent proxy. The only solution should
be to use the pass the IP during the HTTP upgrade.
I think Peter wants to have the IP information for each data sent by
the client on the websocket. which is not doable.
I don't think so because that does not make any sense since it's the
same
Excellent, just what I was looking for!
Peter.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Chris Sarginson ch...@sargy.co.uk wrote:
Search for nbproc in
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/doc/configuration.txt, which explains how
HaProxy handles multiple CPUs in a box.
Chris
On 01/02/2013 15:54
to prototype over the weekend!
Peter.
The real goal I am interested in is running HAProxy on virtual machines, or
in the cloud, where I can provision a load balancer on a multi-cpu VM with
HAPtroxy tuned with enough processes to handle a specific work flow. Before
this information, I was thinking
The information contained in this e-mail is of a confidential nature and is
intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, any
disclosure, copying or distribution by you is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Disclosure to any party other than the addressee, whether
:53 PM, Peter Gillard-Moss
pgill...@thoughtworks.com wrote:
Hello,
I am observing some strange behaviour with haproxy and logging on Ubuntu
Oneiric.
haproxy is setup to log to /dev/log and logs successfully appear in
/var/log/syslog (via rsyslog).
Well, some of them do. Some just
option httplog
frontend http-in
bind *:80
default_backend servers
log global
backend servers
server one one:8080
server two two:8080
Thanks
Peter
--
Peter Gillard-Moss
Developer | ThoughtWorks Studios | Technical Solutions
http://www.thoughtworks-studios.com
changes - yum upgrade should be
the default used in yum examples - I ask because many people don't do this
and there are many security fixes and other package bug fixes that have been
posted]
On 2/6/10 6:59 AM, Peter Griffin wrote:
Hi Will,
Yes X-Windows is installed, but the default init
: 0x0001 (1)
Link detected: yes
I'm attaching dmesg, I don't understand most of it. I'll try to send a file
in both directions to saturate the link as you suggested.
Thanks again.
On 6 February 2010 12:47, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Peter
I forgot to mention that yes this is a dedicated machine.
On 6 February 2010 12:47, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
The minute I put the changes and made the loadbalancer active, external
users experienced serious downtime. I
Hi,
Setup haproxy 1.3.22 with stunnel 4.22 + OpenSSL 0.9.7m and runs well with a
few internal users. I run this setup on a P4 with 1Gb of Ram and with a few
users am left with about 750Mb of free Ram.
After deployment of the site and heavy traffic I noticed free mem going down to
45Mb,
to be done
on the kernel.
Sorry for being annoying.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Peter Griffin griffin...@gmail.com
Date: 5 February 2010 22:02
Subject: Site running slow
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Hi,
Setup haproxy 1.3.22 with stunnel 4.22 + OpenSSL 0.9.7m and runs well
Hi, am getting these results in haproxy logs:
Feb 2 13:17:40 localhost haproxy[3245]:
10.10.10.62:54164[02/Feb/2010:13:17:40.774] load_balanced
load_balanced/www1 -1/1/1/-1/4 0
715 - - 0/0/0/0/0 0/0 BADREQ
I need to log the requests and I cannot understand why we are getting
BADREQ instead
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo