Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-22 Thread Baptiste
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 08:37:36PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote: >> Op 14-9-2015 om 23:46 schreef Willy Tarreau: >> >On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Baptiste wrote: >> >>The issue is related to the connect() function to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-21 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 08:37:36PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote: > Op 14-9-2015 om 23:46 schreef Willy Tarreau: > >On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Baptiste wrote: > >>The issue is related to the connect() function to establish the UDP > >>connection. > >>Currently, I use a sizeof() to get the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-21 Thread PiBa-NL
Op 14-9-2015 om 23:46 schreef Willy Tarreau: On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Baptiste wrote: The issue is related to the connect() function to establish the UDP connection. Currently, I use a sizeof() to get the len of the address structure and Remi suggested to use get_addr_len()

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-17 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 14/09/2015 01:37 μμ, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi all, > > we've fixed several bugs since -dev4 so in order to encourage people to > safely test the code, here comes -dev5. > > This has been running few days now and I haven't noticed any problems. I am going to push it *slowly( to other

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-14 Thread PiBa-NL
Op 14-9-2015 om 13:37 schreef Willy Tarreau: Hi all, we've fixed several bugs since -dev4 so in order to encourage people to safely test the code, here comes -dev5. Hi Willy, As always its nice to have a new -dev release when some fixes have been added. Though i think a day or two heads-up

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-14 Thread Baptiste
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:08:49PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote: >> Op 14-9-2015 om 18:48 schreef Willy Tarreau: >> >BTW as a general rule, patches being merged are ACKed to their authors >> >or rejected, so if you don't get a response,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Baptiste wrote: > The issue is related to the connect() function to establish the UDP > connection. > Currently, I use a sizeof() to get the len of the address structure > and Remi suggested to use get_addr_len() instead. > > Pieter confirmed Remi's

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-14 Thread PiBa-NL
Op 14-9-2015 om 18:48 schreef Willy Tarreau: BTW as a general rule, patches being merged are ACKed to their authors or rejected, so if you don't get a response, simply consider it lost. I didn't sent a patch so to speak, Remi did send a 'diff --git' but without the comment to put into the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.6-dev5

2015-09-14 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:08:49PM +0200, PiBa-NL wrote: > Op 14-9-2015 om 18:48 schreef Willy Tarreau: > >BTW as a general rule, patches being merged are ACKed to their authors > >or rejected, so if you don't get a response, simply consider it lost. > I didn't sent a patch so to speak, Remi did