On 8 September 2015 at 20:56, Daniel Zenczak wrote:
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> Thank you for the response. That old gateway workstation is
> not going to be used anymore (the HDDs failed on it and the RAID board
> didn’t warn/detect/tell us when it happened). I have spun up Ubuntu Ser
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:53:24PM +0100, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> All load balancers work in roughly the same way:
>
> You have a Virtual IP on the load balancer that the clients talk to,
> and the load balancer is configured to talk to multiple Real
> IPs/Backend Servers.
> Your ol
malc...@loadbalancer.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 2:55 PM
> To: Jonathan Matthews
> Cc: Daniel Zenczak ; haproxy
> Subject: Re: SSL and Piranha conversion
>
> Piranha is a front end for LVS (layer 4 load balancing)
> So I'm assuming that all your Piranha box
...@loadbalancer.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 2:55 PM
To: Jonathan Matthews
Cc: Daniel Zenczak ; haproxy
Subject: Re: SSL and Piranha conversion
Piranha is a front end for LVS (layer 4 load balancing)
So I'm assuming that all your Piranha box was doing was forwarding port 443
Piranha is a front end for LVS (layer 4 load balancing)
So I'm assuming that all your Piranha box was doing was forwarding
port 443 & 80 to your two servers...
So just set up HAProxy in TCP mode for port 80 & 443.
Test it , and then when you are happy point your DNS at it.
On 8 September 2
On 8 Sep 2015 20:07, "Daniel Zenczak" wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> First time caller, short time listener. So this is the
deal. My organization was running a CentOS box with Piranha on it to work
as our load balancer between our two web servers. Well the CentOS box was
a Gateway wor
Hello All,
First time caller, short time listener. So this is the deal.
My organization was running a CentOS box with Piranha on it to work as our load
balancer between our two web servers. Well the CentOS box was a Gateway
workstation from 2000 and it finally gave up the ghost
7 matches
Mail list logo
