Not sure if my mails to haproxy mailing lists are being blocked.

2020-09-08 Thread Badari Prasad
Hi Admin, Need help here , not sure if my mails to the mailing lists are being blocked. Can you kindly check. regards badari

stable-bot: Bugfixes waiting for a release 2.1 (23), 2.0 (16), 1.8 (8)

2020-09-08 Thread stable-bot
Hi, This is a friendly bot that watches fixes pending for the next haproxy-stable release! One such e-mail is sent periodically once patches are waiting in the last maintenance branch, and an ideal release date is computed based on the severity of these fixes and their merge date. Responses t

Re: Haproxy 2.2.3 source

2020-09-08 Thread Alex Evonosky
Correct.. this is arm based on my side as well. Sent from my Pixel 3XL On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, 5:47 PM Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 8 septembre 2020 16:13 -04, Alex Evonosky: > > > Just compiling 2.2.3 and getting this reference: > > > > > > /haproxy-2.2.3/src/thread.c:212: undefined reference

Re: Haproxy 2.2.3 source

2020-09-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 8 septembre 2020 16:13 -04, Alex Evonosky: > Just compiling 2.2.3 and getting this reference: > > > /haproxy-2.2.3/src/thread.c:212: undefined reference to > `_Unwind_Find_FDE' I am getting the same issue on armhf only. Other platforms don't get this issue. On this platform, we only get: 000

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for if-none-match for cache responses

2020-09-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 07:14:10PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:59:07PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:51:31PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:21:34PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > > > > Also, when read

Re: Dynamic Googlebot identification via lua?

2020-09-08 Thread Aleksandar Lazic
On 08.09.20 22:54, Tim Düsterhus wrote: Reinhard, Björn, Am 08.09.20 um 21:39 schrieb Björn Jacke: the only official supported way to identify a google bot is to run a reverse DNS lookup on the accessing IP address and run a forward DNS lookup on the result to verify that it points to accessing

Re: Dynamic Googlebot identification via lua?

2020-09-08 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Reinhard, Björn, Am 08.09.20 um 21:39 schrieb Björn Jacke: >> the only official supported way to identify a google bot is to run a >> reverse DNS lookup on the accessing IP address and run a forward DNS >> lookup on the result to verify that it points to accessing IP address >> and the resulting d

Haproxy 2.2.3 source

2020-09-08 Thread Alex Evonosky
Hello Haproxy group- Just compiling 2.2.3 and getting this reference: /haproxy-2.2.3/src/thread.c:212: undefined reference to `_Unwind_Find_FDE' Is there a new lib thats required? Thank you!

Cloudflare Using Companies

2020-09-08 Thread Sophia Lillis
​​Hello, Are you looking for ways to enhance your marketing and sales efforts? We at Fortune Data Services offer niche marketers the most accurate and up to date Cloudflare Customers' List in the market. We also provide Cisco Umbrella, Amazon Route 53, AWS WAF, Google Cloud CDN, NGINX, Amazon

Re: Dynamic Googlebot identification via lua?

2020-09-08 Thread Björn Jacke
Hi Reinhard, On 08.09.20 21:20, Reinhard Vicinus wrote: > the only official supported way to identify a google bot is to run a > reverse DNS lookup on the accessing IP address and run a forward DNS > lookup on the result to verify that it points to accessing IP address > and the resulting domain n

Dynamic Googlebot identification via lua?

2020-09-08 Thread Reinhard Vicinus
Hi, the only official supported way to identify a google bot is to run a reverse DNS lookup on the accessing IP address and run a forward DNS lookup on the result to verify that it points to accessing IP address and the resulting domain name is in either googlebot.com or google.com domain. As far

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for if-none-match for cache responses

2020-09-08 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:48:40PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > William, > > Unfortunately that very much sounds like it is above my "pay grade" as a > community contributor to HAProxy. I *do not* plan on implementing this, > because I don't expect this to getting this right without investing muc

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for if-none-match for cache responses

2020-09-08 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:59:07PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:51:31PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:21:34PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > > > Also, when reading the RFC about the 304, I notice that they impose to > > > remove some o

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for if-none-match for cache responses

2020-09-08 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:51:31PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:21:34PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > > Also, when reading the RFC about the 304, I notice that they impose to > > remove some of the entity headers in the case of the weak etag, so the > > output is not

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for if-none-match for cache responses

2020-09-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:21:34PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > Also, when reading the RFC about the 304, I notice that they impose to > remove some of the entity headers in the case of the weak etag, so the > output is not exactly the same as the HEAD. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#se

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for if-none-match for cache responses

2020-09-08 Thread Tim Düsterhus
William, Am 08.09.20 um 17:21 schrieb William Lallemand: >> Yes, this generally makes sense to me. Unfortunately the code frankly >> is a foreign language to me here. >> >> I have not the slightest idea what steps I would need to perform to get >> the headers of the cached response within 'http_a

Bid Writing Workshops Via Zoom

2020-09-08 Thread NFP Workshops
NFP WORKSHOPS 18 Blake Street, York YO1 8QG 01133 280988 Affordable Training Courses for Charities, Schools & Public Sector Organisations This email has been sent to haproxy@formilux.org CLICK TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM LIST Alternatively send a blank e-mail to unsubscr...@nfpmail2001.co.uk quot

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for if-none-match for cache responses

2020-09-08 Thread William Lallemand
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 04:11:40PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > William, > > [Did you leave out the list intentionally?] > Oops, no sorry, I'll bounce my previous mail on the list. > Am 08.09.20 um 14:40 schrieb William Lallemand: > >> diff --git a/include/haproxy/applet-t.h b/include/haproxy/ap

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.2.3

2020-09-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, HAProxy 2.2.3 was released on 2020/09/08. It added 59 new commits after version 2.2.2, in about 5 weeks. There were not that many issues but they were grouped by subsystem and likely affect some users. First, a number of issues were addressed on SSL. The negative filters in crt-lists didn't

Re: [PATCH] DOC: ssl-load-extra-files only applies to certificates on bind lines.

2020-09-08 Thread William Lallemand
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 12:15:11PM +0200, Jerome Magnin wrote: > Hi, > > this is a small doc patch for ssl-load-extra-files. > I will create a feature request to support separating the key from the > certificate when used on server lines, as discussed privately with > William. > > -- > Jérôme >

Re: [RFC PATCH] MAJOR: ssl: Support for validating backend certificates with URI SANs (subjectAltName)

2020-09-08 Thread Teo Klestrup Röijezon
Hey Willy, sorry about the delay.. managed to get sick right after that stuff. > I don't understand what you mean here in that it does not make sense to > you. Actually it's not even about overriding verifyhost, it's more that > we match that the requested host (if any) is indeed supported by the

Re: Backend servers backup setup

2020-09-08 Thread Artur
Hello, I didn't see any answer or comment on my inquiry. I supposed that one will say it's not possible or there is a miracle solution or it may be a new feature. :) Could you please tell me what would be the right hypothesis ? Le 01/09/2020 à 11:08, Artur a écrit : > Hello, > > I need your help