We've used spread (spread.org) and wackamole (backhand.org/wackamole) with
great success to do HA clustering. Had a very bad time with pacemaker.
As for repos, I'd recommend compiling from source to stay current - it's a
pretty simple build, not many deps.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 16, 2015 5:47 PM,
Hey all,
We'd like to start terminating SSL (so that we can balance on url
parameters, primarily) on one of our busiest load balancer clusters.
Unfortunately, running with nbproc=1 our peak traffic causes us to
just-barely max out a CPU core -- just enough to severely degrade
latency/performance.
Great, we'd love to see that.
And thanks for the other SSL performance trick. We might be able to
make that and some SSL cache tuning work for us, as well.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:23 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2014 19:02, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On
Hi Fred,
I imagine that your high load is due to running many instances of
HAProxy, but hard to be 100% without all the information.
Load indicates that there are processes waiting to execute, so by
reducing the number of HAProxy processes you should see a reduced load
(but still high cpu
,
Are there any parameters that could be touched to potentially help with the
cpu usage ?
And the -sf parameter, will kill the old one while keeping the new one,
that's it ?
-Mensagem original-
De: Jeff Zellner [mailto:j...@olark.com]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013 14:54
Para
a couple connections and not any new ones.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Fred Pedrisa fredhp...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
So, I can run all my instances in just one process and work with it this
way, by using -sf right ?
-Mensagem original-
De: Jeff Zellner [mailto:j...@olark.com
Hey Phil,
I've recently been evaluating all of the above. Wackamole + Spread
have so far worked the best for me (distributing a number of VIP's
across a cluster of HAProxy machines with, allowing failover).
Heartbeat didn't seem to work well in my environment, and I had a lot
of trouble getting
up
identical configurations (in different locations), and the same IP
connected to both, would they be routed in the same way?
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Zellner [mailto:j...@olark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 17:58
To: Jim Gronowski
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re
Hey Jim,
Here's the pertinent section from the docs
(http://cbonte.github.com/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.4.html#4-balance)
The source IP address is hashed and divided by the total
weight of the running servers to designate which server will
receive the request.
Hi there,
We've been running HAProxy 1.5-dev17 (+ 1.5-dev14) on Ubuntu 12.04 for
a few months in order to SSL terminate and load balance WebSocket
connections to our in-browser chat client.
Starting last week, we started to get mysterious crashes now and again
where HAProxy (1.5-dev17) would
10 matches
Mail list logo
