Any advice on using TCP splicing with HAProxy would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi, Willy.
Thank you very much. I will update this issue and the result of
performance test if I get any improvement later.
Best Regards,
Godbach
to
lead the failure or it is a bug indeed.
Best Regards,
Godbach
in
configuration file. The error information as below:
[ALERT] 020/114500 (29257) : parsing [h-ssl.cfg:33] : 'stick':
unknown fetch method 'ssl_session_id'.
Best Regards,
Godbach
2013/1/19 Emeric BRUN eb...@exceliance.fr:
Hi,
If you want to handle ssl offloading on haproxy and ssl session id
Hi, Emeric
Thank you very much.
I tested again just now with the following two lines in backend section:
stick-table type string len 32 size 30k expire 30m
stick on ssl_fc_session_id
The persistence on ssl sessions id worked well.
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Bobby1
Maybe you forgot to set USE_OPENSSL=1 to in Makefile to support ssl.
Godbach
2013/2/26 bobby1 b...@yahoo.com:
Emeric BRUN ebrun@... writes:
Ki,
original message-
De: Godbach nylzhaowei@...
A: Emeric BRUN ebrun@...
Copie à: haproxy
Hi, all
OCSP(Online Certificate Status Protocol) is also used to verify
certificates. I am wondering that if there is any plan to support OCSP
in haproxy in the future.
Best Regards,
Godbach
certificate in the
future.
Best Regards,
Godbach
2013/3/6 John Marrett jo...@zioncluster.ca:
Godbach,
I'm interested to better understand what you want to do with OSCP.
Ordinarily if you present a certificate using haproxy clients will validate
it using methods specified in the certificate
certificates in
the future.
Best Regards,
Godbach
2013/3/6 John Marrett jo...@zioncluster.ca:
Godbach,
I'm interested to better understand what you want to do with OSCP.
Ordinarily if you present a certificate using haproxy clients will validate
it using methods specified in the certificate itself
Hi,
Yes. I have tried that and it works as expected.
The original information in my last mail as below:
Then I put source configuration 'source 0.0.0.0 usesrc clientip' in
backend section, the source function can work well.
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi,
Have you tried moving the source
Hi,
(it's strange I didn't get the original e-mail).
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I have tested 'source' config in haproxy-1.5-dev18, but it didn't work
with the following line in default section:
source 0.0.0.0 usesrc clientip
Other
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 02:44:17PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi,
(it's strange I didn't get the original e-mail).
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I have tested 'source' config in haproxy-1.5-dev18, but it didn't work
with the following line
|X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL);
I guess that it may be the behavior of SSL library but found nothing
related with this problem.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Best Regards,
Godbach
,
X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK|X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL);
I guess that it may be the behavior of SSL library but found nothing
related with this problem.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Best Regards,
Godbach
The main configuration for frontend as below:
frontend fe
bind ip:443 ssl crt 1.cer verify
order 'gzip deflate'.
Zlib version is zlib-1.2.3.
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Godbach,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 12:16:17PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi, all
Haproxy of latest snapshot will crash while initializing compression
under such configuration:
global
...
tune.zlib.memlevel 6
tune.zlib.windowsize 8
frontend
...
compression algo gzip
balance roundrobin
...
Then have a try. :-)
Godbach
On 5/2/2013 5:46 AM, Godbach wrote:
On 5/1/2013 8:39 AM, Bryan Talbot wrote:
Looks like you've listed the same IP address twice.
-Bryan
Typo, Thanks.
How have I missed that??
Eliezer
Hi, Elizer
You can use roundrobin instead of leastconn as below:
listen tcp 0.0.0.0:225
mode
or not. After testing lastest snapshot, http
keepalive has already
token effect between haproxy and server under such conditions:
* configuration without 'option http-server-close' set
* server side has enabled http keepalive.
Best Regards,
Godbach
of haproxy will be promoted. That's what I have
understood, am I right?
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Godbach!
I am wondering that whether server side keepalive you said is
http keepalive between haproxy and server or not.
Thats it exactly.
After testing lastest snapshot, http keepalive has
backend connections and more data to be
processed
by userland in full keepalive mode, CPU shoudl be used more efficiently
as you said.
Best Regards,
Godbach
that whether the flag SRV_RUNNING of server should be
cleared or not when its weight is set to 0.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
size 200k expire 600s
stick on src
server 1 10.128.7.1:80 id 1 cookie srv1 weight 1 maxconn 0
slowstart 0s
server 2 10.128.7.2:80 id 2 cookie srv2 weight 1 maxconn 0
slowstart 0s
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/5/29 13:35, Baptiste wrote:
Hi Godbach
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Baptiste
Thanks for your replying.
I am using the balance roundrobin algorithm and sticking on src, not the the
balance source algorithm. The configuration has been presented in my first
mail as below:
backend pool
Hi Baptiste
Yeah, I got it. Thank you very much for your explanation.
Best Regards,
Godbach
Actually, this is the purpose of dropping a weight to 0: being able to
maintain sticky sessions.
If you want to shutdown rudely your server, preventing everybody to
access it, use the disable keyword
/proto_http.h and use correct
function name in other two files instead of event_accept().
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 949b6e22353260b8d36178cb704bb88d4564894a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:28:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] CLEANUP: session: remove
Hi Merton,
It is a good way to capture the packets during SSL handshake by tcpdump
or wireshark from your client to find out what error happens. I have
used this method in debugging SSL feature in haproxy.
FYI.
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/6/20 1:46, Merton Lister wrote:
Thank you Lukas
am wondering that what I have analysed is correct or not. If correct,
it should be necessary to care about the events on frontend connection
even that haproxy has not got response from backend server.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/6/20 21:31, Godbach wrote:
On 2013/6/20 21:18, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:07:57PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi, Willy
I have noticed that half-closed timeout appears in ROADMAP file.
That't the issue I have tested several days ago.
I have done a test
option nolinger now.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
is
starting, but only fdtab was freed in deinit(), fdinfo should also be freed.
Best Regards,
Godbach
From b0c51207cb74ec01b3cdb0f79b3b60f359912a4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:49:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: deinit: free fdinfo while
;
}
In my opinion, buffer_not_empty() returns a bool type, and logical OR is
a better choiceas follow:
static inline int buffer_not_empty(const struct buffer *buf)
{
return buf-i || buf-o;
}
Best Regards,
Godbach
From ecfcee76b3ac4db843dc3c85f168a2c789a4c653 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach
depends in fact. Anyway the first one is always better since it does
not have to build new values.
Best regards,
Willy
Hi, Willy
Thanks for your detailed analysis. Cool!
I have observed some optimizations in HAProxy before, it is a new one.
Best Regards,
Godbach
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
hash-type consistent
srv1...
srv2...
[40 servers]
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/7/6 16:52, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 04:31:49PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
I've got what you meant. Once allocated from system, haproxy will not
release the memory until it receives SIGQUIT or does soft stop. If less
memory during running is expected, just decrease
with tcpdump -qns 0 -X -r file.cap
translated.cap in order to make the dump readable and extract the two
requests. If the original dump is needed, let me know and I'll attach it
a.s.a.p.
Hi, Andrei
You'd better supply the original pcap file instead, not the readable format.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Willy,
On 2013/7/19 13:32, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:21:23PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
You should strace it. I'm sure you'll see an mmap() call that matches
the size of your allocation, meaning that the libc has decided to use
this instead of sbrk
On 2013/7/19 14:34, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:55:43PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
Here is part information about strace during haproxy startup:
open(h.cfg, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1985, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096
)) {
int w;
w = atol(args[cur_arg + 1]);
if (w 0 || w 256) {
If so, I will give a patch to fix it, or it should be fixed in other way.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013-7-21 16:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
That's quite a good analysis. I'm realizing that durnig the development
of the algorithm, the maximum weight was 255, and it was later changed to
256. The test code that was used for this is still in tests/filltab25.c if
you're curious
On 2013-7-21 18:16, Godbach wrote:
On 2013-7-21 16:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
That's quite a good analysis. I'm realizing that durnig the development
of the algorithm, the maximum weight was 255, and it was later
changed to
256. The test code that was used for this is still
together.
I will finish this job carefully and post patches ASAP.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013-7-21 16:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
I carefully checked and for me we can set SRV_UWGHT_MAX to SRV_UWGHT_RANGE.
It will have the effect of limiting the maximum number of servers a full
weight to 4095 instead of 4128 (so please update the doc for this). It is
also used
2013/7/21 Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
On 2013-7-21 21:17, Willy Tarreau wrote:
No, I really mean UWGHT_MAX set to UWGHT_RANGE since it is used to
fix set highest user weight that can be set.
Willy
Yeah, I get what you meant now. With the following fix:
diff --git a/include/types
2013/7/22 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:56:26PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
On 2013-7-21 16:53, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
I carefully checked and for me we can set SRV_UWGHT_MAX to
SRV_UWGHT_RANGE.
It will have the effect of limiting the maximum number
0:00
./haproxy -f h.cfg -d
The RSS is 113Mbytes with maxconn is 1,048,576. If I decrease the
maxconn to be half, RSS is 55Mbytes.
It seems that dev7 is somehow different from lastest snapshot in the
same condition.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/7/24 16:18, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:55:23PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
On 2013/7/24 13:42, Willy Tarreau wrote:
I agree and can confirm your results here. Also, if I replace the
calloc with a malloc, I still see mmap and we don't have the 300M
RSS anymore :
willy
On 2013/7/24 17:07, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 04:58:31PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
The mechanism of poisoning/memset is used for memory pool. Memory pool
uses MALLOC in dev7 and CALLOC in master, most chunks of memory are
allocated from memory pool while processing sessions
Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/8/1 17:05, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
Haproxy will check the number of concurrent sessions assigned to the
server after being selected from lb trees. Both leastconn and roundrobin
use the same condition as below:
fwlc_get_next_server():
if (!s-maxconn || (!s-nbpend s-served
On 2013/8/6 20:36, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
Sorry for replying late, I don't have a regular internet access at the
moment.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:48:46PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
It seems that static-rr should also use the same check condition for the
server after being selected
but a pity that I cannot fix it
completely by now. :-(
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
in a first time (just check the target).
HAProxy will release 1.5 stable version with this feature.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/8/13 22:54, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi guys,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:48:53PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
On 2013/8/8 18:50, Mark Brooks wrote:
The issue I am seeing is that using the dev version of HAProxy
1.5-dev19 git commit id 00f0084752eab236af80e61291d672e835790cff
I have a source IP
On 2013/8/14 13:10, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:20:10AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
I have done a new test with this patch, it works well now.
Thanks for testing.
Yes, just do the same test as last node for other nodes to be removed. I
had tried to fixed it just
request from the same connection, you
should enable option http-server-close. As far as I know, haproxy maybe
can not fulfill your requirement.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Willy,
There is a patch to fix typo in comments, please check the attachment
for you information.
The commit log is as below:
commit 9824d1b3740ac2746894f1aa611c795366c84210
Author: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Sep 30 11:05:42 2013 +0800
DOC: fix typo in comments
On 2013-10-1 15:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:23:10AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
There is a patch to fix typo in comments, please check the attachment
for you information.
The commit log is as below:
commit 9824d1b3740ac2746894f1aa611c795366c84210
On 2013-10-2 1:12, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 01:08:50AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
It seems that you submit the whole text of mail as commit log to
the git repository.
Ah yes, you're right :-)
At the moment I applied it, I was fooled by the subject into thinking
it was just
if one of
the above load balance algorithms is used.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 9366d553d9415c3d3d7f6889903eca2e7382f597 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 17:10:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: deinit: free server map which is allocated
Hi Willy,
On 2013-10-6 19:32, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
OK. Just for your info, the if before the free() is not needed
because free() already does it, so I'll remove it.
diff --git a/src/haproxy.c b/src/haproxy.c
index ec9f513..265c39c 100644
--- a/src/haproxy.c
+++ b/src/haproxy.c
On 2013-10-7 15:47, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:37:19PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Yes, I have checked the manual of free(), it said that If ptr is NULL,
no operation is performed.
In fact it's true on *most* platforms, and all those supported by haproxy.
So we
there is a 'break' with no condition in the last line of while
loop, the loop will
be only excuted once. It just looks like a 'if' as below:
- while (!(conn-flags (CO_FL_ERROR | CO_FL_SOCK_WR_SH | ...))) {
+ if (!(conn-flags (CO_FL_ERROR | CO_FL_SOCK_WR_SH | ...))) {
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/10/11 14:10, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
Yes I remember about this change, it happened one year ago in the
following commit :
ed7f836 BUG/MINOR: stream_interface: don't loop over -snd_buf()
In 1.4 and 1.5 before the connection rework, the loop was used to
call send() over each
by o=%p, what should it be. If it should
be s-req-buf-p, it is the same as bi_ptr(s-req-buf) actually.
If the replacements are correct and the use of o=%p can be confirmed,
I will send a patch later.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2013/10/15 1:15, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi godbach,
It would make more sense to completely redefine the output based on the
information we have now in my opinion. So better dump the elements of
the channel one by one instead of trying to map them to the old ones.
Indeed, the only reason
Hi Willy,
buffer_dump() in src/buffer.c is a usefull function to dump buffer to do
debugging. However, the last output line should be aligned in a more
readable way.
Please check the attachment for the patch.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 7d19e9f3d35be3fb253ab586041b67312a03232f Mon Sep 17 00
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
into patch0002 and send the
patch again.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 1d9b14eadbfe88f99831e091ee2be6836b44a004 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:14:50 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] DOC: stick-table can be declared in such sections as
frontend, listen
Hi Willy,
On 2013/12/4 15:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:50:36AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
Please check the attachments for the two patches.
Patch 0001: DOC: stick-table can be declared in such sections as
frontend, listen and backend
OK in principle
about this in the first mail but I mean we
should have si_conn_send() return void so that the caller only checks
ther flags, hence the removal of the comment above.
Willy
Got it. :-)
Please check the attachment for the lastest patch.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From
submit a new patch for this issue if you agree with me about this fix.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 35942e286901a50dad02a3cf355f0d943a137eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:48:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] MINOR: code style: use tabs to indent
Hi Willy,
On 2013/12/11 20:43, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
There is also another problem I want to talk about stick table. The
following codes are from lastest snapshot:
(...)
If stktable_init() fails, HAProxy will exit eventually.
I can submit a new patch for this issue if you agree
.html
Thanks to all the early testers who reported issues, configs etc.
Willy
Great news!
1.5-dev21 may be the fastest one of all releases. :-)
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
. The
configuration from the latest docmument is as below:
rate-limit sessions rate
Set a limit on the number of new sessions accepted per second on a frontend
It seems that rate limit for sessions has not been implemented in backend.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
that changing a server's weight on the fly will have no effect.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Willy,
Please check the atthachments for two minor patches about typo and code
style fix.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 3013eada648ee4134c27e0a38d75e4cc4e5f97d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 21:42:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] DOC: fix
misplaced http-request rules
- MEDIUM: config: report misplaced use-server rules
- DOC: update roadmap with what was done.
---
Hi Willy,
Great job. Thank you.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
to rewrite both Host and URI
reqrep expresion for rewritting host if match_host_uri
reqrep expresion for rewritting URI if match_host_uri
Since Host has been rewritten in firest reqrep directive, as I know, the
second reqrep will not be executed as the match will fail.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
On 2014/5/13 15:05, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:01:58PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
If I want to rewrite both Host and URI in request, and they are also in
the match conditions, can HAProxy implement this requirement?
The ACLs are as below:
acl
On 2014/5/13 16:05, Godbach wrote:
On 2014/5/13 15:05, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:01:58PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
If I want to rewrite both Host and URI in request, and they are also in
the match conditions, can HAProxy implement this requirement
as
server_throttle_rate(), server_is_draining(), srv_adm_set_maint() and so
on. Just move #endif directive to the end of file to solve this issue.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 4639eb27ae2dbe4cd047dcf30c51f9190195b1b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:31:57
that there is an active connection on backend but has not been
assigned to any server.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi,
On 2014/10/23 13:24, 王继红 wrote:
Hi Godbach
Another question I want to ask, I see when the backend web server
response time is more than 50s, then the haproxy will return http 504 to
the client user,
if the web server response the request but the response content is
partly
the end of the buffer */
memmove(pos + delta, pos, bi_end(b) - pos);
This patch can be work well for both 1.5 release and 1.6-dev. Please
help review this patch and I will send a patch if it is OK.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Willy,
On 2014/10/30 21:48, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
[ and first, sorry for not having yet responded to your
other mail about caching ]
Take it easy. :)
Yes, it looks fine to me, feel free to send a patch and tag it as BUG/MAJOR.
In the future we'll probably need to rework
number of connections receives the new connection:
http://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.5.html#method
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
which allows user to enable
or disable memset() in pool_alloc2() can be added into HAProxy.
Since it is not an urgent issue, just take your time. :-)
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Willy,
On 2014/11/21 14:35, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:02:52AM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
On 2014/11/19 2:31, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 08:23:57PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
Thanks! Seems working for me :) Will test more
the patch for detailed information. In addition, this patch
should be backported to 1.5 if necessary.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 73f3617908e1da775f10a2116394a1654d150d0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:21:30 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] DOC: fix typo
= epoll_wait(epoll_fd, epoll_events, absmaxevents,
wait_time);
tv_update_date(wait_time, status);
measure_idle();
If the fix is right, I will send a patch later.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
of absmaxevents
In the end, it seems that marking the bug as BUG/MINOR or OPTIM/MINOR is
OK. Since some memory will be saved by the fix, I'd prefer to
OPTIM/MINOR if you don't mind.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Willy,
On 2014/12/17 16:03, Godbach wrote:
On 2014/12/17 15:15, Willy Tarreau wrote:
In my opinion, absmaxevents should be passed to epoll_wait()
instead of global.tune.maxpollevents.
No, that would defeat the principle of maxpollevents. In fact, I found
what happened : commit f2e8ee2b
Hi Willy,
On 2014/12/17 16:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:
In my opinion it's a cleanup since we're removing a leftover from an
ancient piece of code :-)
Willy
OK, I agree with you and please modify the patch directly.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
Hi Willy,
On 2014/12/18 0:07, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:41:33PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
From 798d50b1922e9680ea69cbc39d54f20665c782da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:14:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] OPTIM
this change in latest snapshot in
your opinion? I can send a patch when I get this work done if you will
accept the change.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From c0f268d2638c0053fb470cdeda5cd70ed5cc0b96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:44:58 +0800
Subject
it is necessary to apply this patch, both 1.6 and 1.5 need it.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From 174943fb20fb3b45f186a6536b53151bdf00fee7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:36:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] BUG/MINOR: parse: check the validity of size
Hi Willy,
On 2015/1/28 18:28, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Godbach,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:57:13PM +0800, Godbach wrote:
Hi Willy,
Attached is a patch for parse_size_err().
If a stick table is defined as below:
stick-table type ip size 50ka expire 300s
HAProxy will stop parsing size
,
Godbach
to update 1.6
branch(maybe caused by my local network). As you said, both 1.6 and 1.5
branches should apply this patch.
--
Best Regards,
Godbach
From f8fa9c908b5b817e1a5804584bc8433ab91f4767 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Godbach nylzhao...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:41:52 +0800
Subject
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
