I was able to use vault repo on my CentOS 6 vm (I mentioned that earlier).
if someone wishes to invest dedicated builder vm, we can attach it to
Github Actions.
as for "another oldish but maintained distro", I'll have a look
ср, 16 дек. 2020 г. в 13:43, Willy Tarreau :
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 01:16:02PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> let us drop builds.
> when someone will invest into it, we'll bring em back.
Applied, thank you Ilya. Indeed, it's better if we get rid of these
permanent failures for now until someone figures a different option.
Also, note that it
let us drop builds.
when someone will invest into it, we'll bring em back.
Ilya
вт, 8 дек. 2020 г. в 15:08, Илья Шипицин :
> I played with various options.
> while things work well on my personal centos 6 vm, they still do not work
> on cirrus
>
>
I played with various options.
while things work well on my personal centos 6 vm, they still do not work
on cirrus
https://github.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/master/.cirrus.yml#L21-L22
(we cannot use yum-config-manager --add-repo=..., because
yum-config-manager is not installed)
build:
I'll check on weekend whether we can switch to vault repo
чт, 3 дек. 2020 г. в 02:48, Willy Tarreau :
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:29:03PM +0100, Adis Nezirovic wrote:
> > On 12/2/20 9:45 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:19:47PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > seems,
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:29:03PM +0100, Adis Nezirovic wrote:
> On 12/2/20 9:45 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:19:47PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > seems, CentOS 6 packages were removed from mirrors
> > >
> > > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5915513668763648
> >
> >
On 12/2/20 9:45 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:19:47PM +0500, ??? wrote:
seems, CentOS 6 packages were removed from mirrors
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5915513668763648
I've never understood why some distros do something that stupid. They
even prevent some people
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:19:47PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> seems, CentOS 6 packages were removed from mirrors
>
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5915513668763648
I've never understood why some distros do something that stupid. They
even prevent some people from setting up a backup server in
seems, CentOS 6 packages were removed from mirrors
https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5915513668763648
вт, 17 нояб. 2020 г. в 20:28, Willy Tarreau :
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:50:52PM +0100, William Lallemand wrote:
> > I agree with that, however the problem will be the test of features that
> >
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:50:52PM +0100, William Lallemand wrote:
> I agree with that, however the problem will be the test of features that
> require an up to date version of OpenSSL, maybe we should improve the
> script so we could at least exclude non-openssl and non-1.1.1 versions.
This is a
вт, 17 нояб. 2020 г. в 18:51, William Lallemand :
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:16:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > > No, but since we *only test* master, this is the only way we get
> > > *some* coverage for the
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:16:05PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> > No, but since we *only test* master, this is the only way we get
> > *some* coverage for the changes we are backporting to stable branches.
> > After all,
Hi all,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:10:41AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> No, but since we *only test* master, this is the only way we get
> *some* coverage for the changes we are backporting to stable branches.
> After all, a large percentage of them come from master. How do we know
> that a fix
Hello Ilya,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 22:48, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> we run CI only for master branch.
Exactly!
> do all those people want to run latest unstable haproxy on oldish RHEL 6 ?
No, but since we *only test* master, this is the only way we get
*some* coverage for the changes we are
I mean, I certainly do. And today's unstable haproxy is tomorrow's stable
haproxy...
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:48 PM Илья Шипицин wrote:
> we run CI only for master branch.
>
> do all those people want to run latest unstable haproxy on oldish RHEL 6 ?
>
> пн, 16 нояб. 2020 г. в 23:56, James
we run CI only for master branch.
do all those people want to run latest unstable haproxy on oldish RHEL 6 ?
пн, 16 нояб. 2020 г. в 23:56, James Brown :
> Since CentOS 6 / RHEL 6 is the last pre-systemd release, I think there are
> lots of shops planning on keeping it around with various
>
Since CentOS 6 / RHEL 6 is the last pre-systemd release, I think there are
lots of shops planning on keeping it around with various
community-supported backports for years to come. I would vote to keep it
around until it becomes an undue burden for CI, because there are still
tons of EL6 users out
CentOS 6 isn't EOL until the end of the month, so there is a couple of more
weeks left.
There is at least one place to pay for support through 2024.
($3/month/server)
Might be good to keep for a a bit past EOL, as I know when migrating
services sometimes I'll throw a proxy server on the old
Hello,
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 17:14, Илья Шипицин wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we still run cirrus-ci builds.
> CentOS 6 is EOL.
>
> should we drop it?
I think CentOs6 gives us good feedback about older operating systems
that we may not necessarily want to break.
The question for me is not so much
Ilya,
Am 15.11.20 um 17:14 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> we still run cirrus-ci builds.
> CentOS 6 is EOL.
>
> should we drop it?
>
If it's EOL and they did not upgrade the OS then they are either lazy or
interesting in "stability". Either way they are probably not going to
upgrade HAProxy any
20 matches
Mail list logo
