On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:06 PM, KC kc1...@gmail.com wrote:
This part of the conditional can be written more succinctly as:
all (== test_lcv) [init_lcv, update_lcv, update_lcv']
Wouldn't this be be better as tuple avoiding list overhead or does ghc
optimize it out?
Haskell tuples don't
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Michael Mossey m...@alumni.caltech.eduwrote:
but got
Ambiguous model name 'Prelude': it was found in multiple packages: base
haskel98-2.0.0.1
This sounds like something fundamental about the Haskell packages but I
don't know enough to know what to do.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Bob Ippolito b...@redivi.com wrote:
- Having a PS1 prompt that contained the exit code from the last command
was really clever, I hadn't seen that before. I'm sure some people would be
interested in what the bashrc for that prompt looks like.
Just make sure
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Dan Lior sitipo...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Is this the right place for newbies to post questions about Haskell?
This is most a list for announcements; beginn...@haskell.org is better for
these kinds of questions, and haskell-c...@haskell.org for general
discussion.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Takenobu Tani takenobu...@gmail.com wrote:
and, to haskell-cafe,
Haskell Weekly News: Issue 316 original message[1] had sent only to
haskell@haskell.org?
(not to haskell-cafe? or my mailer trouble?)
gmail suppresses duplicate messages, so if you are
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Tyson Whitehead twhiteh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Out of curiosity, how would you write the special internal type that ($)
has that separates it from ($') above?
I don't think there's any way to write the type. Remember that GHC uses
System Fc internally; that can
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, James M jmar...@eecs.berkeley.edu wrote:
There was talk from an earlier email thread of releasing the Haskell
Platform at the same time as 7.10.2.
I think the right place to ask this is librar...@haskell.org. I would
imagine they're in final testing and/or
There's also the path taken by Homebrew on OS X... make /usr/local owned by
you, since you probably only have one user on the machine anyway. (I
suggest avoiding any suid-root executables in /usr/local in this case.)
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Haisheng Wu fre...@gmail.com wrote:
I think
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 14:48, Artem Chuprina ran-...@ran.pp.ru wrote:
An author writes that the code was tested on ghc 6.6 under Linux/x86. I
have
ghc 6.12.1 on Debian GNU/Linux. My compiler asked me to add type
signatures
in second arguments of catch (original code does not have them).
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:11, Jacques Carette care...@mcmaster.ca wrote:
they chose to stick to pure Haskell 98. Plan B is actually more fragile in
that respect, in that if they forget to be really really explicit about
their code being pure Haskell 98, the resulting compilation errors do not
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 21:09, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
Excerpts from Victor Nazarov's message of Tue Aug 02 19:12:55 -0400 2011:
But GHC always emit parse error on javascript keyword.
For now I'm using (abusing) ccall calling convention and simple
imports works pretty well,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 00:31, John Lask jvl...@hotmail.com wrote:
What is really required is a pluggable back-end infrastructure - whereby
various back-ends could be maintained (or not) at the discretion of their
originators and separate to the official ghc back-ends.
I guess I'm confused; I
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:55, Christiaan Baaij
christiaan.ba...@gmail.comwrote:
So perhaps that's the problem. parseDynamicFlags could perfectly well
simply return any un-recognised flags. Indeed, I thought it did just that --
it certainly returns a list of un-consumed arguments. If it
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 18:57, wagne...@seas.upenn.edu wrote:
(And in any case, the examples above should answer this amusing comment,
immediately following those lines:
-- We don't want to put the cmd into a single
-- argument, because cmd.exe will not try to split it up.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:12, Luite Stegeman stege...@gmail.com wrote:
-- C.hs
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
module C where
class C1 a where
data F a :: *
I believe this is supposed to be syntactic sugar for a data family, so 7.0.4
is wrong. (I also think it was a known deficiency.)
, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:12, Luite Stegeman stege...@gmail.com
wrote:
-- C.hs
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies #-}
module C where
class C1 a where
data F a :: *
I believe this is supposed to be syntactic sugar for a data family, so
7.0.4
I hope I am misunderstanding this
2011/9/2 Conor McBride co...@strictlypositive.org
Also, if I understand you correctly, you say the current situation is
exceptional, and suggest option 2 as a temporary solution to it. You
seem convinced that these kind of situations will not appear in
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:18, Sean Leather leat...@cs.uu.nl wrote:
This time, my system is running the now-old 10.5 (Leopard) using Xcode
3.1.4. I'm probably the only one who wants to build on 10.5, but I still
appreciate the fact that GHC can be built on a variety of systems, allowing
more
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 16:18, Bas van Dijk v.dijk@gmail.com wrote:
type Run t = ∀ n β. Monad n ⇒ t n β → n (St t β)
foo :: (Monad m, MonadTransControl t) = (Run t - m α) - t m α
foo f = liftControl f
Type checking 'foo' this gives the following error:
Couldn't match expected type
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:44, Conor McBride co...@strictlypositive.orgwrote:
under Leopard, and got this far
bash-3.2$ sudo ./configure
Password:
checking for path to top of build tree... dyld: unknown required load
command 0x8022
configure: error: cannot determine current
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 00:35, austin seipp a...@hacks.yi.org wrote:
I looked at the shell scripts that invoke GHC and ran GDB with the
proper arguments. I got a backtrace like so:
I would not place much faith in this particular backtrace; gdb is badly
broken on SL and Lion, it gets seriously
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 15:46, Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ruwrote:
Its installation requires Cabal:
which cabal
cabal: Command not found.
And Cabal is difficult to install, it reports that such and such package
versions are missing.
On the other hand, Cabal is, probably,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:50, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Now you might argue that gmp will never be the source of security
problems (although I woudn’t be too convinced about that). But even then
There's actually a patch for a (claimed to be minor potential) security
issue
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 09:37, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/01/2012 21:00, Joachim Breitner wrote:
And would dlopen make a difference? RTLD_LOCAL sounds interesting...
Maybe, I haven't looked into that.
Beware of platform issues; IIRC RTLD_LOCAL doesn't do what one expects
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 13:53, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
(But I am really wondering why the linker cannot do something that has
the same effect as objcopy --prefix-symbols, but on the fly.)
Some of them can; notably the binutils ld, which comes from the same source
as and uses
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 16:15, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2012, 14:14 -0500 schrieb Brandon Allbery:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 13:53, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
(But I am really wondering why the linker cannot do something
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 13:20, Isaac Dupree
m...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.orgwrote:
way***. If we use the proper Unicode operator ∘, then let's make a wiki
page for all the common OSes/input methods, saying how to input it (aside
from copy/paste). Is there anything on the Web somewhere
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 17:14, Donn Cave d...@avvanta.com wrote:
Spaces or unicode would be the worst idea yet, but hopefully that
isn't what you meant.
Thing is, I think the spaces idea is considered acceptable because it's
*already there*. Take a look at how GHC decides whether (.) is the
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 17:33, Donn Cave d...@avvanta.com wrote:
Quoth Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 17:14, Donn Cave d...@avvanta.com wrote:
Spaces or unicode would be the worst idea yet, but hopefully that
isn't what you meant.
Thing is, I think
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 18:15, Donn Cave d...@avvanta.com wrote:
Quoth Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com,
...
Seems obvious to me: on the one hand, there should be a plain-ASCII
version of any Unicode symbol; on the other, the ASCII version has
shortcomings the Unicode one doesn't
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:32, Morten Brodersen
morten.broder...@constrainttec.com wrote:
Requiring unicode characters for the Haskell syntax to solve a
*relatively* simple problem is a bad bad idea.
Nobody said anything about requiring it.
--
brandon s allbery
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 13:38, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.com wrote:
I know of no proposal that advocates only (A). It seems that we are
agreed
that we must make use of types to disambiguate common
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:42, Brent Yorgey byor...@seas.upenn.edu wrote:
I'm not sure at this point which way I would lean on the issue.
Having infix type constructors that don't have to start with : is
something I would like, too. But I just thought I would point out
that code like tc192
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 14:36, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
| Let me try to describe the goal better. The intended users are people
| new to Haskell or people working with existing code they are not
| familiar with.
|
| Also me. I want this feature.
My question
On Jan 28, 2012 11:14 AM, Sanket Agrawal sanket.agra...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, that is another possibility. I would like to keep it simple, and
just upgrade to XCode 4.2, instead of installing Clang+LLVM binaries
separately, if it is not an issue for GHC.
Xcode 4.2 doesn't include full LLVM
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 01:05, Serge D. Mechveliani mech...@botik.ru wrote:
And now GHC somehow seems to deviate from portability
Registerised GHC was never portable. Or if it was, it was well before
GHC6. You just weren't aware of what was going on, and apparently built
yourself a fantasy
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 15:15, Eugene Crosser cros...@average.org wrote:
I think it would be a right thing to provide the author of an external
module
with baseline C environment by default, compatible with the environment
under
which the modules bundled with the compiler where built. And on
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 06:55, Herbert Valerio Riedel h...@gnu.org wrote:
Arie Peterson writes:
Is there a good reason that partially applied type synonyms cannot be
made
instances of classes?
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2005-April/008340.html
Does anyone here
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 18:41, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
Edward, I have looked at that file before and it didn't make me much
wiser, because I cannot map it to the output.
I find it's the parenthesis that confuses me the most. What does this mean?
C(U(LU(L)))
I think the
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 20:01, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think the original type signature is needed to figure it out. In the
earlier example it indicated ghc drilling down into the type (a tuple
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:56, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
So, it would be pretty interesting if we could have an ST s style
mechanism, where the data structure is not allowed to escape.
But I wonder if this would be too cumbersome for anyone to use.
Isn't this what monadic regions
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 02:14, J. Garrett Morris jgmor...@cs.pdx.eduwrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Yitzchak Gale g...@sefer.org wrote:
This is true; the use of polymorphism for numeric literals is also
unsound.
By this logic, head is unsound, since head [] throws an error.
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that folks were spending time on making GHC work for Win-64,
but I don't remember if it has shipped.
Scheduled for GHC 7.6.1
--
brandon s allbery allber...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Aleksey Khudyakov
alexey.sklad...@gmail.com wrote:
Num inherits from Eq, so Float couldn't have an instance for Num if we
didn't have that Eq instance.
No more since GHC 7.4. But Eq is indeed superclass of Ord and it Ord is
used a lot.
...but Float's Ord
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Gábor Lehel illiss...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Cale Gibbard cgibb...@gmail.com wrote:
case of { ... }
looks much better to me than
\case of { ... }
I also completely agree, but I don't want my opinion to get in the way
of
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Carter Schonwald
carter.schonw...@gmail.com wrote:
meaning: flags for treating it as a warning vs as an error? (pardon, i'm
over thinking ambiguity in phrasing).
if thats the desired difference, that sounds good to me!
I would expect it means that, having
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Philip Holzenspies
p...@st-andrews.ac.ukwrote:
So, there are many things people read in the proposal that I didn't want
to put in, but the things I very much do want to include get lost in
translation also. I wanted to allow the GHC source itself to be written
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Philip Holzenspies
p...@st-andrews.ac.ukwrote:
On 22 Aug 2012, at 16:13, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:37 AM, Philip Holzenspies p...@st-andrews.ac.uk
wrote:
So, there are many things people read in the proposal that I didn't want
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Philip Holzenspies
p...@st-andrews.ac.ukwrote:
Anyway, the point is a bit moot. It seems obvious that the proposal had
very little support and has been withdrawn.
This might be a poor time for it with 7.6.1 around the corner.
That said, I would re-propose
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
Relatedly, I've noticed that OS X is forgiving when you don't link in
a needed object. It will let me run code, but if I call a function
that's not linked in I get a crash. However, linux immediately prints
unknown
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
(man ld.so on Linux, man dyld on OS X, for the details)
I thought ghc uses its own homegrown loader, not the system one? I.e.
ghci loads .o files, not .dyld or .so.
The bytecode backend (used by ghci, TH, runghc) uses
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Roman Cheplyaka r...@ro-che.info wrote:
I find this discussion useful — there are some interesting points
(splitting case of into two parts) that I don't remember reading in the
original thread (but maybe it's just me).
Mentioned twice that I recall, as
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Chris Smith cdsm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious how much of the compile twice situation for static and
dynamic libraries could actually be shared.
Probably none; on most platforms you're actually generating different code
(dynamic libraries require generation
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/12/12 15:17, Brandon Allbery wrote:
Probably none; on most platforms you're actually generating different
code (dynamic libraries require generation of position-independent
Sure there's a lot of differences
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Francisco Vieira de Souza
vieira.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon! Is it not necessary to show the type of igraph_bool_t
igraphhaskell_initialized like
int igraph_bool_t igraphhaskell_initialized = 0?
igraph_bool_t uses the _t suffix convention for typedefs
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Bernhard Urban lew...@gmail.com wrote:
The main issue: The GHC runtime relies on glibc
I have to assume this is not meant literally, because ghc works on OS X and
*BSD.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote:
Let me rephrase: how will Simon's proposed data constructors are in
scope mechanism work? For example, will
let xs :: Map = ...
in map MyNewtype xs
behave differently if the constructors of Map are in scope
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote:
on a Win32 (SP3) machine using the Haskell Platform and GHC-7.6.1
(standalone) and I have noticed the same frustrating errors. Any
suggestions would be most appreciated.
Are you certain you have write permission
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, J. Garrett Morris jgmor...@cs.pdx.eduwrote:
Why is it trying to create .?
You can specify -odir with a directory that doesn't exist; perhaps GHC
always tries to create the output directory?
In any case, I can confirm the observed behavior with GHC 7.6.1 on
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Nathan Hüsken nathan.hues...@posteo.dewrote:
A simple hello world application has 1Mb in by 64 bit ubunut machine.
When I stript it, is has about 750kb.
When I build a cross compiler for android (arm), the executable has a
asize of about 10MB, stripped about
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
In short, I think we already have the situation that you desire. Perhaps
we just need to market it better?
** **
Or am I mistaken?
Except the current question is about how ghc releases interact with the
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
What causes the wave of package updates? Just because GHC 7.8 (say)
comes out, no package author need lift a finger. The Haskell Platform sets
the pace for package updates. When the Haskell Platform comes out,
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for sharing! My perspective is of course as a user. I don't think
I've ever run into a case where the compiler broken a previous work e.g.
C++ program. On the other hand I have to make a release of most of the
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Then I `mv build.mk.sample build.mk`, set BuildFlavour = perf-llvm,
add GhcWithLlvmCodeGen = YES. Finally `./configure
--with-gcc=/usr/bin/llvm-gcc`. Configure output attached.
After make, I
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Then how to check if the output files (executables, libraries) are
generated by llvm, instead of gcc? In other words, to see if llvm was used
correct.
I doubt that there is a good way unless
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, AntC anthony_clay...@clear.net.nz wrote:
Does the lens approach meet SPJ's criteria of:
* It is the smallest increment I can come up with that
meaningfully addresses the #1 pain point (the inability to
re-use the same field name in different records).
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:58 AM, harry volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
Which brings me back to my original question - is there any way that the
type system could be enhanced, so that the compiler understands that Bar
f
= Foo f without being told so explicitly every time?
No. The point is,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Stephen Paul Weber
singpol...@singpolyma.net wrote:
Somebody claiming to be harry wrote:
all of this stems from GHC
looking for libgmp.so, instead of libgmp.so.3
Most systems symlink libgmp.so to the default version installed. On
Debian stable it's
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, harry volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
Could GHC be configured to look for libgmp.so.3, or whatever version it was
actually linked against, if it can't find libgmp.so?
Linux ld.so doesn't work that way.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:35 AM, harry volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
$ ghc-pkg check --package-db=~/cabal
ghc-pkg: ~/cabal: openFile: does not exist (No such file or directory)
$ ls ~/cabal
package.cache
Yet another reason to avoid ~... it's (a) only expanded by the shell, and
(b) not
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:11 AM, asyropou...@aol.com wrote:
and pandoc compiled just fine and it works! However, I have noticed that
libffi.so.6 should not be
installed in a non standard folder, and I have no idea if this is a
problem of OpenIndiana or Solaris
more generally. Now, I think it
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Yitzchak Gale g...@sefer.org wrote:
Do GHC-compiled binaries have a dynamic dependence on libgmp?
If so, what are the exact requirements we need to communicate
to our customers? Does this limit what versions of Linux
we can claim that our product supports?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Yitzchak Gale g...@sefer.org wrote:
I wrote:
[For] GHC-compiled binaries...
what are the exact requirements we need to communicate
to our customers?
You wrote:
Ideally you would use `ldd` on
binaries to determine other dynamic dependencies
that must
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.comwrote:
Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Yitzchak Gale g...@sefer.org wrote:
ldd just says not a dynamic executable.
o.O I don't think the ghc runtime uses dlopen() to get at gmp (and I'm
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:08 AM, harry volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
The documentation for --split-objs states that this only makes sense for
libraries. How is an executable compiled against a split-objs library?
According to
https://github.com/haskell/cabal/issues/1611#issuecomment-30750655,
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:27 AM, harry volderm...@hotmail.com wrote:
Brandon Allbery wrote
I don't understand the question. Whether a library is split-objs or not
does not affect how you link an executable, only the space/time
efficiency
trade-off of doing so. And while in theory you
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Facundo Domínguez
facundo.doming...@tweag.io wrote:
In principle, only symbols in shared libraries can be found. However,
the dynamic linker is able to find symbols in modules that are linked
statically if GHC is fed with the option -optl-Wl,--export-dynamic.
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Tim Watson watson.timo...@gmail.comwrote:
In Erlang, I can rpc/send *any* term and evaluate it on another node. That
includes functions of course. Whether or not we want to be quite that
general is another matter, but that is the comparison I've been making.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Christian Maeder
christian.mae...@dfki.dewrote:
Am 05.02.2014 16:45, schrieb Roman Cheplyaka:
* Christian Maeder christian.mae...@dfki.de [2014-02-05 16:28:50+0100]
This happens, because our /bin/sh is a real sh (and not a bash)
that only allows to export
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Greg Horn gregmainl...@gmail.com wrote:
Is --enable-shared off by default?
It's supposed to be on by default in 7.8. That said, not sure how many
people have played with ~/.cabal/config
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Edward Kmett ekm...@gmail.com wrote:
Foo+rst.lhs does nicely dodge the collision with jhc.
Is this legal on Windows?
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.comwrote:
ghc-7.6.3 passes additional linker options after all the haskell object
files, while ghc-7.8.1 does the opposite.
(...)
Is it intentional change?
Pretty sure it is intentional, because it's necessary for some
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:54 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it intentional change?
Pretty sure it is intentional, because it's
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 12:13 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Yuras Shumovich shumovi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 11:54 -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem I was fixing was that we weren't always passing the -optl
options. Now when we invoke a program the -optXXX options always come
first - I think before it was kind of random and different for each of the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Eric Seidel gridaph...@gmail.com wrote:
The main con here is that there's an increased risk of
module name-clashes, but GHC already solves this with the PackageImports
extension.
IMO almost any use of PackageImports indicates a severe design flaw
somewhere.
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Carter Schonwald carter.schonw...@gmail.com
wrote:
does JHC support template haskell?
Pretty sure TH is too closely tied to ghc.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Christiaan Baaij
christiaan.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -Wno-invalid-pp-token
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -Wno-unicode
Those are clang options, for what it's worth. It seems to be defaulting to
Xcode
FWIW Mark had this reply but is apparently not subscribed to, or being
rejected by, ghc-users and asked me to forward it.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark Lentczner mark.lentcz...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: Installing ghc-7.8.3 OS X bindist fails
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Volker Wysk vertei...@volker-wysk.de
wrote:
Am Dienstag, 5. August 2014, 12:46:23 schrieb Carter Schonwald:
i assume 7.6 and 7.8, if we're talking GHC rather than GCC :)
in 7.8 you can't define userland typeable instances, you need only write
deriving
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Christian Höner zu Siederdissen
choe...@tbi.univie.ac.at wrote:
go xs = unsafePerformIO $ do
forM_ xs $ cfun
return $ somethingUnhealthy
I wonder if this is your real problem. `unsafePerformIO` does some extra
locking; the FFI specifies a function
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
cabal install --enable-documentation
--extra-include-dirs=/usr;local/include --extra-lib-dirs=/usr/local/lib
hmatrix
Is that semicolon a typo?
It kinda has to be, they'd have gotten rather more interesting errors
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com
wrote:
That would be nice if we had a clean slate, but I don't people are going
to change their whole import lists now.
I read the proposal as making all commas optional, not as requiring them to
not be present.
--
brandon
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think that's necessarily is good style. I don't think we want two
different ways of doing import lists.
Yes; I kinda hate the idea myself, it encourages an unreadable programming
style. But it's not the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel h...@gnu.org wrote:
Now it'd be great if I could do the following instead:
module AnnoyinglyLongModuleName (M.length, M.null) where
import AnnoyinglyLongModuleName as M -- - does not work
I think if I wanted this syntax, I'd
, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Brandon Allbery allber...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel h...@gnu.org
wrote:
Now it'd be great if I could do the following instead:
module AnnoyinglyLongModuleName (M.length, M.null) where
import
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Malcolm Wallace malcolm.wall...@me.com
wrote:
How about doing the honest thing, and withdrawing both packages in
ghc-7.10? Haskell'98 is now 15 years old, and the 2010 standard was never
really popular anyway.
There are apparently educators using both,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Michael Jones m...@proclivis.com wrote:
7fe537eff700: cap 0: sendCommand: encoded PROBLEM
HERE
7fe537eff700: cap 0: thread 7 stopped (heap overflow)
Is it just me, or is that second message significant?
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org
wrote:
To restate the problem: this is from code that has not been changed for 2
years. I get
Examples.hs:42:42: Parse error in pattern: con
Failed, modules loaded: none.
I think I see the problem. Are you by any
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org
wrote:
How very clever of you and thank you very much. Changing ‘ to 1 does fix
the problem.
I would have thought this would work
cabal install --with-gcc=gcc-4.9
But sadly I still got the same error.
I think that
1 - 100 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
