i don't think haskell on llvm exists, so the answer would be no
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Dan Mead d.w.m...@gmail.com wrote:
does the haskell on llvm compiler support the ghc extentions?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Anatoly Yakovenko aeyakove...@gmail.com
wrote:
ghc llvm port
does the haskell on llvm compiler support the ghc extentions?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Anatoly Yakovenko aeyakove...@gmail.comwrote:
ghc llvm port would enable arm support as well. i know there were
some issues with llvm when this was discusses a couple of years ago.
has anyone
Dan Mead wrote:
has there been any movement on this topic? i'm also interested in
haskell on arm
do you guys thing telling ghc to emit C and then compiling that for arm
is a better route than
getting direct compilation to work?
If you look on the GHC-on-ARM page[1], you'll find my
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 08:15:44 am Braden Shepherdson wrote:
Dan Mead wrote:
has there been any movement on this topic? i'm also interested in
haskell on arm
do you guys thing telling ghc to emit C and then compiling that for arm
is a better route than
getting direct
Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 08:15:44 am Braden Shepherdson wrote:
Dan Mead wrote:
has there been any movement on this topic? i'm also interested in
haskell on arm
do you guys thing telling ghc to emit C and then compiling that for arm
is a better route than
getting
ghc llvm port would enable arm support as well. i know there were
some issues with llvm when this was discusses a couple of years ago.
has anyone checked if that's the case?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Braden Shepherdson
braden.shepherd...@gmail.com wrote:
Conrad Meyer wrote:
On
has there been any movement on this topic? i'm also interested in haskell on
arm
do you guys thing telling ghc to emit C and then compiling that for arm is a
better route than
getting direct compilation to work?
-dan
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe Buehler wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
For the registerised port, you really need a native code generator
(the mangler is on death row, yay). At a rough guess, I'd say porting
the NCG would take a couple of weeks or so for someone unfamiliar with
the code. Hopefully we'll improve that when
Braden Shepherdson wrote:
So, assuming some GHC dev doesn't swoop down and fix this, what options
are left to the project in the short term?
An unregisterised build of an old 6.6 should work, that would get us a
working, though aging, GHC. Unfortunately a lot of the porting work to
move
Simon Marlow wrote:
For the registerised port, you really need a native code generator (the
mangler is on death row, yay). At a rough guess, I'd say porting the
NCG would take a couple of weeks or so for someone unfamiliar with the
code. Hopefully we'll improve that when we refactor the NCG
| Linux Nokia-N810-42-19 2.6.21-omap1 #2 Fri Nov 16 16:24:58 EET 2007
| armv6l unknown
|
| I would love a working GHC implementation on it, if for nothing else
| than how awesome it would be. Whether that means using a C back-end or
| native compilation doesn't matter to me so much.
|
| I might be
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| Linux Nokia-N810-42-19 2.6.21-omap1 #2 Fri Nov 16 16:24:58 EET 2007
| armv6l unknown
|
| I would love a working GHC implementation on it, if for nothing else
| than how awesome it would be. Whether that means using a C back-end or
| native compilation doesn't matter
Don Stewart wrote:
Could we start documenting this on the wiki ?
It will be interesting to keep track of what we have tried,
what attempts failed and why.
-- Don
I've added some new sections to the top of the wiki page, above the
original attempts. It's now quite long, since it contains
02:57:38
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell on ARM (was Re: ANN: Topkata)
Cool!
By cross-compilation, I assume you mean, a version of GHC which runs
on x86, but generates ARM assembly? Another option might be to use a
nintendo DS emulator which has been configured to support more RAM and
CPU
#PortingGHCtoanewplatform
--
L.Guo
2008-07-02
-
From: Jeremy Shaw
At: 2008-06-28 02:57:38
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: Haskell on ARM (was Re: ANN: Topkata)
Cool!
By cross-compilation, I assume
Hello Jeremy,
Jeremy Apthorp wrote:
Next year I'll be working on a project for my undergraduate computing
course at UNSW that will involve getting GHC to target the Nintendo
DS. It'll require cross-compilation, because the DS isn't powerful
enough to actually run GHC (4M main ram and a 66MHz
At Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:57:29 +1000,
Jeremy Apthorp wrote:
Next year I'll be working on a project for my undergraduate computing
course at UNSW that will involve getting GHC to target the Nintendo
DS. It'll require cross-compilation, because the DS isn't powerful
enough to actually run GHC (4M
At Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:43:45 -0400,
Braden Shepherdson wrote:
I recently acquired the ARM-based Nokia N810 (and 3 it), powered by
Maemo. Running a uname -a on it:
I might be one to attempt this, as I know C and ARM-ish asm decently
well and have a powerful desktop to compile on. I have no
2008/6/25 Braden Shepherdson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jeremy Shaw wrote:
If any does attempt to build for the ARM, please, please, please,
document what you do in the wiki. And, if you do, edit the wiki as you
go, you definitely won't be able to remember what you did after the
fact. (Or, at the
Jeremy Shaw wrote:
If any does attempt to build for the ARM, please, please, please,
document what you do in the wiki. And, if you do, edit the wiki as you
go, you definitely won't be able to remember what you did after the
fact. (Or, at the very least, use some program to capture everything
you
20 matches
Mail list logo
