On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:55:08PM -0700, Kirill Zaborsky wrote:
Brian, I think it would be better to provide your email in the thread. E.g.
from http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2013-July/109061.html I
can only reply to the maillist. I'm answering now through Google Groups
Brian, I think it would be better to provide your email in the thread. E.g.
from http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2013-July/109061.html I
can only reply to the maillist. I'm answering now through Google Groups
hope it will get to you.
Kind regards,
Kirill Zaborsky
воскресенье, 7
Jason Dagit:
The reason I started telling everyone to avoid GHC in apt was the way
it was packaged. [..]
If they are lucky they figure out which apt package to install.
I think people who are too lazy to bother to find out how their
distribution works, should avoid any distribution.
%
Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org writes:
I think people who are too lazy to bother to find out how their
distribution works, should avoid any distribution.
% apt-cache search foo
% sudo apt-get install libghc6-foo\*
Agreed (to the extent that someone who can't be bothered figuring out an
Hi Ivan.
Excerpts from Ivan Miljenovic's message of Ter Mar 30 00:01:19 -0300 2010:
On 30 March 2010 13:55, Jason Dagit da...@codersbase.com wrote:
(...)
[..] now trying to profile something, oh wait, some problem again.
Agreed, if Debian didn't include the profiling libraries with GHC
Hi Jason and other,
thanks for the suggestions, the Debian Haskell Team is eager to learn
why people do or don’t use the packaged libraries.
Am Dienstag, den 30.03.2010, 14:01 +1100 schrieb Ivan Miljenovic:
On 30 March 2010 13:55, Jason Dagit da...@codersbase.com wrote:
[..] now trying to
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
The profiling data is put in -prof packages, i.e. ghc-prof,
libghc6-network-prof etc. Indeed, there is no easy way to tell the
package system: Whenever I install a Haskell -dev package, please
install the -prof package as well.
One option might to
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:53 AM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2010, 09:04 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
I have to say it looks like Debian has gotten their act together
somewhat when it comes to Haskel development. Many of the reasons for
my
On 30 March 2010 13:55, Jason Dagit da...@codersbase.com wrote:
The reason I started telling everyone to avoid GHC in apt was the way it was
packaged. Casual Haskell users would install GHC but get something like
1/10th of the libraries GHC installs when you do a source install
Is that
Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
[..] now trying to profile something, oh wait, some problem again.
Agreed, if Debian didn't include the profiling libraries with GHC
(though is this due to how Debian does packages?).
The haskell packages for Debian (I am one) have decided to stick to
a pattern where
On 30 March 2010 14:33, Erik de Castro Lopo mle...@mega-nerd.com wrote:
The haskell packages for Debian (I am one)
You are a Haskell _package_? :p
- The source code package will be called haskell-foo.
Is this an actual installable package (so you're installing the actual
source code?) ?
Ivan Miljenovic wrote:
On 30 March 2010 14:33, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
The haskell packages for Debian (I am one)
You are a Haskell _package_? :p
s/packages/packagers/
Although I speak for me, not the group.
- The source code package will be called haskell-foo.
Is this an actual
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:13:04 -0500
Jeff == Jeff Wheeler j...@nokrev.com wrote:
Jeff A bunch of stuff is packaged by dons for Arch; you can see a lot
Jeff of links to the Arch packages on Hackage. It might be worth
Jeff looking into.
+1 for Arch.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina,
My choice is latest packages available throug package manager and I use
Fedora 12 as of now. Fedora 13 is coming out with ghc 6.12
By the way did you find out any packaged rpms for ghc on Centos? I remember
a thread from haskell beginners on this where somebody was trying to get
ghc installed on
On 28/03/10 08:50, Gour wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:13:04 -0500
Jeff == Jeff Wheeler j...@nokrev.com wrote:
Jeff A bunch of stuff is packaged by dons for Arch; you can see a lot
Jeff of links to the Arch packages on Hackage. It might be worth
Jeff looking into.
+1 for Arch.
Add one
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2010, 09:04 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
I have to say it looks like Debian has gotten their act together
somewhat when it comes to Haskel development. Many of the reasons for
my deserting Debian seem have been taken care of.
so, what is missing for you to come
Chris Dornan ch...@chrisdornan.com wrote:
I am choosing a Linux distribution for a production Haskell project
and would would normally just go with Debian (pedigree, stability, and
of course Haskell Platfom included) but CentOS is in the frame.
Are there any particularly strong reasons for
On 28/03/10 12:53, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 28.03.2010, 09:04 +0100 schrieb Magnus Therning:
I have to say it looks like Debian has gotten their act together
somewhat when it comes to Haskel development. Many of the reasons for
my deserting Debian seem have been taken
Magnus Therning wrote:
Well, maybe I should qualify that a bit. There were a few issues with Haskell
in Debian in the past. Most noticeably the lack of packages in the standard
repos. This seems to have been addressed. The other thing, that bit me at
the time, and witch really pushed me
2010/03/28 Ertugrul Soeylemez e...@ertes.de
However, as always there is a catch. Gentoo is a source distribution,
which means that you compile the entire system from scratch. On modern
computers this is quite fast, but sometimes it can hammer on your
patience.
To be fair, Gentoo has a
On Feb 21, 2010, at 06:27 , Donghee Nah wrote:
I'm using Windows 7 32bit Host OS(ghc 6.8.3) and Virtualbox
Archlinux Guest OS(ghc 6.8.4)
I feel that ghci code executing speed in guest os is 1.5~2x faster
than host os
My guess is that GHC (and the GHC RTS) on win32 is using a POSIX
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2010, 13:58 +0100 schrieb Ketil Malde:
Donghee Nah ppk...@gmail.com writes:
I feel that ghci code executing speed in guest os is 1.5~2x faster than host
os
The code:
let t n = do {if n `mod` 10 == 0 then print n else return ()} t (n+1)
t 1
any clue?
Donghee Nah ppk...@gmail.com writes:
I feel that ghci code executing speed in guest os is 1.5~2x faster than host
os
The code:
let t n = do {if n `mod` 10 == 0 then print n else return ()} t (n+1)
t 1
any clue?
Speed of the terminal? Cost of syscalls (user/kernel transitions)?
-k
Hi Leif,
Thanks for the suggestions. Unfortunately this no longer works, the process
is repeatedly killed for using too much memory on make install. I also had
to manually install readline 4 since it's absurdly hard to open an RPM (or
at least the compat one they have there).
All up, this is
Ok, I tried nix but I couldn't get it to work. Initially I had a problem
since I was trying to get nix to install in my home directory and on the
host (Dreamhost) that's actually a symlink, which nix doesn't allow. Then
once I got it installed finally it didn't build - I can't remember the
details
Hi Chris,
Unfortunately that's not easy for me, I don't know exactly what the config
of the server is, and I use OSX at home. I could probably rig something up
using VMWare but that's a lot of work just to install the compiler. Another
option might be to create an unregisterised build, as
Hi Marc,
Great, thanks for the pointer. I'll take a look at nix, that might be an
option. Thanks for the offer of server space too, but I'd really like to get
it going on my own space since I have domains and whatnot pointed there.
I also realise that the IDE support isn't there - it's even
Colin Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks from the porting guide that I might be able to make 6.6.2
with just a C compiler, can I then use that to build 6.8.3?
I have the same problem as you -- a hosting environment with an old libc
-- and had the same problem with the binary
Hi, Alan -
./configure fails with checking for path to top of build tree...
configure: error: cannot determine current directory.
Yeah, I got the exact same error yesterday when trying to install
a ghc-6.8.3 binary dist on some older machine.
Well, since I had 6.8.2 working there, I just
acm:
Hi, Haskell!
I've downloaded the ghc-6.8.3-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 tarball, which
I expected to work on my GNU/Linux box (1.2 GHz Athlon, Debian Sarge).
Was there a problem installing GHC from the Debian package system with apt?
-- Don
___
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:20:35PM +0200, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
./configure fails with checking for path to top of build tree...
configure: error: cannot determine current directory.
I guess the 6.8.3 binary does not work because it expects a newer
version of libc or whatever.
That's
Was there a problem installing GHC from the Debian package system with apt?
He said Sarge. I guess the current ghc packages are for Etch only? - J.W.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
HI THERE, JOHANNES, what a surprise, how are you doing?
Remember teaching me the 7-ring 1-count? Might've been at Erlangen,
possibly Augsburg, even Berlin, but it was quite a while ago. :-)
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:20:35PM +0200, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
Hi, Alan -
./configure fails with
Hi, Don!
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:24:20PM -0700, Don Stewart wrote:
acm:
Hi, Haskell!
I've downloaded the ghc-6.8.3-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 tarball,
which I expected to work on my GNU/Linux box (1.2 GHz Athlon, Debian
Sarge).
Was there a problem installing GHC from the Debian
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Don Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded the ghc-6.8.3-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2 tarball, which
I expected to work on my GNU/Linux box (1.2 GHz Athlon, Debian Sarge).
Was there a problem installing GHC from the Debian package system with apt?
Thank you, Fero and Sylvain!
Vasili
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:21 PM, sylvain nahas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Vasili,
Please have a look at http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html
The main list is linux-kernel. Depending on the level of your questions,
you may also check
Hi Vasili,
try one of Linux groups at http://www.nabble.com/Linux-f252.html or maybe
Linux kernel group http://www.nabble.com/linux-kernel-f49.html . But I don't
know if there are people working with Haskell in Linux as well. But if you
would like to ask something only about POSIX, I think they
Hi Vasili,
Please have a look at http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html
The main list is linux-kernel. Depending on the level of your questions,
you may also check
linux-newbiehttp://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-newbie.
If it concerns a defined subsystem/architecture, there is often a
Actually with PCI chipsets, implementing a generic BusMaster DMA driver
is not too hard, assuming you already have interrupts handled (and you
don't want 64bit DMA support)... You just load the parameters for the
disk read into the PCI registers, and wait for the completed interrupt.
I wrote a
But there are plenty of minor variations on how to program
and initiate DMA for different devices.
-- Lennart
Keean Schupke wrote:
Actually with PCI chipsets, implementing a generic BusMaster DMA driver
is not too hard, assuming you already have interrupts handled (and you
don't want
I thought the BusMaster interface was pretty uniform, unlike the earlier
DMA interfaces which varied from chipset to chipset.
Keean.
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
But there are plenty of minor variations on how to program
and initiate DMA for different devices.
-- Lennart
Keean Schupke wrote:
What is this standard BusMaster interface you talk about?
I must have missed something. I've yet to see two PCI chips
that do DMA the same way.
-- Lennart
Keean Schupke wrote:
I thought the BusMaster interface was pretty uniform, unlike the earlier
DMA interfaces which varied from
Have a look at the linux kernel IDE drivers, look for
Generic IDE Chipset support
Generic PCI bus-master DMA support
Keean.
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
What is this standard BusMaster interface you talk about?
I must have missed something. I've yet to see two PCI chips
that do DMA the same way.
Keean Schupke wrote:
Have a look at the linux kernel IDE drivers, look for
Generic IDE Chipset support
That's the part I missed, you were talking about IDE
chips. Yes, they have many similarities. You can
probably run many of them in one of the slower modes
with a common driver. But even these
The generic busmaster diver should go all the way to UDMA mode 4 (133Mb)
Keean.
Lennart Augustsson wrote:
Keean Schupke wrote:
Have a look at the linux kernel IDE drivers, look for
Generic IDE Chipset support
That's the part I missed, you were talking about IDE
chips. Yes, they have many
I don't think I said anything controversial. I guess I was just
over-simplifying things by only considering PC IDE hardware - but then
again that must get you running on 90% of the systems people are likely
to have lying around to play with a developmental OS on.
On the other hand the average
Would it be harder/easier better/worse to use Linux device drivers
from hOp/House as opposed to writing new disk I/O stuff in Haskell?
-Alex-
__
S. Alexander Jacobson tel:917-770-6565 http://alexjacobson.com
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Keean
Hello,
There are no storage drivers at the moment. Actually part of the
motivation for implementing the networking stuff was so that we can
avoid doing that at least for the time being.
-Iavor
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:32:19 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time), S.
Alexander Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Carroll wrote:
I was wondering about the possibility of using Haskell for developing
device drivers that would be kernel modules for Linux. If nothing else,
it would be quite an educational experience for me, as I've not yet
experimented with either the Linux kernel or Haskell FFI, nor
mark:
I was wondering about the possibility of using Haskell for developing
device drivers that would be kernel modules for Linux. If nothing else,
it would be quite an educational experience for me, as I've not yet
experimented with either the Linux kernel or Haskell FFI, nor have I
had to
Wow! Did you also implement tcp in Haskell?
Does hOp or House also have the ability to write to disk?
(With HAppS, I've gotten rid of the AMP part of LAMP, it would be
really cool to get rid of the L as well!)
-Alex-
__
S. Alexander
alex:
Wow! Did you also implement tcp in Haskell?
Does hOp or House also have the ability to write to disk?
(With HAppS, I've gotten rid of the AMP part of LAMP, it would be
really cool to get rid of the L as well!)
Sorry! By We've got a few drivers written in Haskell, I meant
the Haskell
dons:
alex:
Wow! Did you also implement tcp in Haskell?
On this topic, the following House code looks relevant:
http://cvs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/programatica/hOp/kernel/Net/
There's something satsifying about seeing 'instance Functor Packet' in
IPv4.hs ;)
Does hOp or House
Very very cool.
Has anyone written any storage drivers?
If there is already TCP, has someone written an iscsi (RFC3720)
driver?
-Alex-
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
dons:
alex:
Wow! Did you also implement tcp in Haskell?
On this topic, the following House code looks
In diku.lists.haskell you write:
Ok. I know I've seen pointers for this,
but for the life of me I can't find it...
Does anybody know where the linux binaries
are for hbc? (or any haskell implementation, really.)
You'd better have lots of ram for this ;)
From the README for Chalmers Lazy
55 matches
Mail list logo
