The weights are to be able to place the border point somewhere other than
at a vertex. The three vertices are one of the triangles in the surface
file, and the weights represent where to place the point on that triangle.
If you want a border point at a vertex, the weight for that vertex should
Surface-based methods may boost your statistical power enough (by better
alignment, exclusion of irrelevant tissue, and smoothing that doesn't cross
sulcal banks, if you decide you need smoothing) that you may not need to
rely as much on existing ROIs. Parcel-based statistics have a lot of
power,
Hi All,
It seems that each vertex in the border files has an associated weight. What is
this weight? If I want to draw a border vertex by vertex, how should I use the
weights?
Thanks,
Kamal
___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
Thanks, Tim, I'll try that and let you know if it worked.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:21 AM, Timothy Coalson wrote:
> The error message appears to be from syntax in a bash script, so it should
> be possible to track it down.
>
> If you put "set -x" at the top of the script it
The error message appears to be from syntax in a bash script, so it should
be possible to track it down.
If you put "set -x" at the top of the script it fails in and rerun it, it
will tell you each command before executing it, which should help narrow
down which line is the problem. If the line
Hello,
Is wb_view crashing when loading a file or when you are performing an
operation, perhaps editing annotations?
John
> On Feb 23, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Marta Moreno wrote:
>
> Dear experts,
>
> My wb_view crashes after 1 day of using it, what happens is that the
Hi,
I keep wb_view open for a long time and don¹t observe this behavior. If
you can reproduce the crash and make a scene of it we could take a look.
Matt.
On 2/23/18, 12:20 PM, "hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org on behalf of
Marta Moreno"
Alright, thank you!
Darko
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:20 PM, Glasser, Matthew
wrote:
> No we don’t use python in that pipeline. I am afraid that no one else has
> reported this and so I think the issue must be unique to your system. You
> might trying on another computer/or
Dear experts,
My wb_view crashes after 1 day of using it, what happens is that the next day I
cannot keep loading more images with setting created for illustration of brain
results and need to restart all over -even it requires to restart the computer
to have it working properly. I have
There is no difference between the duration of the E-Prime tasks and the
duration of the BOLD time series from the scan. There is likely a
misunderstanding of what the duration should be, but I can’t help without
knowing specifically what doesn’t line up in your opinion.
There have been two
For a “recommended” analysis the only timeseries file you need is
${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/MNINonLinear/Results/${fMRIName}/${fMRIName}_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii.
Peace,
Matt.
From: "Harms, Michael" >
Date: Friday, February 23, 2018 at
No we don’t use python in that pipeline. I am afraid that no one else has
reported this and so I think the issue must be unique to your system. You
might trying on another computer/or in a VM where you install stuff from
scratch and see if the issue persists.
Peace,
Matt.
From: Darko
Hi Mike,
We have a preprint out on this exact question and the conclusion is that it is
really hard to do this accurately for most brain regions:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/01/29/255620
Really the best idea is probably to go back and reanalyze the old data without
volume-based
The FIX cleaned files have “clean” in their file name.
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
---
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave.
Was the MSMAll one cleaned?
Thanks
Ze
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Harms, Michael wrote:
> I guess, if you never plan on using the MSMSulc registered output from the
> preprocessing output. But the CIFTI files are small compared to the volume
> files, so I wouldn’t.
Hi everyone,
There's been a lot posted here over the past year or two on the challenges and
limitations of going back-and-forth between volumetric space and HCP-defined
surface space, with solid arguments for moving to (and sticking with)
CIFTI-defined brainordinates. Here, I'm asking a
I guess, if you never plan on using the MSMSulc registered output from the
preprocessing output. But the CIFTI files are small compared to the volume
files, so I wouldn’t. Also, if you haven’t already cleaned the data (using
FIX), you’ll need that file.
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
Thanks Michael and Matt. Does that mean I can delete
rfMRI_REST1_LR_Atlas.dtseries.nii to save some space?
Ze
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Glasser, Matthew
wrote:
> These are both aligned to the FS_LR spherical surface geographic
> convention.
>
> Peace,
>
> Matt.
>
>
Hi Matt,
Yes, I believe so. It is the FreeSurfer 5.3.0-HCP.
I also downloaded the latest version of that script and compared it with
the one I have in my Pipelines folder and they seem identical.
Could it maybe be python issue? Is FreeSurferHighResWhite written in
python2? Because I had some
Dear HCP experts,
This is Meizhen Han from Peking University.
Thanks for releasing the 7 fMRI tasks written in Eprime software used in Main
HCP. I downloaded and run them on the Sinorad fMRI Stimili System in our lab. I
find there is a slight difference between the actual time duration and
20 matches
Mail list logo