Re: [hlcoders] RE: HL2DM SDK in January or February? Matt, i discovered something

2005-01-18 Thread Ben Davison
Can you please stop changing the posting titles because it starts a new conversation thread on most clients. On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:05:14 +0100, Jose Luis Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] One

RE: [hlcoders] RE: HL2DM SDK in January or February? Matt, i discovered something

2005-01-18 Thread Adrian Finol
pitch change at all? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Luis Gonzalez Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:05 PM To: hlcoders@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [hlcoders] RE: HL2DM SDK in January or February? Matt, i discovered something

Re: [hlcoders] RE: HL2DM SDK in January or February? Matt, i discovered something

2005-01-18 Thread Ben Davison
in January or February? Matt, i discovered something This is a multi-part message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] One note, Matt. First: I fixed the physics bugs with the code in http://www.sourcewiki.org/ www.sourcewiki.org Well, when I walk in a room

Re: [hlcoders] RE: HL2DM SDK in January or February? Matt, i discovered something

2005-01-18 Thread Tim Nagel
I think this specific topic deserves a new thread, dont you? (It isnt really related to the SDK release? ;)) Ben Davison wrote: Can you please stop changing the posting titles because it starts a new conversation thread on most clients. On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 00:05:14 +0100, Jose Luis Gonzalez

Re: [hlcoders] RE: HL2DM SDK in January or February? Matt, i discovered something

2005-01-18 Thread Ben Davison
True, but there are 5 variations of the original topic now :P On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:03:12 +1100, Tim Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this specific topic deserves a new thread, dont you? (It isnt really related to the SDK release? ;)) Ben Davison wrote: Can you please stop changing