I blink in 201 ms because I have sli for my eyelids, and I overclocked
my lower cortex! 250mhz baby!
Completely off track, I know...
Guy Watkins wrote:
I can blink my eyes in 299 ms.
I blink quickly because I am afraid of the dark! :)
} -Original Message-
} From:
Hee-effin-Haw!
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Crazy Canucks crazy_canu...@rogers.comwrote:
I blink in 201 ms because I have sli for my eyelids, and I overclocked
my lower cortex! 250mhz baby!
Completely off track, I know...
Guy Watkins wrote:
I can blink my eyes in 299 ms.
I blink
The topic about 1000fps servers made me take a look at my server's fps.
I am seriously worried, because i have very unstable fps.
Running HLDS with sys_ticrate 350, fps_max 0 and -pinbgoost 2:
stats
CPU InOut Uptime Users FPSPlayers
0.50 0.00 0.00 6 0 103.98 0
What CPU do you have in it?
Eric
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nevermoreneverm...@pheek.net wrote:
The topic about 1000fps servers made me take a look at my server's fps.
I am seriously worried, because i have very unstable fps.
Running HLDS with sys_ticrate 350, fps_max 0 and
Hi,
I just did a complete clean install of a Counter-Strike 1.6 game server
using: ./steam -command update -game cstrike -dir . -verify_all.
When I start the game server is just keeps crashing. When I install AMX
Mod X it exits with a segfault error. See the attached console.txt file
for
It's a dual core intel.
dmesg says:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 03
I am not sure about the model.
Thank you
El mié, 09-09-2009 a las 11:42 -0400, Eric Greer escribió:
What CPU do you have in it?
Eric
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Nevermoreneverm...@pheek.net
Now, i would suggest that your chip *could* be being identified incorrectly. If
this is the case it would be the kernel that is most likely at fault. Do you
know if you have symmetric multi processing support enabled in your kernel?
Also, what is the OS that you are using?
-Original
That looks like P4 with Hyperthreading on it, not actual dual core cpu.
What does cat /proc/cpuinfo say?
-ics
Dave Williams kirjoitti:
Now, i would suggest that your chip *could* be being identified incorrectly.
If this is the case it would be the kernel that is most likely at fault. Do
Make sys_ticrate more than 1000. It is fixing xou problem with the FPS,
but a sys_ticrate over 2500 make the game a little bit faster.
best regards
Florian Uhlrich
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:32:04 -0300
From: Nevermore neverm...@pheek.net
Subject: [hlds_linux] Very unstable FPS
It might actually be a newer dual core P4, I got a 3.0GHz dual core model here
at work ...
--mauirixxx
-Original Message-
From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of ics
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 8:41 AM
To:
Pentium D you mean?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Rick Payton r...@mai-hawaii.com wrote:
It might actually be a newer dual core P4, I got a 3.0GHz dual core model
here at work ...
--mauirixxx
-Original Message-
From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:
yeah that's the one ...
--mauirixxx
-Original Message-
From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of 1nsane
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 11:12 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re:
I'm sure dual-core P4's exist...
Thanks,
- Saul.
On 9 Sep 2009, at 22:11, 1nsane 1nsane...@gmail.com wrote:
Pentium D you mean?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Rick Payton r...@mai-hawaii.com
wrote:
It might actually be a newer dual core P4, I got a 3.0GHz dual core
model
here at
Yes, they were called Pentium D unless you're just talking about
hyperthreading
Saul Rennison wrote:
I'm sure dual-core P4's exist...
Thanks,
- Saul.
On 9 Sep 2009, at 22:11, 1nsane 1nsane...@gmail.com wrote:
Pentium D you mean?
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Rick Payton
I talked with the datacenter.
It is a Pentium 4 with hiperthreading.
Sory about the confusion
Now, anybody have any clue about my fps problem?
El mié, 09-09-2009 a las 19:43 -0400, Nicholas Hastings escribió:
Yes, they were called Pentium D unless you're just talking about
hyperthreading
The Pentium D and the Pentium dual core are not the same thing. The Pentium
D is just two pentium cores side by side on the same package, based on the
netburst microarchitecture. The Pentium Dual-Core is not actually a
pentium, but is based on core technology and uses the Pentium name. They are
I've never ran a server on anything that low end, quite possibly you
need a faster server. Just because the CPU is not maxed out doesn't
mean the server isn't struggling to keep up. Even on the latest
hardware you won't get stable fps under load.
Nevermore wrote:
I talked with the
I have not read most of this thread, but you mentioned 23% CPU usage.
Remember that:
* hlds is single-threaded. This means a single server can only use at most one
CPU core at a time. If you have four cores on your processor, then the maximum
amount of CPU power a single process will appear to
sorry but its not like you said..
hlds is single-threaded, thats true, but it use multiple cores at once time
at least you use taskset to force to use only one core.
pentium 4 have hyperthreading, doesnt have 2 real core.. just a real core +
virtual core (you will see 200% of cpu but its not
If it is single threaded it will only use 1 core at a time. It might use
all cores over time, but if you have 4 cores it will only use 25% of them at
most at any time. Over time, the most CPU that can be used with 4 cores
would be 25%.
Just an FYI, srcds has 2 threads. I thought it had 3, but
20 matches
Mail list logo
