On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 14:02 +, vostinar laurian wrote:
> Hi,
> Any plans to add support for multi part request in Async HTTPClient ?
> Currently, there is only MultipartEntityBuilder which is part of sync
> HTTPClient and can only be used in async API if all the data is
> loaded in memory
Hi,
Any plans to add support for multi part request in Async HTTPClient ?
Currently, there is only MultipartEntityBuilder which is part of sync
HTTPClient and can only be used in async API if all the data is loaded in
memory (which is not ideal). Anyone who has implemented a custom request
On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 21:29 +0200, Joan grupoventus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Do you have a release date in mind for HttpClient5 GA?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Joan.
>
Hi Joan
I will start a thread on time frame for 5.0 API freeze at
d...@hc.apache.org
Oleg
Hello,
Do you have a release date in mind for HttpClient5 GA?
Thanks,
Joan.
tcp connection(verified with the help of wireshark). I use
> Apache
> Httpclient 5 with conscrypt to support ALPN in jdk8 (jdk8 is my
> requirement, I cannot upgrade to jdk9 or later)
>
> The Main block goes like,
>
> try {
> TrustManager[] trustAllCerts = new TrustMa
HI I m trying to write a client that makes http2 request to multiple
servers(which already supports http2). so far I have written this
standalone program which works fine that I can see all requests goes via
same tcp connection(verified with the help of wireshark). I use Apache
Httpclient 5
, 10 de noviembre de 2018 19:30
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 18:02 +0100, Joan Balagueró - ventusproxy wrote:
> Hello Oleg,
>
> Sorry, but I think I'm going to need a bit more help to finish
>
onnections to reuse, shouldn't
> the max_conn value have preference?
>
> 2. Is TEST 5 ok? It seems the 'DefaultMaxPerRoute' cannot be applied
> on the fly in a lax pool. It should have a value of 5000 but it's
> preserving the previous value of 1 (test 4).
>
>
>
> Thanks ,
>
>
Thanks ,
Joan.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: viernes, 9 de noviembre de 2018 15:31
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 15:19 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
>
the lax pool, only max per route.
>
Hi,
Can you make sure this is Javadoc'd in the right places if it is not
already?
Gary
>
> Oleg
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Joan.
> >
> >
> > -Mensaje original-
> > De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.o
: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
>
> On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 13:39 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> > Thanks Oleg. One more thing about the max connections with
> > lax/strict
> > pool. Our code to modify the number of max connections i
.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: viernes, 9 de noviembre de 2018 15:01
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-11-09 at 13:39 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Thanks Oleg. One m
l: jueves, 8 de noviembre de 2018 11:04
> Para: HttpClient User Discussion
> Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
>
> On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> > Hello Oleg,
> >
> > We are finishing the migration and hav
[mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: jueves, 8 de noviembre de 2018 11:04
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: RV: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hello Oleg,
>
> We are finishing the migration and have the last
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 19:30 +0100, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hello Oleg,
>
> We are finishing the migration and have the last questions:
>
> 1. If a connection is kept-alive for 30s at second 0, and after 10s
> is reused, this connection will die at second 30 or will survive
> until second 40?
Hello Oleg,
We are finishing the migration and have the last questions:
1. If a connection is kept-alive for 30s at second 0, and after 10s is reused,
this connection will die at second 30 or will survive until second 40?
2. Regarding the RetryHandler, below the method inherited from http 4.5
Hi Oleg,
Thanks! I'll try it asap
Joan.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: martes, 23 de octubre de 2018 9:28
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 20:40 +0200, Joan
commit/75ca519314b783ba0d314e84f3a7e3488a7c968c
Oleg
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
> Enviado el: domingo, 21 de octubre de 2018 13:11
> Para: HttpClient User Discussion
> Asunto: Re: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
>
> On
That would be great.
Thanks Oleg.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: domingo, 21 de octubre de 2018 13:11
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 20:23 +0200, Joan Balagueró
sion
> Asunto: Re: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
>
> On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 21:07 +0200, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> > Hello Oleg,
> >
> > I think it's a bit more complicated ... Let me explain it:
> >
> > - we have a pool with a response ti
(and avoid read the
response body content).
Thanks,
Joan.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: sábado, 20 de octubre de 2018 18:17
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 21:07
method).
Thanks,
Joan.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: sábado, 20 de octubre de 2018 18:17
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 21:07 +0200, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> H
?
Thanks,
Joan.
-Mensaje original-
De: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:ol...@apache.org]
Enviado el: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2018 18:22
Para: HttpClient User Discussion
Asunto: Re: Migration from Async 4.1.3 to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 18:01 +0200, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hi O
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 18:01 +0200, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
>
> Thanks a lot for all your answers. I'll work on this a bit more.
>
> There is just one problematic thing for us. Our app is an api
> gateway, and one important piece is the response timeouts between our
> app and the client
to HttpClient 5
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 15:08 +0200, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We are in the process of migrating to HttpClient5 from
> AsyncClient4.1.3, and we have some quiestions:
>
>
>
> 1. this.rc =
> RequestConfig.custom
On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 15:08 +0200, Joan Balagueró wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We are in the process of migrating to HttpClient5 from
> AsyncClient4.1.3, and
> we have some quiestions:
>
>
>
> 1. this.rc =
> RequestConfig.custom().setAuthenticationEnabled(false).
>
>
>
Hello,
We are in the process of migrating to HttpClient5 from AsyncClient4.1.3, and
we have some quiestions:
1. this.rc = RequestConfig.custom().setAuthenticationEnabled(false).
setConnectionRequestTimeout(Timeout.ofMillis(this.poolTimeout)).
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 16:57 +0200, Jack van Ooststroom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We started using HttpClient 5 in order for us to communicate with
> Apple's APNs service which requires the usage of HTTP/2. However, we
> are
> currently running into an issue with the "a
Hello,
We started using HttpClient 5 in order for us to communicate with
Apple's APNs service which requires the usage of HTTP/2. However, we are
currently running into an issue with the "apns-collapse-id" header.
According to the specification
(https://developer.apple.com/libra
On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 14:25 +, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> Thanks, that was what I was looking for. However, a few things...
> First, it seems the arguments have changed a bit since that was
> written.
>
> I fixed this by creating a HttpContext with : HttpContext context =
>
5, 2018 2:45 AM
To: HttpClient User Discussion <httpclient-users@hc.apache.org>
Subject: Re: HttpClient 5
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 21:01 +, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> I am finally getting chance to start with HttpClient 5 and HTTP/2. I
> am currently using 4.4.
>
> I am first tr
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 21:01 +, Mark A. Claassen wrote:
> I am finally getting chance to start with HttpClient 5 and HTTP/2. I
> am currently using 4.4.
>
> I am first trying to do a relatively simple port, meaning that I am
> trying to keep as much of the existing code as I
I am finally getting chance to start with HttpClient 5 and HTTP/2. I am
currently using 4.4.
I am first trying to do a relatively simple port, meaning that I am trying to
keep as much of the existing code as I can. I already have an internal API
that reads the entity objects from
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 17:20 +0200, Rémy Amouroux wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I’m trying to use httpclient 5 beta to discuss to a http2 server
> through a proxy.
>
> For the moment, my log4j configuration includes
>
> log4j.logger.org.apache.hc.client5.http=DEBUG
> log4j.l
34 matches
Mail list logo
