[Hugin-devs] [Bug 697039] Re: OSX 10.5 Leopard can't stitch

2011-03-21 Thread TORO
I checked v2011 beta3 + PTbatcherGUI v2011 beta2. Still the same error (makefile) but workaround with PTbatcherGui via send to batchjob from within Hugin works fine for me. Regards, Tobi P.S.: I'm still on Leopard 10.5.8 ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 739090] Re: stitching crashes upon beginning

2011-03-21 Thread tmodes
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 697039 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697039 Which operating system? Which hugin version? Please give more details! If MacOS 10.5, this bug is a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/697039 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 723661] Re: Hugin 2010.4.0 deinstallation also deletes files it didn't install

2011-03-21 Thread tmodes
** Changed in: hugin Milestone: None = 2011.0rc1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723661 Title: Hugin 2010.4.0 deinstallation also deletes files it didn't install Status in

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 735848] Re: updated translation - brazilian portuguese

2011-03-21 Thread tmodes
Thanks, committed. ** Changed in: hugin Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: hugin Milestone: None = 2011.0rc1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735848 Title:

[Hugin-devs] [Bug 679353] Re: Filter unacceptable characters before the stitching process fail

2011-03-21 Thread Bart van Andel
Just to add WHY the = sign is so problematic. When you say: make 'foo\=bar' make assigns the value bar to a variable named foo\. See attached makefile, test with the above commandline. That's what I figured, I was trying to find an escape character for the '=' on the command line, but

Re: [Hugin-devs] [Bug 679353] Re: Filter unacceptable characters before the stitching process fail

2011-03-21 Thread Yuv
On March 21, 2011 06:49:49 pm Bart van Andel wrote: Interesting. Last year during the implementation of the makefilelib there was no help. Also after merging there was no feedback. The makefilelib contains own test routines which creates test makefiles. But now - at once - all problematic