Am Sonntag, 12. September 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
On September 11, 2010 06:04:34 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Samstag 11 September 2010 schrieb Yuval Levy:
On September 9, 2010 06:29:31 pm Kornel Benko wrote:
It should be (at a proper place)
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Erik Krause erik.kra...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 12.09.2010 17:18, schrieb T. Modes:
I assume, that the builder has compiled libtiff without this change.
Please check your libtiff.
In this case: thePanz, could you use a different source for the binaries in
the
i agree this should be an option, not a feature that can't be turned
off.
batch thru imagemagick does NOT seem like a reasonable solution ;-)
On Sep 12, 11:01 am, Erik Krause erik.kra...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 12.09.2010 08:51, schrieb Harry van der Wolf:
You can also use tiffsplit to split your
On Sep 12, 9:11 pm, Aron H aron.hel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 11, 8:58 am, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
...
Hi thePanz,
I will definitely share my build when I can confirm that I can build
x64 too. In the next day or two!
Aron
Hi all,
When compiling , I get the message:
On September 12, 2010 05:01:21 am Erik Krause wrote:
Am 12.09.2010 08:51, schrieb Harry van der Wolf:
You can also use tiffsplit to split your tiffs first.
Hmm, an additional step that wouldn't be necessary if the programmers
would have thought a bit further...
You might be surprised to
Hi all,
When compiling , I get the message:
'LAPACK not available, LU will be used for matrix inversion when
computing the covariance; this might be unstable at times'
I've seen no instructions for Windows on whether LAPACK is
recommended, or how to get it if it is. Anyone have experience
I'm getting ready to build this afternoon. Where are we at for CMake?
Questions are ...
1. Does CMake determine the min dependency, and can evaluate and confirm
the correct one without hardsetting version numbers for the
dependencies?
2. Can -DCPACK ... RPM=on be turned off by default? This
Am Montag 13 September 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
I'm getting ready to build this afternoon. Where are we at for CMake?
Questions are ...
1. Does CMake determine the min dependency, and can evaluate and confirm
the correct one without hardsetting version numbers for the
dependencies?
No
Am 13.09.2010 15:52, schrieb Yuval Levy:
Processing PSD layers is the default behavior of most modern
applications so why should the default for TIFF layers be different?
Because these are no layers. Layers always have the same resolution and
bit depth. TIFF pages don't. Gimp uses TIFF pages
Earlier I had indicated using echo from a script to read in the
dependencies. Someone mentioned that this would not work? Is this
because of the location of the line in the CMakeLists.txt?
I'd have to dig around for the e-mail, but someone indicated that
-DCPACK_BINARY_DEB:BOOL=off/on could
Am Montag 13 September 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
Earlier I had indicated using echo from a script to read in the
dependencies. Someone mentioned that this would not work? Is this
because of the location of the line in the CMakeLists.txt?
It was me.
1.) Location
2.) Syntax
I'd have to dig
Hello,
I'm quite new to hugin but so far I've generally been getting
excellent results creating standard panoramas.
Recently I tried creating one of those 360 degree 'little planet'
stereographic projections that you can find in the gallery on the
hugin homepage. So I went out into my garden and
Am Montag 13 September 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
Reviewing CMakeLists.txt, I've noticed:
SET(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEPENDS libpano13(=2.9.17), libpost2c2,
libglew(=1.5), freeglut3, libboost-filesystem(=1.38.0), liblcms1,
libopenexr6, libtiff4)
Which appears to set debian package
Hi,
On September 13, 2010 12:56:28 pm WaterWolf wrote:
So issue 1: The resulting image is unnecessarily large for my purposes
and so took much longer to generate than it needed to. What is the
best way of reducing the size of the final image and speeding up the
process? It would also be nice
On Mon 13-Sep-2010 at 09:56 -0700, WaterWolf wrote:
Recently I tried creating one of those 360 degree 'little planet'
stereographic projections that you can find in the gallery on the
hugin homepage. So I went out into my garden and took a 360 degree
matrix of images. It took 42 images to cover
On September 13, 2010 05:07:00 pm Dale Beams wrote:
This should work provided the = is the lowest common denominator. For
example, if your system is at (= 0.2.0) and mine has 0.2.2 then it
should check and say it's ok to install.
that's what I would expect too. Let's try it, and if it does
It appears there is a problem. It's looking for those packages
specifically by number when trying to install.
u...@ubuntu:~/src/hugin/hugin.build$ sudo dpkg -i
hugin-2010.3.0-Linux.deb
(Reading database ... 195430 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace hugin 2010.3.0
On September 13, 2010 12:41:08 pm Erik Krause wrote:
Am 13.09.2010 15:52, schrieb Yuval Levy:
Processing PSD layers is the default behavior of most modern
applications so why should the default for TIFF layers be different?
Because these are no layers. Layers always have the same
Hullo All,
I have only recently been playing about with dragging images into
rough alignment in the Fast preview window (FPW), prior to setting
control points and optimisation, so have not previously seen the
effect of a projection change at this this stage.
If I load a number of rectilinear
Thanks Yuval, I think I've solved it. My system has 8GB of RAM. I
tried using a version of Enblend compiled without image cache and I
finally got a successful stitch! Thanks for your suggestions.
On Sep 13, 5:33 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On September 13, 2010 04:35:36 pm Brandroid
Nice tutorial, Bruno -- thanks! One of my youngsters is busy taping
together a globe at this very moment.
Attached is a hugin template that will speed things up for those
interested in trying your technique. To use it, create a new hugin
project, and load 12 copies of your equirectangular
Would love to do this with a philosphere
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:11:00 -0700
From: bbbri...@gmail.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] New tutorial, creating gores for assembling globes
Nice tutorial, Bruno -- thanks! One of my youngsters is busy taping
Am Dienstag, 14. September 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
It appears there is a problem. It's looking for those packages
specifically by number when trying to install.
That's the problem :)
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hmm.
I'm not buying in on many of your arguments here.
I don't know enough about this particular change in Enfuse. Was the
decision to treat all pages of multipage TIFF files equally taken with
a clear understanding of the repercussions of that choice?
Certainly it is not the case that
24 matches
Mail list logo
