Thomas Pryds wrote:
2011/11/4 kfj _...@yahoo.com mailto:k...@yahoo.com
Are you sure you ran the optimizer after generating the CPs? Having
the CPs per se doesn't 'move' the images, only after optimization they
have y, p and r values to spread them out on the panosphere. Try
This page http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/DC210/DC210Acgi.HTM says
that the zoom range is the 135 film equivalent of 29-58mm. Assuming these
were shot as wide as the zoom went, it might be a safe assumption that it
is 29mm with a multiplier of 1. At least, that’s where I’d start.
--
You
I just ran up Ubuntu 11.1 64bit and selected Hugin from the package
manager. It was called Panorama but seems to be the 2011.2 version.
When I try to run it, I get this message.
I'm a Linux noob, so this is probably a simple one to resolve.
Configuration file
Yes, usually it optimizes, but sometimes, when it doesn't find CPs on all
images I guess the optimization is not done. It gives a message that it
found some separated groups of images or something like that. In this case
you will need to mark some more CPs manually and then optimize.
Cheers,
Hi,
If you're interested in watching the Palmela 2011 Conference talks in
video, head on to: http://www.palmela2011.com/info/conference/video-archive
Roughly half of the talks published already and the rest of it is coming
over the next weeks.
Follow Palmela 2011 on
Hi Harry,
I fixed the typo. Hopefully this does not break someone translation
work.
On 6 Nov., 21:48, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On of the new strings to be translated is rule of third but should be
rule of thirds.
Are we going to change this before release or not?
I had that happen just this past Saturday. Turned out that the last
frame had only about 20-30 pixel overlap with the previous one. So I
loaded the images, then manually added some control points between the
last frame and its predecessor. Then I ran the Assistant on it and
everything
Yeah, I'd say that would be an improvement.
I imaging they try to think about placement of controls, etc. for
Hugin on a regular basis, but the developers probably become
accommodated to precedents set by ad hoc kludging done during the
development process rather than from from more conscious UI
On Nov 4, 3:07 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
In an earlier post Robert Krawitz was sharing some nice panoramas he
did:http://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landsca...
andhttp://www.google.com/url?sa=Dq=http://rlk.smugmug.com/Other/Landsca...
and mentioned
Well I have gone back and tried it and looked over the documentation
pretty carefully. Indeed these features do not work on the Mac version
(as far as I can tell.)
Originally, if I remember correctly, Apple developed the command/
Apple key only for GUI related functions, preserving the meaning of
Interesting idea, karmadillo.
On Nov 7, 5:32 pm, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 4, 3:07 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote: In an earlier post
Robert Krawitz was sharing some nice panoramas he
My impulse is to agree with moving the image controls to the right
side, although I think I would put them above the image, since they
control it. As you point out, all the other controls on the left
relate to the masks, so having the image controls with them seems
wrong.
On the other hand, they
Thanks Bruno,
Knowing about the ability to zoom in the mask tab makes many things
better (I hope the mask editing features can be worked out for the Mac
version soon.)
In light of people's suggestions I have done some reading of the
documentation and experimentation. But I think I'm missing some
I suppose the hard part is discerning foolish consistency from
desirable consistency. :-)
On Nov 7, 6:59 pm, JohnPW johnpwatk...@gmail.com wrote:
It's the perennial issue of balance—the natural human desire for, and
love of consistency against the truth that a foolish consistency is
the
14 matches
Mail list logo
