Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
Hi Bruno,
2009/10/9 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net:
Currently Hugin doesn't need to worry about ordering of commands, it
just writes rules and then specifies the end target(s) it wants, you
will need to write a dependency solver.
May be fun. I never did that :-D
Hi Gerry,
2009/10/7 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech
saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports
which
Hi Bruno,
2009/10/7 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net:
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it
could bring some improvements to the current
Hi Yuv,
2009/10/7 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch:
Hi Lukáš,
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included).
I didn't
Hi Garry,
2009/10/8 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
this has
2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com
I am a fan of python but it is probably overkill for the sequence of
commands that would need to be executed.
I think so.
Please don't introduce an extra external dependency. Python works well on
Linux and fine on MacOSX as long as you
Hi Lukáš
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
I don't want to replace .pto files.
would you mind elaborating a little bit more about what exactly you want
to do? given the previous discussions on this list (that you could not
know about) I (and maybe some others too) have some preconceived notions
in the
Harry van der Wolf wrote:
And for windows? Better or worse?
nightmare.
Yuv
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 10:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
I know I'm not great at this stuff, but in the panostart tool there
is a perl module that abstacts all the business of writing and
escaping Makefile rules, i.e. you declare your intent with a list of
input files, a list of output
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech
saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports
which are caused by using some forbidden characters inside makefile
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it
could bring some improvements to the current workflow. I've two ideas
how it could help. First it
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included).
This all sounds like
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML.
this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor
Bruno Postle wrote:
Isn't there enough stuff that really needs fixing in Hugin?
yes there is. but the topic seems to itch Lukáš. Other topics may not be
of interest to him.
What can you do with XML that we can't already do with the current
.pto format?
it's extensible without conflicts,
14 matches
Mail list logo