[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-10 Thread Yuval Levy
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: Hi Bruno, 2009/10/9 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net: Currently Hugin doesn't need to worry about ordering of commands, it just writes rules and then specifies the end target(s) it wants, you will need to write a dependency solver. May be fun. I never did that :-D

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Gerry, 2009/10/7 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com: On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports which

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Bruno, 2009/10/7 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it could bring some improvements to the current

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Yuv, 2009/10/7 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch: Hi Lukáš, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included). I didn't

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Garry, 2009/10/8 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Harry van der Wolf
2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com I am a fan of python but it is probably overkill for the sequence of commands that would need to be executed. I think so. Please don't introduce an extra external dependency. Python works well on Linux and fine on MacOSX as long as you

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Hi Lukáš Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: I don't want to replace .pto files. would you mind elaborating a little bit more about what exactly you want to do? given the previous discussions on this list (that you could not know about) I (and maybe some others too) have some preconceived notions in the

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Harry van der Wolf wrote: And for windows? Better or worse? nightmare. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 10:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: I know I'm not great at this stuff, but in the panostart tool there is a perl module that abstacts all the business of writing and escaping Makefile rules, i.e. you declare your intent with a list of input files, a list of output

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Gerry Patterson
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports which are caused by using some forbidden characters inside makefile

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it could bring some improvements to the current workflow. I've two ideas how it could help. First it

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included). This all sounds like

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Gerry Patterson
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-07 Thread Yuval Levy
Bruno Postle wrote: Isn't there enough stuff that really needs fixing in Hugin? yes there is. but the topic seems to itch Lukáš. Other topics may not be of interest to him. What can you do with XML that we can't already do with the current .pto format? it's extensible without conflicts,