[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.4.0_rc1 source code released

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > * Improved usability, particularly crop settings and help which now > uses the system's default browser. [...] Hello, This does not work for me at all. I somehow get the feeling that the respective wx-function *requires* KDE or GNOME instead of using/falling back t

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.4.0_rc1 source code released

Yuval Levy wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Yuval Levy wrote: >> [...] >>> * Improved usability, particularly crop settings and help which now >>> uses the system's default browser. >> [...] >> Hello, >> This does not work for me

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin-2009.4.0_rc2 tarball released

Yuval Levy wrote: > Panorama stitching and more. A powerful software package for creation > and processing of panoramic images. > hugin-2009.4.0_rc2 (release candidate 2) tarball is available here: [...] This tarball contains some cruft: ametz...@argenau:/tmp$ tar tzf hugin-2009.4.0_rc2.tar.

[hugin-ptx] Hugin 2009.4.0 (and earlier) CP gen. interface question

Hello, the cp-detector preferences are strangly structured: There is the main dialogue, offering a choice of cp detectors. [Edit] allows to customize to specific program invokations. That is were the magic switch is: What does the "Autopano-SIFT / Autopano by A Jenny" choice do? How should it be

[hugin-ptx] Re: Announce: Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0 - Release Candidate ?3

cspiel wrote: > Hello Everybody! >Today we announce the third release > candidate (RC3) for Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0. > We have put a tar-ball of it at >http://sourceforge.net/projects/enblend/files/ [...] Are command-line option fully compatible with 3.2, i.e. will enblend 4.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Announce: Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0 - Release ?Candidate 3

prokoudine wrote: [...] > I finally found some time to try the new version. The very first thing > I ran into is absence of libxmi in my system. Ubuntu 9.10 doesn't even > know what it is. [...] It does. http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=libxmi&mode=filename&suite=karmi

[hugin-ptx] Re: Announce: Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0 - Release Candidate ?3

cspiel wrote: > Hello Everybody! >Today we announce the third release > candidate (RC3) for Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0. [...] The installation logic for the png-files in the html-local target is broken, I think this should fix it: --- --- doc/Makefile

[hugin-ptx] Re: Announce: Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0 - Final Release

cspiel wrote: > Hello everybody! >Today we gladly announce the final > version of Enblend/Enfuse version 4.0. [...] Hello, There seems to be a tiny bug in the tarball building script, the file VERSION is not shipped. This breaks re-running of autoconf, since configure.in reads the file'

[hugin-ptx] Re: Towards a non-patented control point detector

Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sun 03-Jan-2010 at 00:52 +0100, Pablo d'Angelo wrote: >>The code lives in a bzr repository on launchpad: >>https://code.launchpad.net/~pablo.dangelo/hugin/panomatic-lib > Can anyone give me a command-line that I can use with bazaar-1.4.2 > to download this code? ..or c

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 - Use the source!

Dale Beams wrote: [...] > I'm building the binary from source exactly as in the wiki. I'm > building enblend, libpano13, hugin, and autopano-sift-c > My distro has the following binary through aptitude: > autopano-sift{a} enblend{a} enfuse{a} hugin hugin-data{a} > hugin-tools{a} libpano13-1{a}

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 - Use the source!

Dale Beams wrote: > From: br...@postle.net >> What version of autopano-sift-C are you using? You need to have >> 2.5.1 release, the SVN trunk and all other releases have serious >> bugs. > Yes, I've been trying to use the SVN trunk for some time now. I'll > try the 2.5.1 release instead. Th

[hugin-ptx] Re: Can Hugin stitch this?

Gerry Patterson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Gerhard Killesreiter < > gerh...@killesreiter.de> wrote: [...] >> I've come across two photos that I took and was wondering if Hugin would >> be the right tool to "merge" them into one. >> The photos have been taken with a small but notic

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2010.0.0 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > Thanks to everyone responsible for this release! > Hugin 2010.0.0 release notes [...] uploaded to debian/experimental, should hit the mirrors soon. Lenny backports on http://www.bebt.de/debian/dists/lenny/hugin-latest/ cu andreas -- You received this message because you

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.0.0_RC2 released

Yuval Levy wrote: > On May 26, 2011 01:12:46 PM Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Afaict the correct tarball did not make it to either lp or sf. LP 404s >> and sf.net has a tarball that only contain the cmake files: [...] > LP looked good from here. I downloaded the tarball and everyth

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.0.0_RC2 released

Andreas Metzler wrote: > Yuval Levy wrote: >> On May 26, 2011 01:12:46 PM Andreas Metzler wrote: >>> Afaict the correct tarball did not make it to either lp or sf. LP 404s >>> and sf.net has a tarball that only contain the cmake files: > [...] >> LP look

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.0.0_RC2 released

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > Should I have put this sentence in a more prominent place of the release > notes? > |EXECUTABLES > | > |The binaries in this release are identical with the rc1 binaries. No need > |to rebuild. The only update is a script for wrapping Smartblend in > |Windows. I am no

[hugin-ptx] Re: Challenging application of Hugin?

Stanton wrote: > Dear All, > I have a series of overlapping overhead scans which comprise an old > manuscript scroll, which I'd like to re-create as a scrollable > panorama. [...] Could you take a look at http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/scans/en.shtml ? This seems to be describe your situ

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.0.0 for Ubuntu distribution

Peter Steneld wrote: > Is there anyone who knows if there is a Hugin 2011.0.0 package on the > way for the Linux Ubuntu distribution? If you were running oneric, it would be included: http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/hugin cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His o

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0_beta1 released

Yuval Levy wrote: [...] > _Python Scripting Interface_ > Hugin now exposes some of its data structure and functionalities through > a Python module. To get started with scripting, start your Python > interpreter and type: > >>> import hsi > >>> help (hsi) > Standalone Python programs can a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0_beta1 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > On Thu 23-Jun-2011 at 19:18 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >>looks like I made some stupid error when trying to generate a hsi >>enabled build. I installed swig and python-dev, and appended >>-DBUILD_HSI:BOOL=On to the cmake invokation. However the only

[hugin-ptx] 2011.2.0_beta1 ptbatcher - disable autohide

Hello, 2011.2.0_beta1 has dropped Stitch-Now for PTBatcher. Is there a way to disable auto-minimize of progress and PTBatcher window? I am running multiple virtual desktops, hugin on one of them. If I want to check the stitching progress I now need to switch desktops *and* unhide* the progress wi

[hugin-ptx] Re: errors compiling with BUILD_HSI=on

kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On 24 Jun., 19:03, kevin wrote: >> Was running swig 1.3.38, upgraded to swig 2.0.4 and that error went >> away.  But now I have a different error!  I did a fresh pull of hugin >> so maybe it's just temporary with the -current code, because this look >> wx related and

[hugin-ptx] Re: errors compiling with BUILD_HSI=on

Andreas Metzler wrote: > kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On 24 Jun., 19:03, kevin wrote: [...] >> Swig >= 2.0 is a requirement. > [...] > If this is really correct the build scripts should detect incompatible > swig versions and show a useful error message. [

[hugin-ptx] Re: CMake 2.8.5 rc2 breaks

Yuval Levy wrote: > On June 24, 2011 07:41:54 AM Andreas Metzler wrote: >> On Debian this is caused by a CMake upgrade. If I use cmake >> 2.8.4+dfsg.1-5 (includes multi-arch patches) the build continues. >> 2.8.5 rc2 breaks. > do we have to worry about the cmake upgrade?

[hugin-ptx] Hugin 2011.2.0 release notes - fixed background image

Hello, is keeping the background image on a fixed position (making text difficult to read) intended behavior? http://www.bebt.de/tmp/scrolling.mpeg This is on iceweasel (firefox) 3.5.16. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.2.0_rc2 released

Yuval Levy wrote: > Hugin-2011.2.0_rc2 RELEASE NOTES [...] I have just uploaded rc2 to Debian experimental, enabling python support for the first time. Squeeze binaries are available here: http://www.bebt.de/debian/dists/squeeze/hugin-latest/ cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, D

[hugin-ptx] Re: how many man-years to reboot Hugin?

kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: [...] > The looming five or twenty or 65 man years question musn't keep us > from asking: > - how many man years we have to invest in bug hunting in undocumented > or convoluted code (inscrutability) > - how many man years it costs to refacture parts bit by bit, trying

[hugin-ptx] Re: long view of street?

kfj <_...@yahoo.com> wrote: [...] > sorry to be so vague, but I couldn't find the source just now: I read > quite recently about someone who emulated a line scan camera with a > video camera. If you can drive by slowly and always only take the > central vertical strip from successive video images,

[hugin-ptx] Re: cpfind - max matches?

Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > Though my question is, why do you want to reduce the number of > control points? If it is to workaround some bug in other tools, > then the problem isn't really with cpfind. Hello, cpfind is not perfect. Manually filtering out bad control points is often necessary

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.4.0 released

T. Modes wrote: > Hugin-2011.4 RELEASE NOTES [...] Uploaded to Debian/unstable. I will push to backports once it has propagated to squeeze/testing. (Preview for squeeze on http://www.bebt.de/debian/dists/squeeze/hugin-latest/) cu andreas -- You received this message because you are subscribed

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.4.0 released

Stefan Peter wrote: > Hi Yuv > On 12/24/2011 09:13 PM, Yuv wrote: >> As an aside: the binaries on the Hugin PPA still mention autopano-sift >> and autopano-sift-c as suggested packages. This is obsolete and >> should be removed IMHO. > I don't agree here: as long as the Debian packages use this

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2011.4.0 released

Gnome Nomad wrote: > Andreas Metzler wrote: >> T. Modes wrote: >>> Hugin-2011.4 RELEASE NOTES >> [...] >> Uploaded to Debian/unstable. I will push to backports once it has >> propagated to squeeze/testing. (Preview for squeeze on >> http://www.bebt.de

[hugin-ptx] hugin build error with gcc-4.7

Hello, hugin 2011.4.0 does not build with gcc-4.7. There is an easy to fix error about a missing include (already tracked and patched in https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/913250) however there is another issue that I have only seen on s390 yet: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=h

[hugin-ptx] Re: linux/Ubuntu: building deb package from command line

Harry van der Wolf wrote: [...] > Another reason is that the ppa build of enblend/enfuse is not openmp > enabled. I have a quad-core 8-threads i7 in my new laptop which means I > definitely want an openmp enabled enblend/enfuse. Just use the regular (non-ppa) Ubuntu package, /usr/bin/enblend-mp a

[hugin-ptx] 2012.0 pre-beta (i.e. hg default branch as of today) uploaded to Debian/experimental

Hello, to get some build coverage on more exotic archs I have uploaded hugin hg default branch as of today (Version number: 2011.5.0.20120720+dfsg-1) to Debian/experimental. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears

[hugin-ptx] Re: Help optimizing images

Caleb wrote: > I have 6 1280x960 images taken from 6 corresponding videos. They're all > from within an extremely short time span of each other. The cameras they > were all configured for a 170 hfov. The cameras were attached to the inside > of a 19cm cube and it was suspended by one corner. Ho

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2012.0beta1 released

Harry van der Wolf wrote: [...] > This tarball is equivalent to rev/changeset 774550436f28 in our Mercurial > repository, where it is also tagged 2012.0beta1 > Verify its SHA1SUM > 8f9aa64b86f799283d302d702de4ecb16976f07a hugin-2012.0.0_beta1.tar.bz2 Uploaded to Debian/experimental, afaict ther

[hugin-ptx] [trivial one-line patch] Drop Encoding from pto_gen.desktop

Hello, the newly added (in 2012.0) pto_gen.desktop file includes a Encoding field, attached trivial patch drops it. Rationale (courtesy of lintian): The Encoding key is now deprecated by the FreeDesktop standard and all strings are required to be encoded in UTF-8. This desktop entry explicitly s

[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini on ubuntu 12.04

"Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)" wrote: > I have compiled Panini 0.71.104 on > Ubuntu 12.04. For those who does't know, this is a very good visualizer for > many projections, like equirectangular, cube faces and many others. As it > was not an obvious

[hugin-ptx] Re: Panini on ubuntu 12.04

Stefan Peter wrote: > Hi Andreas > On 18.08.2012 19:19, Andreas Metzler wrote: > [...] >> Just out of interest: Does the binary from the hugin ppa >> https://launchpad.net/~hugin/+archive/hugin-builds for oneric not work >> on 12.04? > It should if the missing

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2012.0.0_rc2 released

Harry van der Wolf wrote: [...] > * from Launchpad at > https://launchpad.net/hugin/2012.0/2012.0rc2/+download/hugin-2012.0.0_rc2.tar.bz2 > This is a source code release. For executables see below. [...] Hello, the public key needed to verify https://launchpad.net/hugin/2012.0/2012.0rc2/+downl

[hugin-ptx] Re: "linefind.exe has stopped working"

Gnome Nomad wrote: [...] >> If you want to have a go at the fix mentined, you either have to use >> 2012.0.0+dfsg-1 from Debian/experimental > Just enabled experimental repository. When I force version Hugin to the > one from experimental, Synaptic tells me that hugin will be removed. > Let's t

[hugin-ptx] Re: rapperry pi and hugin possible ?

Emad ud din Bhatt wrote: > is it possible to run hugin on rasperry pi board? > http://www.raspberrypi.org > Can we stitch images using rasperry pi on location? I have not run any tests, biut I would guess it is simply too slow with too little memory. It might work if you only handled low resolu

[hugin-ptx] Re: Strange lines

Gnome Nomad wrote: [...] > IIRC, the problem was traced to the amount of memory available to > enblend, or being used by enblend, (or something like that). I thought > there was some setting in either Hugin or enblend that would increase > that amount of memory? If enblend is built with image-

[hugin-ptx] Re: Strange lines

Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > If enblend is built with image-cache it should be able to handle big > images even with huge panos This should have read "... panos even with little memory" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "

[hugin-ptx] Re: Strange lines

Gérald Brosseau wrote: > Le 2013-01-07 10:48, Andreas Metzler a écrit : [...] >> At least on Debian/Ubuntu /usr/bin/enblend has image-cache enabled. (The >> multi-processor aware /usr/bin/enblend-mp has not.) > Should I use the > enblend-mp > or the plain > enblend

[hugin-ptx] Re: python 2.7 vs. python 3.2 and compilation errors

Harry van der Wolf wrote: > On Ubuntu 12.1- Quantal I'm trying to compile the latest tip of hugin > (6102:1f205fefbcd7 tip). I'm on Ubuntu 12.10 having a mix of python 2.7 and > python 3.2. I need both and so does Ubuntu itself currently. > I started to use from my build directory the following c

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2013.0beta1 released

Harry van der Wolf wrote: > Hugin-2013.0 RELEASE NOTES [...] Hello, I have finally found time to update the Debian packaging and have made an upload to experimental. cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on fro

[hugin-ptx] Minor issues with 2013.0.0 beta1

Hello, * Tclap * It is not used in used in a normal hugin build and therefore not searched for by CMake. However still src/hugin_cpfind/localfeatures/keypoints.cpp has #include and therefore building with -DBUILD_KEYPOINTS=ON fails if tclap is not present. (It succeeds if tclap is present.) Is k

[hugin-ptx] Re: Minor issues with 2013.0.0 beta1

min-overlap=1> =item B<-h|--help> Display help. =back =head1 AUTHORS B was written by Thomas Modes. This manpages was generated by converting the wiki-page on L<http://wiki.panotools.org/> to pod-format by Andreas Metzler.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Trying to install Hugin 2013.0.0-beta1 from Debian Experimental repository

Gnome Nomad wrote: > Enblend, enfuse, hugin-data packages accept the force version in > Synaptic. Forcing the version on Hugin package says that hugin-tools > will be removed. Forcing the version on hugin-tools says that Hugin will > be removed. [...] > So it looks like I can't test beta1, sinc

[hugin-ptx] Re: Release 0.7.0 for Win32 available

Harry van der Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/10/23 Yuval Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] >> my approach was to look at those who are more experienced and have more >> resources than me. Red Hat, Novell, Canonical are all large corporations >> producing popular Linux distributions. Canonical

[hugin-ptx] Re: bug

Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat 01-Nov-2008 at 14:05 -0700, ivanchti wrote: >>I had a bug message from my hugin : >>make: enfuse : commande introuvable > You need to install the current version of enblend, this contains > the enfuse tool: > http://enblend.sourceforge.net/ Pa

[hugin-ptx] Re: bug

ivanchti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried the debian packages of enfuse bt ther were no packages > avalaible for my architecure. I try the compilation. [...] Which arch is that? i386 was missing but is available now. cu andreas --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You rece

[hugin-ptx] Re: Enblend-Enfuse on Intrepid (Ubuntu 8.10)

Yuval Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > has anyone been lucky building enblend-enfuse on a fresh Intrepid Ibex > install? > I can't find the dependency libopenexr2ldbl with apt-cache libopenexr-dev probably. The packages in Debian/experimental http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/enblend-enfuse.htm

[hugin-ptx] Re: enfused stitch failed

prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tried stitching an enfused pano (hugin 0.7.0) to do my first NN5 > powered 360deg :) [...] > false -w -o enfused_stack_ldr_.tif [...] Looks like you do not have enfuse installed. Or you are experiencing http://bugs.debian.org/504296 (not a Debian speci

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > A question: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 was released seven weeks ago and > there have been no bug reports, can I assume that this version is ok > for a 'stable' release? [...] Simple stuff: *man/*.1 still says ".TH PANOINFO 1 "2008-01-22" "2.9.12

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2?released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: > On Sat 25-Apr-2009 at 18:39 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >>tests/simpleTiff16/reference/ ships a .svn subdirectory. > This was fixed a couple of months ago, or at least the beta2 tarball > doesn't contain any .svn folders

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: > A question: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 was released seven weeks ago and > there have been no bug reports, can I assume that this version is ok > for a 'stable' release? [...] Hello, I think library versioning is broken due to ABI breakage (compared to

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Andreas Metzler wrote: > In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: >> A question: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 was released seven weeks ago and >> there have been no bug reports, can I assume that this version is ok >> for a 'stable' re

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.14_beta2 released

In gmane.comp.misc.ptx Bruno Postle wrote: > On Fri 01-May-2009 at 09:28 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >>I think library versioning is broken due to ABI breakage (compared to >>2.9.12) and therefore a soname bump is necessary: >>filter.h: struct adjust_Prefs has ne

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin on Ubuntu Jaunty

cri wrote: > I've just successfully finished compiling Hugin (3814) on Ubuntu > Jaunty following the guide on the wiki. > I don't know if anyone already tried this, but I wanted to post here > to confirm that the wiki guide works also on Ubuntu 9.04 although it > is not written on the page. [...

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin on Ubuntu Jaunty

k...@ph.ed.ac.uk wrote: > On 3 May, 13:31, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> FWIW I have made prelinary deb packages of hugin 0.8.0 beta4 and >> libpano13 2.9.14 rc1 for Debian lenny and later. >> i386 binaries for the trusting. >> deb http://www.bebt.de/debian/lenny hugin

[hugin-ptx] [Patch] Add license headers for files imported from Gabor API and svm

Hello, in the process of trying to prepare 0.8.0 for Debian GNU/Linux I have started going over the copyright/license headers. In src/celeste many files are missing copyright information. Most of these are files imported with minimal changes from Gabor API http://www.kung-foo.tv/gaborapi.php or li

[hugin-ptx] Re: [Patch] Add license headers for files imported from Gabor API and svm

Andreas Metzler wrote: > in the process of trying to prepare 0.8.0 for Debian GNU/Linux I have > started going over the copyright/license headers. In src/celeste many > files are missing copyright information. Most of these are files > imported with minimal changes from Gabo

[hugin-ptx] Re: [Patch] Add license headers for files imported from Gabor API and svm

Tim Nugent wrote: > 2009/5/16 Andreas Metzler [...] >> There is a buch of files in src/celeste/ without copyright/license >> information: [...] >> I think this is all original work (probably deemed to small for the >> license header), Copyright (C) 2008 by Tim Nug

[hugin-ptx] Re: [Patch] Add license headers for files imported from Gabor API and svm

On 2009-05-16 Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > Thanks. I will post a patch. Attached. thanks, cu andreas --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" gro

[hugin-ptx] More copyright questions

Hello, I know this might be a PITA, but I cannot help it. There are a couple of non-trivial files in hugin with no copyright/license headers that are very probably original work for hugin. svn log does not look very helpful. Originating from branches/ippei: ./src/hugin1/tests/test_projections.c

[hugin-ptx] Duplicate file img2vips.cpp, Use of Makefile.am?

Hello, the file img2vips.cpp is contained twice in the tarball: hugin-0.8.0$ md5sum src/hugin1/tools/img2vips.cpp src/hugin1/tools_vips/img2vips.cpp 22026943e857d5a44caa6a15228a84c5 src/hugin1/tools/img2vips.cpp 22026943e857d5a44caa6a15228a84c5 src/hugin1/tools_vips/img2vips.cpp I guess one o

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin on Ubuntu Jaunty

Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > FWIW I have made prelinary deb packages of hugin 0.8.0 beta4 and > libpano13 2.9.14 rc1 for Debian lenny and later. > Source package (easy to verify, tarballs are a copy of the > official ones, diffs are tiny.) tarballs now differ slightly, some fil

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.8.0_rc3 released

Bruno Postle wrote: > A hugin-0.8.0_rc3 (release candidate 3) tarball is available here: [...] Hello, I am getting a segfault when trying to use the crop tool in the opengl preview. Reproducing seems to require that the OpenGL preview has already been loaded automatically at startup, i.e. it wa

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin-0.8.0_rc3 released

Bruno Postle wrote: [...] > I can reproduce this, the Crop button segfaults but only if the Fast > preview was open when hugin was started. This is probably the same > as this bug report: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2801663&group_id=77506&atid=550441 Indeed. Sorry for t

[hugin-ptx] Re: some minor GUI ideas

Thomas Steiner wrote: [...] > * set jpeg as default output format for panoramas, not tif [...] Better: Add some way to set the prefered output format. (I wonder why tif with *no* compression is used by default. Is there any downside for using tif with any of the three lossless compression method

[hugin-ptx] Re: Enfuse v4.2 question

bugbear wrote: > Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: >> 2016-06-08 10:03 UTC+02:00, bugbear : >>> Didn't there used to be a semi interactive GUI for enfuse, which >>> would make such experimentation, if not simpler, quicker and >>> easier? >> Do you mean EnfuseGUI? > A quick google says "no", since the e

[hugin-ptx] [patch] hugin: typo successful

Hello, find attached a trivial typo fix for hugin rc2. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugi

[hugin-ptx] Re: [patch] hugin: typo successful

On 2016-09-11 Andreas Metzler wrote: > find attached a trivial typo fix for hugin rc2. There is another one, updated patch (including the original one) attached. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2017.0 beta 1 release

T. Modes wrote: > Hi all, > today we are releasing a first beta of Hugin 2017.0. > Source tarball can be downloaded Hello, binary packages are available in Debian/experimental. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew hi

[hugin-ptx] [patch] Typo fix "an other"

the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20170617113917.wnlxwrkpwwk47m45%40argenau.bebt.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >From 4aca008ca47a647bc697a8b0aa24ddc48eeb1b1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Metzler Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 13:35:16 +0200 Su

[hugin-ptx] Re: PPA for Hugin 2017.0?

Stefan Peter wrote: [...] > Both the RC2 and the final 2017.0.0 are tagged to the same revision > (7741:eac5e8cc546e) in the hugin source code, so from a functional point > of view, they are identical. i.e. except for dpkg -l hugin\* there is absolutely no difference. This most probably is the

[hugin-ptx] Re: PPA for Hugin 2017.0?

David W. Jones wrote: [...] > So if I have: > 2017.0.0~rc2+dfsg-2 from Debian Testing repository, I have the same > version as the announced 2017.0? Yes, that's right. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on

[hugin-ptx] Re: Problem building hg version on linux / debian sid

On 2017-08-06 "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" wrote: > I've some errors while building Hugin on debian. > I use debian/sid. Please look at https://bugs.debian.org/src:hugin where you will find https://bugs.debian.org/853447 > Maye some packages has been updated on debian but I cannot figure out which

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2018.0 beta1

T. Modes wrote: [...] > today we are releasing a first beta of Hugin 2018.0. (The final release > will not be this year, therefor I called it 2018.0) [...] Should hit Debian/experimental with the next mirror pulse. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friend

[hugin-ptx] libpano - Typo fix

pos found by lintian Resultion/enought Author: Andreas Metzler Origin: vendor Last-Update: 2018-09-23 --- libpano13-2.9.20~rc2+dfsg.orig/parser.c +++ libpano13-2.9.20~rc2+dfsg/parser.c @@ -2479,7 +2479,7 @@ char *panoParserFindOLine(char *script, result = calloc(length + 1, 1);

[hugin-ptx] libpano gcc 8 warnings

Hello, building libpano with gcc 8 (instead of 7) triggers a couple of new warnings that might be interesting: --- parser.c: In function 'ReadImageDescription': parser.c:1854:38: warning: '%s' directive writing up to 65535 bytes into a region of size 256 [-Wformat-overflow=]

[hugin-ptx] Re: libpano13-2.9.20 release candidate rc2 released

On 2018-09-22 Bruno Postle wrote: > libpano13 is the PanoTools library for panoramic imaging. > A libpano13-2.9.20 rc2 tarball has been uploaded to sourceforge, this is > a release candidate for testing that may become the final release: [...] Helo, Build tests on Debian/experimental succeeded.

[hugin-ptx] Re: Failed to build latest hg version: undefined reference to symbol 'LZ4_decompress_safe_continue'

"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" wrote: > Hi, > I tried to build the latest hg version and I got the following: > [...] > [ 71%] Built target align_image_stack > [ 71%] Linking CXX executable cpfind > /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/cpfind.dir/PanoDetectorLogic.cpp.o: undefined > reference to symbol 'LZ4_decompr

[hugin-ptx] Re: Failed to build latest hg version: undefined reference to symbol 'LZ4_decompress_safe_continue'

T. Modes wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 14:46:53 UTC+1 schrieb Andreas Metzler: >> Add >> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/hugin/raw/unstable/debian/patches/20_flann_find_pkg-config.patch >> > Can we use the patch in our repository? Y

[hugin-ptx] Re: Failed to build latest hg version: undefined reference to symbol 'LZ4_decompress_safe_continue'

T. Modes wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 1. November 2018 19:51:18 UTC+1 schrieb Andreas Metzler: >> > Can we use the patch in our repository? >> Yes, I think so. > Thanks for the patch and the explanation. > I committed a slightly modified version so that it works also on

[hugin-ptx] [patch] fix some typos

ps.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/20190126142509.GB1352%40argenau.bebt.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. Description: Fix typos Unknow/Therefor/therefor Found by lintian. Author: Andreas Metzler Origin: vend

[hugin-ptx] 2019.0 - XDG base dir support

Hello, is xdg base dir support enabled automatically? I do not see it. Starting and stopping hugin with an empty ~/ generates .hugindata directory and .hugin file instead of something like ~/.config/hugin/huginrc and ~/.local/share/hugin. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Mat

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2019.0 beta 1 released

On 2019-01-26 "T. Modes" wrote: > Hi all, > today we are releasing a first beta of Hugin 2019.0. [...] uploaded to Debian/experimental, should be available after the next mirror sync. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I

[hugin-ptx] Versioning (was: Hugin 2019.0 beta 2 released)

T. Modes wrote: > Hi all, > today we are releasing a beta 2 of Hugin 2019.0. > Source tarball can be downloaded > at sourceforge: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin/hugin-2019.0/hugin-2019.0beta2.tar.bz/download [...] Hello Can we please stick with a versioning/file-name sc

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2019.0 beta 2 released

David W. Jones wrote: > What's required to compile this on 64-bit Debian Linux? The Hugin > version they seem to have listed now is 2018.0.0.5abfb4de7961. The > testing repository shows "2018.0.0+dfsg-3+b1 (testing)". [...] Source and binary packages are available in Debian/experimental. cu A

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin/cmake patch

On 2019-10-10 Wirz wrote: > Hi, > The cmake command to find python executables and libraries has changed > in cmake 3.12. As a results hugin doesn't build for example in the > current debian/testing. [...] Hello, I have no opinion on the patch, it might be the correct thing to do. I had succe

[hugin-ptx] Re: Re: Hugin 2019.2.0 rc1 released

On 2019-11-29 "David W. Jones" wrote: >>> On November 28, 2019 12:11:47 PM HST, Bruno Postle >>> wrote: Fedora packages of Hugin 2019.2 rc1 are here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bpostle/panorama/ [...] > Sorry for the confusion, it was too short and not clear. I was > wonde

[hugin-ptx] [Patch] Manpage for hugin_stacker

as layer 0 and all input images as additional layers with the mask as described above. =back =head1 AUTHORS POD-format documentation converted from L<https://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_stacker> by Andreas Metzler

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2019.2.0 released

David W. Jones wrote: > On 1/5/20 5:01 AM, Bruno Postle wrote: >> Thanks Thomas! >> Hugin 2019.2.0 will be in fedora linux 32. RPM packages for fedora 30 >> and 31 are in the panorama copr repository: >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bpostle/panorama/ > I compiled and made a DEB packag

[hugin-ptx] Re: Re: Hugin 2019.2.0 released

David W. Jones wrote: > On January 10, 2020 8:45:28 AM HST, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >>Debian buster already has 2019.2.0 rc1 which is (on Linux) identical >>to the final release except for some translations. (I have not yet >>uploaded the final release because

[hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin 2020.0 beta 1 release

On 2020-10-25 "T. Modes" wrote: > Hi all, > today we are releasing beta 1 of Hugin 2020.0.0 [...] Good Morning Binary packages fr Debian are available in experimental. cu Andreas -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received

[hugin-ptx] [patch] typo "normaly"

Hello, find attached a trivial typo fix, generated with sed -i -e s/normaly/normally/g `grep -rl normaly` cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- A list of frequently asked questi

<    1   2   3   >