On 21/11/11 14:14, mark skama wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new focus only for the normal lenses it
possibile create a good
On 21/11/11 18:39, mark skama wrote:
On 21 Nov, 14:14, mark skama melonefre...@libero.it wrote:
who wanna build a new software for normal lenses?
hugin is good program is open source and i love it but has a lot of
errors during the creation of the panorama
i think with a new approch and new
On 26/08/11 02:16, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
A couple of days ago I took some photos in the Ballarat Botanical
Gardens and stitched them together. Most worked well, but in one case
it went completely off the rails. I wasn't able to align the images
even with a manual choice of control
Hi All
As a sideline spectator, I've been half-reading this thread, but I still
have a few ideas that may be rubbish, or perhaps ground some of you,
while you can have a snort about my ignorance ;-)
As I understand hugin, quite a few scripting interfaces have already
been created around the pano
On 24/06/11 01:21, Bruno Postle wrote:
snip
The development branch Mask tab will show the area excluded by the
overall crop, plus it shows the areas in one photo that have been
excluded by masks in other photos.
thanks for the informative answer, It's great to know the next version
will be
On 23/06/11 09:57, kfj wrote:
On 23 Jun., 05:09, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
exactly. check the 2007 GSoC project to see where this ends: wxWidget has
improved enough to make us forget that we wanted to move to Qt.
I'm glad you didn't. I have a funny feeling with Qt. They might decide
On 18/04/11 08:02, Calvin McDonald wrote:
I need someone experienced to check my expectations.
If I ...
) Carefully and robustly (as per these instructions
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/tutorials/calibration/en.shtml) obtain
distortion parameters a, b and c for my lens.
) Provide these
On 18/04/11 12:59, Christopher Allen wrote:
On 18 April 2011 11:11, Simon Oosthoek soml...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 18/04/11 08:02, Calvin McDonald wrote:
If I ...
[ Do everything perfectly ]
Can I expect to get successful stitches from Hugin without any control
points?
In the most optimal
On 02/10/10 00:21, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Thu 30-Sep-2010 at 12:09 +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
I also have a question: what is the default optimisation that hugin
does when you first load images, generate CPs and then presto it
presents the first preview. I was unable to improve
On 29/09/10 00:37, Bruno Postle wrote:
Hugin is a Panorama stitcher and more. A powerful software package
for creating and processing panoramic images.
A hugin-2010.2.0_rc2 (release candidate 2) tarball is available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/hugin/files/hugin-2010.2_beta/
This is
Bob Campbell wrote:
On Apr 13, 3:23 pm, Martin Lukeš martin.merid...@gmail.com wrote:
And if I want to keep already marked points, but since those two
pictures in Control Points tab are rotated differently to each other
(say 90 degrees), I want MANUALLY rotate one of those pictures.
Hi Yuv
Yuval Levy wrote:
I think it should be the other way around. The choice of DVCS is more critical
than the choice of code hosting provider; and it is also more critical than
the choice of bug tracker and other tools which can also be hosted at
different providers. Hosting is an
Hi Yuv
Yuval Levy wrote:
I think it should be the other way around. The choice of DVCS is more critical
than the choice of code hosting provider; and it is also more critical than
the choice of bug tracker and other tools which can also be hosted at
different providers. Hosting is an
Yuval Levy wrote:
most of the CVS history seems to be available in SVN, while in the migration
from SVN to Hg so far I have three options:
a) hugin/trunk only, with all revisions from about 24.. (when Ippei's GSoC
2007 branch became officially trunk): 162 MB
b) hugin the whole story, that
Yili Zhao wrote:
Pablo wrote:
Another question is about the quality of service of the hg repos at sf
net. I haven't tried them yet, but in the past, I was not really
satisfied with the sf.net service.
The most popular distributed version control systems (DVCS) are
Git, Bazaar and
Yuval Levy wrote:
Hi all. Thank you for the feedback. *Keep it coming*. I want to hear more
opinions about Hg. In the meantime, a few notes, trying not to advocate the
change, just addressing points raised and acknowledging that more discussion
and experimentation are needed on both sides of
Rogier Wolff wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:20:47AM -0800, Bart van Andel wrote:
Well, a rectangular projection can only display images with 180
degrees field of view (and 120 degrees for practical use), so for this
projection, the FOV field needs to be modified.
How about:
Bruno Postle wrote:
On Wed 10-Mar-2010 at 12:50 +0100, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
When I changed the projection, some projections altered the FoV in
such a way that the output got totally distorted. Switching back to
something sensible didn't always reset the FoV to sensible values.
Wouldn't
Simon Oosthoek wrote:
Bruno Postle wrote:
On Wed 10-Mar-2010 at 12:50 +0100, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
When I changed the projection, some projections altered the FoV in
such a way that the output got totally distorted. Switching back to
something sensible didn't always reset the FoV
Bruno Postle wrote:
On 11 March 2010 15:45, Simon Oosthoek soml...@xs4all.nl wrote:
the more I think about it, the more I think this is really a bug and UNDO is
not the right way to fix it. The projections shouldn't fundamentally change
properties like FoV
Some projections have
Bruno Postle wrote:
On Mon 11-May-2009 at 20:37 +0200, Simon Oosthoek wrote:
I've not had much time to keep up with the developments, but I
consistently get a segmentation fault when I try to load images into the
assistent panel. I'm running 64bit kubuntu intrepid 8.10.
This is quite
21 matches
Mail list logo
