Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-12-27 Thread Pavan Balaji
Yes, it seems to work fine. Sorry for the delay in responding. -- Pavan On 11/29/2011 11:14 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote: Pavan -- does that solution work for you? (i.e., moving m4/decl.m4 to config/)? On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: Ok. I'll commit on trunk, v1.3, and just

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-11-29 Thread Jeff Squyres
Pavan -- does that solution work for you? (i.e., moving m4/decl.m4 to config/)? On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Ok. I'll commit on trunk, v1.3, and just for good measure, v1.2 and > v1.2-ompi. > > > On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > >> Le 28/11/2011 23:0

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-11-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
Ok. I'll commit on trunk, v1.3, and just for good measure, v1.2 and v1.2-ompi. On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 28/11/2011 23:07, Jeff Squyres a écrit : >> I think the real question is: why do we have both config/ and m4/ ? >> >> There's only a single .m4 file in m4/, but

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-11-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/11/2011 23:07, Jeff Squyres a écrit : > I think the real question is: why do we have both config/ and m4/ ? > > There's only a single .m4 file in m4/, but several in config/. I vote that > m4/decl.m4 should move to config/decl.m4, and then this issue goes away. > > Specifically: I think the

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-11-28 Thread Jeff Squyres
I think the real question is: why do we have both config/ and m4/ ? There's only a single .m4 file in m4/, but several in config/. I vote that m4/decl.m4 should move to config/decl.m4, and then this issue goes away. Specifically: I think the reason we don't specify both directories in Makefile

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-11-28 Thread Pavan Balaji
Hi Brice, On 11/28/2011 10:24 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: This was indeed changed a long time ago when Jeff brought the embedding support. I have nothing against bumping prereq to 2.64. But I'd rather have Jeff look at the missing "-I m4". Ok. I upgraded to newer versions of autoconf on most of my

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-11-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Hello Pavan, This was indeed changed a long time ago when Jeff brought the embedding support. I have nothing against bumping prereq to 2.64. But I'd rather have Jeff look at the missing "-I m4". Brice Le 28/11/2011 04:19, Pavan Balaji a écrit : > > [reviving an ancient email thread] > > I was po

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2011-11-27 Thread Pavan Balaji
[reviving an ancient email thread] I was poking around with hwloc-1.3 on an old machine I had, and I ran into the below problem again. I remembered sending an email about it, so I dug in my archives to find this email; again the problem was autoconf-2.63. The Makefile.am patch that Jeff provi

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2009-11-05 Thread Pavan Balaji
Thanks. That worked. -- Pavan On 11/05/2009 01:56 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Ok, I see the issue. Apply the attached patch and see if that works for > you. > > I'd prefer not to do another release today, if possible. ;-) > > > On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > >>

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc 0.9.2 autogen issue

2009-11-05 Thread Jeff Squyres
Ok, I see the issue. Apply the attached patch and see if that works for you. I'd prefer not to do another release today, if possible. ;-) On Nov 5, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: (re-subjected to be accurate) I notice that my autogen.sh outputs: autoreconf: running: ac