Re: [i2rs] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT)
Nitin: Thank you for email. It really helps the process! Sue -Original Message- From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Bahadur Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 2:19 AM To: Susan Hares; 'Benjamin Kaduk'; 'The IESG' Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [i2rs] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT) Hi Benjamin/Sue, NB> The reason string is indeed not relevant for the success case. The success case is "Installed is TRUE AND Active is TRUE". For everything else a reason will help. It will help the client to know why something was installed but is not active. As I recall (and my memory may be spotty), the reason was available for both "yes" and "no" in case "yes" it is active, and "no" it is not installed (example - 20 ECMP routes and only 10 get installed). Nitin may have more details on this RFC. Cheerily, Susan Hares -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 9:37 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com; i2rs@ietf.org Subject: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model/ -- COMMENT: -- I share Warren's question (and, IIRC, asked a similar one about the associated data-model document). Just one other minor question: in Section 4 Route programming in the RIB MUST result in a return code that contains the following attributes: o Installed - Yes/No (Indicates whether the route got installed in the FIB) o Active - Yes/No (Indicates whether a route is fully resolved and is a candidate for selection) o Reason - e.g., Not authorized Is the Reason only relevant when one of the other two is "No"? ___ i2rs mailing list i2rs@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs ___ i2rs mailing list i2rs@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
Re: [i2rs] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT)
Hi Benjamin/Sue, NB> The reason string is indeed not relevant for the success case. The success case is "Installed is TRUE AND Active is TRUE". For everything else a reason will help. It will help the client to know why something was installed but is not active. As I recall (and my memory may be spotty), the reason was available for both "yes" and "no" in case "yes" it is active, and "no" it is not installed (example - 20 ECMP routes and only 10 get installed). Nitin may have more details on this RFC. Cheerily, Susan Hares -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 9:37 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com; i2rs@ietf.org Subject: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model/ -- COMMENT: -- I share Warren's question (and, IIRC, asked a similar one about the associated data-model document). Just one other minor question: in Section 4 Route programming in the RIB MUST result in a return code that contains the following attributes: o Installed - Yes/No (Indicates whether the route got installed in the FIB) o Active - Yes/No (Indicates whether a route is fully resolved and is a candidate for selection) o Reason - e.g., Not authorized Is the Reason only relevant when one of the other two is "No"? ___ i2rs mailing list i2rs@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
Re: [i2rs] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin: Thank you for your comments. The authors work will to clarify this portion. As I recall (and my memory may be spotty), the reason was available for both "yes" and "no" in case "yes" it is active, and "no" it is not installed (example - 20 ECMP routes and only 10 get installed). Nitin may have more details on this RFC. Cheerily, Susan Hares -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 9:37 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-mo...@ietf.org; Susan Hares; i2rs-cha...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com; i2rs@ietf.org Subject: Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: (with COMMENT) Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-15: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model/ -- COMMENT: -- I share Warren's question (and, IIRC, asked a similar one about the associated data-model document). Just one other minor question: in Section 4 Route programming in the RIB MUST result in a return code that contains the following attributes: o Installed - Yes/No (Indicates whether the route got installed in the FIB) o Active - Yes/No (Indicates whether a route is fully resolved and is a candidate for selection) o Reason - e.g., Not authorized Is the Reason only relevant when one of the other two is "No"? ___ i2rs mailing list i2rs@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
