Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-02 Thread Samson Goddy
Yeah +1 ibiam On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Chihurumnaya Ibiam < ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I totally agree with "We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments > as we now speak about OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs > and mobile devices with xo being consider

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-02 Thread Chihurumnaya Ibiam
I totally agree with "We should be able to speak about Sugar deployments as we now speak about OLPC deployments. Sugar should be available for PCs and mobile devices with xo being considered as one of the supported environments". I think we limited ourselves to an extent on OLPC deployments, we've

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-02 Thread Chihurumnaya Ibiam
+1. On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > Hi, All > > I certainly appreciate the attention my email has received. However, I am > disappointed that the responses do not reflect my main concern. I beleive > Sugar and Sugar Labs will fade away if it continues to be perceived as th

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi, All I certainly appreciate the attention my email has received. However, I am disappointed that the responses do not reflect my main concern. I beleive Sugar and Sugar Labs will fade away if it continues to be perceived as the software that comes on an XO. I believe Sugar Labs and Sugar sh

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Dave Crossland
There is a IAEP thread "Preparing for the 2017 SLOB Election" in early August that has more details about all this. First, I want to note that while an 'election committee' has been mentioned, Walter said in that earlier thread: I am of the opinion that SLOB does not have to approve individual me

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Laura Vargas
t; >>> Laura >> >>> >> >>> 2016-12-01 16:06 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho : >> >>> >> >>>> This year I am not on the election committee because I am very >> involved >> >>>> in setting up an OSSIE track for SCaLE. I don&

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Samson Goddy
>>> Laura > >>> > >>> 2016-12-01 16:06 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho : > >>> > >>>> This year I am not on the election committee because I am very > involved > >>>> in setting up an OSSIE track for SCaLE. I don't know

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Ignacio Rodríguez
; 2016-12-01 16:06 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho : >>> >>>> This year I am not on the election committee because I am very involved >>>> in setting up an OSSIE track for SCaLE. I don't know who is on the >>>> committee this time or what their time table is. It probably s

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Laura Vargas
finalized at tomorrow's meeting. >>> >>> >>> Caryl >>> ---------- >>> *From:* Laura Vargas >>> *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM >>> *To:* Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland >>> *Cc:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Samson Goddy
016 12:37:16 PM >> *To:* Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland >> *Cc:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; samson >> goddy; Tony Anderson >> >> *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs >> >> Caryl, >> >> I Agree with yo

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Laura Vargas
--- > *From:* Laura Vargas > *Sent:* Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM > *To:* Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland > *Cc:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; samson goddy; > Tony Anderson > > *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs > > Car

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Caryl Bigenho
_ From: Laura Vargas Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:37:16 PM To: Caryl Bigenho; Dave Crossland Cc: SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org; samson goddy; Tony Anderson Subject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs Caryl, I Agree with you, we should be patient. The academia cer

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Laura Vargas
10:13:55 AM > *To:* SLOBs; IAEP SugarLabs; sugar-...@lists.sugarlabs.org > *Cc:* Tony Anderson; Dave Crossland > *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs > > Hi all! > > I am really interested in continue helping the community to shape it's > vision for the

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Caryl Bigenho
bject: Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs Hi all! I am really interested in continue helping the community to shape it's vision for the following 10-15 years. I believe society in general, needs urgently to rescue respect for the voice of women and young girls, specially in free/lib

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Laura Vargas
Hi all! I am really interested in continue helping the community to shape it's vision for the following 10-15 years. I believe society in general, needs urgently to rescue respect for the voice of women and young girls, specially in free/libre-culture/software projects. That said I have found th

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Dave Crossland
The discussion stopped because we are waiting for Sameer to publish the second episode of his video about the process of formally defining a vision, mission, goals, tasks and doing a swot analysis and so on. Sameer proposed and I think we all agreed that each of us throwing our own unilateral atte

Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] Future of Sugar Labs

2016-12-01 Thread Walter Bender
I might quibble a bit with some of the wording but I am good with this. I'll work on another draft before tomorrow's meeting (19UTC on irc.freenode.net). regards. -walter On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > The December meetings is coming soon. At the beginning of the year,