Re: Another fine mess ...

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I thank you for your consideration. But our operation may be compared to > a > large (40+kMips) octopus wherein the arms do not always work in sync. > > Someone else owns the datasets and job. At the moment they are consumed >

Re: Two silly questions about USS or OMVS on Z/OS

>The command response in the text of your email was >very hard to read, no doubt due to some translations >(code page?) along the way. There were two characters >that did not display correctly on my PC. > >I have to wonder if that is somehow connected??? It sure is! As I have tried to explain

What does "XL" of "XL C/C++" mean?

Hi all, As of z/OS V1R7, the z/OS C/C++ compiler has been rebranded to z/OS XL C/C++. What does "XL" of "XL C/C++" mean? Thank you for your time! Best Regards, Xie, Bo -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instru

Re: Auto-FTP

On Jan 19, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL wrote: (zSeries is moribund) BSBB! Well, if zSeries is then TSO is deader than a doornail:) Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EM

Re: Billing for SRB Time

> The zAAP may not have a need to use the 360-MP "shoulder tap" technique to > start I/Os or to field I/O interrupts. (I haven't found an appropriate > dump yet - I have other things to do now.) But I wouldn't actually > suspect it uses that antique technique since (a) zAAPs are limited to > proce

Re: Auto-FTP

McKown, John wrote: < Begin Snip --> < End Snip --> Actually, he only likes MS SQL Server because it is from his favorite "open system" vendor. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer UICI Insurance Center Information Technology Of couse its open, it allows any and all viru

Re: Billing for SRB Time

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:06:09 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >On 01/19/2006 at 12:40 PM, I said: > >>The I/O interrupt issue has me wondering though -- are folks claiming >>that a zAAP cannot process paging I/O for itself? Surely the JVM is >>not page-fixed in storage, is it? > >Surely it

Re: TN3270 Question

Pat, You're right - in principle. CS IP developers are also right - but unimaginative. RFC 2355 asserts that there are two types of TN3270E server logic: One where the SSCP-LU session is available and USS commands and messages can be "passed through" and one where there is no access to the SSCP-L

IBM High Level Assembler for Linux on zSeries

IBM recently announced the availability of HLASM for Linux on zSeries, as PRPQ 5799-TCQ. It is fully compatible with HLASM on the current MVS, CMS, and VSE operating systems, and can generate the ELF object format as well as the traditional OBJ and GOFF formats. John Ehrman (ehrmanATvnet.ibm.com)

Re: Another fine mess ...

Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/19/2006 at 12:36 PM, "Knutson, Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Change your code to do the same enqueue used by IEBCOPY What ENQ? AFAIK it doesn't issue one. Probably meant the binder ... -- -

Re: IPCS Standard Print Service

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/19/2006 at 03:10 PM, Robert Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >o The TSO output stream has no sense of pagination since it >originally was written to continuous forms fed through hardcopy >terminals like 2741s. I never saw continuous forms on a 2741, only perforat

Re: REXX Problem

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/19/2006 at 02:58 AM, Rob Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Earlier in this thread you criticized the practice of using "address >env buffer" each time as being inefficient. Not that I recall; I criticized doing *both* and address env *and* doing address env buffer

Re: Does SMP/E APPLY REDO Replace or Merge?

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/18/2006 at 11:28 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Suppose I build a PTF and APPLY it. I have second thoughts, and >rebuild it with a considerably different set of elements from the >original; RECEIVE; and APPLY REDO. Is the result the same as if the

Re: Does DDNAME?? override SUBSYS??

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/18/2006 at 11:53 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >WTF SJF? Scheduler JCL Facility was introduced in MVS/SP 1.3 to support the OUTPUT statement. It allowed adding new JCL statements and new keywords on existing statements. >I have heard tales that th

Re: Billing for SRB Time

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/19/2006 at 12:40 PM, Tom Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >The I/O interrupt issue has me wondering though -- are folks claiming >that a zAAP cannot process paging I/O for itself? Surely the JVM is >not page-fixed in storage, is it? Surely it does not need to d

Re: Billing for SRB Time

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/19/2006 at 10:54 AM, "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >There is a separate (not externally documented) signaling protocol to >get work fired up on a zAAP. Are you sure it's not a normal shoulder tap? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Re: Another fine mess ...

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/19/2006 at 12:36 PM, "Knutson, Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Change your code to do the same enqueue used by IEBCOPY What ENQ? AFAIK it doesn't issue one. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Auto-FTP

Ed Finnell wrote: In a message dated 1/19/2006 1:25:45 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Although I know that our company wouldn't buy it (zSeries is moribund), the thought of having an NJE type connection to submit jobs from IP connected servers such as Linux or Windo

Re: Billing for SRB Time

Tom Schmidt wrote: Yes, I'm aware of that. The question is: can it? zAAPs look (essentially) just like any other processor to z/OS. They have PCCA/LCCA like any other processor and are differentiated from GCPs by testing the PCCAIFA flag. Anyway, a quick look at PCCACRG6 for a zAAP woul

Re: Auto-FTP

>Our management perceives the zSeries as over priced I still get comments like that from my boss and my VP of IT Operations. So, I optimise and I point out the TCO. The problem with the mainframe price model is the up-front costs. We KNOW what it costs. The problem with the other platforms is th

Re: IPCS Standard Print Service

Bob, thanks a bunch for taking the time to spell it out for me. Yes, I was saying "print dataset" while meaning "terminal output". OK, so the NOTOC option will fix it. Fantastic! Bob, if you ever get near Katy, Texas (Houston), I'll buy you lunch, or dinner - your choice! Same thing if I ever

Re: Auto-FTP

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:00 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Auto-FTP > > > >(zSeries is moribund) > > BSBB! > > I don't know where you stand, but I

Re: Auto-FTP

>(zSeries is moribund) BSBB! I don't know where you stand, but I have senior management coming to me and trying to offload. There has not been a single case where they could justify it. The DINOMYTH is just that! A myth. We have found that the cost per fanny is still lower in the M/F arena. W

Re: Billing for SRB Time

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL wrote: >>The I/O interrupt issue has me wondering though -- are folks claiming that >a zAAP cannot process paging I/O for itself? > >A page IO is not necessarily required to be processed on the CP/LP that has the page-faulting task running on it. Yes,

Re: Auto-FTP

In a message dated 1/19/2006 1:25:45 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Although I know that our company wouldn't buy it (zSeries is moribund), the thought of having an NJE type connection to submit jobs from IP connected servers such as Linux or Windows with the return o

Re: Does SMP/E APPLY REDO Replace or Merge?

In a message dated 1/19/2006 3:34:51 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On the other hand, if the earlier PTF(s) had actually been shipped to and installed by customers, then a super-PTF would be need to get them kosher again. >> Yeah, yeah but isn't it packaging of th

Re: Does SMP/E APPLY REDO Replace or Merge?

The suggestion to create a new super-PTF that tries to straighten everything out should work (in principle) mechanically, but as a vendor I would studiously avoid that sort of kludge because it enshrines a developer's experimental efforts in a sysmod. We all try various things that don't work. No u

Re: Auto-FTP

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:59:54 -0500, Jeffrey Barnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Does z/OS have a way to automatically FTP reports from JES to a >destination host? > >Thanks. > >Regards, >Jeff Hi Jeff, Well FTP has a direct interface with JES2, you can submit a job and receive the output of that

Re: National ID card processing?

In a message dated 1/19/2006 2:01:53 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps we should report him to Homeland Security as someone asking sensitive questions about our nation's technical infrastructure? >> Send him to Hindu Kush as forward observer.

Re: Billing for SRB Time

>The I/O interrupt issue has me wondering though -- are folks claiming that a zAAP cannot process paging I/O for itself? A page IO is not necessarily required to be processed on the CP/LP that has the page-faulting task running on it. -teD Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof! ---

Max Region and IEFUSI mystery

Hi all, We have an IEFUSI that basically hard codes a region of 64M. ... MVC REGSIZA,REG64MB SET REGION SIZE ABOVE TO 64MB MVC REGLIMA,REG64MB SET REGION LIMIT ABOVE TO 64MB ... REG64MB DCF'67108864' REGION SIZE OF 64MB ... REGLIMA DSF REG

Re: National ID card processing?

I agree. Sounds like a troll or someone doing school assignments looking for a quick answer. Don Imbriale >-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of Pommier, Rex R. >Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:36 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU >

Re: IPCS Standard Print Service

Todd Burch wrote on 01/16/2006 03:09:36 PM: > Here is perhaps the smallest verb exit I've ever written to demonstrate the > blank lines at the top of the IPCS print dataset. There are three blank > lines at the top. How do I access these? When I write a REXX routine that > call the "NOTE" comma

Re: National ID card processing?

Have not seen the original posts, but the OP could be talking about an ID system that *is* being developed and deployed nationwide under the US DHD. The first generation of these ID's were mag stripe, but are to be replaced by 'smart cards'. The system is a way to identify trained emergency res

Re: National ID card processing?

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R. > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 1:36 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: National ID card processing? > > > I know this has been mentioned before, but why is "a

Re: National ID card processing?

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing > > Why on earth do you persist in asking for specifics about an > implementation that hasn't been authorized by, or even > formally proposed to, Congress? There is a *de facto* "National ID card" know

Re: National ID card processing?

I know this has been mentioned before, but why is "as400" so insistent on finding out information on how government systems, both real and - like below - possibilities? What do his questions have to do with the purpose of this list? Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion L

Re: National ID card processing?

Why on earth do you persist in asking for specifics about an implementation that hasn't been authorized by, or even formally proposed to, Congress? Unless funds are appropriated to study implementing such a system, it would be inappropriate for federal employees to spend working hours analyzi

POSIX run-time option vs TSO and Batch

I have a C application that uses Unix Services and therefore has to run with POSIX ON - logic has been added to the C program to display the setting of the POSIX option. This C application is invoked from a COBOL program that is linked with a CEEUOPT module that has the POSIX option turned ON. Th

Re: Auto-FTP

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Arney > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 1:03 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Auto-FTP > > > Jeff is asking about a feature that is available with the VSE > IP stack's

Re: Another fine mess ...

Maybe you could remove the problem PDS from your JCL and add code to the ASM program to do a dynamic allocate of the PDS (maybe use another parmlib to hold the name of the PDS in case it changes in the future, thus no program changes). If the dynamic allocate fails, issue the STIMER macro, wake

Re: Does SMP/E APPLY REDO Replace or Merge?

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:35:28 -0800, Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A customer's perspective. We recently had a problem for which IBM gave us > an APAR test fix. A while later they rewrote the fix so that it hit a > different MOD within the same LMOD. In that case, APPLY CHECK failed >

Re: Another fine mess ...

I thank you for your consideration. But our operation may be compared to a large (40+kMips) octopus wherein the arms do not always work in sync. Someone else owns the datasets and job. At the moment they are consumed with bringing up two new plexes and at least one new Endeavor environment.

Re: Auto-FTP

In a message dated 1/19/2006 12:46:38 P.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why must it be "from JES"? How about: o Step 1: write the report to a temporary data set. o Step 2: FTP from the data set to the destination host. o Step 3: IEBGENER the data set to the spool

Re: Auto-FTP

Jeff is asking about a feature that is available with the VSE IP stack's FTP offerings. With them and the proper definitions, Auto-FTP support will automatically FTP a report from the VSE/POWER queues to the desired location anytime a spool entry pops up in a designated output class. There is no

Re: How SMFDUMP works?

The output from the MVS operator command D SMF,O will show this and most of the other pertinent SMF configuration information of interest except CISIZE I think. Thanks, Sam -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Víctor de la Fue

Re: Auto-FTP

In a recent note unmask]> said: > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:59:54 -0500 > > Does z/OS have a way to automatically FTP reports from JES to a > destination host? > Why must it be "from JES"? How about: o Step 1: write the report to a temporary data set. o Step 2: FTP from the data set t

Re: Billing for SRB Time

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:54:16 -0600, Craddock, Chris wrote: >> >zAAP engines are a slightly different specialization. They are not >> >visible in the normal scheme of things and they can't field (I/O) >> >interrupts. > >> Is this "they can't" because of the contents of control register 6, or >> bec

Re: Auto-FTP

Is there an "automatically FTP reports from JES to a destination host" feature in z/OS? Not that I know of. Could you do this with a batch job and your scheduler? Possibly. Consider also lpp and third party products. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:

Re: Another fine mess ...

In a recent note, Knutson, Sam said: > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:36:36 -0500 > > Use PDSE > The second-best idea. Unfortunately we can't always do it because we share data sets beyond sysplex boundaries. HFS/z/FS shared by NFS might be even better. > Use DISP=OLD either on your job or

Re: Does SMP/E APPLY REDO Replace or Merge?

A customer's perspective. We recently had a problem for which IBM gave us an APAR test fix. A while later they rewrote the fix so that it hit a different MOD within the same LMOD. In that case, APPLY CHECK failed because the new fix attempted to SUP another sysmod but did not contain the same eleme

Re: How SMFDUMP works?

I'm not sure, but, yes I think so. 2006/1/18, Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Are you using any SMF exits such as IEFU29? > > Don Imbriale > > >-Original Message- > >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf > >Of Víctor de la Fuente > >

Auto-FTP

Does z/OS have a way to automatically FTP reports from JES to a destination host? Thanks. Regards, Jeff -- Jeffrey C Barnard Barnard Software, Inc. http://www.bsiopti.com Phone 407-323-4773 Fax 407-323-4775 -- For IBM-MAIN sub

Re: Another fine mess ...

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:52:51 -0500, Kirk Talman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I own a piece of Assembler batch code that reads a parm member of a system >library managed by Endeavor. This piece of code runs many times a day on >all (10) production plexes. > >The FINE Endeavor folks have chosen to co

Re: Another fine mess ...

Use PDSE Use DISP=OLD either on your job or the compress Change your code to do the same enqueue used by IEBCOPY Best Regards, Sam Knutson, GEICO Performance and Availability Management mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (office) 30

Re: Another fine mess ...

Kirk Talman wrote: I own a piece of Assembler batch code that reads a parm member of a system library managed by Endeavor. This piece of code runs many times a day on all (10) production plexes. The FINE Endeavor folks have chosen to compress the library on each plex around 5 am each day. Th

Another fine mess ...

I own a piece of Assembler batch code that reads a parm member of a system library managed by Endeavor. This piece of code runs many times a day on all (10) production plexes. The FINE Endeavor folks have chosen to compress the library on each plex around 5 am each day. The collisions do not,

Re: Billing for SRB Time

> >zAAP engines are a slightly different specialization. They are not > >visible in the normal scheme of things and they can't field (I/O) > >interrupts. > Is this "they can't" because of the contents of control register 6, or > because of something else? I am not really sure. At some level the I

Re: Two silly questions about USS or OMVS on Z/OS

Could it be that z/os is *too* multi-cultural? :-)) The command response in the text of your email was very hard to read, no doubt due to some translations (code page?) along the way. There were two characters that did not display correctly on my PC. I have to wonder if that is somehow conne

Re: Operator Training Scenarios

Is that ONE better than an IEFBR14? ;-) Fletch -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:54 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Operator Training Scenarios On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:

Re: SHARE 2006

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:45:55 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gene Muszak >> >> Esteemed colleagues >> >> Does anyone know where the SHARE expo is after SEATTLE in March? > >According to

Re: Billing for SRB Time

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:12:50 -0600, Craddock, Chris wrote: >Let's be clear - there is no difference AT ALL between the engines. >Every engine on the die can execute any instruction defined in the >architecture. > >zAAP engines are a slightly different specialization. They are not >visible in the no

DocuText on z/OS 1.7

Can someone tell me if they are running Docutext release 5.8.2D on z/OS 1.7? Vendor says they have not tested this release on 1.7. Any help would be appreciated. TIA, Rogers Confidentiality Notice: This E

Re: Does SMP/E APPLY REDO Replace or Merge?

John is right on with his response regarding REDO processing (thanks John). This surely provokes a wishlist item: If I attempt APPLY REDO, and there are elements in the target zone with the RMID of the PTF, but not in the PTF itself, SMP/E should report an error and fail the APPLY. M&C shoul

Re: How SMFDUMP works?

On Jan 19, 2006, at 5:35 AM, Bruce Hewson wrote: Hello Ed, Date formats can not be assumed. And this was extract from IBM SIS site. I read it as yy/mm/dd = 2002 August 26, I know this but it was a lame attempt at humor. There is always talk on here about the graying of us sysprogs. S

Re: Operator Training Scenarios

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden > > On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:52:33 -0600, Chase, John > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, here's a Q&D program that will just loop "for a long time": > > > >LOOPER CSECT , > >LOOPER RMODE ANYi

Re: Operator Training Scenarios

On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 06:52:33 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well, here's a Q&D program that will just loop "for a long time": > >LOOPER CSECT , >LOOPER RMODE ANYin case you're storage-constrained :-) >USING *,15 >STM 14,12,12(,3) save caller's re

Re: Find the DD/dataset allocations for a job

> I am trying to find a way (without cross memory services) to find the > datasets allocated to DD names in an address space other than my own. > Specifically, I am looking for a way for when given the name of a CICS > region, how do I find the name of the CSD allocated to the DFHCSD DD > card? I

Re: Find the DD/dataset allocations for a job

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am trying to find a way (without cross memory services) to find the > datasets allocated to DD names in an address space other than my own. > Specifically, I am looking for a way for when given the name of a CICS > region, how do I find the name of the CSD allocated to

Re: Does SMP/E APPLY REDO Replace or Merge?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the sort of question that can only (I hope) arise in a development and test environment, not in production. I can arise whenever anyone does what you did; so it's possible in production, but we hope that packagers take steps to prevent that. (When they don't

Re: REXX Problem

Joel Wolpert Director - Performance and Capacity Planning Shared Data Center Securities Industry Automation Corporation 2 Metrotech Center New York, NY 11201 (212) 383-3323 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01/18/2006 06:56

Re: Operator Training Scenarios

Here is a shorter one for really storage constrained systems :-) LOOPER CSECT LOOPER RMODE ANY LOOPER AMODE 31 BR 15 END -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 7:53

Re: Operator Training Scenarios

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craig Bakken > > We would like to develop some scenarios to help train our > operations staff in situations were the operators need to > diagnose a problem and take such actions as taking a > standalone dump, partit

Re: IPCS Batch on "ACTIVE" ?

Thanks For Your Answer ! Cwi Jeret -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main

Re: Two silly questions about USS or OMVS on Z/OS

Glad to give the feedback.I've checked the /etc/services and found out that the port otelnetd is using is 1023.Then I invoke an ordinary telnet session to it and uss shows up:) -- Best Regards, Johnny Luo -- For IBM-MAIN subscr

Re: IPCS Batch on "ACTIVE" ?

Cwi Jeret wrote on 01/19/2006 02:45:58 AM: > U want to submit an IPCS Batch Job on the TSO "ACTIVE" storage > rather than on a DUMP DataSet, like I do on the "Source" entry on the > IPCS Defaults panel of the Online Dialog . > > How do I have to change my following JOB ? > > //IPCS EXEC PGM=IKJEF

Re: How SMFDUMP works?

Hello Ed, Date formats can not be assumed. And this was extract from IBM SIS site. I read it as yy/mm/dd = 2002 August 26, On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:17:38 -0600, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Jan 17, 2006, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Hewson wrote: > >> Hello Victor, >> >> Have you checked your SM

Re: Clear key encryption

Timothy Sipples wrote: It's worth pointing out that so-called "clear key" encryption is what every other standard server does with the keys. Except on a mainframe you have key-protected memory (and accelerators), so it's a lot harder for another task to grab that key. I'd prefer a different t

SV: [Rexx on z/Os]Point to particular member of PDS

You can get a memberlist in a MVS (non-TSO) REXX by executing program IEHLIST. (Doing that myself.) Thomas Berg > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Marco Gianfranco Indaco > Skickat: den 18 januari 2006 20:30 > Till: IBM-MAIN

Re: Two silly questions about USS or OMVS on Z/OS

z/OS UNIX is of course "multi-cultural"! The shell and (most) of the utilities are written in C. C needs the LE runtime environment. The LE runtime enviroment is by default set to the C locale, which means that text is interpreted with code page IBM-1047. Therefore shell and utilities are exp

Re: z/OS IPL Consoles

Walter Marguccio wrote: ... If you have, or plan to get a CPC which support OSC channel type (OSA ICC, or whatever the name is), then you can even get rid of the above mentioned 2074. The functionality of the latter is moved onto this special OSA card. No more external boxes to handle your consol

Re: z/OS IPL Consoles

--- "Laine, Rogers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are currently running z/OS 1.4 with two LPARS that are using > 3174-1L & 3274-1L controllers that have 3270 terminals > attached for IPL'ing our two systems. > What can we do to upgrade this old hardware to something a > little more current? 2

Re: REXX Problem

>>Note the double ampersand which I understand are also required. >I believe that is wrong; one or the other, but not both. Also, >shouldn't the last command be > ADDRESS ISREDIT "SCAN = (oldscan)" I may well be wrong with the exact syntax. I became curious and was quickly STFM (S=searching) and l

Re: Two silly questions about USS or OMVS on Z/OS

Sorry Paul, but every system I have seen in Germany it works quite opposite to yours as you can see below. Maybe it has something to do with the German translation table in TCPIP or pcom. What will we learn from that? z/OS is not multi-cultural :-)) # ps -ef ! grep POHLI 16842875 65