Re. you saying, Ed:
Unfortunately you must register:(
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/W99037
:)
jan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Jan:
Thanks..
Ed
On Feb 4, 2006, at 5:46 AM, Jan Vanbrabant wrote:
Re. you saying, Ed:
Unfortunately you must register:(
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/W99037
:)
jan
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:29:09 -0500, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert A. Rosenberg) wrote:
At 12:37 -0800 on 02/01/2006, Barry Schwarz wrote about
Re: SMP/E SE37 Retry and ++ZAP:
Which can often be resolved with an intervening RESTORE.
There
While doing some historical research, I stumbled into:
CHANGES.1 OS/390 V2R7.0 SMP/E Commands
* | Pre-built Load Module Support. OS/390 V2R7 SMP/E can add, replace, or
| delete pre-built load modules and program objects in PDS and PDSE data
| sets as complete entities in
In a recent note, Arthur T. said:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:51:11 -0500
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 01:29:09 -0500, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[log in to unmask] (Robert A. Rosenberg) wrote:
There is only one MAJOR DESIGN problem IMO with the
current implementation of RESTORE - It wants to
On 4 Feb 2006 10:18:42 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly with Robert (and, I think, Arthur. His
position is less clear to me.) However, we will be a distinct
minority. In particular, Kurt Q. takes the opposite
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:19:10 -0600, Rugen, Len [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on a mystery changed data where the people who created the
process are long gone, others have made changes and nobody knows what is
REALLY happening.
My question, for now anyway, are there any types of dataset
I think this refers to ++PROGRAMs.
Bob
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
While doing some historical research, I stumbled into:
CHANGES.1 OS/390 V2R7.0 SMP/E Commands
* | Pre-built Load Module Support. OS/390 V2R7 SMP/E can add, replace, or
| delete pre-built load modules and program
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:27:46 -0700, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DUMPuncompress
AMA140T UNABLE TO COMPLETE OPERATION DUE TO BINDER ERROR,
FUNCTION = INCLUDE, RC=8, RSN=83000514
AMA113I COMPLETED DUMP REQUIREMENTS
* BOTTOM OF DATA
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:59:53 -0500, Bob Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this refers to ++PROGRAMs.
Indeed. I was somewhat thrown off the track to find it mentioned in
the Summary of Changes for the Commands manual, but actually documented
in the RM.
Thanks!
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 14:24:45 -0500, Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do suspect that implementing UNDO would be *very*
tricky. PREs and SUPs would be a problem, especially as
any mod with a PRE for the mod you're UNDOing would also
have to be UNDOne. Finding the before data and
They're pretty good at bouncing the PMR's around until it hits the right
area.
I open DB2 PMRs under one component ID even if the problem resides in a
different component ID area of DB2, because the right component ID isn't
recognized.
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
Thanks, it further confirm our suspicions.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Norman Hollander
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: What is ILBOSPI0 ?
Well I compiled one of my complex
This might depend on the level of support you've contracted for, but I
generally see two methods for determining component id.
A. In the ETR 'dialog', you can leave compid blank and drill down through a
successive series of menus to the actual product/component that you want to
report the problem
14 matches
Mail list logo
