Kok, Howi wrote:
Thanks for the help. I found that I have to specify
DCB=(LRECL=32756,RECFM=VBS,BLKSIZE=32760) in the input DD regardless of
IFASMFDP or SORT to get by. Will specifying the LRECL during the
initialization of the data set solve this problem?
Do you mean new dataset creation ?
Problem is we don't know which resources he is talking about. Then again
perhaps neither does he. It may or may not be datasets - could be CPU,
storage, tape units, printers -- did I forget anything??
Jim S
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A while ago, I opened a thread discussing problems with
Control-M and non-standard screen sizes. Some reported they
have the same problem.
My colleage told me that he's got a PTF for Control-M that's
supposed to fix the problem. Althought, I haven't had a chance
yet to test this, I thought you
//TMP EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,
// PARM='EX ''VB.INPUT'' LIST CLIST'
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD DUMMY
It seems I have supplanted the CLIST facility ;-)
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
Hi,
Please could you give me your thoughts on the following :-
* Currently, at each of our two 'high-availability' sites, we have an IBM
Z990-303 and an IBM Z890 (one a 450 and the other a 240).
* In July this year we are moving the whole data centre to our own
premises (the
Jim Mulder wrote:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 03/14/2006
11:30:42 AM:
Two ways:
1. Insert new member to PDS on SYSPROC concatenation.
2. Update existing member of the library.
I've got to admit I didn't investigate to much. Just discovered that VLF
Skip Robinson wrote:
No one has suggested looking at LLA. SYS1.PARMLIB member CSVLLA00 may
contain an entry like this:
FREEZE(SYS1.CMDPROC)
or whatever the library name is. If so, changes to a member--add, update,
delete--are not recognized until LLA REFRESH. The purpose of FREEZE is to
Joshua
I've solved this locally by arranging for the first PROC in my startup (well
before JES2) to run an IEBCOPY which copies all the parms in the appropriate
concatenation into a single PDSE as follows:
//LPARM PROC
//LPARM EXEC PGM=IEBCOPY,TIME=10
//P1DD
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 03/14/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No, command == TSO command
Statement == line within file
You're overlooking continuation lines.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Long post...
Charles, (and Ed, Shane, and Mark) and all,
It would be really nice if vendors picked up on this and added the
functionality, but I don't see it happening. Not all sites want to have
a common parmlib for all products, so why force anyone into this? Mark,
you gave a good
No, command == TSO command
Statement == line within file
You're overlooking continuation lines.
Actually, I'm not.
The poster I replied to was confused about the statement:
Each command must start on a new statement.
That was what I was trying to clarify.
A continuation is not a new statement.
I should qualify our maintenance process. We don't go to the extent
of using the MIGRAT parmlib and proclib unless there is a need, ususally
just for the z/OS upgrade. The OEM upgrades are not quite as invasive.
Dave
Dave Jousma
Meganen,
There is more to this than the limited information that you have provided. It
would be very easy for me to say go with the z9 and be done with it.
Justifying that statement, however, requires the information you have not
provided. What types of workloads to you have? DB2? VSAM? The
I would like to access the Archives but I don't know how. Can anybody please
direct me?
Thanks in advance.
Willie
-
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
There's a pointer in the footer of every message posted.
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/14/2006
at 11:41 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
IBM's lexical conventions, traceable to the limitations of the 029
keypunch and 407 card reader
Not even close.
No professor, having a limited number of
lectures to deliver, will choose to waste any of
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/14/2006
at 12:14 PM, Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Each command or subcommand must begin on a separate statement.
That sounds like a candidate for an RCF.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/14/2006
at 03:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I know, but it could also be cabled to a 70* computer and used as a
printer and card reader, in which case it could read only 72 columns
of each card.
There was certainly a 716[1] printer for the 7090
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/14/2006
at 08:25 PM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The real reason I'm posting - and again relying on positively antique
OS education - is that I have always treated it as a golden rule of
data set concatenation that the attributes of the first data set in
the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of willie bunter
I would like to access the Archives but I don't know how.
Can anybody please direct me?
Instructions are at the bottom of every post submitted to the listserv,
including this one.
-jc-
Hi
If someone has seen something like this:
Two of our inactive initiators don't want to accept job's, they are just
hung.
- z/OS 1.5
- Non WLM managed initiators,
- no MAS ,
- no SYSPLEX ,
- init stop/start seems to not help
- we have applied two day's before some JES2 SYSPLEX MAS PTF's
-
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:48:58 -0500
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/14/2006
at 03:08 PM, Paul Gilmartin [log in to unmask] said:
I know, but it could also be cabled to a 70* computer and used as a
printer and card reader, in which
Read the trailer inserted by the list serve!
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
-Original Message-
From: willie bunter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 04:56:31
To:IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Accessing The Archives
I would
Read the trailer inserted by the list serve!
I have problems when searching the archives today.
Zaromil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
.. otherwise, your guess is as good as mine or anyone else's.
Not necessarily true.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Norbert Friemel wrote:
Ulrich,
how about this:
1) create a simple two line rexx in data set A.B.EXEC:
/* rexx */
Or replace
//TMP EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD DISP=OLD,DSN=VB.INPUT
with
//TMP EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,
In a message dated 3/15/2006 6:56:55 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to access the Archives but I don't know how. Can anybody
please direct me?
They've got a two for one offer at Vision Max? At the bottom of every
posting:
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Hi to you all!
This is my fist post to this list.
I'm playing with z/OS, and I know that the smf data sets are sys1.man1.
How can I see what are the users who access and their permissions to
sys1.man1
Thanks
--
Regards / Cumprimentos,
Luís Correia
First a correction of my own typo. I was familiar with a
407 at the University of Colorado circa 1970, not mid-1950's.
(Not quite that old, yet.) And it was standalone on the job
prep floor, not connected to any computer.
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Wed, 15
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 03/13/2006
at 04:02 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've seen MVS system programmers install a product and then never
apply maintenance because they cared nothing about the product.
(They felt it was not their dog even after claiming ownership.)
That, of
Hi to you all!
This is my fist post to this list.
I'm playing with z/OS, and I know that the smf data sets are sys1.man1.
How can I see who are the users who access and their permissions to
sys1.man1
Thanks in advanced!
--
Cumprimentos,
Luís Correia
And not necessarily untrue either based on the limited information he
provided. Granted, Phil, your guess would probably be a more accurate and
informed one, but the types of questions that I was asking are ones that need
answers to provide a more qualified guess.
Of interest, maybe only to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 03/15/2006
04:55:52 AM:
Jim Mulder wrote:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
03/14/2006
11:30:42 AM:
Two ways:
1. Insert new member to PDS on SYSPROC concatenation.
2. Update existing member of the
If you have the RACF special attribute do:
SR MASK(SYS1)
Find the profile that masks the SYS1.MANx datasets, then do:
LD p(profile) all
For a list of authorized users the universal access (UACC)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:12:13 +0100, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Out of curiosity: Can LLA be used for non load module libraries ?
I just RTFM, my understanding is you can use PDS's or PDSE's containing
binary programs (RECFM=U, load module or program object).
Yes. I was just talking about
There is just a bit more to be considered. Beside IBM incentives to move to
this Processor,
there may be other decision points:
- Yes, a single engine is faster (including general purpose, IFL,
ICF, zAAP, zIIP)
* Watch out for Latent Demand
* zPCR can help you size
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 03/15/2006
05:12:13 AM:
Skip Robinson wrote:
No one has suggested looking at LLA. SYS1.PARMLIB member CSVLLA00 may
contain an entry like this:
FREEZE(SYS1.CMDPROC)
or whatever the library name is. If so, changes to a
Luis,
This sounds like a question based in Unix terms.
Access to resources (programs, TSO, datasets etc.) on a z/OS system is
controlled by one of three security products.
RACF from IBM, Top Secret from CA or ACF2 also from CA.
Rules are defined within these products. To determine which
Thanks Dean!
just one more question... is it possible to see this information in the
listuser report ?
On 3/15/06, Dean Montevago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have the RACF special attribute do:
SR MASK(SYS1)
Find the profile that masks the SYS1.MANx datasets, then do:
LD p(profile) all
Fred
Have you tried using File-AID MVS to do the search that you want. If you
want, feel free in contacting the support number in AUS to get any of these
type of questions answered feel free in either contacting the local HOTLINE
number or on frontline.compuware.com which is our internet
Thanks Alan!
In fact I don't have experience in mainframe...i'm more a unix guy!
The system where i'm working have RACF.
Expect some more basic/stupid questions...
On 3/15/06, Alan C. Field [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis,
This sounds like a question based in Unix terms.
Access to
From an LU command no. If you run IRRUT100 against a userid or group you will
see what profiles they have access to. Not sure if it shows the level of
access, it's been a long time since I've run it. At one time, if you ran it
against the live RACF database it would put a reserve on it. I'd
Dear all
I am looking for a map of mvs control blocks with all the relations between
them, do you know where i can have it ?
Regards
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I have a quick question regarding the pax command. I'm in the process of
making a clone but I had a fingure check and I was wondering if you could tell
me if I did any damage or what.
I meant to do pax -rw -pe -v -X / /newroot
Instead I hit the enter key before I completed keying
Ed, the second URL is a good one ... Thanks.
Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/10/2006 8:58:52 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At one time I had a url which pointed to an IBM web site where you could
find all the FMID's. Would any one remember or
Hope you have a very big piece of paper g.
Once upon a time the L or Y manual that became the Data Areas books had a
map of the pointer relationships among the fundamental control blocks, but
that was a long time ago.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Greetings,
From SearchDataCenter yesterday:
Simon Schuster Inc. plans to save $1 million a year on hardware costs and
licensing fees as a result of migrating off its old IBM mainframes.
The Data Areas for 1.7 are online
here...http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/IEA2BK60
Bill Larsen wrote:
Dear all
I am looking for a map of mvs control blocks with all the relations between
them, do you know where i can have it ?
Regards
May be he is just trying to be a Payne in the ...!
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:52:11 -0500, Richards.Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of interest, maybe only to me, is why you chose to nitpick my response
instead of providing a better guess.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Bill Larsen wrote:
Dear all
I am looking for a map of mvs control blocks with all the relations between
them, do you know where i can have it ?
snip
I don't know of one that covers them all...and if there were one,
that would be *quite* a diagram! We document a thousand or so of
them in
In a message dated 3/15/2006 10:52:47 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed, the second URL is a good one ... Thanks.
Don't know what the deal is with AOL. I've been trying to get plain
text in REPLYs for about a year now. I only entered the one url but
AOL inserts
AOL is indistinguishable from the illegimate child of m$win and the Lord
of the flies
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 03/15/2006
12:32:03 PM:
snip
Don't know what the deal is with AOL. I've been trying to get plain ...
-
That problem has been rectified.
Darren
List Owner
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, TISLER Zaromil wrote:
Read the trailer inserted by the list serve!
I have problems when searching the archives today.
Zaromil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Kirk Talman wrote:
AOL is indistinguishable from the illegimate child of m$win and the Lord
of the flies
But how do you really feel?
Actually, I like AOL for a number of reasons,
such as:
1. It is a simple to use interface that covers
a lot of territory
2. When I am on the road
... To be replaced by a cost of $1.5 million in floor space and air
conditioning costs.
Of course, if they weren't running much on their mainframe anymore anyway,
they've already eaten this cost in the infrastructure that replaced it.
Probably grew so slowly they didn't even notice.
Greetings again,
Another link on that page pointed to a company that already made this
migration. This story is from March 2005. Has anybody heard how well it
worked for them and how well it's working now ???
Ancor IT director Kelly Colohan had a decision to make. Informed by IBM
that it
The Data Areas books are excellent manuals (I almost used fine without
thinking of its alias).
But they are reference works. What I think petitioner wants/needs is a
guide to MVS control blocks, which becomes a guide to MVS internals. He
needs to know how to start with the PSA and find
In a message dated 3/15/2006 12:15:10 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The original post asked for all the relations between them. I would be
amazed if even IBM has such a map. The now out-of-print logic manuals contain
useful maps of certain control blocks with
Dave,
I wouldn't restrict its use to just PARMLIB. I would suggest that PROCLIB
might have some use, too, though maybe not as much.
The bigger usage, to me at least, is with SYSLIBs in general. A single
specification for a COBOL compile SYSLIB - or better yet, a series of
commonly-maintained
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe
Discussion List)
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: map of MVS control blocks
In a message dated 3/15/2006 12:15:10
This is was in the smfprm
SUBSYS(SLSP,INTERVAL(003000),TYPE(255))
SUBPARM(SLSP(SUBTYPE(1,2,3,4,5,6,8)))
I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ?
Can anyone please tell me?
Thanks in advanced!
--
Cumprimentos,
Luís Correia
This says for subsystem SLSP ( which I guess is the STK subsystem to run
the tape SILO, we
call ours SLS0) cut an SMF record every 30 minutes.
In the SLSP setup ypu define what SMF record number to use (in this case
the STK default
if I remember right) 255.
IBM reseres SMF record numbers 1
Tom,
I agree, and even eluded to that at the end of my lengthy post. If done
right, vendors should not care, as it would all be external to their
application, and to them it would look like they were opening a standard
DD statement. I don't see PROCLIB as necessary because that function is
I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ?
Can anyone please tell me?
Any record type above 127 is a 'user' record.
IE: from an ISV, usually.
While there are conventions, there are no true controls.
The trick is to find out what the sub-system SLSP is, and go look up its
product
Thanks!
I will look for it...
On 3/15/06, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've looked around and i can't find what type(255) means ?
Can anyone please tell me?
Any record type above 127 is a 'user' record.
IE: from an ISV, usually.
While there are conventions, there are no true
Thanks!
On 3/15/06, Alan C. Field [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This says for subsystem SLSP ( which I guess is the STK subsystem to run
the tape SILO, we
call ours SLS0) cut an SMF record every 30 minutes.
In the SLSP setup ypu define what SMF record number to use (in this case
the STK default
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Hope you have a very big piece of paper g.
... and an excimer laser or equivalent with which to microprint thereon.
:-)
-jc-
--
There is a massive colored diagram of DB2 control blocks and
their interrelationships that is about four feet squared, but that is only
DB2.
Back in the mists of time, a similar beast existed for MVS.
May have been an Amdahl (education) production, I don't recall.
Certainly there was one
You can also search them through the Google Groups Archive
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djqas_ugroup=bit.listserv.ibm-main
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
last question for today...
If execute the irrdbu command I will have all the content of the racf
database...will this include any clear text passwords?
Thanks in advanced
--
Cumprimentos,
Luís Correia
--
For IBM-MAIN
Luis Correia wrote:
Hi to you all!
This is my fist post to this list.
False. Your first post was sent 22 minutes earlier vbg
Nevermind, WELCOME!
I'm playing with z/OS, and I know that the smf data sets are sys1.man1.
How can I see who are the users who access and their permissions to
I believe the Ranade series had an MVS Control Blocks book. This was an
excellent resource for how the main control blocks for MVS were related.
With that and the Data Areas manuals you should have a good start.
Don't know where you can track down a Ranade book, but you should be
able to find one
Mark Zelden wrote:
[...]
So, the library is not in LLA, you updated from this system, and
VLFNOTE also didn't work. H. I know the thread says CLIST
and you added it to SYSPROC, but is this REXX or truely CLIST?
Is the library PDS or PDSE? What OS level are you running?
z/OS 1.4, PDS,
Thanks!
On 3/15/06, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Correia wrote:
Hi to you all!
This is my fist post to this list.
False. Your first post was sent 22 minutes earlier vbg
Nevermind, WELCOME!
I'm playing with z/OS, and I know that the smf data sets are sys1.man1
.
How can I
I'm not a RACF expert, but the answer is almost certainly No, as RACF does
not STORE the clear text passwords.
How does it work then? It uses the result of an encryption process driven in
part by the password. It does it once when you change a password and stores
the result. It does it again when
In a recent note, Luis Correia said:
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:33:44 +
If execute the irrdbu command I will have all the content of the racf
database...will this include any clear text passwords?
I believe that nowadays passwords are not stored in clear text,
and can not be
Hello listers,
After years of telling us that we can only use 3480 tapes, the POTAYBES
(Powers That Be - ripped off from fantasy author Anne McCaffery), are
now telling us that they are dumping the 4480 drives and now we are to
use 9480 drives. These drives can read/write 3490 carts, can they
will this include any clear text passwords?
No. RACF encrypts passwords before storing (or checking) them.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program.
Jon
snip
The trick is to find out what the sub-system SLSP is, and go look up its
product documentation.
While SLSP looks familiar, I cannot recall what product it is.
/snip
On 3/15/2006 2:33 PM, Luis Correia wrote:
last question for today...
If execute the irrdbu command I will have all the content of the racf
database...will this include any clear text passwords?
As documented, no, IRRDBU00 does not dump the passwords.
And as Charles indicated, even if it
The same message is in the CICS TS v3.1 manual - CICS does not support ESDS
data sets that are defined with these extended attributes. The level of
z/OS will not matter.
Your solution will have to be based on what the application can tolerate,
I'd guess. Convert to KSDS? DB2 table?
Greg
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program.
We called our sub-system SILO.
But, it's been a few years since we had one.
ISTR, that 255 was the record used.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eduardo Toledo
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Error message DFHFC0966
Hi guys,
We are running CICS TS2.2, under z/OS 1.4.
We also have a
On z/OS 1.6 an SDSF DA gets some blank lines (no jobno or stepname). Other
lines are correct. I am trying to find a cause because I have another duplicate
1.6 system that is working correctly. I am obviously overlooking something but
just can't put my finger on it. Any ideas?
Is there a product available for offloading sysouts from JES that provides
access (e.g., browser-based) to those reports *without* any further MVS
involvement? -- and provides admin functions for archiving/retention,
jobname+date directory stuff, who-can-see-what authorization, etc.
I'm
Larry Burch wrote:
Is there a product available for offloading sysouts from JES that provides
access (e.g., browser-based) to those reports *without* any further MVS
involvement? -- and provides admin functions for archiving/retention,
jobname+date directory stuff, who-can-see-what
In a message dated 3/15/2006 3:17:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any info would be appreciated, either via the List or direct to me. Vendor
responses will be tolerated (direct only, please).
These folks will sell you software and/or hardware to accomplish
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:59:01 -0600, Larry Burch wrote:
Is there a product available for offloading sysouts from JES that provides
access (e.g., browser-based) to those reports *without* any further MVS
involvement? -- and provides admin functions for archiving/retention,
jobname+date directory
I have a full test this weekend, so hopefully will have some of this ironed
out. I am going with a newly formatted CFRM dataset and retaining all the
other COUPLE datasets.
If I use a new CFRM dataset, where is the CF policy information stored? I
was thinking it was stored in the XCF COUPLE
I will be curious to see how things go in 6 to 12 months also. As I
mentioned last week, our datacenter cut over ALL of our z/OS workload
last Tuesday. From everything I've heard, we are doing very well.
I've never heard of anyone cutting over a datacenter in 1 fell swoop,
but we did it.
I
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 16:00, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Almost certainly the Storagetek tape silo control program.
We called our sub-system SILO.
But, it's been a few years since we had one.
ISTR, that 255 was the record used.
teD's messages always show up in my inbox as Yesterday 16:00:00.
I read that article this morning and I gathered that before the start
of the conversion, they were constantly running close to 100%.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
PH Mining Equipment
414-671-7849
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Original Message -
From: Hall, Ken (GTI) [EMAIL
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 15:21 -0600, Cliff McNeill wrote:
My recollection is that the STK 9840 tape drives are not in anyway
compatible with 3480 tape cartridges.
The 9840 uses a twin spooled cartridge and has a different form factor.
Correct, but she said 9480.
We have 9490 Timberlines on the
you have two different models in your question. the stk 9840 is 3590 like
and won't do anything with a 3480 media on the other hand i believe that
stk 9480 will read 3480 media and it sounds like you're talking about 3490
(ish) devices and you're usually good to go (read) 3480 cart's. we have
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:48:07 -0600, Tom Schmidt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:59:01 -0600, Larry Burch wrote:
Is there a product available for offloading sysouts from JES that provides
access (e.g., browser-based) to those reports *without* any further MVS
involvement? -- and
Is there a LISTSERV for CA products?
Thank You
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
When I get started in this business as a systems programmer, I soon discovered
that the first record that was shipped in the INFO/MVS database (updated
monthly) contained this information.
I took a little more effort to find this record in the IBMLINK or SETOOLS
database, but it was there
I've yet to see a mainframe to client-server transition that didn't end in
tears, higher costs, lowered service levels, gnashing of teeth, roaming
gangs of SysProgs threatening passers by in Hex, large cracks appearing in
the Earth's surface and all life in the Universe coming to a crashing halt.
When you create/reformat the CFRM couple data set, there is no CFRM
policy. It must be (re)created from a driver system before the first DR
IPL. (You could kludge it with multiple IPLs of the DR system, but you
really don't want to go there.)
On the driver system, (re)create the CFRM policy
Richard,
I use a free mailchecker utility for mail notification and spam filtering -
or just offering the opportunity to delete without reading into Outlook
Express.
Ted's contributions nearly always show at the top of the chronological list
of the latest messages in the window presented by this
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
