-- snip --
I am new to this shop, and it is my first time working with FDR, I am
familiar with DFSMS and have just finished reading the FDR manuals (I only
fell asleep a few times.). Currently I am trying to understand this new
environment, how and why things are setup the way they are.
My quest
>I would bet that IBM global services has some folks well versed in this
>by now of course employing them might not be free. There are probably
>some consultants who have done it also.
Actually the IBM services for a product-to-product migration like this one
would come right out of the product
Hi,
I wrote a PC/mainframe hybrid based facility that has, as a small part of
it's capabilities, a console command monitor/processor (it monitors all
console commands) and constantly checks the time of the messages (amoung
other things) against the PC's internal clock, (which is kept up to date vi
---SNIP--
Excellent post Skip.
I might add though something like this. It depends on the amount of
maintenance being applied. If its a year (or more) there will be
quite a bit more research needed, IMO as the number of PTF's needing
researched goes up (exponen
In a message dated 5/11/2006 7:07:05 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But there are two new players in the game. One, there is a shiny new
DS8100 in both the primary and DR sites waiting for power whips and two,
a far more aggressive DR strategy in the pipeline.
>>
Hi listers,
Occassionaly, we get this message regarding some vts media..
CBR3750I Message from library XXVTS1: OP0100 A Read-Only status 214
stacked volume 000502 has been ejected. (VTS 1) (05-12-2006 07:43:20).
*CBR3762E Library XXVTS1 intervention required.
Under what circumstances,
Don't suppose they gave you a vote on weather this was practical or a
good idea
If you have lets say thousands of man hours invested in developed
debugged automation it just isn't going to forklift neatly from OPSMVS
to AF/OPERATOR is it and you may have both for a very long time. On the
othe
We had a similar situation about 2 months ago, but during our maint. window
TESTING the #$()$^% generator. We initiated the test, went on UPS,
generator started and dropped power. No time to wind your watch.
Our problem was that our power on SOP for the 2066-0X2 was incorrect. We
have had this
George-
I would call the ACF2 Helpdesk and get some help from them. There are so
many
possibilities, and the folks here may not have the same configuration as you
do.
Are you caching parts of ACF2 in Real Storage? in a Structure? How many CFs
do you
have? How is the CFs' performance (utilization l
Hi Brian
I haven't looked at the GRS performance side yet and so thank for the tip.
I will check ISGLOCK and the CF link performance.
BTW, I meant ACFVSAM/LOGONIDS as the resource we are having trouble with
Regards,
George Kozakos
-
Mark:
Ben Alford was lamenting the fact that Extent Consolidation only worked
for VSAM. I was speculating that IBM might not have wanted to simply
enable it for non-VSAM because it might break some applications. One
scenario that crossed my mind is as follows:
In a program that writes to d
Must be the season for it - except of course your seasons are all
backwards anyway ;-)
Couple of weeks ago we had a customer that had *3* (separate) failures
in the protection hardware. No power blips, no storms; just our mate
Murphy.
Stuck between UPS and mains - no power to all the gear pr
On Thu, 11 May 2006 13:19:26 -0500, Pommier, Rex R.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>705=z/OS 1.2
>706=z/OS 1.3
>707=z/OS 1.4, FMID HBB7707
>
>Howard,
>
>If you have this maintenance RECEIVEd on your system and are trying to
>find the correlating FMID, the easiest way is to use the SMP/E panels.
You
First, simply from your reply below, you are already probably doing
everything exactly right. In a GRS STAR environment, I would expect a
SYSTEMS ENQ to outperform a DASD RESERVE. Given that you are already doing
everything right, I would guess the below won't help, but just in
casetwo mo
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 09:50 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
> ...
> 11. Now you get to look at the ++HOLD records. This will take longer, but
> still in low single digit hours.
Haven't had to deal with a decent sized DB2 mass APPLY recently then
Skip ???. Those folks need a serious kick in the arse
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 14:01 -0400, Richard Pinion wrote:
> Doesn't the RESOLVER address space setup the default resolver configuration?
>
> ISREDDE2 SYS1.PROCLIB(RESOLVER)
Used to be the proc was only user-adjustable if you added a parm to the
BPX member. Else you got a generated STC with defa
On Thursday, May 4, we experienced a line of moderate to sever
thunderstorms move through our area (southeast Texas). We lost
commercial power. Nothing unusual about that. Happens all the time.
Normally, the UPS carries us until the generator is up and stable. On
any power glitch, we commit to gen
I am new to this shop, and it is my first time working with FDR, I am
familiar with DFSMS and have just finished reading the FDR manuals (I only
fell asleep a few times.). Currently I am trying to understand this new
environment, how and why things are setup the way they are.
My question of
In a recent note, Edward Jaffe said:
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:35:10 -0700
>
> McKown, John wrote:
> >> Ed Jaffe wrote:
> >>
> >> Issue a daily SET TIMEZONE= command to adjust the local time
> >> as necessary.
> >>
> > Well, we are planning on doing a T CLOCK=. In what way would a T
> >
In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said:
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 22:19:27 +0300
>
> On Thu, 11 May 2006 14:13:16 -0500 Mike Bell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> :>At a previous employer - they designed a external time reference that had
> :>some special features - It could adjust the spe
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 10:27:17 -0300
>
> >o Provide explicit assertion of default values for all
> > keyword options, such as "TYPRUN=NORMAL", or even
> > simply "TYPRUN=".
>
> That's in there.
>
I stand corrected by experiment. z
You may try KSDSPACE from CBT file 394.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Joe jeffries
Sent: Thu 5/11/2006 1:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: VSAM Internals
Hi guys,
I wonder if anyone (Mark Thomen at IBM perhaps) can help! At my last sit
Hi,
In order to save $$$ on software, I've been asked to pursue a migration
from CA/OPS-MVS R11 to AF/OPERATOR v3.4.1. This will involve converting
all of our existing OPS/MVS rules and commands to AF/OPERATOR. Two
questions:
1. Can AF/OPERATOR be run concurrently with OPS/MVS on the same
Yes, that was my thinking. By using the RESOLVER SETUP one could insure a
single source for resolver information. One stop shopping!
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/11/2006 3:38:56 PM >>>
On Thu, 11 May 2006 14:01:28 -0400, Richard Pinion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Doesn't the RESOLVER address spac
On Thu, 11 May 2006 14:01:28 -0400, Richard Pinion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Doesn't the RESOLVER address space setup the default resolver
configuration?
>...
>>What I found in the revolver trace is it was using SYS1.TCPPARMS as the
>>default, so I made my changes there and it now works.
>>My
Hi Joe,
We have had a couple general use products (VSUM, LISTCAT+) that tried to
produce useful reports on VSAM KSDS utilization and it has to be explained to
someone every once in a while. On our z/OS R6 system courtesy of APAR OA11334
there are now some concise very useful bits of informati
Mike Bell wrote:
At a previous employer - they designed a external time reference that had
some special features - It could adjust the speed of the clock to
adjust to
time changes.
DST coming - run clock double time until you get to an hour ahead.
fallback - run clock half speed till you match
McKown, John wrote:
Ed Jaffe wrote:
Issue a daily SET TIMEZONE= command to adjust the local time
as necessary.
Well, we are planning on doing a T CLOCK=. In what way would a T
TIMEZONE= be better? Oh, and just to myself, I don't really like this
too very much. But then, I'm just an ol
On Thu, 11 May 2006 14:13:16 -0500 Mike Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>At a previous employer - they designed a external time reference that had
:>some special features - It could adjust the speed of the clock to adjust to
:>time changes.
:>DST coming - run clock double time until you get to an
I can think of a few issues with the clock going backward. Data Base
recovery becomes a nightmare. LOGs and SMF post processing see double
events. I am sure there is more. The best solution I've seen is to keep
the TOD set to GMT and set your local time (zone) accordingly. Most things
I've loo
At a previous employer - they designed a external time reference that had
some special features - It could adjust the speed of the clock to adjust to
time changes.
DST coming - run clock double time until you get to an hour ahead.
fallback - run clock half speed till you match up.
every so often t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:50 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: TOD clock discussion.
>
>
> McKown, John wrote:
> > I guess my question is: Why does IBM and o
McKown, John wrote:
I guess my question is: Why does IBM and other software vendor depend on
the TOD clock not changing "drastically" and never, ever, "going
backwards"?
Ours is not to reason why. The architecture (PoOps) describes the
behavior of the TOD clock and other facilities. These beha
Thanks to all that have responded. Just to clarify the environment it is
GRS STAR with ISGLOCK in a CF with a dedicated CPU. We changed from
hardware reserve + SYSTEM enqueue to global SYSTEMS ENQ. We now get
performance problems with enqueues issued via APPC for exclusive access to
SYSVSAM/LOGONID
I vaguely understand why the hardware, TOD, clock is inviolate. That is,
why a person cannot simply change it to a new value. However,
unfortunately, this is becoming yet another "the mainframe is junk"
argument. The UNIX and Windows servers are constantly adjusting their
clocks using an SNTP serve
Many thanks Rex
"Pommier, Rex R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 705=z/OS 1.2
706=z/OS 1.3
707=z/OS 1.4, FMID HBB7707
Howard,
If you have this maintenance RECEIVEd on your system and are trying to
find the correlating FMID, the easiest way is to use the SMP/E panels.
Simply do a cross-zone query (o
705=z/OS 1.2
706=z/OS 1.3
707=z/OS 1.4, FMID HBB7707
Howard,
If you have this maintenance RECEIVEd on your system and are trying to
find the correlating FMID, the easiest way is to use the SMP/E panels.
Simply do a cross-zone query (option 3.2 fro the main SMP/E menu) and
plug in "SYSMOD" for the
Doesn't the RESOLVER address space setup the default resolver configuration?
ISREDDE2 SYS1.PROCLIB(RESOLVER) - 01.02 Columns
1 00080
Command ===> Scroll
===> CSR
** * To
What I found in the revolver trace is it was using SYS1.TCPPARMS as the
default, so I made my changes there and it now works.
My next question is where can I change this default to something else?
Rogers
-Original Message-
From: Patrick O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
VSAM Manager is a sub-component of CatalogRecovery Plus (CR+) and is, as you
surmised from Mainstar Corp.
Give them a call and explain your circumstances. I have known Ron Ferguson
(President/CEO/all around great guy) and his folks to be very helpful in the
past. Here are their numbers: Phone:
In the list below what would the release number indicate?
FMID release number for which this sysmod is applicable to or the release of
the OS?
Thanks.
PTF List:
Release 705 : UA07390 available 03/12/17 (F312 )
Release 706 : UA07391 available 03/12/17 (F312 )
Release 707
Thanks Ed.
Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a message dated 5/11/2006 12:26:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I found this entry in the Causer section of an apply chek. Can anyone tell
me what this is? It looks like some sort of message thing.
How do you hand t
Hi guys,
I wonder if anyone (Mark Thomen at IBM perhaps) can help! At my last site
I used VSAM Manager (from Mainstar?)to look inside a KSDS. I've since
moved companies and my new company hasn't got that product. It was the
only tool I have ever used to look inside. I need to optimise a
troubl
Skip,
I can just imagine how many junior sysprogs are saving this post for future
reference!
If you don't hear it from anyone else, great job of explaining what 20+ years
of SMP/E experience has taught you. I even picked up a few tidbits of good
advice that I can use myself. Of course, that pr
In a message dated 5/11/2006 12:26:18 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I found this entry in the Causer section of an apply chek. Can anyone tell
me what this is? It looks like some sort of message thing.
How do you hand this if at all?
>>
Normally it's telling yo
I found this entry in the Causer section of an apply chek. Can anyone tell me
what this is? It looks like some sort of message thing.
How do you hand this if at all?
Thanks
*MSGSKEL(UA00760)
-
New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Ca
Here's one I came across in a SearchDataCenter E-Mail.
Just to be clear, you ladies still look marvelous to me. But the guys
are definitely showing some mileage.
Have a great day !!!
==
MAINFRAME LABOR POOL BOLSTE
On Wed, 10 May 2006 15:54:31 -0500, Laine, Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I'm trying to setup a default revolver using Local Hosts file on MVS.
>When using FTP under TSO it's able to find the Server name, but if I try
>a batch job it does not locate the same Server name.
>What do I need to co
When trying to use a different TRANSLATE table via the
PARM car I get the EZA1451E message
Z/06 V1R6
//STEP0010 EXEC PGM=FTP,
// PARM='( EXIT TRACE TRANS PECTAPP.BLVTOBSP.TCPXLBIN'
EZA1451E Cannot load tran
In fact, I can see the ACTIVE Status from HIS server but not sure if the
communication is working.
I know the APPC APING can test it , but no idea about how to issue this
command from the z/OS or From the Window His server ?
sincerely,
Laurence
From: Tsai Laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply
Howard,
The goal here is not to quantify an actual number of hours but to reduce
the work--and the elapsed time--to the point where the answer will be
consistently and reliably 'not too much'. We have the means on the
mainframe platform to identify, collect, and install maintenance with a
mini
On 5/11/2006 12:11 PM, Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
I had a similar performance problem when I converted reserves on a busy RACF
primary a few years ago. Never got to the bottom of why CICS trx were
driving it so hard, but the hardware reserve was much faster than then GRS
ring in a 2xOS390 GRS r
Some info on what's going on in DB2 can be found here. Watch the wrap.
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=64&context=SSEPEK&q1=%
2bpresentation&uid=swg27006985&loc=en_US&cs=utf-8&cc=us&lang=all
Aaron
On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:13:51 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>How to find
George,
I had a similar performance problem when I converted reserves on a busy RACF
primary a few years ago. Never got to the bottom of why CICS trx were
driving it so hard, but the hardware reserve was much faster than then GRS
ring in a 2xOS390 GRS ring.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Greetings,
To define the CICS Transaction to communication the remote Application
server through APPC LU62.
WHAT ARE THE REQIRED STEPS to take care ?
For CICS , connection group ? , For MVS APPC ? , for MS HIS (host
integration server) ?
Is there any simple / good document available to refer
Vir,
Have you thought of using the CPU Time values from a background RMF II?
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Vir Calimlim
> Sent: Thursday, 11 May 2006 9:06 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: SDSF batch show ta
"Binyamin Dissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Wed, 10 May 2006 19:06:47 -0400 Art Celestini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> :>I think it's actually non-VSAM, and it's because a lot of applications
> :>using EXCP or lower would break.
>
> :>Such programs no
Thanks to all for replies.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:13:51 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
How to find out what is memory usage of DB2 xxxMSTR address space ?
Virtual? Real?
Both.
Lots of ways. SDSF, RMF virtual storage detail report (need to
set up parms for RMF STC), RMF III shows
In a message dated 5/11/2006 9:32:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
More important than automating the swap message is investigating the
cause of the I/O errors.
>>
Don't we run EREP anymore? There's a nice summary of temps and perms for
each device in the histor
Robert Pelletier wrote:
Hi All. Once again I look to the group for help. Our data feeding agency
has upgraded to 3490E - 36 track devices. We are still 3480E-16 track
devices. We can't read their cart. Is there anything that can be done so
we can read what they are sending us? I am not sure if T
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/10/2006
at 07:23 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>But my base complaint is with the original and persisting design of
>JCL, which was created without file tailoring in mind. Yes, file
>tailoring existed in those days
Not even close. Manual editing
On Thu, 11 May 2006 12:13:51 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>How to find out what is memory usage of DB2 xxxMSTR address space ?
>
Virtual? Real?
Lots of ways. SDSF, RMF virtual storage detail report (need to
set up parms for RMF STC), RMF III shows frames used, MVS monitors
(Omegamo
This needs a longer answer than I have time but the short version is
1. just increasing the buffer pools because you have more memory may make
more problems than it fixes. There is no point in saving a block in a buffer
pool if there isn't another task/transaction coming along to use it.
2. If you
More important than automating the swap message is investigating the
cause of the I/O errors.
If the errors are occuring mostly one or a few drives, they may need
maintenance. It may be adequate to clean them regularly. If not, you
may need to get your tape drive vendor in to analyze the err
The actual command is UPGRADE.
Set bdy(global).
Upgrade.
Set bdy(target).
Upgrade.
Set bdy(dlib).
Upgrade.
All it does is set a flag in each csi that lets smpe know it can use new
smpe features (smpe 3.2+).
I would run a CLEANUP command in each zone after the upgrade is
performed.
Mark Jacobs
T
No, can I do this during normal operations and what is the command, what will
it do?
Thanks
Mark Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you ever issued the smp/e UPGRADE command against the zones in your
CSI's?
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Have you ever issued the smp/e UPGRADE command against the zones in your CSI's?
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Howard Rifkind
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 10:19 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.E
Shane, if you are talking about the SMPE version I'm at 3.3.
Shane Ginnane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Agreed.
If you are having problems with the LTS, sounds like you haven't
"upgraded".
The changes 3.2 introduced saw LTS usage almost disappear on my systems.
See the SMP reference.
Shane ...
>
In a message dated 5/11/2006 3:14:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
think all, or at least most of us, are interested in being 'feeded' by RSS.
Any experience to share about these RSS readers:
>>
There's a pretty good synopsis from developer works at:
_http://
In a recent note, Vir Calimlim said:
> Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 21:06:07 +0800
>
> My intention is to ran a SDSF batch job that would show which "DA"
> task has the highest CPU usage at any specific time. The batch job's
> output shows all the tasks but only the batch job and WLM have CPU%
Thanks to all you responded to my post. No ill effects occurred during the
LLA,REFRESH.
Desi de la Garza
Systems Programmer
Bexar County Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (S
Thanks all. I really appreciate the group and all your help again.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
In a message dated 5/11/2006 8:02:09 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi All. Once again I look to the group for help. Our data feeding agency
has upgraded to 3490E - 36 track devices. We are still 3480E-16 track
devices. We can't read their cart. Is there anything that
George,
I thought that the ACF2 reserves were to be left alone. ACF2 does a better
job of this than GRS or MIM could do.
Put ACF2 DB on a volume by itself.
I would have to reread the 8.0 book.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B
I know that budgets are tight and you may not have money available, but
we use a Westpoint Chameleon. The Chameleon is a universal tape system
for IBM Mainframes and Midrange Systems, providing full backward
compatibility for 18 and 36 track tape cartridges as well as for 1.2
inch open reel tapes.
No can do...
If you are heavily leveraged in the 3480 area, than obtain a used 3490e
single drive to support this.
However at some point 3490e to 3590 will be every where. Maybe exploring FTP
from the "Data Feeding Agency" would be another solution that's independent
of physical media.
Kevin
-
Hello Gary:
We have found your reply because we have the same problem: even though
Weight Management change weights, no LCPUs in D M=CPU ever get the "W" flag
on them, IRD don't touch them at all.
We dont' have the Initial number of logical CPs equal to the number of
shared physical CPs on th
Could you please describe your serialization environment? GRS Ring? GRS
STAR? MII? In my experience, the best performer is GRS STAR, but it's
certainly possible to implement GRS STAR in a way which performs badly (by
not dedicating an engine to the CF holding ISGLOCK, for example).
Brian
O
Hi all! I've searched the threads & the web but couldn't find the
answer for this thus I had to bother you with this inquiry.
My intention is to ran a SDSF batch job that would show which "DA"
task has the highest CPU usage at any specific time. The batch job's
output shows all the tasks but only
>It is actually described in the FM - just hard to find.
>
> When displaying numeric values that are too large for the column
> width, SDSF scales them using these abbreviations: T (thousands), M
> (millions), B (billions), KB (kilobytes), MB (megabytes), GB
> (gigabytes), TB (terabytes) an
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:02 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Reading 3490E Cartridge on 3480E Device
>
>
> Hi All. Once again I look to the group for help.
Hi All. Once again I look to the group for help. Our data feeding agency
has upgraded to 3490E - 36 track devices. We are still 3480E-16 track
devices. We can't read their cart. Is there anything that can be done so
we can read what they are sending us? I am not sure if TRTCH=NOCOMP will
work. Any
-- snip --
> If you need a snapshot of memory usage, you could use a monitor if you
got any or SDSF/DA Real field or TASID utility (even if it looks TASID
doesn't care about DataSpace data).
>
> If you need a long term trend data, you should use SMF records
post-processing.
>
> Hope it's useful.
I
MASSIMO BIANCUCCI wrote:
If you need a snapshot of memory usage, you could use a monitor if you got any
or SDSF/DA Real field or TASID utility (even if it looks TASID doesn't care
about DataSpace data).
If you need a long term trend data, you should use SMF records post-processing.
Hope it's
I do not know about plans to update DESERV (since if an update was made to
BLDL it would usually be made to DESERV).
But there are no plans to update LLACOPY (or any other exploiter of
BLDL/DESERV that I am aware of).
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
I'm trying to setup a default revolver using Local Hosts file on MVS.
When using FTP under TSO it's able to find the Server name, but if I try
a batch job it does not locate the same Server name.
What do I need to code in the JCL to locate the correct Server using
Local Hosts?
Rogers
Rogers,
B
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 12:13 +0200, R.S. wrote:
> How to find out what is memory usage of DB2 xxxMSTR address space ?
Think of a (large) number.
Double it.
If you have allowed the DBAs free reign with buffers, double it again.
If the result looks ridiculously high, you're probably getting close.
If you need a snapshot of memory usage, you could use a monitor if you got any
or SDSF/DA Real field or TASID utility (even if it looks TASID doesn't care
about DataSpace data).
If you need a long term trend data, you should use SMF records post-processing.
Hope it's useful.
Best regard.
Bill,
I agree its a size thing, but the ironic bit is that the creating of
these tables is usually a waste of time as the size of the zseries
complex increases.
Why? Well, this internal representation of the IO config that is
maintained by ESCM is only really used if you want to use ESCM to
How to find out what is memory usage of DB2 xxxMSTR address space ?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-M
Thank you Frank !!. Great discovery!!. We are starting to have a look at the
redbook and we'll test it in a few days.
Have a nice day
Jorge García Juanino
Técnica de sistemas host/Area de Producción
MAPFRE TECNOLOGIAS DE LA INFORMACIÓN
Crtra de Pozuelo nº 52
28220 Majadahonda (Madrid)
TELF: 9
In a message dated 5/11/2006 4:42:20 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>It still burns a
>large amount of CPU at startup. From what I've seen this is due to the
>size of the IO config i.e. how big the IODF is. I get the impression
>that ESCM reads the IODF and builds a
I am working with a customer implementing GDPS HyperSwap. On of the
requirements is to convert all hardware reserves to global enqueues. We are
having performance problems with the ACF2 LOGONIDS database after
converting the reserves. In particular, there is queueing by APPC on
SYSVSAM/LOGONIDS mai
Sam,
I wouldn't hold out much hope with the SA/390 version. It still burns a
large amount of CPU at startup. From what I've seen this is due to the
size of the IO config i.e. how big the IODF is. I get the impression
that ESCM reads the IODF and builds a various internal tables and cross
matches
On Wed, 10 May 2006 19:06:47 -0400 Art Celestini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
:>I think it's actually non-VSAM, and it's because a lot of applications
:>using EXCP or lower would break.
:>Such programs normally issue an EOV to cause allocation of a new extent
:>for an output data set. I suspect
Hi,
To Jorge Garcia Juanino, who asked
> ...add many volumes (for example, 256) in a storage group...
> ...is it possible do it in a batch JCL this operation?
Yes, it is possible to add volumes to a storage group in batch.
You can do it by using Naviquest (it is not very fast, and not very
flexib
Hi,
I think all, or at least most of us, are interested in being 'feeded' by RSS.
Any experience to share about these RSS readers:
SharpReader http://www.sharpreader.com/
Pluck (IE Plug-in)http://www.pluck.com/
NewsGator http://www.new
98 matches
Mail list logo
