Russell Witt wrote:
Radoslaw,
As Greg indicated, this WWID field is for use with a 3592/WORM cartridge.
You may or may not need an upgrade to your 3592 devices; but the cartridges
themselves are unique. As WORM indicates, they are Write-ONCE-Read-Many (the
ONCE being the key). After you have
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Anyone thought about it ???.
Is it possible ???. Manuals don't mention it, and it sure doesn't look
like it from the messages at start up.
Looks like I am going to have to go find some ESCON CTCs. Anyone have a
solution ???.
Yes, some of us thought about it. g
Do you
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Auditors neither make rules, nor enforce them.
I wish. They come armed with checklists that have no connection to actual
requirements.
Yes. But.
In theory, they should not be creating those lists.
Nor should they be enforcing them.
All they can do is document
John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
Chantal wrote:
That was my argument as well. How to do offsite backups. My classmate
mentioned the possibility of a remote SAN for companies that already
have the infrastructure and bandwidth available to them. I'm really
not sure how feasible that is though.
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In ISPF DSLIST, I enter as Dsname Level the pattern,
USER.**.CSI, and deselect Include Additional Qualifiers.
The display presented shows such as:
USER.XYZ.GLOBAL.CSI*VSAM*
USER.XYZ.GLOBAL.CSI.DATA
This is only a wish.
In North America, it's more than a wish.
It's a requirement.
Focusing on mainframe shops I've got to admit, very
often there is no position even for auditor, so auditor role is maintained by
...security administrator.
This is relevant to all organisations, not just
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/21/D8HODD7G0.html
The report by the Justice Department agency found that 62 percent of people
in jails have not been convicted, meaning many of them are awaiting trial.
A lot of us are frightened to go to the USA these days. Baltimore or anywhere
else.
--
I have about 60 volumes, and I need to perform a selective dataset backup on
all of those volumes. Does DFDSS allow to code a generic volume name? For
example the volsers start in SYSxxx and I want to backup only HFC.** dsns. I
know this is possible using the FDR command :
MOUNT VOLG=SYS.
No, all 60 volumes would have to be listed unless you were willing to backup
using catalog control and not limit your search to the SYSxxx vols. In other
words, if all your HFC.** datasets reside on SYSxxx volumes and are catalogued
then the following should work for you:
//JOB3 JOB
Hi, All,
In conjunction with our upcoming datacenter and CPU upgrades, we're
looking for information regarding what kind of hardware (PC-type) and
software (TN3270E-capable) would minimally be necessary. We already
license Bluezone from Seagull Software as our shop standard for
normal terminal
Radoslaw,
The VOLSAFE from STK has actually been around even longer then IBM
3592/WORM. However, because STK cannot change the operating system, they did
not include things like the WWID and the usage-count that IBM has inside
theirs. Will they in the future, only STK can answer that. But their
The info you want is found here:
http://dtsc.dfw.ibm.com/adcd04/products.html
Hope this helps,
Salah
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:24:56 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:
release numbers and FMIDs - again To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU I'm trying to
find out which FMIDs relate to which
Thanks David. I guess I am stuck coding 63 steps. I cannot risk backing up
via catalog just in case.
Thanks for your help.
O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, all 60 volumes would have to be listed unless you were willing to backup
using catalog control
As I mentioned this weekend, some Java code
that used to run no longer runs. When I run
a simple lab exercise, I get:
Howdy.class 4: FSUM7343 cannot open ÈëÈÊÁ/_--- for output: EDC5129I No
such file or directory.
Howdy.class 4: FSUM7343 cannot open ¦/Î/Ñ? for input: EDC5129I No such
file or
Not 63 steps. The job can be done in one step, you just have to code the
volumes in the indynam parameter.
-Original Message-
From: John Dawes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS Question
Thanks David. I guess I am
One more thing, you'll want to code ALLMULTI(FIRST) to avoid getting multiple
backups of multi-volume files.
-Original Message-
From: John Dawes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS Question
Thanks David. I guess I
In a recent note, Jim McAlpine said:
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:24:56 +0100
that Mark Zelden recently suggested contained this info. Wouldn't it make
life much easier if the FMID's appeared in the apar description instead of
these cryptic release numbers.
Yes. Even as if would
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Payne
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/21/D8HODD7G0.html
The report by the Justice Department agency found that 62
percent of people in jails have not been convicted, meaning
many of them are awaiting
On Mon, 22 May 2006 11:24:56 +0100, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to find out which FMIDs relate to which release numbers (as they
appear in apar descriptions) for VTAM and TCPIP. More specifically, which
release numbers relate to HIP6140 and HVT6140 which are the TCPIP and
Thanks Mark. I didn't realise that the PGMDIR was included on these
bookshelves, I thought it just came as machine readable material as part of
the install.
Thanks again
Jim McAlpine
On 5/22/06, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2006 11:24:56 +0100, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL
I guess FDR/ABR vs. DSS/HSM is a little like politics and religion,
everyone has an opinion and they have strong feelings regarding those
opinions. Sometimes the opinions are based on facts and sometimes they
are not. And sometimes our opinion are based on things that happened a
long time
Hello,
I noticed that some SMF 15 records were lacking SMS info (SMF15DCN, SMF15SCN
and SMF15MCN). After some investigation, this seems to be true for temporary
datasets. From IGD messages I know the datasets have a mgmtclas, storclas and
dataclas assigned, but this is not reflected in the
This was supposed to go to the list.
--Original Message--
To: O'Brien, David W. \(NIH/CIT\) [C]
Sent: May 22, 2006 09:37
Subject: Re: SMS-Managed System Volumes (Was: FDR/ABR in large shops)
Neither, the manual just hadn't gone through the necessary hoops to get
published to the world.
Does anyone know when 3.4 was first introduced?
How about when the Workplace (3.11) was introduced?
There's a lack of credibility when people talk about 3.4 as an example
of using new features.
As to panels that pop up to tell me about new features, I find them
to be rather annoying. If they
Hello,
I'm revising DFSORT and I have had a look to SMF16 records and only shows
statistics of executed jobs but it not shows statistics DFSORT use by
Started Tasks.
I have revised ICEIEXIT/ICETEXIT and I don't see anything.
Could you help me?
Hi !
I have made a dfsmsdss full volume copy
and want to copy it from tape to dasd.
Is this possible when the tape blocksize is
larger than 32760 ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
About SMFPRMxx used:
SYS(NOTYPE(1:3,9:13,19,20,23,24,25,27,28,29,31,32,33,38,39,43:59,
69,92,99),EXITS(IEFACTRT,IEFUSO,IEFU29,IEFUTL,IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFUSI,IEFUJI),
INTERVAL(SMF,SYNC),NODETAIL)
Is it possible ???. Manuals don't mention it, and it sure doesn't look
like it from the messages at start up.
Actually, the 1.7 GRS Planning manual SA22-7600-04 is pretty clear. For
a ring config,
In this document, link, path, and CTC link can mean an IBM 3088 MCCU
data link, a parallel
Focusing on mainframe shops I've got to admit, very often there is no
position even for auditor, so auditor role is maintained by
...security administrator.
I can't quote the Latin (I took French) but the famous Latin quote
translates to something like who shall guard those selfsame guardians,
I have made a dfsmsdss full volume copy
and want to copy it from tape to dasd.
Is this possible when the tape blocksize is
larger than 32760 ?
Apparently not. I thought that the COPYDUMP function of DSS might be
able to do this, but it says
The COPYDUMP command cannot change the block
The Latin tag Bruce was looking for is
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
_
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there!
Tom Marchant wrote:
Does anyone know when 3.4 was first introduced?
How about when the Workplace (3.11) was introduced?
There's a lack of credibility when people talk about 3.4 as an example
of using new features.
As to panels that pop up to tell me about new features, I find them
to be
We have two separate parallel sysplexes. We logon to TSO on one image of
each sysplex.
We try to logon to a second image. On one sysplex we get this:
IKJ56425I LOGON rejected, UserId xxx already logged on to system SYS1
IKJ56400A ENTER LOGON OR LOGOFF-
On the other sysplex the logon
In the golden days (just 5 or 6 years ago,
even), many companies built in training time
as part of each IT employee's performance plan.
That may be true, but IMO training budgets never recovered from cutbacks
in the early 1990ss.
Bob Shannon
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruce Black
Focusing on mainframe shops I've got to admit, very often
there is no
position even for auditor, so auditor role is maintained by
...security administrator.
I can't quote the Latin (I took
Yes, I've tried to read the manual. But I am not very CA-7 literate. My
basic question is simple. Can CA-7 trigger a job when a UNIX file is
created? I know that CA-7 can trigger a job upon the creation of a
legacy z/OS dataset. Due to some political bickering, it may become
helpful if CA-7 could
Phil,
So whats the percent of people in jail in England?
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
From: Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/21/D8HODD7G0.html
The report by the Justice Department agency found that 62 percent
Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Payne
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/21/D8HODD7G0.html
The report by the Justice Department agency found that 62
percent
Thanks. We looked at the RNL before posting the question and two of us
decided they were
the same. One system had SYSIKJUA commented out in the RNL though.
Have to wait till all TSO users are off or IPL to make the change.
Check your GRS RNL list for SYSIKJUA.
Don Imbriale
they are part of the same dataset. i like this ..don't change it ibm..
R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
05/22/2006 04:08 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: DSLIST
That did it! I located the Storage Groups in ISMF (option 6 - Storage
Group) and turned off the pre-defined groups from the ADCD. No more hourly
ARC0570I messages!
Thanks to all.
Eric,
I leave Phil to provide the precise figure - although the question doesn't
really follow on from his post.
The percentage isn't anything like high enough if the recent Home Office
scandals are anything to go by. One heavyweight has just left the ring on
his back and the bantamweight who's
On Mon, 22 May 2006 09:58:30 -0500, Alan C. Field
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have two separate parallel sysplexes. We logon to TSO on one image of
each sysplex.
We try to logon to a second image. On one sysplex we get this:
IKJ56425I LOGON rejected, UserId xxx already logged on to system
Actually, my question to Phil obviously is off topic, but I'm curious just
the same. I'm sure the percent is a lot lower than the US.
More on topic: I've only been to 2 Share meetings. San Franscisco in 2003
and Long Beach in 2004. In San Francisco, the convention center seemed to
be
Do anybody experience with Z/OS UNIX NFS SERVER AND Z/VM SLES9 NFS CLIENT.
DO ANYBODU SEND ME MVSNFS.CNTL(EXPORTS) AND MVSNFS.CNTL(NFSATTR)
HELP ME!
BEST REGARDS
ZORAN TRIFUNOVIC
Is this a phishing expedition?
A hacking attempt?
Or, a teach me all the knowledge in the world while I stand on one
HI!
We have Z/OS UNIX NFS SERVER(10.200.5.59),
On Z/VM SLES9 , we mounted :
mount -o vers=2,proto=udp 10.200.5.59:zoca /mnt
succesfully.
On Z/VM SLES9 we type command
pttlin1:/ # df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/dasdb2 1.7G 1.4G 269M 84% /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Zoran Trifunovic
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: nfs server
HI!
We have Z/OS UNIX NFS SERVER(10.200.5.59),
On Z/VM SLES9 , we mounted :
mount
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric N. Bielefeld
Actually, my question to Phil obviously is off topic, but I'm
curious just the same. I'm sure the percent is a lot lower
than the US.
http://www.sentencingproject.org/pdfs/pub9036.pdf
In a message dated 5/22/2006 12:21:41 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, my question to Phil obviously is off topic, but I'm
curious just the same.
Then why not do as Darren asked about 26 hours ago and get back to IBM
mainframe discussions? You could
If you read the rest of my post, I thought it was very on topic, as it was
about how safe the area is around the Share convention.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From: (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 5/22/2006 12:30:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you read the rest of my post, I thought it was very on topic, as it was
about how safe the area is around the Share convention.
I did read it. It was. You could also have broken your post
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
For a free country, the US has a lot of locked up innocents.
This is a non-sequitur. Other than the presumption of innocence, a
basic tenet of our legal system, on what basis can you say that people
in jail awaiting trial are innocent? At the bail hearing, you are
On Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You made the blanket statement that, Auditors neither make rules,
nor enforce them. No one has disagreed with you that it *should* be
as you describe, but your insistance that it *is* reveals your naivete.
It's not naïveté.
We were hoping to downgrade our z900 from a 105 to 104 in January of 2007. IBM
has told us that the announcement:
Effective June 30, 2006, IBM will withdraw all models of the IBM zSeries® 900
(2064) and all upgrades from Parallel Enterprise Servers Generation 5 (9672),
Parallel Enterprise
means we have to have the conversion complete by Oct 2, 2006, not just the
purchase. Has anyone encountered a different opinion? I had assumed we could
buy the downgrade and install it at a later time. Has anyone looked at buying
an upgrade for installation after 10/2/2006? Any advice?
Alan,
1) Change GRSRNL00, excluding SYSIKJUA definition.
2) Use ISPCCONF command to change ISPF_TEMPORARY_DATA_SET_QUALIFIER
field
to your system name. Or code ISPF exit 16.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Don't you just turn off an engine to downgrade a 105 to a 104?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gibbons, Mark
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z900 model conversions
We were hoping to
Don't you just turn off an engine to downgrade a 105 to a 104?
Who's going to do that for you?
If you don't have IBM do it, it doesn't count (in my experience).
Of course, the last time I did it, it was an R65 to an R55.
-
-teD
300,000 Kilometres per Second
Not only is it a good idea!
It's the
MacIntyre, Cory
Don't you just turn off an engine to downgrade a 105 to a 104?
Getting the cpu id right for licensing means we get to pay for it.
Mark
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
I would start by reading the FM. It states the starter/skeleton versions
can be found in SYS1.SAMPLIB, starting with GFS.
If he does that, he should stop asking questions for a few hours. g
On Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do anybody experience with
I'm just curious if there are any recommendations on data and index cisizes
for a general volcat. When we first set ours up, we used the sample job in
the IBM Magstar Tape Redbook which just takes the system defaults (in this
case on a non-sms managed volume). I did a listcat against our volcat
Steve,
Talking to a few fellows who have been working with Java on the
mainframe, they suggested looking at the value of 'file.encoding' system
property.
Here is a page that has some code snippets and a discussion that may
help.
http://java.sun.com/developer/JDCTechTips/2003/tt0110.html
Hope it
Finger checked before so not sure if this got sent already.
I looked at your SMFPRMxx parms and they appear ok. Type 16 is not in
your NOTYPE list for STC. But I'm still a little unclear as to what your
situation is.
Did you just implement your own initialization (ICEIEXIT) and termination
On Mon, 22 May 2006 07:12:50 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
In conjunction with our upcoming datacenter and CPU upgrades, we're
looking for information regarding what kind of hardware (PC-type) and
software (TN3270E-capable) would minimally be necessary. We already
license
George Dranes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm just curious if there are any recommendations on data and index
cisizes
for a general volcat. When we first set ours up, we used the sample job
in
the IBM Magstar Tape Redbook which just takes the system defaults
Radoslaw wrote:
Do you mean GRS over CTC, but *not* over XCF ?
Yep ... :(
IMHO you can't do it. GRS requires pretty ancient device type (BCTC),
while this type is not supported on FICON chpid.
Yes, I was expecting the same way, hoping for different.
Probably it is IBM recommendation to
Eric and I must be on the same budget constraints. Share SFO was
certainly in an interesting neighbourhood. However, you didn't have to
stray too far from the beach area in Long Beach to feel decidedly
uncomfortable either.
Last time I holidayed in New Orleans, getting lost heading back to your
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 10:47 -0700, Gibbons, Mark wrote:
means we have to have the conversion complete by Oct 2, 2006,
not just the purchase. Has anyone encountered a different opinion?
I had assumed we could buy the downgrade and install it at a later time.
Has anyone looked at buying an
Kevin Pintar wrote:
Steve,
Talking to a few fellows who have been working with Java on the
mainframe, they suggested looking at the value of 'file.encoding' system
property.
And where would I expect to find that? In /usr/lpp/java/J1.4/bin
there is a java.properties file, but it does not have
Hello List..I need the structure (data areas) of VVDS. Anyone can give me
?
Thank in advance
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
Don't ever be afraid to ask questions. We have all had them in the past.
What CBT file did you get the VRECOV clist from?
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Hi,
I have not heard the Too Many Consoles suggestion before, but possibly
they just didn't want you to give one to everyone:). Any way, most of the
client sites that I have set up that have ICC capability have between 6 to
10 consoles actively in use, and normally spread accross alternate
I think with only 500 volsers that you won't see any tangable benefits to
making any changes at all.
Brian
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
73 matches
Mail list logo
