Hi,
Anyone know is it neccessary to offline all HDS rapid exhange DISKs before
OPEN can access it?
The disk may crash if HOST system and OPEN system access the same disk
simultaneously, is it true, and other method can resolved it?
thanks
Tommy
Hi,
I am trying to code a REXX Routine to solicit information from z/OS Console
Services, but am not getting the anticipated response.
If I issue D R,,,MSG=DFS9 under SDSF I get the anticipated response which
includes the outstanding message id.
If I issue the same command from REXX in
Terry,
This is probably because of your RACF OPERPARM segment which is used to
determine the authority of the E-MCS console.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Terry,
Here is the rexx code which works fine here for 'D TS,L' or 'D R,,,MSG=DFS9'
Get_SA :
address TSO 'CONSPROF SOLDISPLAY(NO)'
address TSO 'CONSOLE ACTIVATE'
/* address CONSOLE 'D TS,L' */
address CONSOLE 'D R,,,MSG=DFS9'
/* RETRIEVE OUTPUT COMMAND */
do forever
fc =
Hi Rob and Pierre,
Thank you for your prompt responses.
Pierre your REXX sample was useful for comparison purposes, but the code I had
is actually working the issue is a security one.
Outside of REXX if I issue the commands from ISPF Panel 6 I get the same
truncated response of NO MESSAGES
Would F LLA, REFRESH (link list refresh)...
Be aware that a full LLA refresh is overkill.
F LLA,UPDATE=nn where CSVLLAxx contains a suitable update statement for the
specific data set requires far less processing and does what you want.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
I would agree with the originator of this question that any required use
of FORCE is a bug. The possible consequences of FOCREing an address
space are severe and are not within the scope of 'normal' operation. If
you need to issue a FORCE then you have a problem and it should be fixed
by the
Peter Relson wrote:
Would F LLA, REFRESH (link list refresh)...
Be aware that a full LLA refresh is overkill.
F LLA,UPDATE=nn where CSVLLAxx contains a suitable update statement for the
specific data set requires far less processing and does what you want.
It uses fewer computer
It also won't accidentally pick up changes that someone else might have
pre-staged in a LINKLIST dataset. Keep it simple (and safe).
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter
Terry,
Try the following command instead of just D R,R
D R,R,CN=(ALL)
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
[snip]
...their (obviously optimised like zAAPs and zIIPs) engines(s).
What is optimized with them?
I was being facetious.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
Article on 'The Greatest Software Ever Written':
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=191901844
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
I would agree with the originator of this question that any required use of
FORCE is a bug.
I disagree. Sometimes you have to FORCE. For example, you have an address space
swapped out.
CANCEL won't take effect until it swaps back in.
So, you cannot restart it until it's gone.
The possible
Human resources well spent, I might add. In a large shop there may be
more than one person updating the LINKLIST. By issuing 'F LLA,REFRESH'
you may cause new code to be picked up before it should be (ie. may
require updates to LPA to be concurrent). Always take the least invasive
option. It is
Tommy,
I am using SMS to manage a group of volume but how to handle the WORK
PACK,
I means the storage volume, how can the ACS routine to bypass checking
the
storage volume datasetst?
UNIT=SYSDA,DSN=TESTFILE,DISP=(,PASS)
Do you want the temporary dataset to *not* be SMS managed?
IF DSTYPE =
The only way I have ever pulled this off is if the module is loaded in
Private I could Hot-start JES2 by doing a $PJES2,ABEND and then restart
JES2.
Not very elegant, but it does work.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Use of FORCE
I would agree with the originator of this question that any required
use of FORCE is a
Hi Rob,
The command D R,R,CN=(ALL) did the trick.
I tried it first in ISPF Panel 6 to ensure it gave the correct results before
putting it into the REXX routine.
I am now correctly capturing the outstanding reply information for IMS which
was my goal.
Many thanks - Terry
Terry Sambrooks
I'm not saying that we never issue a FORCE, but we do it as a last resort and
keep a close eye on the system after we issue it. Again, this is NOT normal it
is a bug to have to issue a force.
Again, I disagree.
Most of the issues with FORCE went away 20 years ago.
And, there are many reasons
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Salt
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Need source file editor recommendations
snip
What Spiffy and SimpList do is provide the
I must be doing something wrong then since we have seen several problems
in the past couple of years (certainly less than 20 years) with using
FORCE.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:35:54 +0800, Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am using SMS to manage a group of volume but how to handle the WORK PACK,
I means the storage volume, how can the ACS routine to bypass checking the
storage volume datasetst?
UNIT=SYSDA,DSN=TESTFILE,DISP=(,PASS)
Hi Gurus
We are installing a z9 BC system and we are in doubt how to define IBM 2105
F20 to be accessed using Ficon channels.
We have 04 options in shark configuration:
P-T-P_FCP
P-T-P_FICON
FCAL
Undefined
Operating system can't see shark dasds using Ficon, just using escon
Consider using the FORCE command as a last resort when the CANCEL
command still fails to perform its function after you have issued it
several times.
WARNING: Never use the FORCE command without understanding that:
- After issuing FORCE, you might have to re-IPL.
ARM The system is to terminate
I must be doing something wrong then since we have seen several problems in
the past couple of years (certainly less than 20 years) with using FORCE.
We are using it at least twice a month, unfortunately.
One business-critical task is taking a S0C4 occasionally, and won't cancel
since it's
So you consider an unscheduled IPL to be part of normal operation?
Who said we had any?
Maybe we've been lucky?
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
HI,
Currently all our volumes are NON-SMS managed therefore all temporary files
UNIT=SYSDA, VOL=SER=NIL will allocate to WORKs volumes/STORAGE volumes, all
TEMP files will allocate to PUBLIC volumes and the others will allocate to
private volumes. if we plan to use SMS managed all volumes how can
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Use of FORCE
I must be doing something wrong then since we have seen
several problems in the
This is likely not possible, but have you considered writing an assembler
routine which does an ATTACHX on the actual program.
Unfortunately, it's not possible.
The main reason is, we are out-sourced and our provider doesn't have the smarts.
Nor, do they like modifying vendor code.
When in
If so, how do you like it? What advantages does it offer over standard ISPF?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
I think this should have gone to the list?
After all, I mis-typed.
Had ARM in the wrong order.
--Original Message--
To: Gabriel Tully
Sent: Aug 17, 2006 10:07
Subject: Re: Use of FORCE
Shouldn't it be:
CANCEL task
FORCE task,ARM
wait * if ARM does not work then
FORCE task
START task
And, unless I am mistaken, REFRESH invalidates the entire VLF cache and
you will be running without VLF's performance enhancements for all
LLA/VLF managed libraries until LLA decides to start staging to VLF
again.
I remember from the past this fully killed system performance for about
10
The problems we have seen are mostly when someone tries to FORCE a job
that is using DB2. The least impact is that the threads don't go away
and the ASID remains unusable until DB2 goes down. The most impact we
have seen is that DB2 is unusable.
Maybe if you are not using DB2 then FORCE will not
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:55:03 +0800, Tommy Tsui
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HI,
Currently all our volumes are NON-SMS managed therefore all temporary
files
UNIT=SYSDA, VOL=SER=NIL will allocate to WORKs volumes/STORAGE
volumes, all
TEMP files will allocate to PUBLIC volumes and the others will
Something like F LLA,UPDATE=DSN=some.data.set.name
would be very useful and could help eliminate manual
effort of creating a PARMLIB member and the attendant
clutter of members in PARMLIB.
Don Imbriale
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:33:07 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Relson
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:55:02 -0600, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you
wrote:
On 16 Aug 2006 08:28:34 -0700, Mickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moving to a PC based platform is the best way I know of to engage in
empire building. I oft times suspect that some managers do it for just
that reason. Managing
This should have gone to the list too:
In addition, there are several things I check before I issue any kind of
FORCE:
- Check SRVCLASS for low priorty
- Check RMF for waits
- Check WTOR
- Check GRS contention
- Check for SMC (step must complete) status in D A,taskname
- Check to see if task
On 16 Aug 2006 06:15:07 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Greetings,
For those of you that are members of SHARE, I submitted a SHARE
requirement regarding this.
One of the problems is that the user-id is still only 8 characters.
This is more and more of a limitation since most other
Go get file 196 from the CBT tape. www.cbttape.org is the URL. It has a
JES2 exit 5 which will accomplish what you are looking for.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 07:25:32 -0500, Pat Schlehuber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only way I have ever pulled this off is if the module is loaded in
Private I
You don't distinguish the volumes. To the MVS system, all SMS managed
volumes are mounted PRIVATE.
Use SMS ACS routines to separate the datasets into separate storage groups.
All your STORAGE volumes today would be placed in a storage group named
E.G. STORWRK. All your PUBLIC volumes would be
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:28:34 -0400, Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I looked at the PMR, and it does not mention a dump of the
address space in question after the CANCEL was done. A dump would be
required to figure out what is going on before trying to decide if there
is a problem
=Dave Salt wrote
What Spiffy and SimpList do is provide the mainframe
equivalent of Internet
Explorer.
=John McKown wrote =
What?!? They crash the operating system? GRIN
Ouch! (Actually, that was pretty funny!)
Hmmm. Now that you've pointed
I seem to remember some way to determine if a dataset has been allocated to
some job from the ISPF 3.4 menu.
Can anyone refresh me on this and if not 3.4 then where?
Thanks
-
Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com
Does anyone know where I can download the installer for windows? The sysadmins
for our MF have removed the dataset containing the member required.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thu 8/17/2006 10:46 AM
To:
If the action you are trying to do tells you that someone else has
control of it, press PF1 (twice, I think).
Otherwise, download the free version of MXI or TASID or SHOWMVS. Check
the CBT site for SHOWMVS: www.cbttape.org or for MXI 4.3:
http://www.rocketsoftware.com/portfolio/mxi/download.php
Howard,
I know there should be a better way of doing this, but for PS or PO
datasets, I just attempt a rename of the dataset from 3.4. If it asks
for a new name, it isn't allocated and I just PF3 back out. If it comes
back saying dataset in use I just hit PF1 twice and it shows who has
it.
Hi folks,
Just double checking. If PDA=none is set in the hsm parmlib, you can use a
SETSYS PDA(ON) and SETSYS PDA(OFF) to turn it on/off inflight?
Many thx,
Joe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
In 3.4 on the DSN line
ISRDDN E \
Regards, Herman Stocker
avis budget group
Phone: 1973-496-4847
Fax:1973-496-4979
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Thursday,
Rather than 3.4, issue command DDLIST E on any ISPF panel. Then enter the
name of the data set in the field Minor Name Prefix and press enter.
Don Imbriale
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:12:50 -0700, Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I seem to remember some way to determine if a dataset has
Herman,
Does that fill in the MINOR name on your system when you invoke it? It
did not on my system.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stocker, Herman
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:25 AM
To:
From: Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to remember some way to determine if a dataset has been allocated to
some job from the ISPF 3.4 menu.
Can anyone refresh me on this and if not 3.4 then where?
Howard,
Enter ISRDDN E next to a data set in a DSLIST and it will give you the
Dave,
Thanks! That answers my previous question. The \ was superfluous.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Salt
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Allociated
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:00:42 -0500, Matthew Stitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip!
All your STORAGE volumes today would be placed in a storage group
named
E.G. STORWRK. All your PUBLIC volumes would be placed in a storage
group
named E.G. STORPUB. The ACS routines would send the appropriate
Michael,
I tried using the ISPF GUI for a while. The only thing I liked about it was
the fact that each 'split screen' appeared as a new, individual window on my
desktop. This allowed me (for example) to put two windows side by side for
comparison or other purposes. However, this alone was
From: Kuredjian, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know where I can download the installer for windows? The
sysadmins for our MF have removed the dataset containing the member
required.
Michael,
I'll send the file to you off-list.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - The easiest, most powerful way
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:06 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Use of FORCE
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:28:34 -0400, Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
In the
Timeout!
Before this gets into a my way is the best way thread, let's agree that
Matthew would not actually convert to SMS that way. I thought he was merely
mentioning a logical one for one concept. :-)
What *is* important in what Matthew wrote is that Tommy needs to do some more
reading.
What is the garbage before the RE:?
I have a SPAM filter that gets rid of $B in the subject line.
Fortunately, I checked my BULK folder, rather than just clobbering it.
When in doubt.
PANIC!!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
We've had some success with the $DA,X command listing the tasks still
running. Glad to hear that this is fixed in the next release!
*After* you've shot JES2 in frustration and re-ipled, JES2 will identify
the culprit via msg $HASP406I xxx WAS EXECUTING. However, it sometimes
gives us a false
Not sure where that came from. I looked at what I sent in my sent items
folder and it is not there.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Alford
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: JES2 Not Dormant
We've had some success with the $DA,X command listing the tasks still
My storage admin guy is having a problem that he thinks started when we went to
z/OS 1.4.
We use FDR Upstream to back up certain workstations and servers to mainframe
DASD. We use the same SMS data class for all of them. It allows for up to 59
volumes to be used for each backup data set.
I want to create an OMVS Script which will allow me to populate the
OMVS.ROOT file shipped from the factory with my symbolic links and
directories for mount points. Can anyone help me with a template?
___
Jim Petersen
MVS - Lead Systems Engineer
Jim,
Here is sample of a 'batch TSO' job I use to customize a ROOT mounted
at '/newroot' with directory mountpoints and symbolic links:
//TSOB EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSEXEC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.SBPXEXEC
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD
Tom,
The most valuable suggestion in addition to the one on SMS manuals is the one
found at the bottom of every note on this list:
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
We both know that topics about ACS routine coding have been discussed many
times over.
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:00:28 -0500, Eric Bielefeld Eric-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is IBM really giving up on VM? They tryed that once before, but then
started promoting z/Linux under z/VM. Or is this just speculation. I
would think that if they are stilling promoting the z boxes to run Linux,
snip
but z/VM *is* the most programmable,
flexible, powerful, and robust hypervisor in existence.
/snip
A-M-E-N to that!!!
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior Technical Engineer
Office: (408) 970 - 7978
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:07:52 -0400, Richards.Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom,
The most valuable suggestion in addition to the one on SMS manuals
is the one found at the bottom of every note on this list:
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Agreed. Too bad
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Petersen, Jim
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 12:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Scripts for HFS Files
I want to create an OMVS Script which will allow me to populate the
Tom,
If I understand you correctly, I am in agreement with you about avoiding
coding routines for explicit volume allocations. It *was* generally for
transitional purposes only that I used them. After that, the default was
to SMS-manage everything. Exceptions were otherwise coded and excluded.
My
Alan,
Thank you for giving us an I assume official word on VM's future viability.
I was pretty sure that IBM was not giving up on VM, but its good hear it
ffrom the developers.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From:
Does anybody know a way to get the jobid when a c program writes some JCL to
the internal reader and then get the jobid back? I had an assembly program
that did it, but it no longer compiles under ZOS 1.6. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
The system volumes - not just the IPL volumes, but everything needed to get
MVS up and ready to restore applications - should not be managed by SMS.
In my reference below to The first volumes to restore in a D/R situation,
I was thinking of the first SMS volumes that are restored to get
the
Are there any control blocks or services an application written in
assembler can use to determine the system's base LU for APPC/MVS? I'
have tried the REXX MVSVAR(SYSAPPCLU) function but only get spaces
returned. Some sample execs on CBT have the use of MVSVAR(SYSAPPCLU)
coded but also
Of course, this assumes that a sufficiently small subset of the total
SMS environment can be defined to make it worthwhile.
Understood and agreed.
I'm out of practice and spoiled at the moment. GDPS/XRC :-)
Bob Richards
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
The information transmitted is
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:11:06 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would agree with the originator of this question that any required use
of FORCE is a bug.
I disagree. Sometimes you have to FORCE. ...
I didn't mean to imply that FORCE should not be used. I even can see
where it
Sun sells mainframe re-hosting business to Clerity
http://cwflyris.computerworld.com/t/781733/650249/30377/2/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
In a recent note, Dave Salt said:
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:49:49 +
the fact that each 'split screen' appeared as a new, individual window on my
desktop. This allowed me (for example) to put two windows side by side for
comparison ...
But this list taught me, a couple years
Hi
In display of SDSF in Z/os 1.4 appear in jobname manys address space as
STARTING without name, the stepname is H4A00257 in this case. Below a SDSF
display:
D A,OTSU
DSF DA PSP1 PSP1 PAG0 SIO 21192 CPU 79/ 79 LINE 1-5
(5)
NP JOBNAME STEPNAME PROCSTEP JOBIDSIO CPU% DP
I'm very happy to hear that.
It would be a waste of a very good software (and hardware) otherwise.
Thomas Berg
== Alan Altmark == wrote2006-08-17 20:14:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:00:28 -0500, Eric Bielefeld Eric-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is IBM really giving up on VM? They tryed
On Thursday 17 August 2006 16:06, Darren Evans-Young wrote:
Sun sells mainframe re-hosting business to Clerity
http://cwflyris.computerworld.com/t/781733/650249/30377/2/
From the article:
Sun had written two major mainframe programs to run on its Solaris
version of Unix, both of which have
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe jeffries
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: PDA on DFHSM
Hi folks,
Just double checking. If PDA=none is set in the hsm parmlib, you can use
a
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But this list taught me, a couple years ago, even better to turn off
Always show split line in Option 0, then use the SWAP key for a
blink comparison.
I always have show split line disabled, but on rare occassions I split my
screen in the middle so I can
I'll check with Ed Baker at Share tomorrow but my understanding is if
you set PDA=NONE at
-Original Message-
From: Friske, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 5:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDA on DFHSM
Yes.
-Original Message-
I'm researching what resources are required to implement Enterprise
Extender on a z/OS 1.4 system?
Would I need to install any additional software/hardware on our
2086-A04?
What I think thus far is a GigaBit OSA card is needed with some
additional VTAM coding, right?
TIA,
Rogers
Sorry finger check
I'll check with Ed Baker at Share tomorrow but my understanding is if
you set PDA=NONE at start-up then you cannot use PDA without re-starting
HSM.
Better to use PDA=OFF, then switch to ON inflight.
Just double checking. If PDA=none is set in the hsm parmlib, you can
use a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/15/2006
at 09:47 AM, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Subject: Baby MVS???
No, just a starter system, such has been a fixture since the OS/360
days.
206203 IBM Customized Offerings Driver V2.2, a subset of an IBM
z/OS JES2 system, enables installation of z/OS
Thank you all for your prompt response, much appreciated.
Richards.Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave,
Thanks! That answers my previous question. The \ was superfluous.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 08/15/2006
at 11:01 AM, Daniel A. McLaughlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Sounds like the old one-pack recovery system.
Except that it is typically at a higher service level. Your recovery
system may be too old to install the latest release.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/16/2006
at 03:58 AM, John R. Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This must be the grandson of C0E,
I've never seen the term before.
so deemed because it uses a split console of a card reader at 00C
and a 1403 printer at 00E.
I've always had a 1052-7 or better
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/16/2006
at 08:14 AM, Michael Cleary [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For those of you that are members of SHARE, I submitted a SHARE
requirement regarding this.
The text assumes that the field is intended to hold a userid; that
assumption is incorrect.
To effectively use
Hi everyone,
Did I miss an announcement, notice, E-mail, etc. recently?
I just tried to order a PTF on SRD via IBMLINK2K IBMLINK.
When I received the screen/GUI to enter the Shipping Medium
I don't see the INET ( Internet Delivery ) option. I see 3480, 3490,
3590 and CD05.
Is this because of
Your big change/challenge will be to implement APPN first.
If you have access to the SHARE web site, there have been a lot of
presentations on implementing EE.
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
U.S. Navy Retired, CTO1, 1969-1991
- Original Message
From: Laine, Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Why doesn't it assemble?
There's no reason why it shouldn't work in z/OS 1.6 and 1.7.
Do you know about opening the INTRDR as a VSAM ESDS and then issuing an
ENDREQ to get the job idenfier?
Later,
Ray
--
M. Ray Mullins
Roseville, CA, USA
http://www.catherdersoftware.com/
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 08/17/2006
11:06:29 AM:
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 01:28:34 -0400, Jim Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
I looked at the PMR, and it does not mention a dump of the
address space in question after the CANCEL was done. A dump would
Hi
since all our STORAGE volumes /PUBLIC volumes are share to all application
system under non-sms managed, If we change to SMS-managed how can we share
the same pool for storage volumes otherwise we have to allocate a large
number of volumes for each application and storage group... for example
thanks BOB and TOM briefly explanation..thanks again...
Under non-sms managed, we have to allocate some double journal VSAM file
into different volumes such as IBMA01, IBMB01, (for performance purpose)
In SMS managed, the two journal may allocate to same volume after reorg (if
use a same
Glenn wrote on 18/08/2006 07:58:40 AM:
Hi everyone,
Did I miss an announcement, notice, E-mail, etc. recently?
I just tried to order a PTF on SRD via IBMLINK2K IBMLINK.
When I received the screen/GUI to enter the Shipping Medium
I don't see the INET ( Internet Delivery ) option. I see
Rogers
I assume Mark has used the nature of the question in order to assume that
1. your current VTAM implementation was traditional subarea, that is, it
uses CDRM/SSCP in order to communicate between domains rather than Control
Points, CPs
2. you needed to be told that Enterprise Extender
I must be old fashioned - I just use D GRS,RES=... on the log.
That way I get a persistent list I can go back and reference if I find I
have to go find several people whose heads I need to bang together.
Always seemed to be faster too than any of the other (homegrown) options -
never really
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
