David Andrews wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 18:38 +0200, R.S. wrote:
I observed an abend S237-04, when reading dataset from tape (using
IEBGENER).
The manual says it is due to discrepancy between # of blocks read and
the value written to EOF label.
As a matter of curiosity, was the tape
Your bible for CF's and Sysplexes always was, is and will be: SA22-7625,
Setting up a Sysplex.
Ch 4.2.2.6 Determining the Amount of Coupling Facility Dump Space, says:
IBM recommends that you specify 5% of the available storage in a
coupling facility for dump space.
Kees.
munif sadek [EMAIL
Hi Radoslaw,
In respect of:
As I mentioned before, it is probably not a media error, because the tape can
be read using BLP. It is single-file tape, so I can read three BLP datasets:
label, dataset, label.
I would no consider the ability to read a tape using BLP as proof that the tape
is
Hi Rashmi,
I am not a CICS Programmer but I believe the CICS Application Reference manual
is fairly clear on this point.
RIDFLD - Specifies the name of the KEY field only, NOT the entire record, and
the length of the field should match KEYLENGTH.
INTO - Species the area to receive the record
Terry Sambrooks wrote:
Hi Radoslaw,
In respect of:
As I mentioned before, it is probably not a media error, because the
tape can be read using BLP. It is single-file tape, so I can read three
BLP datasets: label, dataset, label.
I would no consider the ability to read a tape using BLP as
Base on first 20 bytes.
Best regards,
He Ming (贺 明)
Bayshore Consulting and Service Co., Ltd
百硕同兴科技(北京)有限公司
Mobile: 1392-500-5956,
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Http://www.bayss.com
Zhong Chen Building
Room 209, No.1 2nd Middle Li Ze Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China, 100102
朝阳区利泽中二路1号
Josef Berger wrote:
Hello,
we have to create for some users SSH environment on OMVS. This includes
- create a HFS for each user
- mount it to its mount point
- create SSH directory
- generate private and public keys
The problem is, this users are batch users, without a RACF TSO Segment. So
Possibly the existence of hardware that included such an assist. BTDTGTTS.
Hard to envisage the economics of an assist for an instruction whose worst case
is a machine
cycle and whose best case is pre-cycle recognition.
Most BCTRs don't consume a cycle. Their superfluousness is recognised in
Thanks to all who have contributed.
I did think about 122, I would not have thought about BLDL/FIND, although
(with hindsight) it should have been obvious...
Plowing through the trace data now.
Cheers,
Jantje.
--
For
PKB.
Forgive me my ignorance... What is PKB standing for?
Thanks,
Jantje.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Don't forget ATTACH and XCTL. Also, is there a PC interface these
days?
I did include ATTACH, but did not think about XCTL.
I don't know if there is a PC interface, but I am confident I can exclude
PC in my particular case.
Thanks,
Jantje.
and I think refreshable implies must be read-only.
Also no.
I disagree.
Obviously one can write an incorrect program with any attributes. But a
correctly written refreshable program does not modify itself.
If the program is refreshable, it means that it can be refreshed at any
time. And that
Oooo! I know this one! Or should I say... IK. (Well, ok, I looked it
up.)
PKB = Pot calling the Kettle Black.
There are quite a few dictionaries on the net for this new language... one
example...
http://www.acronymdictionary.co.uk/acronympt.html
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer, Systems Engineering
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:56:42 -0500 Jan MOEYERSONS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
:I did think about 122, I would not have thought about BLDL/FIND,
although
:(with hindsight) it should have been obvious...
No reason to
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:51:05 +0200 Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
:news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:56:42 -0500 Jan MOEYERSONS
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: wrote:
: :I did think about 122, I would not have thought
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:31:12 -0400 Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:and I think refreshable implies must be read-only.
:Also no.
:I disagree.
:Obviously one can write an incorrect program with any attributes. But a
:correctly written refreshable program does not modify itself.
:If the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Multiple FTP Problems
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 10/23/2006
at 08:04 AM,
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 10/25/2006
at 06:27 AM, Jan MOEYERSONS [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is not a 'homework' type of question. In fact, I need to set up
a trace for capturing all LOADs and LINKs a given program is doing
In a message dated 10/25/2006 7:28:38 P.M. Central Daylight
Jason wrote on 24/10/2006 08:16:34 AM:
hence our understanding that this is of benefit on both z990's
z9's, and at various levels of z/OS...but that it should be done with
care due to possible impacts to WLM etc.
For any that may be interested, my testing indicated this fix *is* also
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:51:05 +0200 Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
:news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 05:56:42 -0500 Jan MOEYERSONS
You have to wonder.
===
Your message sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], with subject: BCTR out of favor?
has been electronically scanned and falls into the category of undesirable
content according
to the bank's policies (e.g. Chain Letters, Pornography, Racism, Harsh or
Offensive Language,
SYS1.ASRLIB was also relevant to the S/370.
True, but the /165's TTL memory didn't have a fraction of the problems the
/65's core had.
Didn't figure.
Why would it, unless you were writing a nucleus csect, an ERP or an SVC? The
MCH in OS/360
never refreshed anything else.
Very true, but not
Hi again,
I have made some debug by my own and discovered that BLDL was returning
RC=4 and RS=0, which indicates a bad parameter list.
I`ve not investigated deeply but detected that $MODULE was building
parameter list with 8 bytes of prefix area for BLDL (PDSBLDLP DSECT)
which
is causing the
Tom,
John may correct me, but I believe that the storage report was from
running java -version
and not the actual program.
As previous mentioned on the forum, a LE Storage Report might be helpful
in figuring
out if there are tuning problems in LE.
There should be a way to get the app to
(2) a system event that can be seen by system automation or
installation exits upon completion of an individual flash copy.
That would require that the control unit generate a state change
asynch interrupt when each flashcopy relationship is finished. I don't
believe it does so. Some doc
It's just Shmuel's intellectual incapacity to realise that some people are just
bloody good at
what they do.
The moronic take an NDA and blab about it. Many analysts make a comfortable
living at this,
serving to a large extent as the spinmeisters for large computer companies.
The hard-working
I know it's not Friday, but a net nanny just excelled itself.
Your message sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], with subject: Fw: BCTR out of favor?
has been electronically scanned and falls into the category of undesirable
content according
to the bank's policies (e.g. Chain
You and I know that. But it seems some PC/network folks don't fully
grasp the concepts. When they say FTP, they visualize data flowing from
here to there via an interactive dialog using the well known ports. When
we say FTP, we refer to the hundreds of fully automated concurrent
transfers using
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:49:00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know this is very late, but just saw it since I'm not a regular reader
of the group.
You should never CUT and paste from something like a log file. Most log
files are open files being written to as needed. To CUT from the log
would
In a message dated 10/26/2006 9:00:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That would require that the control unit generate a state change
asynch interrupt when each flashcopy relationship is finished. I don't
believe it does so. Some doc that I have suggests that it
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:24:46 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, I couldn't even highlight any thing in the file.
I don't remember you saying that. Did you try Edit/Select All? Just a
thought. Sorry I missed the first part.
Testing, I see that I can highlight a line in the task manager.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:49:00 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should never CUT and paste from something like a log file. Most log
files are open files being written to as needed. To CUT from the log
would change it and it could be corrupted when the program tries to
write to it. You
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:30:06 -0400, Ogden Johnson III
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Copy the log file to log.bak or something. Then use log.bak.
You should be able to copy and paste as desired.
What's the name of the log file, and where is it?
s'ok - Shmuel regularly expands my USENET acronym vocabulary ...
In this context, I think by PKB he means: Pot - Kettle - Black, a
reference to an old adage the pot calling the kettle black.
Is there an API that can be used to get elapsed service units?
For current TCB or current AS, and possibly with zAAP SUs broken out?
TIA,
Kirk Wolf
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
On 26 Oct 2006 07:21:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is one's inadvertent/accidental use of CUT instead of COPY prevented? I
have often cursed Windows because Rename is right above Delete, and ISPF's
3.4 because on my Dvorak-style keyboard the s for select is adjacent to d
for
Kirk,
Look at the TIMEUSED macro. I believe it is strictly TCB related, and
to my knowledge it won't break out zAAP data, but I haven't looked at it
since early in the OS/390 days.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original
Look at the ASSB mapping macro - there a quite a few fields in there
that show pretty much what you need.
However the data is returned in CPU time format - you will have to
convert this to Service Units - I am sure there is a formula around to
do this somewhere.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
You said butt.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Phil Payne
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Net nannies
You have to wonder.
===
Your message sent to:
[EMAIL
More likely - the g..d...
(I know it wasn't capitalized)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Net nannies
You said butt.
Charles
This is a forum OF professionals, FOR professionals.
I, for one, object very strongly to the use of this forum for personnal
attacks, for ANY reason. I consider it to be highly UNprofessional.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
In MVT days (i.e. pre-DAT days) Type-3 and Type-4 SVCs (and I think
certain machine check error handling routines, but I'm not sure) were
loaded into a fixed set of 1K buffers. As interrupts would occur, the
SVC code (if any) being used by the interrupted task would be
overlayed in the buffers
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Campbell Jay wrote:
More likely - the g..d...
(I know it wasn't capitalized)
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Net nannies
You said butt.
Charles
And from my experience with these stupid analyzers,
he
Would agree. Such as I have seen today leaves a bad taste and brings down
the calibre of the whole show.
JC
On Thu, October 26, 2006 17:57, Rick Fochtman wrote:
This is a forum OF professionals, FOR professionals.
I, for one, object very strongly to the use of this forum for personnal
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:12:02 -0500, Darren Evans-Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Campbell Jay wrote:
More likely - the ...
(I know it wasn't capitalized)
Charles Mills wrote:
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Net nannies
You
I've been looking at our IEAFIX00 member which has been carried forward from
operating system to operating system and have some questions I'm hoping you
experts can help me out with. Our current IEAFIX00 member is:
INCLUDE LIBRARY(SYS1.LPALIB) MODULES(
IEAVAR00
In a message dated 10/26/2006 11:06:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In MVT days (i.e. pre-DAT days) Type-3 and Type-4 SVCs (and I think
certain machine check error handling routines, but I'm not sure) were
loaded into a fixed set of 1K buffers. As interrupts
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:56:16 -0500, Kirk Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom,
John may correct me, but I believe that the storage report was from
running java -version
and not the actual program.
As previous mentioned on the forum, a LE Storage Report might be helpful
in figuring
out if there are
I've been grumbled at for my recent ad hominem directed at Schmuel. On balance
the grumble is
justified.
While I maintain the opinion expressed, the ad hominem was inappropriate and I
apologise to
Schmuel and the list.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Is it correct that here in Finland I have zero seconds of
leaping seconds?
No, you still have them. They are probably not as conspicuous near the
poles because they don't leap as far. :-)
I will make a true confession... I bet that gets caught by net nanny
software:-) In hopes of learning something my Coupling Facilities all
have what was the default in our policy from long ago not even close to
5%.
NAMED CF00
COUPLING FACILITY SPACE UTILIZATION
ALLOCATED
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brian Peterson
[ snip ]
Getting to the latest z/OS
--
z/OS 1.8 is available, and z/OS 1.9 is just around the corner.
Has the next release after z/OS 1.8 been officially previewed as
1.9?
Thanks, this is what I wanted. I've removed all but the options that are
really going to matter for performance (for java)...
Programmer default ALL31(ON)
Programmer default ANYHEAP(786432,131072,ANYWHERE,FREE)
Programmer default
And extremely selfish and childish.
Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
10/26/2006 11:57 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
This forum
This is a forum
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pinnacle
Storage Report for Enclave main 10/25/06 3:14:46 PM Language
Environment V01 R05.00
[ snip ]
John,
LE storage looks good. Any differences in your run times?
If not, your problem ain't LE.
I have absolutely no information about what the next release of the
operating system we currently call z/OS 1.8 will be. When I wrote z/OS
1.9, I was wrong. I apologize. I imagine it might be logical to presume
that the release number would increment by one, but of course that is not
the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Payne
You have to wonder.
===
Your message sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], with subject: BCTR out of favor?
has been electronically scanned and falls into the category
of undesirable content
Phil Payne wrote:
I've been grumbled at for my recent ad hominem directed at Schmuel. On balance
the grumble is
justified.
While I maintain the opinion expressed, the ad hominem was inappropriate and I
apologise to
Schmuel and the list.
Please learn to spell his name correctly. It's
In addition to Sam's question regarding DUMPSPACE, I have a question as
well. What about VOLATILE? Years ago, ours were set to NO. Is this wrong?
Brian
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:29:46 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will make a true confession... I bet that gets caught by net
The 1.8 announcement mentions z/OS V1.9 and z/OS V1.10, but includes a
note which says Operating system levels beyond z/OS and z/OS.e 1.8
represent current intentions of IBM.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Tom,
John may correct me, but I believe that the storage report
was from running java -versionand not the actual program.
Correct.
As previous mentioned on the forum, a LE Storage Report might
be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Payne
I know it's not Friday, but a net nanny just excelled itself.
Your message sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], ...
I've had that one kill-filed since forever.
-jc-
Z/OS 1.9 sounds like an innocent error.
We should not be quick to zap if someone makes a faux pas.
What about a code name like pterodactyl?
Daniel McLaughlin
Z-Series Systems Programmer
Crawford Company
4680 N. Royal Atlanta
Tucker GA 30084
phone: 770-621-3256
fax: 770-621-3237
email:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Payne
I know it's not Friday, but a net nanny just excelled itself.
Your message sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], ...
I've had that one kill-filed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Nicholas Carbone
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:56:16 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
John may correct me, but I believe that the storage report was from
running java -version and not the actual program.
[ snip ]
It is
Eric N. Bielefeld wrote:
Jeez Ed, your as bad as me, correcting people's spelling. Oh well, at
least you didn't make any spelling errors doing it like I did! (Meant
in humor)
Eric, You have a last name that's probably misspelled/mispronounced as
often as mine is. Smith would be nice. ;-)
Daniel McLaughlin of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 10/26/2006 12:16:20 PM:
Z/OS 1.9 sounds like an innocent error. We should not be quick to
zap if someone makes a faux pas.
What about a code name like pterodactyl?
I have been hoping for a name change like
The use of Volatile really (in my opinion) deals more with DB2 Data Sharing
than anything else. If you set the CF to Volatile YES - the DB2 Data Sharing
Regions put out a message
DSN7507I :DSNQ DSN7LSTK 737
SCA STRUCTURE DSNSB0Q_SCA IS ALLOCATED IN A
Nah, we know how to pronounce your last name Ed. We just like to bust on
ya!
(Kiddingyou mean it isn't hefe? LOL!)
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:24 PM
To:
snip
Daniel McLaughlin of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 10/26/2006 12:16:20 PM:
Z/OS 1.9 sounds like an innocent error. We should not be quick to zap
if someone makes a faux pas.
/snip
Agreed. It seems like everybody is a bit edgy over the Shmuel/Phil
Eric, You have a last name that's probably misspelled/mispronounced as
often as mine is. Smith would be nice.
I'll sell you the rights to use Black for a very reasonable price.
Maybe I should put it on EBay (people will buy anything there!)
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Hi,
I am attempting to exeucte a batch job (DFDSS backup) and it keeps abending
an IEF450I CTTGS#2A STEP1 - ABEND=S322 U REASON=
The message indicates that the time parm is at fault. I have upped it to :
//STEP1EXEC PGM=ADRDSSU,REGION=4096K,TIME=1750
and it still
if your shop allows, try TIME=1440 or TIME=NOLIMIT or TIME=MAXIMUM - these
settings free you from CPU or wait time constraints
Chris Hoelscher
IDMS DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-476-2538
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
You're right about that. Most people pronounce my name as BI, with a hard
I, instead of like BE with a hard E. There is a city in Germany named
Bielefeld. I really don't know much about it though, although I remember my
brother used to say it was famous for 3 things. One was having a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:33 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SHARE in Tampa Florida, February 11-16, 2007
snip
Daniel McLaughlin of the IBM Mainframe
On Thursday, 10/26/2006 at 12:28 EST, John P Kalinich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have been hoping for a name change like z/MVS.
tweeet! OK. Everyone out of the pool! Now cut that out... As soon as
the pool has been drained, disinfected, and refilled, we can all get back
in.
Alan
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Daniel A. McLaughlin
Z/OS 1.9 sounds like an innocent error. We should not be quick to zap
if someone makes a faux pas.
Neither should we assume that a simple question of fact is intended as a
zap.
-jc-
Thanks; I'm familiar with TIMEUSED and ASSB for getting CPU times.
I was hoping that the was one-stop shopping for getting SUs (both TCB
and ASCB).
I'm afraid that the forumula might be the LSPR guide :-)
Kirk
Rob Scott wrote:
Look at the ASSB mapping macro - there a quite a few fields in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Darren Evans-Young
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Payne
I know it's not Friday, but a net nanny just excelled itself.
Just refer to him as Feel Pain. :-)
From: Edward Jaffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Apology
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:01:49 -0700
Phil Payne wrote:
I've been grumbled at for my recent ad hominem directed
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:38:03 -0400, esmie moo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am attempting to exeucte a batch job (DFDSS backup) and it keeps
abending an IEF450I CTTGS#2A STEP1 - ABEND=S322 U REASON=
The message indicates that the time parm is at fault. I have upped it to :
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:31:12 -0400, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and I think refreshable implies must be read-only.
Also no.
I disagree.
Obviously one can write an incorrect program with any attributes. But a
correctly written refreshable program does not modify itself.
...
I'm
On 26 Oct 2006 10:28:37 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe)
wrote:
Eric, You have a last name that's probably misspelled/mispronounced as
often as mine is. Smith would be nice. ;-)
When I see your last name, I think of Gunga Din more often than I
thank of Dr. Zorba.
The job is only one step. I have the Time parm specified on the EXEC only. I
will code the time parm in the job card as well. Regarding exits I wouldn't
know how to find that out.
Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:38:03 -0400,
esmie moo wrote:
Hi,
I am
Well, putting MVS back into the name would certainly help those who left the
support ranks when it was called MVS, and now have to deal with recruiters
and personnel folks who think that MVS or (OS/390) skills have nothing to do
with being a z/OS system programmer.
Tom Chicklon
snip
I have been
I'm familiar with TIMEUSED and ASSB for getting CPU times.
I was hoping that the was one-stop shopping for getting SUs (both TCB
and ASCB).
I'm afraid that the forumula might be the LSPR guide :-)
Actually you can calculate the SRM constant as 16,000,000 divided by the CPU
adjustment
On Thursday, 10/26/2006 at 02:30 AST, Chicklon, Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, putting MVS back into the name would certainly help those who left
the
support ranks when it was called MVS, and now have to deal with
recruiters
and personnel folks who think that MVS or (OS/390) skills have
When the job abends, how much CPU and wall clock time was actually
consumed?
-Original Message-
From: esmie moo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ABEND - S322
The job is only one step. I have the Time parm
In a message dated 10/26/2006 1:27:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The job is only one step. I have the Time parm specified on the EXEC only.
I will code the time parm in the job card as well. Regarding exits I
wouldn't know how to find that out.
Look at
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:23:42 +0100, Phil Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RESEARCH.FREESERVE.CO.UK wrote:
... intellectual incapacity ...
The moronic ...
...
But that won't bother poor, bitter, twisted little Shmuel.
...
I guess the net nannies missed one. That certainly falls into the
Harsh or
True, when you haven't taken quite a few twists and turns in your career,
changing names does add to the bulk in a resume, even if there isn't all
that much substance.
But if you've been away from it for a while (OK, not counting managing
OS/390 system programmers for a while, it was about 10
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:09:23 EDT, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/26/2006 1:27:55 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The job is only one step. I have the Time parm specified on the EXEC only.
I will code the time parm in the job card as well.
Excuse me, but yes, you are correct. Pretty hard to share UCBs for
tapes...grin...
Choate, Bill wrote:
Are you thinking of shared UCW instead of shared UCB?
Bill Choate
Emory University
AAIT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Howard Brazee wrote:
When I see your last name, I think of Gunga Din more often than I
thank of Dr. Zorba.
Sam and my Dad (Daniel) grew up around the same time in the same area of
Brooklyn. They never knew each other. Related? Who knows.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International,
http://www.planetmvs.com/flowerbox/index.html
-Original Message-
Flower boxes are a local thing from IEFACTRT SMF exits. Not all systems
have them. But they all do have IEF374I / IEF376I if the proper
MSGLEVEL is used.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS
Someone just sent me the following link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bielefeld_Conspiracy
I had no part in it!
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:03:21 -0400, Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25 Oct 2006 11:22:43 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Marchant) wrote:
And moot, now that they have redefined RENT to say that A
reenterable module cannot modify its
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:41:04 -0500, Eric N. Bielefeld wrote:
You're right about that. Most people pronounce my name as BI, with a hard
I, instead of like BE with a hard E. There is a city in Germany named
Bielefeld. I really don't know much about it though, although I remember my
brother
John,
I'm afraid that the reports that you are seeing are from the parent
shell and not the java process,
because none of java's programmer default LE settings are present.
I'm guessing that you are not seeing the LE report from java because:
- you are running jboss under java with
Hi all,
Can anybody explain why occasionally IEAMSCHD takes several seconds to
schedule an SRB? Normally this takes microseconds but in one case I am
looking at it took 61.4 secs!!!
The environment was an LPAR with 13 shared engines and zero dedicated
engines.
The IEAMSCHD was in a DIE and
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
