Is it just me? After the first step I get always (exclude french text).
I already email support and they told me retry but results remains the same
The page you have requested is temporarily unavailable.
We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Error Status:
An email has been s
Hi,
I believe you better post this at CICS-L.
Look at
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=cics-l&A=1
to join and
http://listserv.uga.edu/archives/cics-l.html
for the archive.
Roland
>We have problem for transaction Using FEPI.
>
>I have problem for specific branch/Pool-id ( One branch o
We have problem for transaction Using FEPI.
I have problem for specific branch/Pool-id ( One branch one POOL-id). The
problem was all user in one branch can not transaction with message "HOST
MESSAGE". The Problem solve after release/disable the last
node/terminal-id/LU in one POOL-id.
why
Hello Legolas :-D
Look into "Network Deployment" nodes in a Parallel Sysplex, with DB2 in a Data
Sharing Group, also with CICS in CICSPLEX enabled environment, to see how
WebSphere Application Server for z/OS exploits the capabilities of sysplex and
WLM.
It is a bit different from clustering,
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:22:31 +0330, legolas wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Does DB2 work in the same manner, I mean db2 for windows and linux are
>alike?
>I know that some features that are available in windows and *nix based
>version are not available in zOS. I will not use them.
z/OS DB2 tend
George Fogg wrote:
OK, MGCEFAST has a purpose in certain conditions but I could set this bit on
in a simple MGCRE call to issue a command without using CPF and CMDSYS
processing and it will bypass the command exits and CMDAUTH (OPERCMDS
checking)processing?
Yes.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix So
> Edward Jaffe wrote:
>
>>George Fogg wrote:
>>> Seems like MGCEFAST is kind of like RACF truested where authority exits are
>>> bypassed and 99% of authority checks are passed just for issuing commands
> from
>>> MGCRE.
>>>
>>> MGCEFAST = Bypass SSI, command exits, and CMDAUTH.
>>>
>>
>>MGCEFAST s
Pinnacle wrote:
Referee Scott Fagen halts the contest at 2:30 of the 3rd round, for
the winner by TKO and STILL champen, Ki
Jaee!
Tom, maybe it's time to cut back a bit on the caffeine. ;-)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Centur
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 3:35 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
legolas wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-snip-
> If we have an J2EE based application which we need to deploy on
> WebSphere application server, and our J2EE application uses DB2 as its
> database, what can be possible deploym
I heard it too: there will be a segment about it on the CBC (Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation) Radio One on Wednesday at 11:30am, on a program
called "Spark". So I contacted the show's producer (Elizabeth Bowie - contact
information below) to express my concern that this might misrepresent the
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/06/2007
at 09:35 PM, "W. Kevin Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>We are contemplating making a change to MCSOPER processing to prevent
>user's from specifying a console that has been defined as a system
>console.
Sounds good to me, assuming that you're just refe
Maybe I shouldn't say anything after Scott, however I'll dare to.
I don't know "guts" of subsytems and commands, but I know more or less
how RACF (or ACF) protection works for them:
If we're talking about MVS commands, I mean START, STOP, CANCEL, FORCE,
MODIFY - all those commands *are* protect
Yeah, well, it's all fun and games until someone installs and replaces
it with Vista...
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mike Baldwin
> Sent: 10. joulukuuta 2007 23:39
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Mainframe Funera
>From my CPU charts the Amdahl 1015 was around a 9 MSU / 55 MIP box
With the exception of the last line the eulogy is nice.
Eulogy http://umanitoba.ca/mainframe/eulogy.php
For forty-seven years you've served us well, you cast us in your
green spell. You processed transactions without complaint
Referee Scott Fagen halts the contest at 2:30 of the 3rd round, for the
winner by TKO and STILL champen, Ki
Jaee!
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:43 PM
Storgroups are easy. No more datasets on volumes. No ACS dataset
filter assignments. Not an extend storgroup.
Dataclass, Storclass, and Mgmtclass have much further reaching
implications. With these you may have to search catalogs for datasets
with these assignments and including the tape manag
Edward Jaffe wrote:
>George Fogg wrote:
>> Seems like MGCEFAST is kind of like RACF truested where authority exits are
>> bypassed and 99% of authority checks are passed just for issuing commands
from
>> MGCRE.
>>
>> MGCEFAST = Bypass SSI, command exits, and CMDAUTH.
>>
>
>MGCEFAST should be used
Hi listers,
This morning on the way to work, to my surprise I heard something on the
radio about the death of "the" mainframe. No, I didn't turn around and head
home!
But I did find this:
http://www.cbc.ca/spark/blog/2007/11/manitoba_mainframe_funeral.html
Manitoba Mainframe Funeral
Posted b
In our IP stack we currently have SOMAXCONN set to 1500, however, we are
still running into problems with certain applications exceeding backlog limit
and
connections being dropped. When I look at the Maximum in backlog I show
many different numbers other than the 1500. Last week a DB2 applic
If you check the online help it will indicate that 65535 is the max
displayed for size.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 4:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Stra
Lizzette,
ISPF stores the number of lines in a 2 byte hex field, so 65535 is the largest
value it can store.
HTH
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Maybe I missed some maintanence, but I just added a 70,000 line member to a
TEXT file (Lrecl=133) and the Member listing shows as follows
EDIT TSO.LK41591.PDF.TEXT Row 00029 of 00108
Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR
Everything that applies to creating a reasonable, maintainable
WebSphere Application Server environment on distributed platforms
(AIX, Linux, Windows, whatever) also applies to the mainframe. You
should have a cluster, preferably with the cluster members on different
LPARs on different boxes.
In a message dated 12/10/2007 2:41:53 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>How could runing a SRB and anchor a CADS cause any problems beside
problems for the SRB itself.
My coding runs now for several customers without any problem/ticket so far.
I didn't modify anythin
How could runing a SRB and anchor a CADS cause any problems beside
problems for the SRB itself.
My coding runs now for several customers without any problem/ticket so far.
I didn't modify anything I just create/delete the CADS while running under
*MASTER*.
Also no complains about this issue, pe
Hi,
Again it's me, with my newbie like questions.
I have no experience with mainframes so I always think to map mainframe
world with intel based servers world.
If we have an J2EE based application which we need to deploy on
WebSphere application server, and our J2EE application uses DB2 as its
Is there a way to tell when a member of a Construct was referenced? I can
see when they were last modified. But, would like to know when they were
last referenced. I am hoping that finding that out would help in the cleanup of
the Constructs Groups( Dataclas, Mgmtclas, Storclas, and storgrp).
In a message dated 12/10/2007 2:12:51 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>We have a number of vendor and IBM SCOPE=COMMON data spaces that are
anchored off *MASTER*. None have ever caused a problem so far.
Have any of these vendors even been asked to look at a problem
We have a number of vendor and IBM SCOPE=COMMON data spaces that are
anchored off *MASTER*. None have ever caused a problem so far.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
System z Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
George Fogg wrote:
Seems like MGCEFAST is kind of like RACF truested where authority exits are
bypassed and 99% of authority checks are passed just for issuing commands from
MGCRE.
MGCEFAST = Bypass SSI, command exits, and CMDAUTH.
MGCEFAST should be used only when that processing has alrea
> Gregory, Gary G wrote:
>> That is true but if the application is NOT passing the UTOKEN or using
>> the macro that requires the commands be defined in OPERCMDS then that
>> won't work.
>
> I'm not sure I follow you here...
>
> Most of the time, passing UTOKEN is unnecessary. For example, MGCRE
>
Sorry, but I just tried it and it worked fine.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pinnacle
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BA
Years ago, I inherited a usermod that changes when relative GDG bias is
adjusted from end-of-job to end-of-jobstep. This was accomplished by zapping
two instructions to NOP.
The zap has fit OS/390 1.3 - z/OS 1.7. But my luck ran out in z/OS 1.9.
Apparently, IEFAB461 was completely re-written
We are running OPS/MVS and OPSUSS. We use RACF. Does anyone know what
security settings in RACF are necessary so that one can do something
like
_BPX_JOBNAME='XYZABC' _BPX_USERID='MYUSER' shellscript_of_your_choice
And get it to run under MYUSER. We can get the jobname to change to
XY
Ed,
Your paragraph " Obviously, other commands, not defined in "MVS System
Commands", would be subject to whatever security checking is appropriate
for the command and the product that defines it." Is exactly what I was
trying to point out.
Not all OEM (once again I state OEM) products use CM
Greetings- here's your reminder :-)
Just a reminder that the final 2007 Linux on System z Live Virtual
Class is:
Tuesday, Dec 11th at 11:00 AM ET.
There is no charge to participate in these technical education sessions.
You don't have to pre-register, but if you haven't participated before
Hi,
It's working fine for me Tom. I just logged in a new session went
through Registration just fine.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
System z Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pinnacle
>
> I can't get to IBMLink. Cleared cache 4 times, rebooted,
> still no joy at www.ibm.com/ibmlink. Called the Help Desk
> and they say they're working, so they won't open a ticket.
> Anybody else having
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:19:23 -0600, Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To John, I think I mentioned earlier on that SSL is not what we're looking for
>because our goal here is to place a "sentry" on the Flex-Es box's Telnet port
>23 and not allow anyone to pass without a vali
I can't get to IBMLink. Cleared cache 4 times, rebooted, still no joy at
www.ibm.com/ibmlink. Called the Help Desk and they say they're working, so
they won't open a ticket. Anybody else having problems?
Regards,
Tom Conley
-
Gregory, Gary G wrote:
That is true but if the application is NOT passing the UTOKEN or using
the macro that requires the commands be defined in OPERCMDS then that
won't work.
I'm not sure I follow you here...
Most of the time, passing UTOKEN is unnecessary. For example, MGCRE
issued from a T
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 04:52:01 -0600, Jorge Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We have offloaded the logrec logstream and now it's 2% full but when
>we refresh the check the exception continues though we have refreshed
>the structure.
Sorry for the late reply... What Jorge describes has been a kno
Rick,
I'm sorry, I can't give you the PL/1 - internal info you asked for, but I
can perhaps give you a quick fix for your problem:
Years ago, in the early days of LE, I also had a memory-hungry program that
liked to abend S878 during CLOSE after hours of run time. The quick and
dirty solution was
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Fochtman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 11:38 AM
Subject: PL/1 Storage Control Issue
Can anyone point me to a reference that describes in detail the various
storage control blocks used by PL/1 in m
In a message dated 12/8/2007 7:32:57 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>you are only a few minutes away from some problem ticket asking you to
prove/state that your software was not the cause of the system problem.
It's much easier to fix a bug in your own persistent
Can anyone point me to a reference that describes in detail the various
storage control blocks used by PL/1 in managing BASED storage entities?
I have an application that's running out of storage, supposedly, far too
soon, even with REGION=0M. The number of entities that lead to failure
leads
That is true but if the application is NOT passing the UTOKEN or using
the macro that requires the commands be defined in OPERCMDS then that
won't work. I was only suggesting they refer to the documentation to
see if commands are defined in other resource classes. The CMDAUTH
macro requires that
Gregory, Gary G wrote:
That's assuming the OEM product issues the RACROUTE call to verify the
user has access to the command.
No. The system issues the CMDAUTH call when processing the command
unless MGCEFAST is set in the MGCRE parameter list.
The only responsibility of any product issui
That's assuming the OEM product issues the RACROUTE call to verify the
user has access to the command.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 9:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: MV
Keith Moe said
> Scheduling an SRB into the Master sure seem to be a touchy subject, I
> have two observations/comments.
>
> First, since the SRB is a unit of work that is independent of any
existing
> dispatchable unit in the Master, any normal error that occurs within
it
> has
> no impact on a
>
> Can someone explain to me - in this day and age - why we're talking
CADS
> and not Shared Memory Objects (above The Bar).
>
Arguably that's a good question. The main reason is that a "CADS" is
already on every PASN-AL in the system, so you can use the ALET without
doing an ALESERV SEARCH/ADD
My old mate Shane said;
> Just setup a "long lived" STC that can manage any/all of these sort of
> things, and arrange for it to stay up. Document its
> requirements/function(s) - then it's out in the open, you get the
credit
> for the work done. Every vendor in the market should do the same.
Ha h
All,
is there a way to get the CALL-Stack? I have a mixture of C, COBOL and
ASM Programs and I want to display the call stack out of a COBOL-Prog
upon SYSOUT.
Thank you,
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
I have just updated the CAVXTRT (CA-View Extract ISPF Dialog) with support
for CA-View release 11. The package now dynamically detects the
differences in the CA-View report between release 2, release 11 and
release 11 with maintenance and should work for future releases (assuming
CA doesn't cha
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:33:40 +0900, Clement Clarke wrote:
>
>You must agree that you will abide by the GNU terms, and not use it
>commercially without some appreciation, or for war.
What does that mean?
--
Tom Marchant
--
For I
R.S. wrote:
David Cole wrote:
I think you have the open source security risks backwards, Herbie.
One of the features of open source is that the source code is public.
This means that ANYONE can read it, study it, find bugs in it, AND
find trap doors in it! And "anyone" means anyone in the who
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Warner Mach
>
> I see where Jeff Foxworthy, the comedian, worked for IBM for
> four years before launching his entertainment career (Check
> it out on Google). He was applying maintenance to IBM
> mainframes (I assu
Dave, thanks.
>>> Dave Danner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/7/2007 4:14 PM >>>
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:48:29 -0600, Patrick Lyon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you are a SHARE member, the last conference had an excellent session on
>maintenance best practices.
>
>z/OS Maintenance Best Practices - The Rat
Here is a sample of our code
USI200 DS0H
L R7,SMFMEML ADDRESS OF MEMLIMIT PARMS
USING MEMLIMIT,R7ESTABLISH ADDRESSABILITY
SPACE 1
Title: Principal Systems Programmer
Requisition #: 2007-60572
Employment Type: Regular
Full/Part Time: Full Time
FLSA Status: Exempt
Division: IT
Location: FIFTH THIRD CENTER-CINCINNATI, CINCINNATI, OH
Posted Date: 11/30/2007
Requirements
JOB DUTIES: Support for
Just did a test:
1. In TN3270 server profile (because TN3270 sever can run as a separate
STC), find the BEGINVTAM/ENDVTAM block for the target port and then remove
both USSTCP and DEFAULTAPPL statement.
After that the first screen user will see at connection time is the telnet
solicitor panel:
E
Charles Hardee wrote on 03/20/2007 12:31:45 PM:
> I have two questions regarding IPSC.
> 1) From within an IPCS oriented CLIST or REXX Exec, is there a way
> to determine what IPCS level one is executing under?
>No. You can glean a lot of information about the dump being processed
by
>lookin
David Cole wrote:
I think you have the open source security risks backwards, Herbie.
One of the features of open source is that the source code is public.
This means that ANYONE can read it, study it, find bugs in it, AND find
trap doors in it! And "anyone" means anyone in the whole world!
O
Hi,
Hope my experience can help.
In your TCPIP profile:
RESTRICTAPPL CICS01
USER IBMUSER
USER SYSPRG1
When a logon request for application CICS01 is issued, a telnet solicitor
screen will show and you need to supply the RACF pass/id. In this case, only
IBMUSER and SYSPRG1 can use CICS01
Does anyone have any practical experience with using (i.e. developing
applications utilising) the z9 console object Management JAVA API's? We
would like any information relating to their comparative usability,
robustness/resiliance in relation to their non-JAVA counterpart.
Regards
Steve Talbot-W
To Terry, we're a very small shop. The first problem is non-existant by us. I
assume the 2nd problem won't occur if we're strict about logging in
immediately.
Still my main problem is setting up the Telnet Solicitor in the first place.
The 1
page of IBM documentation is sparse and I don't know
66 matches
Mail list logo
