Jim Marshall writes:
Bad news is you would have to buy Parallel Services
to have ADABAS running on multiple engines.
But the original poster is nowhere near hitting a uniprocessor capacity
limit yet. For example, a System z9 BC with one processor active would
offer up to a little over 4 times the
replied
Patrick Hayward, Code Magus Limited (England reg. no. 4024745)
Apartment 6, 69 Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6EY, United Kingdom
Voice: +44 1844 208127 Mob: +44 7711 273014 Fax: +44 1865 316979
http://www.codemagus.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howard Rifkind wrote:
Christmas = 20081225
Weekday = DATE('W',Christmas,'S')
Brian
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Claudio Marcio
Sent: 24 September 2008 05:21
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sounds really interesting! I'm sure this community will have some good
ideas for you.
Are you expected to write code (to program), or can you use, say, open
source code already written by others? (Is there a minimum amount of code
you're expected to write?) Also, what software environment do you
Yes, but there is always a simpler solution:
/* Rexx */
year=2010
y=year//100
c=(year-year//100)/100
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2008
at 08:27 PM, Claudio Marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
How do I convert a member with data EBCDIC to ASCII in the TSO
environment?
You almost certainly don't want to convert to ASCII, but rather to some
code page that matches ASCII for code points 40-FE. Your
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/22/2008
at 01:10 PM, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I stand (or sit) corrected. But, in my JCL parser, how would I process
such a thing?
Well, if you're running on the same system as where it will be converted,
then you could checked what's defined to SJF. Or
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/22/2008
at 05:09 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not aware of any supported undocumented statement.
There's an interface for adding new statements and adding new keywords to
existing statements.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/22/2008
at 11:16 AM, Jrgen Kehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I would like to build a procedure which check the actual date and checks
if the latest dataset is available, if yes it should get this one, if no
it should get the one from the preceding month.
I've done
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2008
at 02:58 PM, Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm missing the distinction you are trying to oint out,
An overlay structure is a single load module; when you load a segment you
are doing an I/O to the same member as when the module was initially
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 09/19/2008
at 03:41 PM, Timothy Sipples [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you do have to create a compiler backend, that's some work. But one
thing you could try, at least for bootstrap purposes, is to keep an
existing backend but do something like a double compile. For
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:34:05 +0200, John Ticic IBM-MAIN wrote:
You can also use the SETIOS command.
Once the LCUs have been converted, the other LPARs can't move the aliases
around. The IBM documentation states that they are ignored.
RMF will show you the LCU and HyperPAV activity. The MVS
Linda Mooney wrote:
We are finishing up our cutover to a BusTech virtual tape appliance. We will
be de-installing our old ATL (about 12 years old) and our even older 3480
drives. We will still have a need to read and write some physical 3480 and
3490e tapes for the next several years, just
Look for a 3490-C22.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:34:35 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have to figure out what we will be doing as we replace our smallest CEC
with a z10 for the smallest LPARs as well.
z/VM?
Seriously, we'll be having similar discussions, here. We have several tiny
JES2
systems
In a message dated 9/24/2008 7:05:44 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's cheap - you already paid it
It's working - you currently use it
If you need to save floor space, then you can reduce the size of your
ATL (eiliminate some cabinets) or just keep only the drives
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:34:11 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, if you're running on the same system as where it will be converted,
then you could checked what's defined to SJF. Or does some of SJF run in
the Interpreter?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
Arthur Gutowski wrote:
[...]
Seriously, we'll be having similar discussions, here. We have several tiny JES2
systems running alongside some comparatively huge JES3 systems and a habit
of keeping LPARs to an established MIPS (or MSU) rating, though we've been
advised keeping an LPAR under 3-5%
may want to focus on software and hardware relationshipmay want to
notice how the mainframeibmtoday is merging the p/i/z
hardwareover time there will not be a diffand all operating
systems will run on them and it will depend on the need to the company to
pick the best fit
This is simpler? Three lines to replace one?
I'd hate to see your definition of cheaper ... :-)
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Lindy Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but there is always a simpler solution:
/* Rexx */
year=2010
y=year//100
c=(year-year//100)/100
mons = 'Sat Sun Mon
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:46:56 -0500, Arthur Gutowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 15:34:35 -0400, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We have to figure out what we will be doing as we replace our smallest CEC
with a z10 for the smallest LPARs as well.
z/VM?
Seriously, we'll be
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/24/2008
at 12:09 AM, Ahmet Alper TEC MER [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there anybody who can advise to me a project title?
What are your constraints? Would a TSO version of OOREXX be considered
mainframe related? Would it be of the appropriate level of difficulty?
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
09/24/2008
at 01:13 PM, Lindy Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, but there is always a simpler solution:
things should always be as simple as possible, but no simpler.
Yes, I know that we'll all be dead by the time that it breaks, but it's
actually easier to do it
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2008
at 03:29 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's possible to have UCW without corresponding UCB (and UCB without UCW
as well). First case may be desired configuration and not an error.
The second case may be legitimate as well, e.g., for VIO.
--
Actually OA21934 only mentions PDSE_BUFFER_BEYOND_CLOSE(NO) but it
looks like it should also mention PDSE1_BUFFER_BEYOND_CLOSE(NO).
The APAR text has been updated to include PDSE1_BUFFER_BEYOND_CLOSE.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America
There is no need for a dummy UCB for VIO.
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/24/2008 7:53 AM
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/19/2008
at 03:29 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's possible to have UCW without corresponding UCB (and UCB without UCW
as well). First case may be desired
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 17:57 +0900, Timothy Sipples wrote:
- Bring another programming language to z/OS.
... or to Linux on z. I'd vote for SBCL.
- Bring another relational database to z/OS, such as PostgreSQL or MySQL.
Seems to me we'd be better off with a free development environment (FSVO
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:58:41 -0400, David Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Seems to me we'd be better off with a free development environment (FSVO
free). We could use a gcc for z/OS, as well as a glibc. That would
have a snowball effect, and would make porting of applications to z/OS
more
A couple of us can get as far as logging on but then get an Our
apologies ... screen.
Internal server error 500.
Alan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was on IBMLINK but now I get the 'Our apologies...' screen.
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:28 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
A couple of us can get as far as logging on but then get an
Our apologies ... screen.
Internal server error 500.
Same here (Chicago). Green screen still works (as usual)
-jc-
IBMLINK isn't the only thing that's down. z/OS Library pages are also
down:
http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/
gives Our apologies. The page you requested cannot be displayed. with
the same 500 Internal server error message.
DOS attack on IBM web pages or genuine server problem?
Same here in the DFW area for me.
IBMLINK isn't the only thing that's down. z/OS Library pages are also
Down
SNIP
Regards,
Steve Thompson
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:37:15 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBMLINK isn't the only thing that's down. z/OS Library pages are also
down:
http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/
gives Our apologies. The page you requested cannot be displayed. with
the same 500 Internal
I would observe that this perception might be more superstition and
ancient legends than factual
:-)
Find the right person at your business partner and propose a change in
media/transport. I'll bet a virtual brew that you'll be met with cheers
and jubilation more often than not. Why? Because
http://www.ibm.com/ibmlink is down
IBMLink help desk at 1-800-543-3912 confirms this.
SEV1 ticket being opened # not currently available from IBMLink help desk. No
ETA for uptime.
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain
In a message dated 9/24/2008 9:41:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some auditors are
uneasy because the data exists in the clear as it passes through these
servers.
My suspicion is that there are nefarious agents planted in
mail rooms and courier services
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:41:22 -0500, Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would observe that this perception might be more superstition and
ancient legends than factual
:-)
Find the right person at your business partner and propose a change in
media/transport. I'll bet a virtual brew that
The operators have an HSM tape that has gone missing. I want to mark the
tape full so nothing new gets added to it because HSM is still calling for the
tape to probably add to it.
I found the following notes in the HSM reference :
Marking a Migration Level 2 Tape Volume Full Example: In this
Works as advertized.
Len Rugen
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But in
practice, there is.
- Yogi Berra
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gilbert Cardenas
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008
HSEND DELVOL XX MIGRAT(MARKFULL).
There will be no probems.
HTH
snip
The operators have an HSM tape that has gone missing. I want to mark
the
tape full so nothing new gets added to it because HSM is still calling
for the
tape to probably add to it.
I found the following notes in the HSM
Thanks for the confirmation Len and Allen. Worked like a charm.
Best regards,
Gil.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
Do a *complete* port of cURL, including libcurl!
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/24/2008
at 12:09 AM, Ahmet Alper TEC MER [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is there anybody who can advise to me a project title?
What are
Delvol Markfull will only mark the tape full so that HSM stops appending to it.
(I know this has already been answered. I include only for completeness.)
Now to the rest of your problem - Are your tapes duplexed? If yes, you issue a
Taperepl command against the missing tape. Now all pointers
Apologies if you've already seen this:
IBM plans to discontinue delivery of software on 3480, 3480 Compressed
(3480C), and 3490E tape media. IBM recommends using Internet delivery
when ordering your z/OS products or service, which eliminates tape
handling. If you must use physical delivery, you
Just a thought.
HSM may be trying to do a RECALL from that tape. That is another reason HSM
maybe asking for it.
Lizette
The operators have an HSM tape that has gone missing. I want to mark the
tape full so nothing new gets added to it because HSM is still calling for the
tape to
DELVOL ... MARKFULL is safe to execute and the only way out of this misery.
ML2 tapes are a precious commodity, because they contain the only copy of a
migrated dataset (unless a backup copy also exists). Therefore you should
have duplicates (or should I say: you _better_ have duplicates).
So,
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:02:52 +0100, Greeley, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Apologies if you've already seen this:
IBM plans to discontinue delivery of software on 3480, 3480 Compressed
(3480C), and 3490E tape media. IBM recommends using Internet delivery
when ordering your z/OS products or
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they
still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yup
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Donnelly, John P
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist
And no smiley :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3480/3490 tape devices
In a message dated 9/24/2008 9:41:32 A.M. Central
And now the library pages are back again.
Thanks for the bookshelf link, it's good to have an alternate way in.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:41 AM
To:
You can use DATE() to do that.
Ex.:
xmdate = x
Hi Claudio.
You can use DATE() to do that.
Ex.:
xmdate = xmyear'1225' /*where xmyear is year in four digit format*/
xmwday = DATE('W', xmdate, 'S')
Regards
Alexandre
- Mensagem original
De: Claudio Marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:02:55 -0400, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Delvol Markfull will only mark the tape full so that HSM stops appending to
it.
(I know this has already been answered. I include only for completeness.)
Now to the rest of your problem - Are your
http://www.interopnews.com/analysis/how-to-make-a-killing-in-the-mainframe-market.html
Actually, it is more about how IBM has captured the zArch and thus z/OS
market. It seems to bemoan the fact that there is not, and likely never will
be, a competitor which can run z/OS and thus run z/OS legacy
A mod 400 year is also a leap year.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX EXEC
Yes, but there is always a simpler solution:
/*
Excellent read.
Two questions came to mind. I tried to think of another mainframe
besides IBM's. Only Sperry and Unisys came to mind. I had to look in
wikipedia to see if they still exist. I think so.
And when reading about the marriage of the operating system to the z
hardware, I wondered if
But it doesn't matter if it is a leap year for the month of December, is
that right?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mansell, George R.
Sent: 24. syyskuuta 2008 21:07
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX EXEC
A mod 400
We did look at keeping the existing devices, but like many others we are in a
space/power/cooling crunch for our raised floor. Plus with the age and mileage
on this equipment the maintenance costs are increasing, then add in the costs
of reducing the size of the ATL, the bottom line dictates
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lindy Mayfield
But it doesn't matter if it is a leap year for the month of
December, is that right?
The day of week calculation would be off by one if the leap year is
ignored.
-jc-
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:12:14 +0200, Lindy Mayfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And when reading about the marriage of the operating system to the z
hardware, I wondered if this was somehow different from the Mac. Anyone
know if/how it is?
It is similar. Apple will only license Mac OSX on Apple
Gilbert,
You indicate that these are just TMM backups but if your ML2 tapes are set to
'REUSE how do you segregate this ML2 tape from your Secondary Space Mgt.? Just
curious.
From: Gilbert Cardenas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008
No problemo. For us, our pysical tape needs are driven by our customers. I am
already using internet delivery for IBM products and some of our ISVs. Some of
our suppliers don't have internet delivery available yet.
Thanks,
Linda
-- Original message --
From:
Hmmm. I checked it with quite a number of years going back to 1200
against calendars and didn't find any errors yet. Anyway, it was just a
mental exercise. Why should the C and Perl people get all the fun?
The Rexx date function is of course the far superior solution.
lindy
I used my rdate exec / rdatef function prior to OS/390 2.4 (when the
REXX built in DATE function was enhanced to convert between date
formats). I still do use it at times because the built in function doesn't
support some to / from formats.
ABSOLUTELY
John Hamman
Senior Systems Programmer
BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi
601.664.4410
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Donnelly, John P [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/24/2008 11:35:34 AM
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they
still be specified in the DFHRPL
Hello,
I would like to pass a situation by everyone to get their opinon of an issue I
am having. I have opened an issue with IBM but many heads are better than 1.
We are getting some new dasd and after the dasd is installed I am to run an
ICKDSF REFORMAT with the REFVTOC parm against all the
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:53:59 -0700, Kurt Eastwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to pass a situation by everyone to get their opinon of an
issue I am having. I have opened an issue with IBM but many heads are better
than 1.
We are getting some new dasd and after the dasd is
You didn't say what release of z/OS you're on, or whether you have SMS active.
This is our VATLSTxx member (one line):
VATDEF IPLUSE(PRIVATE),SYSUSE(PRIVATE)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt
Eastwood
Sent: Wednesday,
We are running z/OS 1.8 and SMS is active.
Kurt
--- On Wed, 9/24/08, Field, Alan C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Field, Alan C. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VATLST00
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 8:03 PM
You didn't say what release of z/OS you're on, or
I need some SMS help. I've never had to mess with it before, and don't have
a clue. If there is a quick and dirty way to get what I need done, I'd
appreciate someone givimg me some help.
I've just migrated from a 1.6 Flex-es system to IBM's RDP system. Running
1.9. SMS is active.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:27:24 -0500, Dave Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need some SMS help. I've never had to mess with it before, and don't
have a clue. If there is a quick and dirty way to get what I need done, I'd
appreciate someone givimg me some help.
I've just migrated from a 1.6
Hello all, I tried searching the archives for VOLID starting with ##,
and volume id ##, but didn't get any hits. We have from time to time had
cataloged datasets that have the volid as ## Where the ## are really
##'s and the ? are some assortment of characters. This has been going on
for years
No, I don't really want SMS for any reason. I tried IPL'ing with the SMS
sub-system not getting started, and had numerous problems when running. So,
I'm back to having SMS active. Since it is active, it must have some or all
of the functions you defined all ready in place. It would seem to
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:27:24 -0500, Dave Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need some SMS help. I've never had to mess with it before, and don't
have a clue. If there is a quick and dirty way to get what I need done, I'd
appreciate someone givimg me some help.
I've just migrated from a 1.6
Mike,
Hello all, I tried searching the archives for VOLID starting with ##,
and volume id ##, but didn't get any hits. We have from time to time had
cataloged datasets that have the volid as ## Where the ## are really
##'s and the ? are some assortment of characters. This has been going
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:45:33 -0500, Dave Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I don't really want SMS for any reason. I tried IPL'ing with the SMS
sub-system not getting started, and had numerous problems when running. So,
I'm back to having SMS active. Since it is active, it must have some or all
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:45:33 -0500, Dave Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since it is active, it must have some or all
of the functions you defined all ready in place. It would seem to me I just
have to find them, and modify them.
Not necessarily. SMS must be active in at least a null
Can you use the Mount command to change the usage to private
M ,VOL=(SL,MVSCAT),USE=PRIVATE where is the unit address
We run SMS and still have a storage volume. It is used by temporary data sets
that fall outside SMS assignment. For us one such product is HCD. It
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 09/24/2008
at 08:00 AM, Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
and all operating systems will run on them
That's not going to happen. The platforms for, e.g., WXWX VIII, GCOS, MCP,
Multics are too different.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:00:15 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 09/24/2008
at 08:00 AM, Ron Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
and all operating systems will run on them
That's not going to happen. The platforms for, e.g., WXWX VIII, GCOS, MCP,
There is no constraint. To write a TSO version of OOREXX would be considered
mainframe related but i think it is difficult. Actually, i want to make a
career as a mainframe system administrator. So I prefer to choose my
project title about mainframe. my expectation about this project is
? You can then go into the ISMF application and look at what is defined in
the
ACTIVE configuration. There is likely not much.
OK, how do I do that? Below is a cut and paste from the 1st panel when I
enter the application.
Enter Selection or Command ===
Select one of the following options
You should re-title your project
I read everything from IBM-MAIN, RACF-L, and CICS-L and actually understood
all that was said.
That would impress anyone. :-)
Here's wishing you the best for your future career.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
You need to first go to option 0 and make yourself an administrator.
Then you will see more options off of the ISMF panel.
Norris Jackson
MVS Systems Programmer
Colonial Bank
Montgomery, Al. 36142
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: Montgomery - (334) 954-1834
Hoover - (205) 402-8549
Oh, and you will have to back all the way out of ISMF and then go back
into it. Then you can select options 7 and 8 to display/edit ACS
routines and info in the CDS's.
Norris Jackson
MVS Systems Programmer
Colonial Bank
Montgomery, Al. 36142
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: Montgomery - (334) 954-1834
If it wasn't necessary to show my working project to jury of my university
in June 2009 i would try it :)
--
From: Tony B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 12:17 AM
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Three years later, I guess this (discontinue software distribution on tape)
is still in the planning stage.
A customer of ours just ordered their IBM z/OS maintenance...on 3490 tapes.
They've kept some C22's.
STK shops wonder what to do with those 3590/3592 carts, when they do
sometimes arrive.
I bet John's beat me to it, but the first thing is to go into option 0
and change yourself to an administrator
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Day
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
thanks to those who offerred advice. I got some help over the phone from a
knowledgeable and helpful individual who lurks here on this list.
--Dave
- Original Message -
From: Gibney, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday,
You can spend a week learning to do it right or a month correcting
problems you find in the quick and dirty. You have already been given
two manuals to start with and the offer of a third plus advice on how to
do it outside of SMS. It is not likely that any new responses will
improve the
A mod 400 year is also a leap year.
More to the point, century year that is not a mod 400 year is not a leap year.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they
still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation?
The answer is YES; I've never understood why.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
It looks like I could shut down the system, ipl a stand alone ICKDSF and run
the REFORMAT but that seems like a last resort to me.
You can use the MOUNT to change the STORAGE attribute, change the VAT; no IPL
required.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
There is not really a quick and dirty way to do this.
As I read the original post, the OP already has SMS implemented.
It should be relatively simple to add the new DASD to the config, but I haven't
done it in years, so I don't recall the steps.
Again, do you really want SMS for some reason?
I
Actually, i want to make a career as a mainframe system administrator. So I
prefer to choose my
project title about mainframe. my expectation about this project is gaining
experience.
What kind of administrator?
1. DBA - which type
2. Storage
3. Security/RACF
4. Systems Programmer
If you can
While I don't believe that this is true can someone confirm. If a task goes
into some sort of SRB wait, no time is also accrued to the JWT timer making
these wait types mutually exclusive. Do I have this right or am I all wet? I
would think that if you did hit the JWT limit, set at several
REQUEST FOR COMPRESSION WAS NOT HONORED -- PROCESSING CONTINUES
IDC0181I DATACLASS USED IS DEFAULT
IDC0001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 4
Additional senior moments, I thought I remembered a discussion here that
the RC=4 on this message was to be removed. But it's still here
Dave,
SMS is necessary if you don't want to use anything that is new in allocation
in the last 15 years (G, D, R). Mounting all or some of your volumes as
STORAGE and specifying UNIT=3390 or UNIT=SYSALLDA for non-specific
allocation will get you up and running.
If you want to use SMS then you
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Lindy Mayfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent read.
Two questions came to mind. I tried to think of another mainframe
besides IBM's. Only Sperry and Unisys came to mind. I had to look in
wikipedia to see if they still exist. I think so.
Of course, it
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
