Hi
Searching for the simples way to prevent the users to define dataset's
in the MASTER catalog(s)
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax: (+43) 2236 21081
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hotline:
Miklos Szigetvari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi
Searching for the simples way to prevent the users to define dataset's
in the MASTER catalog(s)
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information Systems Gmbh
tel: (+43) 2236 27551 570
Fax:
We're RACF here.
I have the PROTECTALL option on, so users cannot allocate a dataset that isn't
covered by a RACF dataset rule.
I have a RACF rule for the master catalog with UACC(READ) and ALTER access for
syadmins/sysprogs, CONTROL access to some system STCs, and UPDATE access to any
other
If you have MXG in house, then review the chapters in the SOURCLIB. Dr.
Merrill has provided a lot of good information on performance analysis of
SMF data in that file.
Otherwise, go to the following weblink for the IBM RMF Performance Report
Manual
After all, a APAR fix isn't guaranteed to be the perfect fix; only a
temporary fix that will hopefully address the problem effectively.
I'll ignore the unfortunate fact that even many PTFs aren't the perfect
fix. But at least they are the intended fix.
While each case may have to be evaluated
Asked a question about my poor DFSKERN SMB performance; few takers. So
let me pose it another way.
Who is running z/OS using SMB and it is running just fine as far as CPU
usage.
1. Are you using HFS or zFS files.
2. Would the SMB share being accessed by Windows Servers or UNIX/LINUX
3.
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 07:40 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
While each case may have to be evaluated separately,in Poughkeepsie at
least, it is typically not the case that the ++APAR is a temporary fix.
That might be more likely for a sev 1 APAR than an other, since it's even
more important then
No, I don't.
-
Robert B. Richards(Bob)
US Office of Personnel Management
1900 E Street NW Room: BH04L
Washington, D.C. 20415
Phone: (202) 606-1195
Email: [EMAIL
Another good manual is the Redbook System Programmer's Guide to: z/OS
System Logger SG24-6898.
Baron Carter
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
Once again, I apologize for not noticing that this was going back to the
list.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HMC
Dear all,
Thank you for your answers.
IBM recomend us so our programmers make the data validation. Please review
following link below:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21238919
Best regards,
K. Zafiropoulos
In a message dated 10/3/2008 6:02:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you have MXG in house, then review the chapters in the SOURCLIB. Dr.
Merrill has provided a lot of good information on performance analysis of
SMF data in that file.
Another source to
set UACC(READ) for master catalog.
Jim McAlpine
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Miklos Szigetvari
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Searching for the simples way to prevent the users to define dataset's in
the MASTER catalog(s)
--
Miklos Szigetvari
Development Team
ISIS Information
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Hello all,
I received a PTF in error and it isn't needed because it has been
supp'ed.
What is the proper way to remove it from the global zone?
SMP/E REJECT command.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lou, Jim
Hello,
I have been working with IBM on a problem involving
1. OMEGAMON XE on z/OS 4.1 exit invoked by
2. ICSF invoked by
3. LDAP using SSL/TLS with RACF.
IBM has determined that the exit is in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
We've been told to cut the IT budget by 16 million US$
for
2009. And, if the past is any indication, that burden will likely be
born
mainly by the z. It has fewer, larger line items and so it's
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:18:19 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You could cut your IT budget to zero by regressing to paper pencils.
BTW, we sell paper pencils. :-)
-jc-
Believe it or not, I was at a place which was told to cut their budget by
10%. They came up with a
This is old but I thought I'd post the resolution for posterity. We
installed MIM R11.6 SP1 and haven't seen any enqueue conflicts with z/OS
1.9.
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rabbe, Luke
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008
Hi, All,
Got the new SMP/E downloaded, but so far haven't been able to complete
the RECEIVE. The job keeps running out of space in the HFS for the
unpack operation. 4,000 cylinders is too small.
Anybody know just how much space it will eventually need?
TIA,
-jc-
I'm looking at the ADCD web site and the oldest available documentation is
that for the z/OS 1.8s system. Does anyone know if the
1.7s documentation is still available online anywhere. Alternatively, can
anyone provide me with a copy.
Jim McAlpine
On 3 Oct 2008 07:25:22 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKown) wrote:
Believe it or not, I was at a place which was told to cut their budget by
10%. They came up with a plan to cut it 50%! They had two production
machines. The cut was to eliminate one machine and its costs along with its
users.
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:33:50 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Got the new SMP/E downloaded, but so far haven't been able to complete
the RECEIVE. The job keeps running out of space in the HFS for the
unpack operation. 4,000 cylinders is too small.
Anybody know just how much
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:33:50 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Got the new SMP/E downloaded, but so far haven't been able to complete
the RECEIVE. The job keeps running out of space in the HFS for the
unpack operation. 4,000 cylinders is too small.
Anybody know just how much
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:40:57 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
While each case may have to be evaluated separately,in Poughkeepsie at
least, it is typically not the case that the ++APAR is a temporary fix.
That might be more likely for a sev 1 APAR than an other, since it's even
more important then to
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:05:38 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
If you need the fix now, APPLY (but do NOT ACCEPT) the APAR. When the
PTF becomes available, APPLYing it should supersede the APAR.
I'll call that a strong should indeed. Otherwise it's too likely
that the PTF would PRE the APAR, and that
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:03:32 -0500, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:40:57 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
... But in most cases in the areas in which I work, the
++APAR is the intended final fix.
U ...
Linkname: APAR Fixes
URL:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:33:50 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, All,
Got the new SMP/E downloaded, but so far haven't been able to
complete
the RECEIVE. The job keeps running out of
One thing to remember, if you are the orginal submitter of a problem that
causes an APAR to be opened and IBM supplies APAR fix test code. If you do
not apply and test the APAR, and supply IBM with good feedback. The APAR
can get be close without a PTF being built, even though there are others
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:58:32 -0500, Patrick Lyon wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:33:50 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Anybody know just how much space it will eventually need?
John - I posted a similar question back in July when trying to receive my 1.9
order. This thread may help. It was posted on
My SMPWKDIR and SMPNTS pointed to a 6000 Cyl ZFS which worked...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:05:38 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
If you need the fix now, APPLY (but do NOT ACCEPT) the APAR. When
the
PTF becomes available, APPLYing it should supersede the APAR.
I'll
I've found what I wanted now, no need to reply thanks.
Jim McAlpine
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at the ADCD web site and the oldest available documentation
is that for the z/OS 1.8s system. Does anyone know if the
1.7s documentation is
I've found what I wanted now, no need to reply thanks.
Jim McAlpine
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm looking at the ADCD web site and the oldest available documentation
is that for the z/OS 1.8s system. Does anyone know if the
1.7s documentation
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:33:34 -0500, Rabbe, Luke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is old but I thought I'd post the resolution for posterity. We
installed MIM R11.6 SP1 and haven't seen any enqueue conflicts with z/OS
1.9.
Luke
I'm still running MIM 11.6 SP0, but have HIPERs on. The entire MIIplex
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:33:50 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, All,
Got the new SMP/E downloaded, but so far haven't been able to complete
the RECEIVE. The job keeps running out of space in the HFS for the
unpack operation. 4,000 cylinders is too small.
Anybody know just how much
We did work with CA. Neither CA nor IBM was ever able to narrow it
down.
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 10:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.9 Catalog Enqueue
I believe that what Peter was saying is that in his area in the BCP, they
rarely send ++APAR's to customers that don't contain the same ++MOD
statements and text that the fixing PTF also will contain. In other words,
they find and correct the problem, then they build the impacted modules and
Just saw this come across -
IBM and Business Partners Collaborate to Further Mainframe Education
Friday October 3, 12:20 pm ET
New Scholarship Program Supports Increased Channel Demand in Mainframe
Computing
ARMONK, NY--(MARKET WIRE)--Oct 3, 2008 -- IBM (NYSE:IBM - News) today
announced that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bohn, Dale
My SMPWKDIR and SMPNTS pointed to a 6000 Cyl ZFS which worked...
An SMPWKDIR of 5,500 cyls finally succeeded.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN
I know how to lock images, but I can't seem to figure out how to lock profiles.
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:25:36 -0500, Bohn, Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...if you are the orginal submitter of a problem that
causes an APAR to be opened and IBM supplies APAR fix test code.
If you do not apply and test the APAR, and supply IBM with good
feedback. The APAR can get be close
All,
Has anyone had experience that they can share with sending
syslog or snmp traps to outside products? We have Nimbus in-house from
Nimsoft. It is a central messaging system for thresholds and alerts. It
accepts SNMP traps or SYSLOG routing. We have worked on send alerts from
AIX,
Tim,
I'll start off with recommending that you consider using standard MIB
MIB2 SNMP packets to support other products that may be in your network.
Nimbus probably does that.
My problem with some other products has been the type of information
collected by the agents on Z/OS. Will it be just
Hello all!
I have a Z9 BC with no extra crypto processors. (ZOS 1.7) We are in the
process of installing ICSF so we can encrypt tapes that go offsite (CA:DISK
and CA:VTAPE tapes)
Does anyone have any nuggets of wisdom on how to do this??? I have all the
manuals printed but can't seem to find
Lucy,
We are just getting started on this also. We use CA's Tape Encryption
product. Toy should have feature code 3863 CPACF that will handle AES128
and some SHA-1 stuff via macros or you can codes the five or some
commands into a API.
I've found several documents on the IBM page and receive
Correction. In my previous original e-mail I meant ICSF panels NOT ISMF
panels.
Lucy Arnold
Storage Manager
U.C. Davis Medical Center
916-734-5498
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
Lucy,
Installation of ICSF is not really going to help you without CEX2C
features. The 3863 feature code (MES) will give you CPACF. Which
effectively gives you some hardware enabled clear key encryption but
requires assembler coding in order to take advantage of it.
ICSF will give you a
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:35:16 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote:
Mark Yuhas of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 10/02/2008 12:27:32 PM:
Has IBM announced what release of LE will not support old COBOL runtime
environments, specifically OS/VS COBOL and VS COBOL II?
LE is a runtime
Hi,
How make to receive one string in rexx language??
Ex. say ' you want exit (s/n)?'
pull ??
arg ??
parse ??
if (string??) = 's'
return to begin exec
else
exit
I want ready the string with which command?
regards
This would work:
==
do until answer = N'
say 'Do you want to exit? (s/n)'
pull answer
if answer = 'S' then exit
end
==
It could be made a lot more elegant, of course.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Claudio Marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How make to receive
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 22:20:11 -0300, Claudio Marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How make to receive one string in rexx language??
Ex. say ' you want exit (s/n)?'
pull ??
arg ??
parse ??
if (string??) = 's'
return to begin exec
else
exit
I want ready the string with which command?
hi
I make this:
do until answer = N'
instructions
say 'Do you want to exit? (s/n)'
pull answer
if answer = 'S' then exit
end
I type s, but not exit of the do until?? Why?? this is a case sensitive??
It´s correct??
more a question:
how i do to treat for error:
10 +++ dec25
In a message dated 10/3/2008 4:45:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
encrypt/decrypt gets called??? My brain has turned to green slime and is
coming out of my ear - ANY help would be appreciated. :)
Most processors since G5 ship with CRYPTO cards. The activation
53 matches
Mail list logo
