Its alreqdy 8:30am here but it might still be too early
to understand your sample. The result shown indicates
that you implemented an append, which of course is
equal to insert after last record. Not what the OP
wanted.
But why are you reading the data set in first? ALLOC
with MOD followed by
Yes, I'd agree that the most probable cause is a missing member.
But I don't have any way of telling which member it is.
Any reason the message doesn't tell? After all, ICEMAN knows
what it was looking for.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Credit Suisse
For a few bucks you can get the z/OS CD collection and you'll
be independent of unreliable internet services.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
I don't see neither an error nor REXX code? What is your problem?
Pleaes take your time to write sufficient information so others
are able to help instead of wasting time trying to guess what
you want.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
Why does IBM have their first question for Lenova, when they don't even
own the PC line anymore.
It is not an issue of the biggest moneymaker. Lenovo is probably first
because they get called more about Lenovo products than about z/OS
software problems.
Btw. Lenovo is still in IBM's products
You were correct. Thanks for that. with NSLOOKUP I have tested.
What is surprising that I did not have to REFRESH the RESOLVER. I just
changed the SYS1.TCPPARMS(TCPDATA) NSINTERADDR address and then issued the
TSO NSLOOKUP and it was taking that new IP address value.
Whatever IP address I
Rich Smrcina wrote:
John McKown wrote:
Thanks for the correction. But, from your comments, I would take it
that the
System z is simply not worth using, except for z/OS (maybe z/VSE) legacy
work. If this is true, then I see no reason why any company would get a z
for new work. And, if a
Ken Porowski wrote:
Look at licensing costs for Oracle (and other products licensed per
CPU). Last I heard was around $40K per CPU. If I can replace 4-5 Intel
servers with a single IFL software costs alone generate savings.
The larger question is can IFL/z/VM compete with Intel/Vmware (or
Hi Mark,
Thanks very much for your reply. That's actually one of the things that's
confusing me as the MSGCLASS for our STCs is Z which is our purge class. The
output from $DJOBCLASS(STC) is:-
JOBCLASS(STC) TIME=(60,00),REGION=0001M,
_ 10 SYS1 ASM2 STARTING A
_ 11 SYS2 ASM2 STARTING A
_ 12 SYS3 ASM2 STARTING A
_ 13 SYS4 ASM2 STARTING A
These look like dynamically allocated SYSOUT DD statements
to me. I guess the program allocates them upon need
Re. Bruno Sugliani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
saying Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:02:54 -0500
about VMWare:
It is an Hypervisor with some extremely sophisticated features ( drag
and drop of a partition from one machine to another )
http://www.vmware.com/products/vi/esx/
It helps us a lot to run servers without
Hi Barry,
It's the STC for IXR. In the STC, we set the DD for IXRMAIN1 to SYSOUT=Z,
which is our purge class. Also, in our JES parms, our JOBCLASS for STC sets
MSGCLASS=Z. In the proc, all other SYSOUT for IXR is set to X, which is our
held class. In IOF, the job display shows:-
R.S. wrote:
David Crayford wrote:
[...]
15 years ago I worked on one of the first mainframe DB2 data warehouse
systems in the UK. We used SP2 AIX boxes for the mining, and they were
very quick back then. I suppose it all depends on the z10 and how IBM
prices them...
They seem to be making
It was an example for Gil and I also included a url for the actual execio
diskru ..from IBM ...
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
[p] 678.266.3399 x304[m] 609-346-0399 identityforge.com
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or
Peter,
See below
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
[p] 678.266.3399 x304[m] 609-346-0399 identityforge.com
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received it in error, please notify the
Thomas Kern wrote, re guest migration:
I thought the early prototype of this was the Single-System-Image code
written at University of Waterloo back in the early 1980's.
Now why would you think that? Just because Romney wrote both of them... ;-)
The SSI SWITCH command was a lot of fun. It moved
Timothy Sipples wrote:
MIPS shipments grew 49 percent, including a whopping 120 percent growth
in specialty engine MIPS.
That is for system z as read in press release on the website.
Question: How many % NEW customers are attributable to that growth?
Are the existing customers just
Here the US, there is a Site license for Oracle or some call it, an Enterprise
License. It works something like this. For something in the range of $1-2M per
year you get to run an unlimited number of Oracle DB and Apps Server plus all
of the features they offer; performance tool, track
Scott,
I thought you wanted to demonstrate how to insert records
at the beginning of a file. I must have misunderstood.
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008o.html#55 Virtual
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008o.html#56 Virtual
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008o.html#57 Virtual
and from long ago and far away
Hi,
We have a problem about CEE.SCEERUN usage. This LE dataset is in LINKLIST
and all users are able to use it. However a batch program, which is compiled
in Enterprise Cobol (V3.2) and make dynamic calls to ASM programs needs
CEE.SCEERUN dataset coded inside JCL (via joblib).
When we remove
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:58:16 -0500, Sally Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks very much for your reply. That's actually one of the things that's
confusing me as the MSGCLASS for our STCs is Z which is our purge class. The
output from $DJOBCLASS(STC) is:-
JOBCLASS(STC)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Chase, John wrote:
Does VMWare run on bare metal yet?
Well, I guess that depends upon your definition of 'bare metal'. (What
is 'is'?)
For a very long time VMWare would install a modified
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:36:57 +0300, Mürsel Ta#351;g#305;n (BT
#304;#351;letim ve Teknik
Destek Bölümü) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We have a problem about CEE.SCEERUN usage. This LE dataset is in LINKLIST
and all users are able to use it. However a batch program, which is compiled
in
Chase, John wrote:
Agreed. If it requires even the tiniest of independent operating
systems on which to run, then it is an application program. To me,
bare metal on the x86 platform includes nothing beyond the BIOS
between the software and the hardware.
I would tend to agree, this would
Can anybody get to this document? It keeps coming up as corrupted for
me.
Musta been around Chuckie too long. That would corrupt anybody.
Jon
snip
An early prototype of this sort of technology has been demonstrated at
the last few SHAREs.
z/VM Live Guest Migration:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:47:08 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Then I'd go back to CA. They must be allocating it with SYSOUT(A).
I don't have any test programs dynamically allocating sysout to
play with, but if I do a TSO ALLOC for sysout without a class, it
goes to the MSGCLASS.
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:19:20 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
Is this always the case, or only if the DD statement specifies
SYSOUT=*. I believe in our lab configuration if I leave the
class empty on my DD SYSOUT statement, and omit the OUTPUT JCL
statement, the SYSOUT again goes to bit bucket.
What
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:35:28 +0200, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) wrote:
Its alreqdy 8:30am here but it might still be too early
to understand your sample. The result shown indicates
I didn't understand it last night.
that you implemented an append, which of course is
equal to insert after last
sent offline to Jon.
jan
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van : Jon Brock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden : vrijdag , oktober 17, 2008 03:02 PM
Aan : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Onderwerp : Re: Virtual (was: IBM PR: System z Announcement ...)
Can anybody get to this document? It keeps coming up
Hi Peter and Mark,
I have a call logged with CA but their response is:-
'ASM2 does not ask for a specific SYSOUT class. No code within the product
asks for this. It appears that the operating system default is doing this
class definition for us.'
Hence why I was trying to establish if there is
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:16:22 -0500, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean if you have a DD SYSOUT statement with the
class empty? You have to specify something, don't you? At least
in JCL. ...
Actually, you don't have to specify something:
Linkname: 12.63.1 z/OS
On 16 Oct 2008 14:06:57 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder - Why is it not possible to add records to the beginning of a
data set? Wouldn't it be possible for a sufficiently clever program to
place the inserted records into a newly allocated area on disk, and then
modify the VTOC to
Sally Mason wrote:
Hi Peter and Mark,
I have a call logged with CA but their response is:-
'ASM2 does not ask for a specific SYSOUT class. No code within the product
asks for this. It appears that the operating system default is doing this
class definition for us.'
Hence why I was trying to
On 16 Oct 2008 17:40:00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy
Sipples) wrote:
And so you do that. Within the contract period, the marginal
price for deploying additional licenses is zero.
Did you catch what I wrote, within the contract period? That gives you a
clue what happens next: contract
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:40:55 -0500, Sally Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Peter and Mark,
I have a call logged with CA but their response is:-
'ASM2 does not ask for a specific SYSOUT class. No code within the product
asks for this. It appears that the operating system default is doing this
Hi Mark,
We checked the CEE.SCEERUN dataset again to be sure. CEE.SCEERUN in LNKLST
and the one coded inside JCL are exactly the same(no volser is coded and the
dataset is accessed via MCAT). When we searched CEEBINIT it is found in
CEE.SCEERUN as well.
One further investigation; we listed all
I cannot speak for Oracle licensing terms obviously -- check with Oracle --
but z10 is quad core technology so would evidently use their 0.75 price
multiplier per core for licensing. For example, if you have 4 dual core
Intel/AMD CPUs then that would be 4 Oracle processor licenses (8 cores *
0.5 =
A guess:
You may have something in front of SCEERUN on your either LNKLST or LPA
that overrides SCEERUN...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:57:54 -0500, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:40:55 -0500, Sally Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Peter and Mark,
I have a call logged with CA but their response is:-
'ASM2 does not ask for a specific SYSOUT class. No code within the product
Peter,
Did you see the url I sent you...
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
[p] 678.266.3399 x304[m] 609-346-0399 identityforge.com
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received it in
Simple: call volume. Just in the U.S. there are a couple hundred million
people with PCs, and you want to get them shunted to the correct call queue
as quickly as possible. Statistically speaking, you're probably calling a
general IBM help number with a PC problem. I don't think the statistics are
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:18:20 +0300, Mürsel TaÅgın (BT Ä°Åletim ve Tek
nik Destek Bölümü) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
We checked the CEE.SCEERUN dataset again to be sure. CEE.SCEERUN in LNKLST
and the one coded inside JCL are exactly the same(no volser is coded and the
dataset is
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:19:38 -0500, Jan Vanbrabant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruno,
Is this within a single CEC or multi-CEC ?
Multi CEC
One physical server is in computer room 1
the target server is in computer room 2
( of course short distance between computer rooms because of latency)
Dasds
Further to that thought, you should also check for MLPAs or dynamic LPA
updates (via SETPROG).
Bill
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:26:31 -0400, Jakubek, Jan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A guess:
You may have something in front of SCEERUN on your either LNKLST or LPA
that overrides SCEERUN...
Peter Hunkeler wrote on 10/16/2008 11:44:07 PM:
Yes, I'd agree that the most probable cause is a missing member.
But I don't have any way of telling which member it is.
Any reason the message doesn't tell? After all, ICEMAN knows
what it was looking for.
I don't know why we don't include the
snip
We checked the CEE.SCEERUN dataset again to be sure. CEE.SCEERUN in LNKLST
and the one coded inside JCL are exactly the same(no volser is coded and
the
dataset is accessed via MCAT). When we searched CEEBINIT it is found in
CEE.SCEERUN as well.
unsnip
Only time I see things like this is
And ... MXI LPD * displays what's in the current, in VStorage, active
LPA...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Big Iron
Sent: October 17, 2008 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: C03 abend when omitting CEE.SCEERUN
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:15:07, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any compelling reasons to place a shared PARMLIB on a volume
that holds a sysplex couple dataset?
Only if you haven't the DASD to put it anywhere else.
Are there any compelling reasons NOT to place it there?
As
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Subject: Re: Default class for JES2 SYSOUT
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:19:20 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
Is this always the case, or only if the DD statement specifies
SYSOUT=*. I believe in our lab
Hi Mark,
We are at zOS 1.9. We put CEE.SCEERUN at the top of LNKLST and activate a
new set of LNKLST. We searched LPA and MLPA datasets as well for a module
having same name with the ones in CEE.SCEERUN but didn't find any.
Is there a quick way (a parameter or tracer) to list or report which call
Why not just take care of the C03 Abend? it is usualy relates to unclosed
datasets in the program. Check to see if the program or one of the routines
dosn't close files.
Itschak
2008/10/17 Mürsel Taşgın (BT İşletim ve Teknik Destek Bölümü)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
We have a problem about
The cause could be ANY duplicate module in SCEERUN that is in LPA or ahead of
SCEERUN in linklist that gets invoked, directly or indirectly, by the
executing program.
And ... MXI LPD * displays what's in the current, in VStorage, active LPA...
Further to that thought, you should also check
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:09:30 +0300, Mürsel TaÅgın (BT Ä°Åletim ve Tek
nik Destek Bölümü) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
We are at zOS 1.9. We put CEE.SCEERUN at the top of LNKLST and activate a
new set of LNKLST. We searched LPA and MLPA datasets as well for a module
having same name
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:07:50 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
2 //BR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
3 //DD01 DD SYSOUT= == nothing there
Result:
IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (DD01)
That's surprising. Paul's SYSOUT=() does the same thing. His SMS
configuration must be
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:20:44 -0500, Roach, Dennis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The cause could be ANY duplicate module in SCEERUN that is in LPA or ahead
of SCEERUN in linklist that gets invoked, directly or indirectly, by the
executing program.
And ... MXI LPD * displays what's in the current, in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:07:50 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
2 //BR14 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
3 //DD01 DD SYSOUT= == nothing there
Result:
IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (DD01
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:47:49 -0500, John McKown wrote:
I find duplicates using DDLIST in ISPF. On any command line, enter DDLIST.
Then enter LINKLIST to add the current LNKLST to the display. Then enter
ONLY LINKLIST to exclude all other allocations. Then enter DUPLICATES to see
what is
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:20:44 -0500, Roach, Dennis wrote:
The cause could be ANY duplicate module in SCEERUN that is in LPA or
ahead
of SCEERUN in linklist that gets invoked, directly or indirectly, by
On 10/17/2008 at 9:02 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jon Brock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody get to this document? It keeps coming up as corrupted for
me.
When I uploaded the presentations for SHARE 111, I did a test download on all
of them. Somehow this one is now getting
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:47:49 -0500, John McKown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find duplicates using DDLIST in ISPF. On any command line, enter DDLIST.
Then enter LINKLIST to add the current LNKLST to the display. Then enter
ONLY LINKLIST to exclude all other allocations. Then enter DUPLICATES to see
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:04:51 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When we remove CEE.SCEERUN joblib statement from the JCL, the job
abends with C03:
IKJ56641I SYSTEM ABEND CODE C03 REASON CODE 0004
Note the message ID: It's a TSO message. Leads me to believe more
needs to be
In thinking about uses for the mainframe to extend its life, one that came to
mind is using RACF as a password server so users need only a single password
to logon into the many systems they must access. Like most shops today,
we have a multitude of Microsoft Unix servers, each having different
Marvin Lukasik wrote:
In thinking about uses for the mainframe to extend its life, one that came to
mind is using RACF as a password server so users need only a single password
to logon into the many systems they must access. Like most shops today,
we have a multitude of Microsoft Unix servers,
We need to TERSE a fairly large (for us) amount of data. This data is in
multiple separate datasets now, but needs to be sent as one large sequential
dataset. We can TERSE the concatenated sequential input of course; but out
of curiosity I'm wondering: can you TERSE the individual components,
Marv,
We use Vanguard PSYNCH. All ID's and passwords are maintained in RACF and
are propagated to other platforms when a password changes. I can't really
address cost, but it interfaces with just about everything and our
security people are very happy with it.
Jerry
Marvin Lukasik [EMAIL
This is must not an easy project.
I believe we are on our third attempt to do single signon. The first two
failed and I think I heard this one isn't going so well either.
I also think we've tried three different solution providers. None of the
implementations are mainframe based.
Alan
Oops I forgot. Here is Vanguard's contact info
VANGUARD Integrity Professionals
Enterprise Security Software
6625 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
Phone: (702)794.0014 | Fax: (702)794.0023
We also use their RIOVISON product to maintain RACF.
Hi,
couldn't you put the sequential datasets into one large PO dataset and
terse this one ? On the other side you unterse it to a PO file again and
unload it with IEBGENER.
Tim Hare schrieb:
We need to TERSE a fairly large (for us) amount of data. This data is in
multiple separate datasets
Tim,
We need to TERSE a fairly large (for us) amount of data. This data is in
multiple separate datasets now, but needs to be sent as one large
sequential
dataset. We can TERSE the concatenated sequential input of course; but
out
of curiosity I'm wondering: can you TERSE the individual
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:50:49 -0400, Jerry Fuchs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marv,
We use Vanguard PSYNCH.
I thought it was from M-Tech?
I just googled it and it looks like it is now Hitachi ID Systems, not
M-Tech Information Technology.
Does Vanguard also have a product called PSYNC?
2008/10/17 Tim Hare [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We need to TERSE a fairly large (for us) amount of data. This data is in
multiple separate datasets now, but needs to be sent as one large sequential
dataset. We can TERSE the concatenated sequential input of course; but out
of curiosity I'm wondering:
I would probably do the following:
1. TERSE each dataset to be transmitted.
2. Create a PDS large enough to contain each TERSEd dataset as a separate
member.
3. Put another member in that pds to restore the TERSEd datasets within it
4. XMIT that PDS (not TERSE).
Why the XMIT at the end
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:23:44 -0500, John McKown wrote:
Why the XMIT at the end instead of another TERSE? Because TERSE'ing the PDS
would likely just use CPU with little futher compression.
Yes, but XMIT expands it somewhat with control sequences.
Of course step 2 assumes that you have a single
As Rich Smrcina said, this can be accomplished by using LDAP. For OS
that support using NIS servers (Unix/Linux), you can even use LDAP on
z/OS as a NIS server, thus you don't even have to add users to the local
security database.
In addition to politics you may also run into password length
I'd like to clarify my note to Steve which I hadn't meant to send to the
list - The PA meetings are not better (how would I know if I hadn't
been to Columbia), but based on topics presented in the meeting notices,
the topics in Harrisburg have been more interesting to me. Didn't mean
to
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:00:48 -0500, Tim Hare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
n Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:00:48 -0500, Tim Hare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need to TERSE a fairly large (for us) amount of data. This data is in
multiple separate datasets now, but needs to be sent as one large sequential
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
What's the advantage of zip without compression over pax? tar?
Most Windows people have zip and know what it is. But, in this case, it
might be better to pax the files. Does pax read and write legacy datasets?
Dammit! why won't AMATERSE tolerate
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:09:43 -0500, John McKown wrote:
What's the advantage of zip without compression over pax? tar?
Most Windows people have zip and know what it is. But, in this case, it
might be better to pax the files. Does pax read and write legacy datasets?
I was thinking terse, then
Been meaning to jump on the bandwagon here - I had two stents placed 2
years ago (LAD CFX). So far, so good.
If you are at risk - smokers especially (my Dr. said 95% of his patients
are smokers, as I was) you need a radiation stress test (or Thallium
stress test). Painless but a tad time
when I run my exec REXX the error appears:
1 +++ ?
IRX0013I Error running BRAS, line 1: Invalid character in program
see my program rexx BRAS:
/* REXX para mostrar o dia da semana que cai o natal. BY CLAUDIO MARCIO */
/***/
/*
Claudio,
How are you executing your clist ???
Option # 6 as 'exec clist-pds(clistname)' or
How ?
Also what are the dcb parameters of your clist pds ?
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
[p] 678.266.3399 x304[m] 609-346-0399 identityforge.com
This message is for the designated
I got it!!!
run the pack off command inside member
the now it´s OK! very, very thank´s to all
what helped me!
regards
- Original Message -
From: Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, October 17,
I got it!!!
run the pack off command inside member
the now it´s OK! very, very thank´s to all
what helped me!
thank´s Scott and thank´s for all
regards
- Original Message -
From: Scott Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:08:19 -0200, Claudio Marcio wrote:
when I run my exec REXX the error appears:
1 +++ ?
IRX0013I Error running BRAS, line 1: Invalid character in program
Have you repaired the conflicts in DCB attributes? The error above
could easily result from an RDW's being
Don't change settings you don't understand.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:53:21 -0200, Claudio Marcio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got it!!!
run the pack off command inside member
the now it´s OK! very, very thank´s to all
what helped me!
regards
That depends on the Rexx interpreter being used. On my windows/XP system I
need nothing on the first line. It is surprising how many people who know Rexx
so well, know so little.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:21:22 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use Rexx on other
I don't know if this will help or not, but can you tell us:
A) is the (dynamically called subprogram in) Assembler is LE-conforming or
not?
B) Do you have any other COBOL (older) run-times in the steplib or the
joblib of the program?
C) Does anything in the C03 output tell you which dataset was
88 matches
Mail list logo
